09.07.2015 Views

a case study of municipal solid waste management in the ... - lumes

a case study of municipal solid waste management in the ... - lumes

a case study of municipal solid waste management in the ... - lumes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MASTER THE SIS<strong>of</strong> Lund UniversityInternational Master's Programme<strong>in</strong> Environmental Science(LUMES)1999/2000LUNDA CASE STUDY OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTEMANAGEMENT IN THE MUNICIPALITY OFJINGSHAN, CHINALiLILUMESLund UniversityBox 170, S-22100Lund, SwedenE-mail: env98lil@student3.lu.seSUPERVISOR: PER LUNDGRENM.Sc. Manager <strong>of</strong> Environmental AffairsTyrens Infrakonsult AB, Box 27, SE-291 21 Kristianstad, SwedenTel +46 44106800, Fax +46 44 2113 26E-mail: per.lundgren@tyrens.seLund, SwedenNovember 1999


Page 1TABLE OF CONTENTSSUMMAR Y 31. INTRO DUCTI ON 52. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPES 62.1 OBJECTIVES:. 62.2SCOPES 73. THEORY AND METHODS 83.1BASIC PRINCIPLE 83.2METHODS 84. PROBLEMS DEFINITI ON 94.1 THE INCREASING OF WASTE GENERATED 94.2 NO MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE SORTING AT SOURCE 104.3 NO MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY 105. OVERVIEW OF MUNICIPAL WAS TE SOLID MANAGEMENT 115.1 MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONALSTR UCTURE AND FUNDING 115.2 MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE GENERATION AND ITS CHARACTERISTICS... 115.2.1 The Growth Rate <strong>of</strong> Municipal Solid Waste Generated 115.2.2 The Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Municipal Solid Waste 125.2.3 Recycl<strong>in</strong>g Activities 135.3 COLLECTION AND TRANSPORT A TION SYSTEMS 145.4 PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENTAL ATTITUDES 145.5 THE MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES 145.5.1 Landfill<strong>in</strong>g 155.5.2 Inc<strong>in</strong>eration 155.5.3 Compost<strong>in</strong>g 166. CASE DESCRIPTION 166.1 GENERAL INFORMA TION 166.2 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT. 176.3 WHY TO CHOOSE JINGSHAN AS CASE STUD Y 197. ANALYSES AND RESUL TS 207.1 EXPERIENCES FROM LEADING INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES 207.1.1 Experiencesfrom USEPA 20


Page 27.1.2 Experiencesfrom SNEPB 217.2SYSTEM ANALYSIS: WHICH APPROACH IS BETTER? 227.2.1 Crude Dump<strong>in</strong>g 227.2.2 Sanitary Landfill 247.2.3Inc<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & Landfill 257.2.4 Compost<strong>in</strong>g & Landfill 277.2.5 Inc<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, Compost<strong>in</strong>g & Landfill 287.2.6 Summary <strong>of</strong>Discussion <strong>of</strong> Approaches 287.3ECONOMIC ANAL YSES 297.4 ENVIRONMENT AL ANAL YSES 307.5SOCIAL PS YCHOL OGY ANAL YSES 317.6 COMPREHENSIVE ANAL YSES 328. SUGGESTIONS- INTEGRATED APPROACH TO ADDRESS PROBLEMSOF MUNICIPAL SOLID W ASTE MANAGEMENT IN JINGSHAN 348.1 CURRENT S OL UTION 348.2 SH ORT-TERM SOL ..UTION 358.3 LONG-TERM SOL UTION 369. DISCUSSIONS AND REFLECTIONS 389.1 THE OBSTACLES AND OPPORTUNITIES 389.2 LESSONS FROM THE MUNICIPAL SEWERAGE WATER TREATMENTSYSTEM 389.3 THE SIGNIFICANT MEANING OF ENERGY RECOVER IN CHINA 3910. CON CL USI ONS 39APPENDIX A: LIST OF FIGURES 40APPENDIX B: LIST OF T ABLES 40APPENDIX C: CONCEPT DEFINITIONS 40REFEREN CES 42


Page 3SUMMARYIn Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> is currently a grow<strong>in</strong>g national problemwithout a good solution. Economic development and urban population growth rapidlyaccelerate <strong>the</strong> generation <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. The negative environmental effectsrelated to <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>, such as landfills occupy<strong>in</strong>g a great area<strong>of</strong> arable land, air and water pollution nearby landfills and <strong>waste</strong> explosion accidentshave reached critical stages.Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> is an on-go<strong>in</strong>g challenge caused by <strong>the</strong> huge amount <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong> generated, lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment facilities, technologies, f<strong>in</strong>ance and<strong>management</strong>. The characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment methods <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>aare:. Landfill is <strong>the</strong> most common method for handl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. But most<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se, especially <strong>the</strong> landfills <strong>of</strong> small cities, have no gas controi system, noleachate collection system or lack o<strong>the</strong>r necessary equipment.. The <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erators for <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment are small and <strong>of</strong>ten requiresmanualload<strong>in</strong>g and sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. These <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erators are generally very simpleand have no environmental protection systems.. Some Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cites have set up relatively low technology and small sized-vesselcompost<strong>in</strong>g systems to process <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. But <strong>the</strong> products - compost,are commonly with low quaiity due to <strong>the</strong> mixed <strong>waste</strong> and improper hand sort<strong>in</strong>g.The current <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment methods <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is unsusta<strong>in</strong>able and willburden future generations. The ma<strong>in</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> this <strong>the</strong>sis is to ascerta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> properapproaches to solve <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> problems <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan, especially technicalsolutions based on <strong>the</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>.Susta<strong>in</strong>ability will be considered as <strong>the</strong> basic pr<strong>in</strong>cip le <strong>of</strong> this cage <strong>study</strong>, so energyrecover, nutrition recover and rationalland lise will be prior <strong>in</strong> this <strong>study</strong>. Based onthis goal and basic pr<strong>in</strong>cip le, several analyz<strong>in</strong>g methods and perspectives <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gsystem analysis, economic analyses, environmental analyses, social psychologyanalyses will be applied to analyz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> four different technical approaches <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gsanitary landfill, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill, compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill, and <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g,compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill. F<strong>in</strong>ally, an overall comprehensive analyses will be applied <strong>in</strong>order to conclude <strong>the</strong> analyzed results above.


Page 4The comprehensive result <strong>of</strong> analysis is that <strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill approach is abetter solution. To reconstruct crude dump<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong>to sanitary landfill and <strong>in</strong>stallbiogas <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant might be suitable technical solution for <strong>the</strong> <strong>case</strong> <strong>of</strong>J<strong>in</strong>gshan.S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> is not just a question <strong>of</strong> technology, it isalso a matter <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach which <strong>in</strong>cludes source reduction, sort<strong>in</strong>g atsource, educat<strong>in</strong>g residents. An <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach is necessary and should beimplemented step by step. So, <strong>the</strong> suggested <strong>in</strong>tegrated approaches for J<strong>in</strong>gshan's<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>management</strong> are addressed based on current solutions, short-termsolutions and long-term solutions. These are presented below:. Current solution <strong>in</strong>cludes to sort out batteries and mercury tubes, to reconstructcrude dump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to sanitary landfill, to educate residents reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>waste</strong>generation, and to make feasibility studies on <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant.. Short-term solution <strong>in</strong>cludes to sort out organic <strong>waste</strong>, and to <strong>in</strong>stall biogas <strong>waste</strong>treatment plant.. Long-term solution <strong>in</strong>cludes to sort <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> higher degree, to implement <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill approach <strong>in</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> region, and to cap <strong>the</strong>full filled-up landfill.It is hop ed that this <strong>study</strong> will orientate fur<strong>the</strong>r feasibility <strong>study</strong> on J<strong>in</strong>gshan's<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant and contribute to some extent towards <strong>the</strong>solution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> serious <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> problems which Ch<strong>in</strong>a isfac<strong>in</strong>g.


Page 51. INTRODUCTIONCh<strong>in</strong>a is a rapid develop<strong>in</strong>g country with an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g standard <strong>of</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g. Ch<strong>in</strong>a' sGNP (gross national product) is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g at approximately 9% per year dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>last 20 years (Ch<strong>in</strong>a Statistical Year 1997). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> statistic prediction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese SEP A (State Environmental Protection Adm<strong>in</strong>istration), <strong>the</strong>re will be 700-800 cities and around 20 000 towns <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year 2000, <strong>the</strong> city population will reach0.45 billion - about 35% <strong>of</strong> total population <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. The economic development andurban population growth places great stress on urban environment. Municipal <strong>solid</strong><strong>waste</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> many problems re1ated to development. The total annually output<strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generation <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is about 0.11 billion tons <strong>in</strong> 1996, thisfigure will <strong>in</strong>crease to 0.14 billion tons, 0.85kg/cap/day <strong>in</strong> 2000 (SEPA, 1998). Incomparison, <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> u.S <strong>in</strong> 1995 was to 0.22 billion tons.(DSEPA, 1995).In <strong>the</strong> recent ten years, <strong>waste</strong> treatment facilities have <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> great numbers <strong>in</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a, especially facilities for <strong>in</strong>dustrial hazarded <strong>waste</strong>. Dnfortunately, <strong>the</strong>setreatment and <strong>management</strong> facilities are unable to cope with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g growth <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. Landfill is <strong>the</strong> most common method for handl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>municipal</strong><strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Generally, <strong>the</strong>se landfills do not meet best practices from ei<strong>the</strong>ra design or <strong>management</strong> perspective. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, especially <strong>the</strong> landfills <strong>of</strong> smallcities, have scavengers on-site, have no gas controi system, no leachate collectionsystem <strong>in</strong> place. Even some <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> has been causally dumped <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>suburb <strong>of</strong> cities. The pollution accidents <strong>of</strong>ten occurs. The environmental problemsre1ated to <strong>waste</strong> are becom<strong>in</strong>g worse ( 1. Paul Henderson & Terrill J. Chang, May,1996). Some <strong>of</strong> most serious environmental problems are addressed as follows:Landfills occupy<strong>in</strong>g a great amount <strong>of</strong> arable land. From 1987 to 1992, <strong>the</strong> grossloss <strong>of</strong> arable land <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a are 6,556 thousand hectares, about 5.0% <strong>of</strong> cropland(Lester R. Brown, 1997). Landfill occupy<strong>in</strong>g is one <strong>of</strong> reasons <strong>of</strong> arable landdecreas<strong>in</strong>g. In some cities, it is nearly impossible to f<strong>in</strong>d new dump<strong>in</strong>g sites, hencevaluable arable land are used as landfill.Air pollution <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> landfills. Most <strong>of</strong> landfills emit odor, and arebreed<strong>in</strong>g ground <strong>of</strong> rats and fungus. Landfills also release harmful gases such asammonia (NH4), hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and so on.


