11.07.2015 Views

COM-1, pages 179-226 - ICOET

COM-1, pages 179-226 - ICOET

COM-1, pages 179-226 - ICOET

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 1. Approximate location of game-proof fencing and underpasses (milepost = MP) alongUS 30 in Nugget Canyon, Wyoming.Our study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the newly constructed underpasses and associated fencing.Specifically, we aimed to: 1) quantify how many mule deer (and other wildlife) used the underpasses; 2) identifytemporal patterns of mule deer movements; 3) evaluate deer-vehicle collisions before underpass construction (1990-2000), after construction of one underpass (2002-2007), and after construction of six additional underpasses (2009-2010). This information was intended to improve the ability of wildlife and transportation agencies to sustain migratoryungulate populations and maintain public safety on roadways.METHODSWe used digital photos from infrared Reconyx cameras to calculate the number of deer that used each underpass.Three cameras were mounted in each of the seven underpasses, including one at the entrance, one in the middle, andone at the exit (Fig. 2). This camera configuration allowed us to count the number of deer that approached and/orpassed through the underpass from either direction. The underpasses were equipped with cameras from December 16,2008 through May 31, 2010. This time period included the later part of the fall 2008 migration, and the entire spring2009, fall 2009, and spring 2010 migrations. We examined seasonal temporal patterns by plotting the number of deerthat passed through each structure each day, across the entire monitoring period. We examined the daily temporalpatterns by calculating the number of deer that moved through structures each hour of the day, for a 10-day samplingperiod that corresponded with the peak levels of use during fall and spring migrations.We used deer-vehicle collision data from WYDOT to assess how underpass and fence construction reduced deer-vehiclecollisions. We compared the number of deer-vehicle collisions in three time periods: 1) January 1, 1990 – October 1,2001, (141 months) prior to construction of the underpass at milepost 30.5, 2) October 1, 2001 – October 1, 2008, (82months) following construction of the underpass at milepost 30.5, and 3) October 1, 2008 – May 1, 2010, (19 months)following construction of six additional underpasses. To make comparisons between the three periods that differed intemporal length, we standardized the number of deer-vehicle collisions by the number of months in each period.Reducing Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions 209 <strong>ICOET</strong> 2011 Proceedings

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!