09.07.2015 Views

a case study of municipal solid waste management in the ... - lumes

a case study of municipal solid waste management in the ... - lumes

a case study of municipal solid waste management in the ... - lumes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page 28difference between <strong>the</strong> two sanitary landfill parts <strong>in</strong> this compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfillapproach and <strong>the</strong> previous <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill approach. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>of</strong>sanitary landfill <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two approaches are actually different due to different sharesbetween organic <strong>waste</strong> and combustible <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>. In cage <strong>of</strong>J<strong>in</strong>gshan's <strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong>, <strong>the</strong> portion <strong>of</strong> organic <strong>waste</strong> <strong>in</strong> total <strong>waste</strong> is greaterthan combustible <strong>waste</strong>'s. The loss <strong>of</strong> potential energy and its potential economicvalue is only partly avoided because some combustible <strong>waste</strong> can not be reused toproduce electricity as <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g process.As shown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> right hand part <strong>of</strong> loop, <strong>the</strong> benefits both ITom energy and nutritionrecoveries could be ga<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this approach. There are a total four re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loopswith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> right hand part have been described as folIows:. <strong>the</strong> first re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loop consists <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth,<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generat ed, <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g, organic <strong>waste</strong>, biogas &compost, and economic benefits ITom sell<strong>in</strong>g biogas. <strong>the</strong> second re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loop consists <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth,<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> generated, <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g, organic <strong>waste</strong>, biogas &compost, and economic benefits ITom sell<strong>in</strong>g compost. <strong>the</strong> third re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loop consists <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth,<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> biogas plant, biogas & compost, and economic benefits ITom sell<strong>in</strong>gcompost. <strong>the</strong> fourth re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g loop consists <strong>of</strong> urban population & economic growth,<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> biogas plant, biogas & compost, and economic benefits ITom sell<strong>in</strong>gcompost<strong>in</strong>g biogas7.2.5 Inc<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, Compos t<strong>in</strong>g & LandfiIIThis approach is reorganized by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g & landfill and compost<strong>in</strong>g &landfill. Hence no causal loop diagram is shown aga<strong>in</strong>. In <strong>the</strong> compost<strong>in</strong>g & landfilldiagram, <strong>in</strong>organic <strong>waste</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> combustible <strong>waste</strong> such as paper, textile, plasticand so on. The combustible <strong>waste</strong> could be sorted out for <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration, and <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong>it goes to landfill. In this approach, <strong>the</strong>re are two k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g costs, Olle fororganic <strong>waste</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g, ano<strong>the</strong>r for combustible <strong>waste</strong> sort<strong>in</strong>g. Only <strong>the</strong> real <strong>waste</strong> isrut <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> landfill after recyclables have separated aiready. Hence <strong>waste</strong> reduction issignificant compar<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r approaches.7.2.6 Summary <strong>of</strong> Discussion <strong>of</strong> ApproachesFrom <strong>the</strong> system analysis perspective, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g is ranked on <strong>the</strong> bortom <strong>of</strong> all<strong>municipal</strong> <strong>solid</strong> <strong>waste</strong> methods which are discussed <strong>in</strong> this <strong>the</strong>sis because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> allloops are balanc<strong>in</strong>g and with <strong>the</strong> negative effects on <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> urban andeconomy. So, crude dump<strong>in</strong>g should not be <strong>in</strong> lise cont<strong>in</strong>uously.The four approaches can be considered. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erat<strong>in</strong>g, compost<strong>in</strong>g& landfill approach is a best approach because it will ga<strong>in</strong> economic benefitsITom

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!