Page 7. describe <strong>the</strong> general situation <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>.. comprehensively analyze which technical approach is more suitable for J<strong>in</strong>gshancage based on some experiences <strong>of</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial countries, system analysis,and economic, environmental and social psychology analyses. The susta<strong>in</strong>able andenvironmentally-friendly sound technology for <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> will bestrongly recommended.. suggest to carry out <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated solutions step by step based on <strong>the</strong> concreteconditions <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshanis <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>.. simply discuss <strong>the</strong> obstacles and opportunities <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegratedsolutions.The o<strong>the</strong>r objective <strong>of</strong> this prelim<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>study</strong> on J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong><strong>management</strong> is to provide <strong>the</strong> references for:. <strong>the</strong> decision makers <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong>ity,. <strong>the</strong> urban planners <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan,. <strong>the</strong> decision makers <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions which might givef<strong>in</strong>ancial support to J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> project,. <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g up feasibility <strong>study</strong> on J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatmentplant.2.2 ScopesScope <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong>:In this paper, only <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> is studied, which <strong>in</strong>cludes three componentssuch as household <strong>waste</strong>, street garbage and commercial <strong>waste</strong> which are produced by<strong>of</strong>fice, restaurants, stores and etc. Municipal <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> does not <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>dustrial<strong>waste</strong>, demolition-construction <strong>waste</strong> or hazardous <strong>waste</strong> which are treated separatelyby J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong>ity. With<strong>in</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>, organic <strong>waste</strong>, <strong>municipal</strong>hazardous <strong>waste</strong> such as batteries and mercury tubes will be focused.Scope <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong> treatment technologies:Landfill, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g and compost<strong>in</strong>g will be discussed as <strong>waste</strong> treatmenttechnologies, hut recycl<strong>in</strong>g is only slightly discussed due to <strong>the</strong> limited space <strong>of</strong> this<strong>the</strong>sis and not as relevant as <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three to this topic for Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cities.


Page 83. THE ORY AND METHODSThe <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong><strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> is crucial <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> efforts to achieve a susta<strong>in</strong>ablesociety. Municipal <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> is relevant to many o<strong>the</strong>r environmental aspects,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g utilities <strong>of</strong> natural resources, land lise, human health, surface and groundwater pollution, air pollution and so on. Successful <strong>management</strong> is important to avoid<strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r environmental problems. Municipal <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>as a key role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development towards a susta<strong>in</strong>able society must be recognized.Waste is produced after us<strong>in</strong>g natural resources by human be<strong>in</strong>g. People have to close<strong>the</strong> loop which <strong>the</strong>y made for liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to mitigate <strong>the</strong> depletion <strong>of</strong> naturalresources and to protect our environment. The susta<strong>in</strong>able solutions will be highlyappreciated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> solutions <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>.3.1 Basic Pr<strong>in</strong>cipleTo achieve <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>, <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability isconsidered <strong>the</strong> basic pr<strong>in</strong>cip le <strong>in</strong> this <strong>study</strong>. The specific application <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability<strong>in</strong> handl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> could be <strong>waste</strong> reuse, recycl<strong>in</strong>g, energy recover,nutrition recover and rationalland lise through decreas<strong>in</strong>g landfills. By us<strong>in</strong>g biogas toproduce e1ectricity or heat which is come ITom organic contents <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong><strong>waste</strong> is a very good example <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able solution, because on <strong>the</strong> one hand, itsolves <strong>waste</strong> problem and it's correspond<strong>in</strong>g negative effects, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, it savesnon-renewable energy recourses.Besides, <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g environmental effect and ITom source to solve problem couldbe <strong>the</strong> basic requirements <strong>of</strong> handl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. So when to choose <strong>the</strong>different approaches, which one is <strong>the</strong> best one with <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g environmentaleffect should be considered. Source reduction and sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> at source can avoidmix<strong>in</strong>g all k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> and br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g a lot <strong>of</strong> trouble <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r treatmentprocesses.In <strong>the</strong> analysis and results chapter, <strong>the</strong> above pr<strong>in</strong>cip le <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability and its specificrequirements <strong>in</strong> handl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> will be applied to choose <strong>the</strong> priorsolution.3.2 MethodsThe below methods are adopted comprehensively <strong>in</strong> this <strong>study</strong>:. Literature search and <strong>study</strong>. Relevant important literature and data are ITom LundUniversity Library, Tyrens InITakonsult AB Library, The Library <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>


Page 9International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund Universityand LUMES (Lund University International Master' s Prograrnrne <strong>in</strong>Environmental Science) Library. And also very relevant literature and data aregiven by my supervisor, Per Lundgren. Latest data and material about <strong>waste</strong><strong>management</strong> <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan are obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Solid Waste Division <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>eseSPEA and J<strong>in</strong>gshan Municipility.. Study visit and <strong>in</strong>terview. In order to acquire general <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>municipal</strong><strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>, <strong>study</strong> visit and <strong>in</strong>terview local VIP <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan havebeen carried out. Study visit to Kristianstad Biogas Plant which is one <strong>of</strong> mostsuccessful operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegrated digestion and compost<strong>in</strong>g plants <strong>in</strong> Sweden, <strong>the</strong><strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> department <strong>of</strong> Kristianstad Municipality, and MalmöInc<strong>in</strong>erator Waste Treatrnent Plant. Some consultants <strong>in</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatrnent field havebeen <strong>in</strong>terviewed while fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> technical problems. The <strong>in</strong>terview to <strong>the</strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer <strong>of</strong> Solid Waste & Toxic Chemicals Management Division <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>eseSEPA has been done and obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> general situation about Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>waste</strong><strong>management</strong>.. Jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Swedish Environmental Delegation for Ch<strong>in</strong>a which is led bySwedish Environmental M<strong>in</strong>ister, Mr. Kjell Larsson from Ser. 13 to Ser. 20,1999. I have followed <strong>the</strong> whole activities <strong>of</strong> this delegation <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g twonational sem<strong>in</strong>ars on <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> and technologies, and <strong>the</strong>visit<strong>in</strong>g to Hongkong household <strong>waste</strong> collect<strong>in</strong>g systern. Discussions with <strong>the</strong>experts <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatrnent field about <strong>the</strong> solutions <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> problems <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ahave done dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> conference.. System analysis. Systern analysis has been applied to figure out <strong>in</strong>ter-relationshipsamong <strong>the</strong> different ma<strong>in</strong> actors <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>cycle, <strong>the</strong> causalloop diagrams have been drawn to help <strong>the</strong> explanations.. Comprehensive analyses. That will be applied to conclude <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong>respective analyz<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>in</strong> this <strong>study</strong>.4. PROBLEMS DEFINITION4.1 The Increas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Waste GeneratedAccord<strong>in</strong>g to "J<strong>in</strong>gshan City Plann<strong>in</strong>g", its population is 110 thousand <strong>in</strong> 1999 andwill be170 thousands <strong>in</strong> 2005, <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g generation <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>is expected from approximate 94ton/day <strong>in</strong> 1999 to 145ton/day <strong>in</strong> 2005 if <strong>the</strong>


Page 10contribution <strong>of</strong> economic growth to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generatedis ignored, obviously, <strong>the</strong> growth rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan is quitehigh.4.2 No Municipal Solid Waste Sort<strong>in</strong>g at SourceThe same as <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cilies, J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> is not sorted atsource except for some recycables such as <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> paper, <strong>the</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>um beveragecans, <strong>the</strong> metal and metal food cans, and glass bottles which can be sold to <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>dividual collectors or garbage pickers.The three components <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> such as household <strong>waste</strong>, streetgarbage and commercial sector <strong>waste</strong>, are mixed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> drop-<strong>of</strong>f spots or landfills byus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> common collection and transportation systems <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan. These mixtures<strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> create a lot <strong>of</strong> problems for <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>and treatment.4.3 NOMunicipal Solid Waste Treatment FacilityThere is no <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant <strong>in</strong> place for treat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong>J<strong>in</strong>gshan. The only landfill place is a naturallow-land and around 2 hectares, withoutany environmental protection work carried out before or after it was used as a<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> dump<strong>in</strong>g place. The related environmental problems such as airpollution, surround<strong>in</strong>g water pollution, bad smell, <strong>the</strong> huge amount <strong>of</strong> flies andmosquitoes and <strong>in</strong>fectious disease are very serious.In conc1usion, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> problems <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> are<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generated, without any separation <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> and no<strong>waste</strong> treatment facility toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong>ir relevant negatively environmental effects.Through <strong>the</strong> <strong>study</strong> trip, it was learnt thai J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong>ity has realized <strong>the</strong>seriousness <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se critical problems and try to f<strong>in</strong>d proper solutions. Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>long term, <strong>the</strong> <strong>municipal</strong>ity <strong>in</strong>tends to <strong>in</strong>stall a <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment plantwith <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> 150ton/day. They have started to consult about technical solutionsand to look for <strong>the</strong> partially f<strong>in</strong>ancial supports.


Page 115. OVERVIEW OF MUNICIPAL WASTE SOLIDMANAGEMENTIn this chapter, <strong>the</strong> general <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> situation <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a willbe briefly <strong>in</strong>troduced, which <strong>in</strong>c1udes <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> systems,collection and transportation systems, treatment and disposals systems. Also, <strong>the</strong>comparisons to some lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial countries will be simply made <strong>in</strong> order toobta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>.5.1 Municipal Solid Waste Management Organizational Structureand Fund<strong>in</strong>gIn Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>the</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> government takes <strong>the</strong> responsibility for <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong><strong>management</strong>. Specifically, <strong>the</strong> local environmental protection agency is responsiblefor <strong>the</strong> environmental monitor<strong>in</strong>g and policy on <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> issues, <strong>the</strong> localenvironmental sanitation department is responsible for <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>collection, street sweep<strong>in</strong>g, refuse transportation and disposal.Municipal <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> is funded directly by <strong>the</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> government.In some Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cities, residents are charged 1 to 3 Yuan (8 Yuan equalsapproximately $1 US, 1 Yuan almost equals SEK 1) per month for <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> service.Waste collection fees only cover a t<strong>in</strong>y portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong>.(SPEA, 1998)5.2 Municipal Solid Waste Generation and its Characteristics5.2.1 The Growth Rate <strong>of</strong> Municipal Solid Waste GeneratedAs mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction chapter, Ch<strong>in</strong>a' s <strong>waste</strong> generation has been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gvery rapidly <strong>in</strong> recent years driven by <strong>the</strong> economic and urban population growth, <strong>the</strong>growth rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> generated <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> experienced and anannually average <strong>of</strong> 7.9% with<strong>in</strong> 1991 and 1997(Ch<strong>in</strong>a Environmental StatisticalYearbook, 1998), slightly lower than <strong>the</strong> growth rate <strong>of</strong> GNP (10.8%) at <strong>the</strong> sametime, but higher than urban population growth rate (3.0%) (Ch<strong>in</strong>a StatisticalYearbook, 1997). If <strong>the</strong> rear 1990 is taken as based rear, considered as 1.0, <strong>the</strong>growths <strong>of</strong> GNP, urban population and <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> respectively are shown<strong>in</strong> Figure 1. Figure 1 also <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<strong>in</strong>crease at <strong>the</strong> current growth rate.


