A Rapid Assessment of Kili Island - Sea Grant College Program
A Rapid Assessment of Kili Island - Sea Grant College Program
A Rapid Assessment of Kili Island - Sea Grant College Program
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 1. A generalized comparison <strong>of</strong> the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kili</strong> and Jabat to contemporary and future impacts <strong>of</strong> storm and sea-level risedriven flooding.ExposureSensitivityAdaptivecapacityVulnerabilityKILIModerate:Low-lying island with existing swampwhich regularly receives salt water input.Moderate wave energy environment.Infrequent storms.Moderate:Low dependence on locally grown food,inundation damage to crops is not a criticalfood security issue. Electrical supplysystem has resulted in wide spread uptake<strong>of</strong> electrical appliances, air conditioningetc, which are highly sensitive to saltwater.Likewise trucks, cars, heavy equipment arehighly sensitive to saltwater exposure. Highpopulation density.Moderate-high:Access to heavy equipment to aid inresponse. Runway for emergency relief.Large population. Greater financialresources.High:Highly exposed to inundation hazardswhich are expected to increase in frequencyand magnitude. A number <strong>of</strong> highlysensitive assets which can be severelyimpacted by inundation. Higher level <strong>of</strong>adaptive capacity to mitigate impacts,respond and adapt.JABATModerate:Low-lying island, although higher than<strong>Kili</strong>. Moderate wave energy environment,slightly more energetic than <strong>Kili</strong>. Infrequentstorms.Moderate:Moderate dependence on locally grownfood, so crop damage has an impact on foodsecurity. Little use <strong>of</strong> electricity so impactson households <strong>of</strong> minor inundation areminimal. Low population density.Low:Low population with low capacity torespond to inundation events. Difficultlocation to access and provide relief.Moderate:Less exposed, less sensitive, lower adaptivecapacity• There is a need for improved forecasting <strong>of</strong> inundation events throughout RMI, particularlyin the outer-islands. The community should have received advanced notice <strong>of</strong> the high likelihood<strong>of</strong> inundation during this event. ENSO guidance is issued quarterly 10 and distributed to theRMI government and its agencies. This guidance predicted higher than normal water levelsover the 2010/2011 winter. The elevated tide levels were predicted and wave models wouldhave provided a forecast <strong>of</strong> the arrival <strong>of</strong> long period waves from the north-northwest. If thecommunity was adequately warned simple preparations for the event including moving electricalequipment above likely flood level and ensuring adequate levels <strong>of</strong> food and drinking waterwere available could have been made in anticipation. <strong>Kili</strong> has access to cellular and internetbasedtelecommunication technology not generally available to other outer-islands. As such, <strong>Kili</strong>should be amongst the most well informed communities when it comes to receiving weatherinformation and warnings. However, at the time <strong>of</strong> the October 2011 assessment communicationswere unreliable. As such, the purchase <strong>of</strong> satellite telephone should be considered as temporary13