Part 2: Case Studies32
1. The Nabq Managed Resource Protected Area, South Sinai, Egyptian Red SeaThe Nabq Managed Resource Protected Area is a multiple-use management area that covers 47km of coast onthe east of the Sinai Peninsula in the Egyptian Red Sea. It has a total marine area of 122km 2 and also includes465km 2 of adjacent terrestrial habitats. It was established in 1992 by the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agencyand forms part of the larger network of five parks and protected areas of the Southern Sinai Protectorates: a totalarea of 8,085km 2 of land and 1,651km 2 of sea (Pearson and Shehata 1998). The area is characterised by welldevelopedfringing reefs running parallel to the coast and lagoons which are often dominated by seagrass beds.There are also four areas of mangrove (the most northerly in the Indian Ocean region). The local fishery isconducted by Bedouin who are semi-resident at two small coastal camps within the Nabq Protected Area. It is amulti-gear, multi-species fishery, employing mainly trammel nets and gill nets from the shore, with somehandline fishing. The area is protected from large-scale development, and destructive and unsustainable uses ofresources are not permitted. For example, destructive fishing techniques such as dynamite fishing and trawlingare banned throughout the protected area. This is a precautionary measure as these techniques have never beenused locally. There is also a spearfishing ban and minimum mesh size regulations on nets.Discussions with local fishers and community leaders built up local support for the management area, and a keydevelopment in community participation was the employment of local Bedouin as ‘Community Rangers’,involved in day-to-day management. Community support and involvement was well established by 1995 when anetwork of fully protected areas, in which all extractive uses are forbidden, was incorporated into themanagement plan. These areas were selected in close consultation with local fishers, and the process wasaccompanied by community education on ecology, conservation and management issues. Support forconservation was strong and built upon the Bedouin’s existing traditional conservation measures, for examplethe return of bycatch to the sea and a ban on cutting timber for fuel and building. Five no-take zones wereestablished in a network with fishing grounds interspersed between them. The total area designated as no-takewas approximately 17km of coastline, out of a total length of 47km. The smallest area covers less than 1.5km ofcoastline, and the largest over 3km.Using underwater visual census, fish abundance was estimated in 1995 when no-take reserves were established,then two years later in 1997 and again in 2000 (Galal et al. 2002). Abundance of the three main target fishfamilies was significantly greater overall after 5 years of protection (Figure 1). Of the species assessedindividually, five showed a clear increase in mean lengths over the 5 years of protection. These were theemperors (Lethrinidae) Lethrinus mahsena and Monotaxis grandoculis, and the groupers (Serranidae)Cephalopholis miniata (coral hind), Varioli louti (lyretail grouper) and Epinephelus tauvina (greasy grouper).Abundance of the following species increased with time protected: Lethrinus obsoletus (orange-stripe emperor),Lutjanus bohar (red snapper), Cephalopholis argus (peacock grouper), and Variola louti. Abundance ofCephalopholis hemistiktos (halfspotted hind) and Epinephelus fasciatus (blacktip grouper) increased from 1995to 2000, but dipped in 1997.Mean catch per unit effort (CPUE) from all fished sites combined increased between 1995 and 1997, but was notstatistically significant. In 2000, mean CPUE had increased further, and this time was significantly greater thanCPUE at the onset of protection in 1995 (see Figure 2). Overall the increase was from 0.79 kg net -1 h -1 to 1.31 kgnet -1 h -1 , a rise of 66%. When the CPUE for each of the nine fishing sites were assessed separately, seven hadsignificantly higher CPUE in 2000 than in 1995. The biggest increases in fish family biomass seen in thereserves were at the two sites which were most heavily fished prior to the closure of the reserves. The increasesin the length of fish were also most dramatic at sites which had been heavily exploited by hook and line fishing,rather than net fishing, presumably because line fishing selects for the larger individuals.There was no change in the number of fishers active in the area over the time period so the increase in CPUEalso suggests an increase in the total catch, despite the loss of fishing grounds to reserves. Overall the Nabq areawas not classed as overfished before the implementation of the marine reserves. The study indicates thatreserves can have benefits even in areas where a relatively small fraction of high value species are targeted,contrasting with intensively fished places like Apo Island in the Philippines or the Soufrière <strong>Marine</strong><strong>Management</strong> Area in St. Lucia (see other Case Studies).The management history of the Nabq <strong>Marine</strong> Protected Area may also have contributed to improvements in thefishery, and the increased abundance of key commercial families. The ban on damaging fishing methods that hasbeen in place in the protected area since 1992, and the use of traditional management techniques and theincreased awareness of environmental issues locally have all been important in the successful management of the33
- Page 1 and 2: The fishery effects ofmarine reserv
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsPart 1: Review1. Summary 62
- Page 5 and 6: Part 1: Review5
- Page 7 and 8: egan being published. Those studies
- Page 9 and 10: unprotected area (21.2cm vs 38.1cm)
- Page 11 and 12: species of snappers and grouper are
- Page 13 and 14: 6.1 What are the mechanisms involve
- Page 15: They concluded that reserves coveri
- Page 18 and 19: which there are decadal shifts in e
- Page 20 and 21: managed with reserves alone, while
- Page 22 and 23: However, in some areas fishers have
- Page 24 and 25: Literature citedAlder, J. (1996) Co
- Page 26 and 27: Fiske, S.J. (1992) Sociocultural as
- Page 28 and 29: Levine, A. (2002) Global partnershi
- Page 30 and 31: Roberts, C.M. and Hawkins, J.P. (20
- Page 34 and 35: Mean abundance of fish per count100
- Page 36 and 37: 2. Contrasting experiences from the
- Page 38 and 39: Russ and Alcala (1996) assessed cha
- Page 40 and 41: Key points• Very high reef fisher
- Page 42 and 43: 3. The effects of New Zealand marin
- Page 44 and 45: important species for recreational
- Page 46 and 47: Ballantine, W.J. (1991) Marine rese
- Page 48 and 49: experimental data obtained in the T
- Page 50 and 51: ReferencesAttwood, C.G. and Bennett
- Page 52 and 53: 5. Lobster fisheries management in
- Page 54 and 55: Rowe, S. and Feltham, G. (2000) Eas
- Page 56 and 57: fishers. At a meeting of fishers an
- Page 58 and 59: 7. Marine parks and other protected
- Page 60 and 61: 8. Community-based closed areas in
- Page 62 and 63: People are also seeing some species
- Page 64 and 65: 9. The Sambos Ecological Reserve, F
- Page 66 and 67: 10. The Nosy Atafana Marine Park, n
- Page 68 and 69: 11. Mombasa and Kisite Marine Parks
- Page 70 and 71: species that are mobile enough to d
- Page 72 and 73: Emerton and Tessema (2001) looked a
- Page 74 and 75: McClanahan, T.R. and Mangi, S. (200
- Page 76 and 77: Goodridge et al. (1997) collected b
- Page 78 and 79: offshore fishing with tourism, such
- Page 80 and 81: • The SMMA would have been improv
- Page 82 and 83:
species decreased in the second fou
- Page 84 and 85:
eserve in the form of increased cat
- Page 86 and 87:
15. Merritt Island National Wildlif
- Page 88 and 89:
Thousand Islands, St Lucie canal an
- Page 90:
is closed to scallop fishing. Ten y