Page 12GNP, urban population& MSW growth32.521.5--+- GNPurban population--.to- MSW0.5OoO)O)~o;O)~NO)O)~(V)O)O)~"'"O)O)~I[)O)O)~year


Page 13Table 1. MunicipalSolid Waste CompositionOrganic <strong>waste</strong> (i.e. food <strong>waste</strong>)Inorganic <strong>waste</strong>:PaperPlasticMetalGlassBrick, tile, coal ash, c<strong>in</strong>der and dustTextilesO<strong>the</strong>r65.2 32.04.6932.71.678.81.545.11.992.916.02.91.983.76.9311.9Source: *SEPA, 1998, p.187Source: ** J Paul Henderson & Terrill J Chang, May, 1996, p.5Table l shows that <strong>the</strong> organic <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> south Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> is muchhigher than Vancouver's. The pretty higher organic <strong>waste</strong> results <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower heatvalue which ranges from 800-1100kCal/kg. In comparison, <strong>the</strong> mean heat value <strong>of</strong>Vancouver's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> is 6278kCal/kg. The low heat value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> would have a major impact on <strong>the</strong> economic viability <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration projects <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. (J. Paul Henderson & Terrill J. Chang, May, 1996).In <strong>the</strong> table 1, paper <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong>cludes paper cartons, paper carrier-bags, wrapp<strong>in</strong>g paper,corrugated cardboard newspapers, magaz<strong>in</strong>es, journals and advertis<strong>in</strong>g material.Plastic <strong>waste</strong> refers to plastic packag<strong>in</strong>g bags, disposable styro foam food conta<strong>in</strong>ers,PET bottles, plastic utensils, plastic toys and so on. Metal means alum<strong>in</strong>um beveragesuch as conta<strong>in</strong>ers for beer and s<strong>of</strong>t dr<strong>in</strong>ks, metal food cans and some <strong>waste</strong> metallikeiron. Glass ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> different color (green, white, brown) glass bottles.Textiles <strong>in</strong>cludes used clo<strong>the</strong>s and cloth. O<strong>the</strong>r item <strong>in</strong> table 1 refers to some <strong>waste</strong> notclaimed above. The o<strong>the</strong>r item <strong>in</strong> category <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a conta<strong>in</strong>s batteries and mercurytubes which are almost not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this category <strong>in</strong> Canada.5.2.3 Recycl<strong>in</strong>g ActivitiesIt is worth mention<strong>in</strong>g that households practice a form <strong>of</strong> recycl<strong>in</strong>g when it comes to<strong>waste</strong> from paper, alum<strong>in</strong>um beverage cans, metal and metal food cans and glassbottles. These tyre <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong>s are generally collected by <strong>in</strong>dividual collectors, that rayshouseholds a little stim <strong>of</strong> money for separat<strong>in</strong>g and keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se <strong>waste</strong> at source.


Page 14In addition, garbage conta<strong>in</strong>ers are cont<strong>in</strong>ually scavenged by <strong>waste</strong>-pickers look<strong>in</strong>gfor recyclable. IIOnically, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>dividual collectors and<strong>waste</strong>-pickers,Ch<strong>in</strong>a could be considered as hav<strong>in</strong>g a relatively high rate <strong>of</strong> recyc1<strong>in</strong>g.5.3 Collection and Transportation SystemsThe adequate <strong>waste</strong> collection systems are provided with <strong>of</strong> daily <strong>waste</strong> collection anddaily street sweep<strong>in</strong>g for citizens. The most common <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> collectionsystems are central dIOr-<strong>of</strong>f spots <strong>in</strong> each neighborhood, located on <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>street. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> collection conta<strong>in</strong>ers <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a are not covered, and due to <strong>the</strong> highfood <strong>waste</strong> content, <strong>the</strong>y are emit unpleasant odors and attract flies. All systemcomponents <strong>in</strong>c1ud<strong>in</strong>gbicyc1e carts, trucks and build<strong>in</strong>gs are generally owned by <strong>the</strong><strong>municipal</strong>ity. There are very few large-scale transfer stations <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Several citiesare plann<strong>in</strong>g to construct such facilities. (SEPA, 1998).5.4 Public and Governmental AttitudesTo establish cultural and sanitary cities as a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese central govemmental goal hasbeen more than 10 years, <strong>the</strong>refore, public enviIOnmentalattitudes are chang<strong>in</strong>g andpeople's actions are also chang<strong>in</strong>g.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to SEPA, sanitary landfill is considered as Olle <strong>of</strong> necessary <strong>waste</strong>treatment method and will be commonly used for a long time due to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r treatment technologies. In accordance to requirements <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a's Agenda 21,biogas generated from sanitary landfills will be recovered by <strong>the</strong> year 2000.Compost<strong>in</strong>g is highly appreciated and to improve <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> composts is thoughtabout as a key issue. (SPEA, 1998)(Ch<strong>in</strong>a's Agenda 21, 1994)5.5 The Municipal Solid Waste Treatment TechnologiesNowadays, <strong>the</strong> common exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies on treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>are landfill, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g and compost<strong>in</strong>g besides recyc1<strong>in</strong>g. More than 70% <strong>of</strong> total<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is dumped <strong>in</strong> landfills. High temperature compost<strong>in</strong>gtakes up about 20% <strong>of</strong> total <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. The amount for <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration isfew(SEPA, 1998). Compare to <strong>the</strong> U S, 60.9% <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> was disposed<strong>in</strong> landfill, 15.5% <strong>of</strong> that was combusted and 23.6% was recyc1edand composted <strong>in</strong>1994. (VS EPA, 1995).


Page 155.5.1 Landfi/l<strong>in</strong>gHistorically, <strong>the</strong> landfill is firstly used along with <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> cities, crudedump<strong>in</strong>g is orig<strong>in</strong>al way <strong>of</strong> landfiiI. But as liv<strong>in</strong>g standards <strong>in</strong>crease so does <strong>the</strong>demand for improved environmental benefits, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> become<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly unacceptable to a more highly educated and weIl <strong>in</strong>formed public. So,<strong>the</strong> sanitary landfills which are with <strong>the</strong> gas and leachate controi and collectionsystems are be<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> crude dump<strong>in</strong>g. Today, <strong>the</strong> tendency is to m<strong>in</strong>imize<strong>the</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> landfill <strong>in</strong> most <strong>of</strong> western countries because <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong>energy and raw material recovery as weIl as rationai land lise has been graduallyrealized by people. (Bridgwater A. V. & Lideren, K. 1981)But, most landfills are without <strong>the</strong> gas and leachate controi and collection systems <strong>in</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Of <strong>the</strong> several cities <strong>in</strong>vestigated, Olle<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> top level landJill <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is<strong>the</strong> Asuwei Sanitary Landfill with 200Oton/day capacity, which is located <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>suburb <strong>of</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g founded <strong>in</strong> 1994. Impervious treatment was carried out to <strong>the</strong>landfill base to prevent <strong>the</strong> groundwater from be<strong>in</strong>g polluted. The compacted <strong>waste</strong> iscovered with soil to avoid exposure. The leachate resulted from <strong>waste</strong> is used foragricultural irrigation arter be<strong>in</strong>g treated to meet discharge standards. At present, <strong>the</strong>landfill gas is released <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> air, hut <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> long ron, it will be reclaimed forapplication. A length <strong>of</strong> coil road is constructed on <strong>the</strong> landfill heap which shallf<strong>in</strong>ally add to <strong>the</strong> landscape.(Beij<strong>in</strong>g General Municipal Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Design &Research Institute, Dec, 1997) The low level landJill <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, such as J<strong>in</strong>gshan'sLandfill, is really crude dump<strong>in</strong>g place. It almost have no pre-treatment both for<strong>waste</strong> and dump<strong>in</strong>g place.5.5.2 Inc<strong>in</strong>erationThe big-sized <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eratorsare built Olle arter ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> western world s<strong>in</strong>ce 1980's.And <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration and electricity produc<strong>in</strong>g is appreciated andapplied if it is balanced between <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment and benefit from sell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> recoveryenergy. But, although <strong>the</strong> advanced air clean devices are <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erators, <strong>the</strong> secondary pollution problem is still debated among <strong>the</strong>environmental scientists. (Jackson & Jackson, 1996)The <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erators <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a are small and orten requires manualload<strong>in</strong>g and sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong>. These <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erators are generally very simple and have no environmentalprotection systems.(SEPA, 1998) But, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration is looked on favorably by manycities due to <strong>the</strong> small land requirements and <strong>the</strong> potential for electricity generation.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> sem<strong>in</strong>ar <strong>of</strong> Swedish Environmental Delegation <strong>in</strong> Guangzhou(Canton), some Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cities plan to build <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erationsystems. (Ch<strong>in</strong>a SEPA & Swedish M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Environment, 1999)


Page 165.5.3 Compost<strong>in</strong>gCompost<strong>in</strong>g is not new concept, especially for Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese farmers could makebiogas and compost s<strong>in</strong>ce hundred years ago through <strong>the</strong> natural decompos<strong>in</strong>g process<strong>of</strong> used straws , manure <strong>of</strong> both human be<strong>in</strong>g and animal. Unfortunately, compost<strong>in</strong>ghas been not carried out <strong>in</strong> urban area to treat <strong>the</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>dustrialization <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Contrarily, <strong>in</strong> some lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial countries, <strong>the</strong>comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>waste</strong> treatment plants <strong>of</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g biogas and compost <strong>in</strong> big size andcapacity are accepted <strong>in</strong> recent years due to its environmentally friendly way andc1os<strong>in</strong>g natural cyc1e. But <strong>the</strong> strict sort<strong>in</strong>g requirement <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>which is to completely sort organic <strong>waste</strong> out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>waste</strong> at source is Olle<strong>of</strong>most important key issues to operate this k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> plant successfully. (Leif Wannholt,1998)Some Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cites have set up relatively low technology and small sized-vesselcompost<strong>in</strong>g systems to process <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. But <strong>the</strong> products, compost, arecommonly with low quaiity due to <strong>the</strong> mixed <strong>waste</strong> and improper hand sort<strong>in</strong>g.Experience has shown that <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> compost is less than <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>git s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> bad compost has no marketability. So, <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>gfacilities have shut down. (J. Paul Henderson & Terrill J. Chang, May, 1996)In short, due to <strong>the</strong> secondary pollution <strong>of</strong> small <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erators and low quaiity <strong>of</strong>compost, and also <strong>the</strong> limited f<strong>in</strong>ancial capacity at present, landfill is still <strong>the</strong> commonway <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a to handl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> advanced <strong>waste</strong>treatment technology and <strong>in</strong>ternational f<strong>in</strong>ancial supports are highly demanded <strong>in</strong> thisfield <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.6. CAgE DESCRIPTION6.1 General InformationJ<strong>in</strong>gshan is a small city with 110 thousands population as mentioned before andlocated <strong>in</strong> Hubei Prov<strong>in</strong>ce which is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. From Wuhan, <strong>the</strong>capital <strong>of</strong> Hubei Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, Olle<strong>of</strong> important place <strong>of</strong> communications <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, around3 hours are taken to <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan city by car. Adm<strong>in</strong>istratively, <strong>the</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshancity is directly controlled by J<strong>in</strong>gshan Municipality, and Hubei prov<strong>in</strong>cial govemmentmanages J<strong>in</strong>gshan Municipality.


Page 176.2 The Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Municipal Solid Waste ManagementJ<strong>in</strong>gshan shares many characteristics with many small Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cities <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> its<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>. J<strong>in</strong>gshan's Municipality takes full responsibilityfor <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> collection, transportation, disposal and fund<strong>in</strong>g. Residentsnot pay towards <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gsan.Residents <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan city ma<strong>in</strong>ly lise natural gas for cook<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>the</strong>re is no heat<strong>in</strong>gsystem because it located on sou<strong>the</strong>m part <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a with <strong>the</strong> very few cold days <strong>in</strong>w<strong>in</strong>ter. If necessary, residents lise <strong>the</strong> household electrical heaters. So, <strong>the</strong> <strong>municipal</strong><strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> composition <strong>in</strong> south Ch<strong>in</strong>a by us<strong>in</strong>g gas for cook<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> table 1 can beconsidered to basically represent <strong>the</strong> compositions <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong><strong>waste</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce no data is available on compositions <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>.J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> collection systems have already reached <strong>the</strong> bigcities such as Beij<strong>in</strong>g and Shanghai's standards. In some aspects it is even better thanbig cities, especially <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> disposal build<strong>in</strong>gs facilities. Drop-<strong>of</strong>f spot (smallwooden houses) and garbage conta<strong>in</strong>ers are specifically shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2 and Figure3. The collection vehicles are sealed and specially designed trucks like that one shown<strong>in</strong> Figure 4.!""'"1:~. -~.~...~// .,~ .."~.~.-.--...........:",.f ::~."Figure 2. Drop-<strong>of</strong>f Spot <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan Municipal Solid Waste (SmallWooden House)


Page 18"-'--Figure 3. The Garbage Conta<strong>in</strong>ers <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshanF,..I ,. ti, IiFigure 4. The Sealed Collection Vehicle (Blue and White Sealed Truck)for J<strong>in</strong>gshan's Municipal Solid Waste


Page 19In J<strong>in</strong>gshan, <strong>the</strong>re are a total <strong>of</strong> four garbage transfer stations, each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m is roughlywith 20ton capacity. Olle <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>m is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 5. This particular station is deanand without strong bad smell, which is ra<strong>the</strong>r rare <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.-. '-..-.........-- /';~~ - .--"Figure 5. The Garbage Transform Station for J<strong>in</strong>gshan's MunicipalSolid Waste6.3 Why to Choose J<strong>in</strong>gshan as Case StudyIn Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> problems are common <strong>in</strong> most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cities and towns. WhyJ<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> is chosen as cage <strong>study</strong>, becausethrough <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation to J<strong>in</strong>gshan, <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g facts have been discovered:. J<strong>in</strong>gshan ranked <strong>the</strong> first place <strong>of</strong> hygiene (sanitation) competition <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mediumand small cities <strong>of</strong>Hubei Prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>1999.. "No Fragmentary Waste on Ground" which means every family must lise bags toconta<strong>in</strong> household <strong>waste</strong> and plit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> drop-<strong>of</strong>f sites is <strong>the</strong> big progress which <strong>the</strong>J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong>ity made <strong>in</strong> this first halfyear.. J<strong>in</strong>gshan Municipality is highlyaware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environmental problems which <strong>the</strong>yare fac<strong>in</strong>g and will face. The local regulations on <strong>waste</strong> collection andtransportation facilities such as drop-<strong>of</strong>f sites or house, are basically completed.


