11.07.2015 Views

A Rapid Assessment of Kili Island - Sea Grant College Program

A Rapid Assessment of Kili Island - Sea Grant College Program

A Rapid Assessment of Kili Island - Sea Grant College Program

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 1. A generalized comparison <strong>of</strong> the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kili</strong> and Jabat to contemporary and future impacts <strong>of</strong> storm and sea-level risedriven flooding.ExposureSensitivityAdaptivecapacityVulnerabilityKILIModerate:Low-lying island with existing swampwhich regularly receives salt water input.Moderate wave energy environment.Infrequent storms.Moderate:Low dependence on locally grown food,inundation damage to crops is not a criticalfood security issue. Electrical supplysystem has resulted in wide spread uptake<strong>of</strong> electrical appliances, air conditioningetc, which are highly sensitive to saltwater.Likewise trucks, cars, heavy equipment arehighly sensitive to saltwater exposure. Highpopulation density.Moderate-high:Access to heavy equipment to aid inresponse. Runway for emergency relief.Large population. Greater financialresources.High:Highly exposed to inundation hazardswhich are expected to increase in frequencyand magnitude. A number <strong>of</strong> highlysensitive assets which can be severelyimpacted by inundation. Higher level <strong>of</strong>adaptive capacity to mitigate impacts,respond and adapt.JABATModerate:Low-lying island, although higher than<strong>Kili</strong>. Moderate wave energy environment,slightly more energetic than <strong>Kili</strong>. Infrequentstorms.Moderate:Moderate dependence on locally grownfood, so crop damage has an impact on foodsecurity. Little use <strong>of</strong> electricity so impactson households <strong>of</strong> minor inundation areminimal. Low population density.Low:Low population with low capacity torespond to inundation events. Difficultlocation to access and provide relief.Moderate:Less exposed, less sensitive, lower adaptivecapacity• There is a need for improved forecasting <strong>of</strong> inundation events throughout RMI, particularlyin the outer-islands. The community should have received advanced notice <strong>of</strong> the high likelihood<strong>of</strong> inundation during this event. ENSO guidance is issued quarterly 10 and distributed to theRMI government and its agencies. This guidance predicted higher than normal water levelsover the 2010/2011 winter. The elevated tide levels were predicted and wave models wouldhave provided a forecast <strong>of</strong> the arrival <strong>of</strong> long period waves from the north-northwest. If thecommunity was adequately warned simple preparations for the event including moving electricalequipment above likely flood level and ensuring adequate levels <strong>of</strong> food and drinking waterwere available could have been made in anticipation. <strong>Kili</strong> has access to cellular and internetbasedtelecommunication technology not generally available to other outer-islands. As such, <strong>Kili</strong>should be amongst the most well informed communities when it comes to receiving weatherinformation and warnings. However, at the time <strong>of</strong> the October 2011 assessment communicationswere unreliable. As such, the purchase <strong>of</strong> satellite telephone should be considered as temporary13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!