Page 20. Crude dump<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> only way <strong>of</strong> treatment <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> this city.That means no any pre-treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> or no leachate controI system on itslandfill place.. J<strong>in</strong>gshan is relatively rich area <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, so <strong>municipal</strong>ity can f<strong>in</strong>ance or partlyf<strong>in</strong>ance to build and fl<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant.Therefore, <strong>the</strong> subjective and objective conditions to search <strong>the</strong> proper solution forJ<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> is basically mature. In <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>gcharters, <strong>the</strong> proper susta<strong>in</strong>able approach, especially technical solutions will bediscovered and analyzed.7. ANALYSES AND RESULTSWaste <strong>management</strong>plays an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall debate on <strong>the</strong>protection <strong>of</strong> our environment and <strong>the</strong> rationaI lise <strong>of</strong> raw materials. This has becomequite c1ear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> recent years, when <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> problem has received public attention atall leveIs. In Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> is currently a grow<strong>in</strong>gnational problem without a good solution. In this charter, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong><strong>waste</strong> technical approaches which are suitable for J<strong>in</strong>gshan's realistic conditions hasbeen analyzed and compared from <strong>the</strong> different aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c1ud<strong>in</strong>g experiences fromlead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustri al countries, system analysis, economic analyses, environmentalanalyses, and social psychology on different technical approaches. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong>comprehensive analyses have been applied <strong>in</strong> order to f<strong>in</strong>d realistic solution for<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan.7.1 Experiences from Lead<strong>in</strong>g Industrial CountriesIn order to learn <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational development on <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong><strong>management</strong>, <strong>the</strong> reference studies specifically on US and Sweden have been donedur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> this <strong>the</strong>sis. The solution for <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> experiencedby national environmental authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two countries is briefly conc1uded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>next few paragraphs.7.1.1 Experiences from USEPAThe results <strong>of</strong> studies <strong>of</strong>USEPA (D. S. Environmental Protection Agency) shows thai<strong>the</strong>re are below c1asses <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>(USEPA,1995):


Page 21....Source reduction tops <strong>the</strong> classes because <strong>of</strong> its potential to reduce system costs,prevent pollution, reduce consumption <strong>of</strong>resources and <strong>in</strong>crease efficiency.Recycl<strong>in</strong>g and compost<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> second step <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> classes. It <strong>in</strong>volves collect<strong>in</strong>gmaterials, reprocess<strong>in</strong>g/re-manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, and us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g products. With<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>g approaches, USEP A places mixed <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>compost<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> bottom. Source-separated compost<strong>in</strong>g is highly appreciated,especially over <strong>the</strong> long-term.Waste combustion and landfill are at <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> classes. USEP A does notrank Olle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se options higher than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, as both are viable components <strong>of</strong>an <strong>in</strong>tegrated system.Sanitary Landfill is necessary to manage non-recyclable and non-combustible<strong>waste</strong>s, and is <strong>the</strong> only actual <strong>waste</strong> "disposal" method.7.1.2 Experiences from SNEPBIn order to <strong>in</strong>vestigate appropriate treatment methods, <strong>the</strong> SWEPB (Swedish NationalEnvironmental Protection Board), performed a <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> technology, economic andenvironmental impact <strong>of</strong> various treatment methods. Tyrens Infrakonsult AB reported<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> project <strong>of</strong> Grand Abu Dhabi Citythat <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>vestigations demonstrated that a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> different treatmentmethods was required.Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>study</strong> visit<strong>in</strong>g to Municipal Solid Waste Department <strong>of</strong> KristianstadMunicipality, it could be concluded that <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> is agood comb<strong>in</strong>ation. The organic <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> this area is collected separatelyand <strong>the</strong>ntreated <strong>in</strong> Kristianstad Biogas Plant for produc<strong>in</strong>g biogas and compost. Thecombustible was te is taken to Malmö Inc<strong>in</strong>eration Waste Treatment Plant. The rest<strong>waste</strong> is carried to Kristianstad landfill or Hässleholm landfill. This was due to <strong>the</strong>fact that <strong>the</strong>re was no s<strong>in</strong>gle treatment method that prov ed suitable for all <strong>waste</strong>. Itwas fur<strong>the</strong>r determ<strong>in</strong>ed that sort<strong>in</strong>g by mach<strong>in</strong>e alone did not provide sufficiently pureseparation for subsequent treatment methods.Interest <strong>in</strong> <strong>waste</strong> disposal handl<strong>in</strong>g and its environmental aspects has grown, whichhas given <strong>waste</strong> issues more attention <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> environmental debate. The strategy thathas emerged dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990's is a closed loop, i.e. recycl<strong>in</strong>g/reuse comb<strong>in</strong>ed withvarious treatment methods.Through <strong>the</strong> leam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> same lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustri al countries, <strong>the</strong> briefconclusions can be drawn out: source reduction and sort<strong>in</strong>g at source are <strong>the</strong> mostimportant issue and should be ranked on <strong>the</strong> top levelon <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong><strong>management</strong>. No s<strong>in</strong>gle method can be used to cover <strong>the</strong> all <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>.Although source reduction, reuse, recycl<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, and compost<strong>in</strong>g can divertlarge portions <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> from disposal, same <strong>waste</strong> still must be placed


Page 22<strong>in</strong> landfills. AIso consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> technologies, <strong>the</strong> fourpossible technical approaches could be discovered for handl<strong>in</strong>g J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong><strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> which are sanitary landfill, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill, compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill,and <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill. These will be discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter.7.2 System Analysis: Which Approach is Better?System analysis th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and casualloop diagrams is a useful method to analysis <strong>the</strong>complicated questions and to make <strong>the</strong>m simple. System analysis will be applied <strong>in</strong>analyz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> above possible approaches. Crude dump<strong>in</strong>g is shown as <strong>the</strong> currentsituation.Prior to show<strong>in</strong>g casual loop diagrams, same symbols which will be used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>diagrams are <strong>in</strong>troduced. Firstly, "+" is used at <strong>the</strong> arrowhead to <strong>in</strong>dicate that a change<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> item at <strong>the</strong> tail <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> arrow will cause a change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same direction for <strong>the</strong>item at <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> arrow. Secondly, "-" is used at <strong>the</strong> arrowhead to <strong>in</strong>dicate that achange <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> item at <strong>the</strong> tail <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> arrow will cause a change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> opposite directionfor <strong>the</strong> item at <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> arrow. Symbol "R" with half arrow circle is placed <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> loop to suggest that it is a positive causal loop, on <strong>in</strong> whichbehavioral changes are re<strong>in</strong>forced. Symbol "B" with half arrow circle is placed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> loop as well to suggest that it is a negative causal loop, on <strong>in</strong> whichbehavioral changes are balanced.(Roberts N. & o<strong>the</strong>rs)7.2.1 Crude Dump<strong>in</strong>gAs mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> problem def<strong>in</strong>ition chapter, no <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatmentfacility is available <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> naturallow-Iand located onout-skirt <strong>of</strong> this city is only Ollemethod to treat J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. Thebelow casualloop diagram has been drawn based on <strong>the</strong> current situation <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong><strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan and its correspond<strong>in</strong>g environmental andeconomic effects.


Page 23airpollution& globewarmmg++arable landfordump<strong>in</strong>g+crude dump<strong>in</strong>gFigure 6. Causa. Loop Diagram <strong>of</strong> Crude Dump<strong>in</strong>gIn above causal loop diagram, <strong>the</strong>re are a total <strong>of</strong> six loops, and urban population &economic growth, and <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> two actors are <strong>in</strong> each loop. Due to <strong>the</strong> growth<strong>of</strong> urban population and economy, doubtless, <strong>the</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> is generatedmore, so is transportation demand <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g collection and its correspond<strong>in</strong>genvironmental pollution which result <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> negative effects on economic and urbanpopulation growth. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> right hand first loop consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> urban population,<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>, transportation, transportation cost & pollution is a balanc<strong>in</strong>gloop.In <strong>the</strong> right hand second loop, that <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> crude dump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> occupied arableland has been expressed through <strong>the</strong> five actors such as urban population & economicgrowth, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generated, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g, arable land for dump<strong>in</strong>g andGropsproduction loss. The loss <strong>of</strong> arable land for dump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> could make <strong>the</strong>shortage <strong>of</strong> Grops.So, this is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r negative effects on <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong>urban population and economy produced by us<strong>in</strong>g arable land to dump <strong>waste</strong>.S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>re is no <strong>waste</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan, each <strong>waste</strong> generator is directly thrownout <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>waste</strong> except some recyclables. Some organic substance which are richlyconta<strong>in</strong>ed elements such as N(nitrogen) and P(phosphorus) has been left <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. On <strong>the</strong> one hand, <strong>the</strong>se can be nutrition for soil if that might beseparated out from <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> proper way, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong>se can be pollutants andseriously contam<strong>in</strong>ate surface water and ground water, and simultaneously itspotential economic value is lost. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> right hand third loop among urbanpopulation & economic growth, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generated, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>


Page 24loss <strong>of</strong> potential nutrition, and <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> potential economic value from nutrition andfourth one consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>generated, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> potential nutrition and water pollution both arebalanc<strong>in</strong>g loops and decrease <strong>the</strong> urban population and economic growth.Biogas will be generated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural decompos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. CH4 is <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>component <strong>of</strong> biogas and also is a very good energy source. This has been lost and itspotential economic value as weIl. CH4 leaked <strong>in</strong>to air, contributes to globe warm<strong>in</strong>gbecause it is one <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gases. So, <strong>the</strong> both left hand first loop (among urbanpopulation & economic growth, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generated, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>loss <strong>of</strong> potential energy, and <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> potential economic value from energy) andleft hand second one (among urban population & economic growth, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong><strong>waste</strong> generated, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> potential energy, and air pollution &globe warm<strong>in</strong>g) are also balanc<strong>in</strong>g loops and are not good for <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> urbanpopulation and economy.In short, <strong>the</strong> whole six loops <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> crude dump<strong>in</strong>g process are completed balanc<strong>in</strong>gloops. Therefore, <strong>the</strong>re is no any positive effect from <strong>the</strong> total aspects discussed. Therelevant environmental problems, such as water pollution, air pollution and loss <strong>of</strong>arable land are obvious. Although, <strong>the</strong>re is no cost on dump<strong>in</strong>g except on collectionand transportation <strong>waste</strong>, <strong>the</strong> potential nutrition and energy and <strong>the</strong>ir economic valuesare unfortunately not considered.7.2.2 Sanitary LandfillSanitary landfill is one <strong>of</strong> four possible approaches and is shown <strong>in</strong> as a causal loopdiagram <strong>in</strong> below Figure 7.


Page 25urban population &economic growthC!!J<strong>in</strong>vestment<strong>of</strong> sanitarylandfillenergy<strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong>potentialeconomlCvalue fromnutrition+cropsproductionloss+ + <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong><strong>waste</strong> generated+<strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong>potentialenergy"+<strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong>potentialnutritionarable landfordump<strong>in</strong>gtransportation+sanitary landfiIIFigure 7. Causa} Loop Diagram <strong>of</strong> Sanitary LandfillS<strong>in</strong>ce sanitary landfill has <strong>the</strong> gas and leachate collection and controi system <strong>the</strong>pollution produced by leachate to water and CH4 to air would be mostly avoided. Theserious environmental problems <strong>of</strong> crude dump<strong>in</strong>g would be solved by us<strong>in</strong>g sanitarylandfill <strong>in</strong>stead.The o<strong>the</strong>r difference between sanitary landfill and crude dump<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong>construction, operation and capp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sanitary landfill that is not required <strong>in</strong> crudedump<strong>in</strong>g, or maybe crude dump<strong>in</strong>g places have to be capped as weIl <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future, butthat is not <strong>in</strong>c1uded <strong>in</strong> crude dump<strong>in</strong>g causal loop diagram. So, <strong>the</strong> loops <strong>of</strong>transportation, arable land, <strong>the</strong> both losses fYom potential nutrition and energy and<strong>the</strong>ir correspond<strong>in</strong>g economic values are completed as <strong>the</strong> same as crude dump<strong>in</strong>gprocess.7.2.3 Inc<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & LandfillWaste can never be combusted totally, so <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g can not be used alone and hasto be comb<strong>in</strong>ed with landfill as <strong>the</strong> second approach <strong>in</strong> this analysis. Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>heat should not be fYeely got rid <strong>of</strong>, <strong>the</strong> technology <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration andenergy recover is discussed <strong>in</strong> this paper. The below causalloop diagram shows us <strong>the</strong>comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g and landfill process.


Page 26<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>gplantFigure 8. Causa. Loop Diagram <strong>of</strong> Inc<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & LandfiIIIn this process, <strong>the</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> should be separated <strong>in</strong>to non-combustibleand combustible parts ei<strong>the</strong>r at source or by mach<strong>in</strong>es. Correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g is needed. The non-combustible part is treated <strong>in</strong> sanitarylandfill and <strong>the</strong> combustible part is plit <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erator.Correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, this causal loop diagram consisted <strong>of</strong> two parts: left and right. On<strong>the</strong> left hand part is similar to s<strong>in</strong>gle sanitary landfi11. The difference is <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong>potential energy and its potential economic value can be partly avoided by energyrecovery. And s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> combustible <strong>waste</strong> is <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erated <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> landfill, <strong>the</strong>amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> for sanitary landfill is less compared to <strong>the</strong> first approach's. Ofcourse, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> sanitary landfill is also less than <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle sanitary landfillor under <strong>the</strong> same <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> sanitary landfill construction, operation and capp<strong>in</strong>ghut with longer full fill<strong>in</strong>g up time.On <strong>the</strong> right hand part shows us <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g and energy recover. The loopconsist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generated,<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g, combustible <strong>waste</strong>, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erator & electricity generator and airpollution, is revealed <strong>the</strong> new secondary pollution problem due to <strong>the</strong> emission <strong>of</strong>organic pollutants dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g process. This might f<strong>in</strong>ally result <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>negative effects on urban population & economic growth, so this is balanc<strong>in</strong>g loop.The economic benefits from sell<strong>in</strong>g e1ectricity is <strong>the</strong> first positive effect which isdiscussed. The loop consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth, <strong>municipal</strong>


Page 27<strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generated, <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g, combustib1e <strong>waste</strong>, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erator &e1ectricity generator and economic benefits from se1l<strong>in</strong>g e1ectricity is re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g.The next re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g 100p <strong>in</strong> this diagram is among urban population & economicgrowth, <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g plant, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erator & e1ectricity generator, andeconomic benefits from se1l<strong>in</strong>ge1ectricity,four actors. It is easy to understand becausethat displays <strong>the</strong> simple streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g re1ationship between <strong>the</strong> economicdeve10pment and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure. But <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stallation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>waste</strong> treatment plant return<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> environmenta1 pollution a1so reflects <strong>the</strong>restra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g re1ationship between <strong>the</strong> economic deve10pment and our environment,which is described <strong>in</strong> 100p consisted <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth,<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g plant, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erator & e1ectricitygenerator, and air pollution.7.2.4 Compost<strong>in</strong>g & LandfillCompost<strong>in</strong>g is considered as a good treatment method for organic <strong>waste</strong>. Thisapproach requires <strong>the</strong> same th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and structure as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & 1andfill:<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> cou1d be separated <strong>in</strong>ta <strong>in</strong>organic <strong>waste</strong> and organic <strong>waste</strong>. The<strong>in</strong>organic component is treated <strong>in</strong> sanitary 1andfill, <strong>the</strong> organic <strong>waste</strong> is used toproduce biogas and compost. Based on this approach <strong>the</strong> causa1 100p diagram hasbeen drawn <strong>in</strong> Figure 9 to show <strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>g & 1andfill processurban population &economic growth<strong>in</strong>vestment<strong>of</strong> sanitarylandfiIIcropsproductionloss+arable landfordump<strong>in</strong>gC!!Jtransportationcost &pollutionC!!)<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong><strong>waste</strong> generated+1- I ooooom;obenefitstransportation I I <strong>in</strong>vestment<strong>of</strong> I I from sell<strong>in</strong>sortmgeconomicfrom sell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> biogasbenefits II<strong>in</strong>vestmentbIOgas compost plantsanitarylandfiIIFigure 9. Causa} Loop Diagram <strong>of</strong> Compost<strong>in</strong>g & LandfillCompared to <strong>the</strong> causa1 100p diagram <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & 1andfill, <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> potentialnutrition and its potential economic va1ue has been avoided. This is <strong>the</strong> on1y


Page 28difference between <strong>the</strong> two sanitary landfill parts <strong>in</strong> this compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfillapproach and <strong>the</strong> previous <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill approach. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>of</strong>sanitary landfill <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two approaches are actually different due to different sharesbetween organic <strong>waste</strong> and combustible <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. In cage <strong>of</strong>J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>, <strong>the</strong> portion <strong>of</strong> organic <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> total <strong>waste</strong> is greaterthan combustible <strong>waste</strong>'s. The loss <strong>of</strong> potential energy and its potential economicvalue is only partly avoided because some combustible <strong>waste</strong> can not be reused toproduce electricity as <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g process.As shown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> right hand part <strong>of</strong> loop, <strong>the</strong> benefits both ITom energy and nutritionrecoveries could be ga<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this approach. There are a total four re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loopswith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> right hand part have been described as folIows:. <strong>the</strong> first re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loop consists <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth,<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generat ed, <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g, organic <strong>waste</strong>, biogas &compost, and economic benefits ITom sell<strong>in</strong>g biogas. <strong>the</strong> second re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loop consists <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth,<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generated, <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g, organic <strong>waste</strong>, biogas &compost, and economic benefits ITom sell<strong>in</strong>g compost. <strong>the</strong> third re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loop consists <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth,<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> biogas plant, biogas & compost, and economic benefits ITom sell<strong>in</strong>gcompost. <strong>the</strong> fourth re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loop consists <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth,<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> biogas plant, biogas & compost, and economic benefits ITom sell<strong>in</strong>gcompost<strong>in</strong>g biogas7.2.5 Inc<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, Compos t<strong>in</strong>g & LandfiIIThis approach is reorganized by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill and compost<strong>in</strong>g &landfill. Hence no causal loop diagram is shown aga<strong>in</strong>. In <strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfilldiagram, <strong>in</strong>organic <strong>waste</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> combustible <strong>waste</strong> such as paper, textile, plasticand so on. The combustible <strong>waste</strong> could be sorted out for <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration, and <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong>it goes to landfill. In this approach, <strong>the</strong>re are two k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g costs, Olle fororganic <strong>waste</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g, ano<strong>the</strong>r for combustible <strong>waste</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g. Only <strong>the</strong> real <strong>waste</strong> isrut <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> landfill after recyclables have separated aiready. Hence <strong>waste</strong> reduction issignificant compar<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r approaches.7.2.6 Summary <strong>of</strong> Discussion <strong>of</strong> ApproachesFrom <strong>the</strong> system analysis perspective, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g is ranked on <strong>the</strong> bortom <strong>of</strong> all<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> methods which are discussed <strong>in</strong> this <strong>the</strong>sis because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> allloops are balanc<strong>in</strong>g and with <strong>the</strong> negative effects on <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> urban andeconomy. So, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g should not be <strong>in</strong> lise cont<strong>in</strong>uously.The four approaches can be considered. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, compost<strong>in</strong>g& landfill approach is a best approach because it will ga<strong>in</strong> economic benefitsITom


Page 29sell<strong>in</strong>g electricity, biogas and compost, and simultaneously avoid <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> potentialnutrition and energy and <strong>the</strong>ir negative environmental effects as weIl. And o<strong>the</strong>robvious advantage is dramatically reduced <strong>waste</strong> both on weight and size.And through count<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loop <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> positive effects on<strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> urban and economy to compare among <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three approaches<strong>in</strong>c1ud<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill and sanitary landfill. Thesequence <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se three approaches are:1. compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill2. <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill3. sanitary landfill.S<strong>in</strong>ce complex economic and environmental problems can not be critically and c1earlydemonstrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> above casual loop diagrams, fur<strong>the</strong>r analyses specifically fromeconomic, environmental, and social perspectives will be carried out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nextsections.7.3 Economic AnalysesFrom <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>the</strong> direction is to enlarge <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong> treatment plant because <strong>of</strong> both economic and <strong>management</strong> reasons.Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> economic affordability and size <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan, <strong>the</strong> approach <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill is unlikely to be suitable. It might be a very goodapproach for a region. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant can be<strong>in</strong>stalled c1ose to big city like Wuhan <strong>the</strong> capital <strong>of</strong> Hubei Prov<strong>in</strong>ce with 4.2millionurban population, and combustible <strong>waste</strong> <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan is possibly treated <strong>the</strong>re (Ch<strong>in</strong>aStatistical Yearbook, 1997). So, from economic perspective, <strong>the</strong> approach <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill would not be suggested to carry out <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshanMunicipality.So far, <strong>the</strong>re is nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & electricity or biogas & compost available <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Therefore, it isdifficult to make <strong>the</strong> economic comparisons among <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three technicalapproaches which are sanitary landfill, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill, and compost<strong>in</strong>g &landfill due to lack <strong>of</strong> data. Hereby, only <strong>in</strong>vestment is possible roughly compared byborrow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment data <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustri al <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g plant withoutelectricity generation and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment data <strong>of</strong> Kistianstad Biogas Plant with <strong>the</strong>capacity 73 million ton/year.


Page 30Table 2. Investment<strong>of</strong> Plant and EquipmentUnit: million RMB12-16* I 60-80** I 43***Source 1: * SEPA, 1998, Environmental Pollution Control and Measures <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a,p: 189. And exclud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> capp<strong>in</strong>g costs.Source 2: ** SEPA, 1998, Environmental Pollution Control and Measures <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a,p: 189. This is <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eratorfor treatment <strong>in</strong>dustrial was te, no electricity generator.Source 3: *** Kruger AB, (1998) Description <strong>of</strong> Kristianstad Biogas Plant, Sweden,p:7 and suppose SEK1roughly equals to RMB1.So, by consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> above specific items, sanitary landfill is cheapestOlle, followed by biogas and compost plant, <strong>the</strong>n lastly, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration. If <strong>the</strong> differences<strong>of</strong> transportation and operation costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three approaches are not accounted <strong>in</strong>ta<strong>the</strong> comparisons but capp<strong>in</strong>g costs for sanitary landfill, e1ectricity generator<strong>in</strong>vestment, and benefits from sell<strong>in</strong>g e1ectricity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g plant and sell<strong>in</strong>gbiogas and compost <strong>in</strong> biogas plant, <strong>the</strong> total costs for <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill approachis like ly still ra<strong>the</strong>r higher than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two. Moreover, because almost no economicbenefit will be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from sanitary landfill approach, contrarily, <strong>the</strong> obviousbenefits would be returned when biogas plant is operated normally, Olle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se twoapproaches cannot be ranked higher than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r through <strong>the</strong> simply economicanalyses, especially for <strong>the</strong> long fl<strong>in</strong>.Based on <strong>the</strong> above rough economic estimation, <strong>the</strong> results are <strong>the</strong> approach <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill is elim<strong>in</strong>ated. The conclusions based on available<strong>in</strong>formation is <strong>the</strong> best approach ei<strong>the</strong>r sanitary landfill or compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfi1l. Thesecond best approach is <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill.7.4 Environmental AnalysesS<strong>in</strong>ce sanitary landfills are more secure and have more better pollution controI andmonitor<strong>in</strong>g devices than earlier landfills, environrnental cancerns at properly managedlandfills are greatly reduced. Also, many new landfills lise methane recovertechnologies to develop a marketable product. So, from environrnental po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view,sanitary landfill is an acceptable approach if its potential pollut<strong>in</strong>g sources is undercontrol.The care environrnental problem concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration is <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> sentfor <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration frequently <strong>in</strong>clude chlor<strong>in</strong>e-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g substances, such as


Page 31polyv<strong>in</strong>ylchloride (PVC). The trace amounts <strong>of</strong> polychlor<strong>in</strong>ated dibenzo-p-diox<strong>in</strong>sand polychlor<strong>in</strong>ated dibenz<strong>of</strong>urans (PCDDs and PCDFs), same <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are highlytoxic (Jackson & Jackson, 1996). But <strong>waste</strong> combustion reduces <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong><strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> and can provide <strong>the</strong> added benefit <strong>of</strong> energy production. And technologiesdevelopment <strong>in</strong> recent years have greatly reduced <strong>the</strong> adverse environmental impactsassociated with <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration through high temperature combustion, a long residencetime <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> a hot oxidiz<strong>in</strong>g environment and so on (Jackson & Jackson,1996). And although <strong>waste</strong> combustion is not risk-free, many lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrialcountries are rely<strong>in</strong>g on or partly rely<strong>in</strong>g on this method.Through <strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill approach, some <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> environmental problemsregard<strong>in</strong>g organic <strong>waste</strong> are likely to be solved. This also can reduce <strong>the</strong> lise <strong>of</strong> landfillgrace, save energy and natural resources and provide useful products. So thisapproach is most suitable for <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability.So, from <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g environmental effect aspect, <strong>the</strong> results should be <strong>the</strong> bestapproach ei<strong>the</strong>r compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill or sanitary landfill. The second best approachis <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill.Therefore, from susta<strong>in</strong>able energy and nutrition recover aspect, <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sethree approaches are:1. compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill2. <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill3. sanitary landfill.7.5 Social Psychology AnalysesHere, only <strong>the</strong> social psychology <strong>of</strong> local residents is discussed for deal<strong>in</strong>g withsanitary landfill, <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g and compost<strong>in</strong>g. Sanitary landfill is neutral word <strong>in</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese. In order to improve <strong>the</strong>ir liv<strong>in</strong>g environment, this is quite easily accepted byresidents s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>waste</strong> can be treated <strong>in</strong> sanitary way. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese people have <strong>the</strong>common perception that <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g plant will pollute <strong>the</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g environmentwhen <strong>waste</strong> is combusted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erator because <strong>waste</strong> is dirty. So, it will difficult tochoose <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g plant near <strong>the</strong> city.Ch<strong>in</strong>a has a long history to produc<strong>in</strong>g biogas which is considered as a very goodenergy source. People have <strong>the</strong> basic knowledge on <strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>g process and feel itrealistic and practical. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> 1970's, <strong>the</strong> strategy <strong>of</strong> government has beenpromot<strong>in</strong>g underground, <strong>in</strong>dividual anaerobic digesters to process rural organicmaterials and resulted <strong>in</strong> approximately five million household anaerobic digesters<strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a today(J. Paul Henderson, January,1997). Biogas <strong>waste</strong> treatmentplant might be easily accepted by J<strong>in</strong>gshan residents.


Page 32Therefore, through <strong>the</strong> simply social psychologyapproaches is:1. compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill2. sanitary landfill3. <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfillanalyses, <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three7.6 Comprehensive AnalysesFirst <strong>of</strong> all, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan has two obvious features as describedearlier, Olle is high organic composition, ano<strong>the</strong>r is low <strong>of</strong> heat value. Approximate65% <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> is organic <strong>waste</strong> (see table 1), and <strong>the</strong> heat value <strong>of</strong><strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> rang e from 800-1100kCal/kg which is six times lower thanVancouver' s <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> as mentioned before. In this <strong>case</strong>, compost<strong>in</strong>g &landfill approach will be much more appreciated than <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill approachfor J<strong>in</strong>gshan.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g is firstly elim<strong>in</strong>ated through <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> systemanalysis. And through economic analyses, <strong>the</strong> approach <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill is also elim<strong>in</strong>ated afterwards. The rest threeapproaches will be ranked <strong>in</strong> accordance to <strong>the</strong> orders <strong>in</strong> different analysisperspectives. The selective fUles are <strong>the</strong> worst Olle among <strong>the</strong>se three approaches isconsidered 1 credit, <strong>the</strong> best Olle is considered 3 credits, <strong>the</strong> middle Olle is considered2 credits. If <strong>the</strong> best Olle and middle Olle could not be determ<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong>se two are bothconsidered 2 credits, and <strong>the</strong> worst Olle is considered 1 credit. If <strong>the</strong> worst Olle andmiddle Ollecould not be determ<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong>se two are both considered 1 credit,<strong>the</strong> rest Olle is considered 3 credits. Table 3 shows <strong>the</strong> credits <strong>of</strong> different analyses.The comprehensive analyses is <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> total credits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se approaches through<strong>the</strong> different analyses methods:


Page 33Table 3. The Credits <strong>of</strong> Different Approachessanitary <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g compost<strong>in</strong>g &landfill & landfill landfillsystem analysis l 2 3economic analyses 2 l 2. .mlmmlzmg2 l 2environmental environmentalanalyseseffectssusta<strong>in</strong>ability 1 2 3social analyses 2 1 3comprehensive analyses (total) 8 7 13Obviously, compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill approach is suitable for handl<strong>in</strong>g J<strong>in</strong>gshan's<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> with pretty high credits compar<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two <strong>in</strong> this <strong>study</strong>stage. That is also identical with <strong>the</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan's<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. So, to reconstruct sanitary landfill on <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al crudedump<strong>in</strong>g place and <strong>in</strong>stall biogas <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant are prelim<strong>in</strong>arily suggested tobe applied <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan Municipality based on <strong>the</strong> current studies.Modem technology and equipment toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>waste</strong> disposal know-how areneeded to meet <strong>the</strong> demands <strong>of</strong> proper <strong>waste</strong> disposal. Waste disposal is not just aquestion <strong>of</strong> technology, hut also <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated program <strong>in</strong>c1ud<strong>in</strong>g knowledgedissem<strong>in</strong>ation, good cooperation between <strong>municipal</strong>ityand citizens. And <strong>the</strong>re is along way to go <strong>in</strong> order to reach practice <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated program, for stakeholders haveto take time to approve and improve <strong>the</strong> program and coord<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> relationship. Andalso <strong>the</strong> improvements are c1osely relied on <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> technological andeconomic development. So, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g chapter, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach forJ<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> will be discussed based on differentduration.


Page 348. SUGGESTIONS - INTEGRATED APPROACH TOADDRESS PROBLEMS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTEMANAGEMENT IN JINGSHANThe <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach program for J<strong>in</strong>gshan's, <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong><strong>in</strong>c1udes:source reduction, sort<strong>in</strong>g at source, educat<strong>in</strong>g residents, and <strong>waste</strong> treatmenttechnologies based on current, short-term and long-term. For <strong>the</strong> time schedule, <strong>the</strong>suggestion is <strong>the</strong> current solution might be carried out as soon as possible byJ<strong>in</strong>gshan's Municipality <strong>in</strong> order to shift crude dump<strong>in</strong>g situation with <strong>the</strong> least. Theshort term solution could be carried out <strong>in</strong> two years later because it takes time fordo<strong>in</strong>g feasibility studies and chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> deal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> habits <strong>of</strong> residents. The longterm solution might be implemented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next 10, even 20 years depend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong>degree <strong>of</strong> environmental education <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan's residents and <strong>the</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong>environmental restrictions and economic <strong>in</strong>centives.8.1 Current SolutionSource reductionSource reduction is on <strong>the</strong> top level <strong>in</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> due tosolv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> problems at <strong>the</strong> source. It will save <strong>the</strong> raw material and subsequently<strong>waste</strong> treatment procedure, and also <strong>the</strong> negative effects produced by <strong>waste</strong>. Sourcereduction can be approached by manufacturers with m<strong>in</strong>imum packag<strong>in</strong>g volume orby citizens through selective buy<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> reuse <strong>of</strong> products and materials.(USEPA,1995) So, <strong>the</strong> first item <strong>in</strong> educat<strong>in</strong>g J<strong>in</strong>gshan residents can be to reduce <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>waste</strong>generation.The beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g at source:Sort<strong>in</strong>g at source can be started from batteries and mercury tubes which have alreadybeen concemed by some residents with environmental awareness. The first step mightbe spread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> word to citizens through mass media to <strong>in</strong>form <strong>the</strong> public <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> newprogram, how it would work, and when it would start. To prepare news releases forJ<strong>in</strong>gshan newsletter, and make a videotape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program us<strong>in</strong>g local talent that is<strong>the</strong>n shown on <strong>the</strong> city public access TV channel. Telephone hot l<strong>in</strong>e maybe good wayto spread <strong>the</strong> program if <strong>the</strong> speakers are well tra<strong>in</strong>ed about <strong>the</strong> subject and areavailable to any citizen who is <strong>in</strong>terested.Special conta<strong>in</strong>ers can be prepared for batteries and mercury tubes with specific signs<strong>in</strong> residential areas, <strong>of</strong>fice areas and some public areas such as restaurants, hospitals,department stores. The most important is to be careful <strong>in</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g care <strong>of</strong> mercury tubesso that <strong>the</strong>se are not broken. After collection, <strong>the</strong> used batteries and mercury can be


Page 35carried to <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g plants which are able to treat <strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>waste</strong> conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gcadmium or mercury.To built sanitary landfill:First <strong>of</strong> all, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan should be replaced by sanitary landfill before<strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant built. There are four steps <strong>in</strong>volved accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>experiences <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> experts <strong>in</strong> Tyrens Infrakonsult AB, <strong>the</strong>se are:1. Cap <strong>the</strong> filled-up-part to make it get as small amount <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong> as possible by putt<strong>in</strong>gc1aycover on it.2. Make <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g-part as small as possible just enough for garbage truckdumpl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to avoid ra<strong>in</strong> water and bad smel!.3. Water pro<strong>of</strong> construction should be done <strong>in</strong> un-fill<strong>in</strong>g-part by putt<strong>in</strong>g 10-20cmsand layer and 1.0 orl.Smm HD (High Density) plastic material on its bottom.4. Leachate collection system and gas pipes should be <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong> this landfill.Moreover, <strong>the</strong> necessary equipment for sanitary landfill such as compactors should beavailable <strong>in</strong> place.Prepar<strong>in</strong>g work for biogas <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant:The plan <strong>of</strong> biogas <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant is better to be done <strong>in</strong> staged. The <strong>in</strong>itialsteps are after separation <strong>of</strong> organic <strong>waste</strong>. These <strong>in</strong>c1udes to tell residents what isorganic <strong>waste</strong> and how to sort respectively at household and commercial sector.Feasibility studies for <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant can be done at this stage. F<strong>in</strong>ancialsources both self-f<strong>in</strong>ance and o<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial support could also be prepared.Key problems which will be solved through carry<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> current solution:In <strong>the</strong> current solution, some <strong>of</strong>hazardous <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>waste</strong> problems such as batteriesand mercury tubes are supposed to be solved. The sort<strong>in</strong>g concept will be plit <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>m<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> residents with a s<strong>of</strong>t start<strong>in</strong>g. The very important work <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g biogasplant, feasibility studies, will be done, which will guide <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r steps.8.2 Short-term SolutionSort<strong>in</strong>g organic <strong>waste</strong>The next step <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g is to separate <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong>to two fractions <strong>of</strong> organic <strong>waste</strong>and <strong>in</strong>organic <strong>waste</strong>. Organic <strong>waste</strong> which <strong>in</strong>c1udes household kitchen <strong>waste</strong> andrestaurant food <strong>waste</strong>. Inorganic <strong>waste</strong> and <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> are sent tolandfill. And <strong>the</strong> organic <strong>waste</strong> would be <strong>the</strong> raw material for <strong>the</strong> biogas <strong>waste</strong>treatment plant.In order to promote <strong>waste</strong> separation, some economic <strong>in</strong>centive and local restrictionsare suggested to be applied toge<strong>the</strong>r with environmental education. For <strong>in</strong>stance, free<strong>of</strong> charge for sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> two sectors: organic <strong>waste</strong> and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, o<strong>the</strong>rwise, <strong>the</strong>


Page 36extra fee for sort<strong>in</strong>g will be added. Commercial generators pay <strong>the</strong> fees associatedwith <strong>the</strong> collection and disposal. For <strong>the</strong> residents, payment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> collection anddisposal <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong>s is accomplished through <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> bags.J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>municipal</strong>ity might follow <strong>the</strong> USEPA's PAYT (Pay as you throw) program.The residents under this program are asked to pay for each conta<strong>in</strong>er <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>the</strong>ygenerate. It gives <strong>the</strong>m an <strong>in</strong>centive to reduce <strong>waste</strong>, and it can be very effectivethrough <strong>the</strong> practices <strong>in</strong> SOfie American communities. (Janice L. Canterbury &Gordon Hui, 1999)Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>study</strong> visit<strong>in</strong>g to Kristianstad Biogas Waste Treatment Plant, <strong>the</strong> paperbags made by special material <strong>in</strong> order to be easily shredded by shredder are preferredto be used to conta<strong>in</strong> organic <strong>waste</strong>. The paper bag could be help to keep organic<strong>waste</strong> dry and slow down <strong>the</strong> natural decompos<strong>in</strong>g procedure. The plastic bag can beused to plit <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>waste</strong>. In order to lessen <strong>the</strong> burden on residents, <strong>the</strong> stores suchas grocery, drog and convenience stores might be set up a program <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>ywould sell <strong>the</strong> both above plastic and paper bags without pr<strong>of</strong>it.Install<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> treatment plantIf feasibility studies show us <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stallation <strong>of</strong> biogas <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant is aproper choice for J<strong>in</strong>gshan, <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g work should be to design <strong>the</strong> plant,construction, <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g and choos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relevant equipment, tra<strong>in</strong> workers and soon.Key problems which will be solved through carry<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> short-term solution:Organic <strong>waste</strong> contributes 65% <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> might be mostlyseparated and treated. Except <strong>the</strong> organic fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>, <strong>the</strong>organic <strong>waste</strong> <strong>of</strong> local food <strong>in</strong>dustry and farms could be carried to <strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>g<strong>waste</strong> treatment plant as a good material source.I8.3 Long-term SolutionHigher Degree <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> like <strong>in</strong>dustrial countriesFor <strong>the</strong> long-term solution, higher degree sort<strong>in</strong>g can be suggested to carry out <strong>in</strong>J<strong>in</strong>gshan. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> from different sectors suchas household, street and commercial are different, especially <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> paper andbrick and so on, for <strong>in</strong>stance, paper <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice area should be much more thanthat <strong>in</strong> street garbage. And street garbage might be conta<strong>in</strong> more brick, tile, and dustthan that <strong>in</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>of</strong> household and commercial sectors. So this three sectors' <strong>waste</strong> isstrongly suggested to be separated <strong>in</strong> order to simplify <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g treatment.


Page 37Specific conta<strong>in</strong>ers for different <strong>waste</strong> such as organic <strong>waste</strong>, paper, plastic, glass,metal, batteries, mercury tubes and o<strong>the</strong>rs. The o<strong>the</strong>r hazardous <strong>waste</strong> like chemicalscan be collected <strong>in</strong> specific time dur<strong>in</strong>g Olle year. With <strong>the</strong> previous sort<strong>in</strong>gexperiences and <strong>the</strong> successful results <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong>ity deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong>, if <strong>the</strong>reare, residents perhaps will separate <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>waste</strong> obey<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan<strong>municipal</strong>ity.To apply <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration, compost & landfill approach <strong>in</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> regionAs mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> analyses and results charter, <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g,compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfill can be a very good approach. Unfortunately, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>economic affordability and <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan, it can not be applied <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan butthat can be applied <strong>in</strong> a region where J<strong>in</strong>gshan located as a long-term solution.Inc<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g plant could be <strong>in</strong>stalled for <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> Wuhan as suggested early <strong>in</strong> thispaper, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> combustible <strong>waste</strong> <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan is likely to be treated <strong>the</strong>re.Capp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> full filled-up landfillWhen this landfill is fully filled-up, <strong>the</strong> whole capp<strong>in</strong>g and gas collection system arebetter done because anaerobic degradation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> capped landfilloccurs over 3-10 year period (Jackson & Jackson, 1996). Three layers are needed <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> capp<strong>in</strong>g procedure, <strong>the</strong> first layer is clay or HD plastic material, <strong>the</strong> second Olleisaround 1m soil and <strong>the</strong> last layer is grass and trees accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> practices <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong><strong>management</strong> experts <strong>in</strong> Tyrens Infrakonsult AB. Ma<strong>in</strong>ly CH4 and COz (carbondioxide) are collected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas collection system. The garbage mounta<strong>in</strong> might beconsidered to restructured as city park <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan like some western countries did.Key problems which will be solved through carry<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> long-term solution:To m<strong>in</strong>imize <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> to landfill, only <strong>the</strong> actual <strong>waste</strong>, non-recyclableand non-combustible <strong>waste</strong>s, would be disposed <strong>in</strong> sanitary landfill. The old landfillwill be become a good place for recreation.As described earlier, <strong>the</strong> three ma<strong>in</strong> problems <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> are<strong>the</strong> more and more <strong>waste</strong> generated, no any separation on <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> andno any <strong>waste</strong> treatment facilityand <strong>the</strong>ir relevant negatively environmental effects. If<strong>the</strong> three (time-bas ed) solutions are completely carried out, <strong>the</strong> later two problemsmight be solved or partly solved. The problem <strong>of</strong> more and more <strong>waste</strong> generated ismostly relied on <strong>the</strong> urban population <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan, but that can be improve somehowby source reduction.


Page 389. DISCUSSIONS AND REFLECTIONSIn this charter, <strong>the</strong> obstac1es and opportunities for carry<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegratedapproach are discussed. Also, some associated questions with <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong><strong>management</strong> are thought over aga<strong>in</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>the</strong>sis work. These questions areaddressed to betteTunderstand <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis.9.1 The Obstacles and OpportunitiesShortage <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ance to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>the</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant and sort<strong>in</strong>g<strong>waste</strong> can be Olle<strong>of</strong> big obstac1es<strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach. But dueto <strong>the</strong> rapid economic growth rate, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational fund<strong>in</strong>g is enormously flow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a. So, it is not very difficult to borrow <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational f<strong>in</strong>ance, especially for <strong>the</strong>loan <strong>of</strong> import<strong>in</strong>g equipment.Lack <strong>of</strong> environmental awareness is Olle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r big obstac1es. The <strong>waste</strong><strong>management</strong> and sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> education difficult to be carry out at <strong>the</strong> verybeg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. So, <strong>the</strong> <strong>municipal</strong>ity has to persist, especially when no obvious resultwould be expected dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial stages. Management should be competent; ifpeople see <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong> separated by <strong>the</strong>m to be mixed <strong>in</strong> some transfer stations orlandfill, <strong>the</strong>n previous efforts will be lost and <strong>the</strong> confidence <strong>of</strong> some residents will bediscouraged, and <strong>municipal</strong>ity willlose credit with<strong>in</strong> residents and also make difficultto implement aga<strong>in</strong>. Step by step, let people see <strong>the</strong> achievement, even smallachievement. In addition, residents <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan relatively rely on <strong>the</strong> localgovemment, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> education, economic <strong>in</strong>centives andenvironmental restrictions perhaps can be help to sort <strong>waste</strong> and built <strong>the</strong>environmental concerns with<strong>in</strong> residents.Although, Ch<strong>in</strong>a is fac<strong>in</strong>g a lot <strong>of</strong> problems both on economy and environment, <strong>the</strong>rapid potential <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a likely gives us <strong>the</strong> enough space <strong>of</strong>imag<strong>in</strong>ation for optimal future, this is also suitable for J<strong>in</strong>gshan <strong>case</strong>.9.2 Lessons from <strong>the</strong> Municipal Sewerage Water Treatment SystemAt present, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cities have adopted <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustri al countriesby us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same sewerage water collection system to collection whole <strong>municipal</strong>sewer <strong>in</strong>c1ud<strong>in</strong>g storm water, gray water and black water, each city has at least Olle<strong>waste</strong> water treatment plant, just because <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g sewerage water collectionsystem mixed storm, gray and black <strong>waste</strong>, <strong>the</strong> work load <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> water treatmentplant is added up to a couple <strong>of</strong> times or more than ten times sometimes. And <strong>the</strong>function <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> water treatment plant is only to separate <strong>the</strong> black water out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>


Page 39rest <strong>of</strong> sewerage water, which means <strong>the</strong> dean standard <strong>of</strong>water<strong>waste</strong> water treatment plant is just reach <strong>the</strong> gray water's.after be<strong>in</strong>g treated <strong>in</strong>Therefore, if Ch<strong>in</strong>a had separately designed and built <strong>the</strong> collection systemspecifically for storm water, gray water and black water, <strong>the</strong> both <strong>in</strong>vestment andoperation costs <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong> water treatment would have been remarkable saved. But now,it seems too late to change <strong>the</strong> all system, <strong>the</strong> whole follow<strong>in</strong>g solutions have to basedon <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g system. From this lesson, Olle<strong>in</strong>spiration could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed that is<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> treatment should not repeat <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>treatment. Do not to mix <strong>the</strong> all k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> or to f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> solution for <strong>the</strong> mixed<strong>waste</strong>! The wise choices are to separate <strong>waste</strong> at source and f<strong>in</strong>d solutions for everyspecific <strong>waste</strong>. These would avoid leav<strong>in</strong>g countless troubles for future generations.9.3 The Significant Mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Energy Recover <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>aIn Ch<strong>in</strong>a, coal rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant position <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary energy supply andconsumption <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Coal consumption accounted for approximate 70% <strong>of</strong> totalenergy consumption <strong>in</strong> 1996 (Ch<strong>in</strong>a Statistical Yearbook, 1997). So, energy recoverfrom <strong>waste</strong> does not only mean to save natural resource but to replace coal by us<strong>in</strong>gbiogas as energy source and to avoid <strong>the</strong> coal relevant environmental pollution,especially greenhouse effect produced by COz.10. CONCLUSIONSThe <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> situation <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan is critical. To reconstructcrude dump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to sanitary landfill and to <strong>in</strong>stall biogas <strong>waste</strong> treatment plant mightbe suitable technical solutions for J<strong>in</strong>gshan based on this prelim<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>study</strong>. Thesuggested <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach is necessary and should be implemented step by step.Although, <strong>the</strong> obstades <strong>of</strong> shortages <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ance and environmental awareness areexist<strong>in</strong>g, this approach still have chance to be carried out <strong>in</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan.


Page 40APPENDIX A: LIST OF FIGURESFigure l. The Growth <strong>of</strong> GNP, Urban Population & Municipal Solid Waste <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a 12Figure 2. Drop-<strong>of</strong>f Spot <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan Municipal Solid Waste (Small Wooden House) 17Figure 3. The Garbage Conta<strong>in</strong>ers <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>gshan 18Figure 4. The Sealed Collection Vehicle (Blue and WhiteSealed Truck)for J<strong>in</strong>gshan 's Municipal SolidWaste 18Figure 5. The Garbage Transform Stationfor J<strong>in</strong>gshan 's Municipal Solid Waste 19Figure 6. Causal Loop Diagram <strong>of</strong>Crude Dump<strong>in</strong>g 23Figure 7. Causal Loop Diagram <strong>of</strong>Sanitary Landfill 25Figure 8. Causal Loop Diagram <strong>of</strong>Inc<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & Landfill 26Figure9. CausalLoopDiagram<strong>of</strong> Compost<strong>in</strong>g& Landfill 27APPENDIX B: LIST OF TAB LESTable l. Municipal Solid Waste CompositionTable 2. Investment <strong>of</strong> Plant and Equipment -Table 3. The Credits <strong>of</strong> Different Approaches133033APPENDIX C: CONCEPT DEFINITIONSCapp<strong>in</strong>g - Structure and construct on full fill-up landfills with m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> flow <strong>of</strong>surface and uncontrolled escape for gas.Commercial sector - Inc1udes schooIs, hospitals, retail establishments, hotels, andrestaurants.Compost - Discarded organic material that has been processed <strong>in</strong>to a soil-like materialused as a soil amendment or mu1ch.Disposal - Landfill<strong>in</strong>g or combust<strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> recyc1<strong>in</strong>gor compost<strong>in</strong>g it.


Page 41Household hazardous <strong>waste</strong> - Products conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g hazardous substances that are usedand disposed <strong>of</strong> by <strong>in</strong>dividuals, not <strong>in</strong>dustrial consumers. These produces <strong>in</strong>c1ude,hutare not limited to, certa<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> pa<strong>in</strong>ts, solvents, batteries, and pesticides.Integrated <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong> - The complementary lise <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> practices tohandle <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> safely and effectively. Integrated <strong>waste</strong> <strong>management</strong>techniques <strong>in</strong>c1ude source reduction, recyc1<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong>c1ud<strong>in</strong>g compost<strong>in</strong>g), combustion,and landfill<strong>in</strong>g.Landfill<strong>in</strong>g - The disposal <strong>of</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> at eng<strong>in</strong>eered facilities <strong>in</strong> a series <strong>of</strong>compacted layers on land that is covered with soil daily. Fill areas are carefullyprepared to prevent nuisances or public health hazards, and c1ay and / or syn<strong>the</strong>ticl<strong>in</strong>ers are used to prevent releases to ground <strong>waste</strong>r.Leachate - Liquid that has come <strong>in</strong>ta contact with or percolated through <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>and may conta<strong>in</strong> extracted, dissolved or suspended materials.Municipal <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> - Waste generated <strong>in</strong> households, commercial establishments,<strong>in</strong>stitutions, and bus<strong>in</strong>esses. It <strong>in</strong>c1udes used paper, discarded cans and bottles, foodscraps, yard and street garbage, and o<strong>the</strong>r items. Industrial process <strong>waste</strong>s, agricultural<strong>waste</strong>s, m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>waste</strong>s and sewage sludge are not <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>.Recyclables - Products or materials that can be collected, separated, and processed tobe used as raw materials <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> manufacture <strong>of</strong> new products. The recyc1able optionshould be available to <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> residents through curbside recyc1<strong>in</strong>gprogramsor fixed recyc1<strong>in</strong>gcenters.Sanitary landfiII - A <strong>waste</strong> disposal site designed and constructed to accommodate<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> whilst protect<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st hazards to <strong>the</strong> environment and publichealth and safety from <strong>the</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. As a standard sanitary landfill should has a leachatecollection and treatment system and adequate compaction, us<strong>in</strong>g daily cover and gascontroi system.Source reduction (Waste prevention) - The design, manufacture, purchase, or lise <strong>of</strong>materials to reduce <strong>the</strong> amount and/or toxicity <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. Source reduction techniques<strong>in</strong>c1ude reus<strong>in</strong>g items, m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> lise <strong>of</strong> products that conta<strong>in</strong> hazardouscompounds, us<strong>in</strong>g only what is needed, extend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> useful life <strong>of</strong> a product, andreduc<strong>in</strong>g unneeded packag<strong>in</strong>g.Waste generated - Sum <strong>of</strong><strong>waste</strong> recovered and <strong>waste</strong> disposed <strong>of</strong>.Sources: Janice L. Canterbury, Lessons Learned About Unit Pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> MunicipalSolid Waste, Us. EPA Office <strong>of</strong> Solid Waste


Page 42REFERENCESBooks & JournalsBridgwater A. V. & Lideren, K. (1981) Household Waste Management <strong>in</strong> Europe,Van Nostrand Re<strong>in</strong>hold Ca. Ltd, Great Brita<strong>in</strong>. pp.9,10.Ch<strong>in</strong>a Environment Yearbook 1998, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Environmental Yearbook Publish<strong>in</strong>gHouse, Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>aCh<strong>in</strong>a's Agenda 21, (1994) Ch<strong>in</strong>a Environmental Science Press, Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.Ch<strong>in</strong>a SEPA & Swedish M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Environment, (1999) Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> S<strong>in</strong>o-Swedish Sem<strong>in</strong>ar on <strong>the</strong> Driv<strong>in</strong>g Forces <strong>of</strong> Environmental Projection, Published byCh<strong>in</strong>aSEPA.Ch<strong>in</strong>a Statistical Yearbook 1997, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Statistical Publish<strong>in</strong>g House, Beij<strong>in</strong>g,Ch<strong>in</strong>a.Environmental Advisory Council, (1992) Eco-Cyc1es, The Basis <strong>of</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>ableUrban Development, Norstedts Tryckeri AB, Stockholm, Sweden.Gary Gardner, (1997) Recyc1<strong>in</strong>g Organic Waste: From Urban Pollutant flo FarmResource, Worldwatch Institute, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton DC, USA.Jackson & Jackson, (1996) Environmental Science, Longman Group Limited,England. pp: 329-331Janice L. Canterbury, (1999)Lessons Learned About Unit Pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> MunicipalSolid Waste, u.S. EPA Office <strong>of</strong> Solid Waste.Janice L. Canterbury & Gordon Hui, (1999) Rate Structure Design - Sett<strong>in</strong>g ratesfor a Pay-As-Y00-Throw Program, u.S. EPA Office <strong>of</strong> Solid Waste.J. Paul Henderson, (January, 1997) Anaerobic Digestion <strong>in</strong> Rural Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Biocyc1e(periodical), 419 state Avenue, Emmaus, PA18049. P: 79


Page 43J. Paul Henderson & Terrill J. Chang, (May, 1996) Solid Waste ManagementPractices <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, MSW Solutions Vancouver. Canada. pr: 5-9Leif Wannholt, (1998) Biological Treatment <strong>of</strong> Domestic Waste <strong>in</strong> Closed Plants <strong>in</strong>Europe - Plant Visit Reports, Daleke Grafiska AB, Sweden.Lester R. Brown & o<strong>the</strong>rs, (1997) State <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> World 1997, Earthscan PublicationsLtd. UK.p:46Roberts N. & o<strong>the</strong>rs, given by System Analysis Course, Introduction to ComputerSimulation - A System Dynamics Model<strong>in</strong>g Approach, Productivity Press, Portland,Oregon. pr: 33-38SEP A (State Environmental Protection Adm<strong>in</strong>istration), (1998) EnvironmentalPollution ControI and Measures <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Environmental Science Publish<strong>in</strong>gHouse, Beij<strong>in</strong>g.Swedish M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Environment, (1997) From Environmental Protection toSusta<strong>in</strong>able Development,Ljunglöfs Offset AB, Stockholm, Sweden.Swedish M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Environment, (1998) The Environmental Code, this documentis produced by <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Environment.Swedish Trade Council, (1999) Waste Management, Graphium Norstedts Tryckeri,Stockholm, Sweden.Sundberg, J. (1993) Generic Modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Integreted Material Flows and EnergySystems, Peproservice, Chalmers bibliotek, Götebborg, Sweden.The World Bank, (1997) Clear Water, Blue Skies, Manufactured <strong>in</strong> USA.VS EPA. (1995 update), Characterisation <strong>of</strong>MSW <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton DCVS EPA, (1995) Decision Maker's Guide to Solid Waste Management, Volume II,(EPA 530-R-95-023),Wash<strong>in</strong>gton DCVaclav Smil (1993) Ch<strong>in</strong>a' s environmental Crisis, M. E. Sharpe, Inc. New York,UAS.Proiect Reports & Documents:Beij<strong>in</strong>g General Municipal Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Design & Research Institute, Dec, 1997,Urban Solid Waste Sanitary Landfill Sites, B-2 South Yuetan Street, Beij<strong>in</strong>g.


Page 44J<strong>in</strong>gshan City Plann<strong>in</strong>g, 1997, given by J<strong>in</strong>gshan's MunicipalityJ<strong>in</strong>gshan government paper, No. 23, 1999, given by J<strong>in</strong>gshan's MunicipalityKroger AB, (1998) Description <strong>of</strong> Kristianstad Biogas Plant, Sweden, Gladsaxevej363, DK-2860, Soborg, Denmark.Tyrens Infrakonsolt AB, Collection and Transportation <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> and GeneralClean<strong>in</strong>g works <strong>of</strong> Grand ABU DHABI City and Attached Areas and WesternRegion, Satrahodjen 114A, S-806 36, Govle Sweden.Tyrens Infrakonsolt AB, (1999) Feasibility Study <strong>of</strong> Waste Management WesternPart <strong>of</strong> Estonia, Box 27, S-291 21, Kristianstad, Sweden.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!