Secure <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> are an important element <strong>of</strong> rural empowerment. Where <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> are weak ornonexistent, rural populations may be displaced or customary access and control over <strong>resource</strong>s may bechallenged by outside <strong>in</strong>terest groups. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, secure <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> that are protected by law canempower rural communities, ensur<strong>in</strong>g participation <strong>in</strong> critical decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g processes related to <strong>the</strong><strong>management</strong> <strong>of</strong> land and <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s, and o<strong>the</strong>r social political processes.Given <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g critical <strong>in</strong>centive for susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>management</strong> <strong>of</strong> landand <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s, and potential for subsistence livelihoods and <strong>in</strong>come generation as well as ruralempowerment, <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong>, what constitutes <strong>the</strong>se <strong>rights</strong>, and what makes for secure <strong>rights</strong>needs to be clearly understood. Conversely, a better understand<strong>in</strong>g is needed <strong>of</strong> how <strong>in</strong>secure, unclear, limitedor short-term <strong>rights</strong> to land and <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s provide dis<strong>in</strong>centives for susta<strong>in</strong>able use and <strong>management</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s. Indeed, failure to take <strong>in</strong>to consideration land and <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> at <strong>the</strong> outset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programmay <strong>in</strong>advertently elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong>dividual or collective <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong>, foster<strong>in</strong>g poverty, <strong>in</strong>equity, social<strong>in</strong>stability, or <strong>in</strong> some cases, conflict. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, failure to grasp <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>centive structures <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> landand <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> arrangements may lead to unsusta<strong>in</strong>able outcomes (FAO, 2002a).2 ROLE OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN NRM: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND EMPOWERMENT OF THE RURAL POOR
2.0 THE MANY TYPES OFPROPERTY RIGHTS TONATURAL RESOURCES:CONCEPTS, CHARACTERISTICSAND IMPLICATIONSControl over and access to land and <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s may be understood as an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s or group’s claimto a bundle <strong>of</strong> <strong>rights</strong>. These <strong>rights</strong> typically <strong>in</strong>clude authority to use, manage, and transfer land and various<strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s on it. People’s <strong>rights</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong>, weigh heavily <strong>in</strong> matters <strong>of</strong> fairness, equity,and justice, and can be understood and analyzed through a simple and long-stand<strong>in</strong>g model that portrays<strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> as bundles <strong>of</strong> <strong>rights</strong>. 3 This concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> serves to keep <strong>the</strong> multi-dimensionality,social embeddedness and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional breadth and depth at <strong>the</strong> forefront <strong>of</strong> development andenvironmental plann<strong>in</strong>g. 42.1 BASIC PROPERTY RIGHTS CONCEPTS2.1.1 The Rights BundleA bundle <strong>of</strong> <strong>rights</strong> comprises a set <strong>of</strong> <strong>rights</strong> that may <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> right to use a <strong>resource</strong>, <strong>the</strong> right to manage it,and <strong>the</strong> right to transfer (assign or reassign) <strong>management</strong> and use <strong>rights</strong>. 5 Also discussed below is <strong>the</strong> commonyet imprecise term, ownership. Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>rights</strong> (summarized <strong>in</strong> Box 2) may be seen as a strand with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>rights</strong> bundle.3Henry Ma<strong>in</strong>e first conceptualized bundles <strong>of</strong> <strong>rights</strong> <strong>in</strong> his classic book, Ancient Law, published <strong>in</strong> 1861.4Social embeddedness here refers to <strong>the</strong> social, economic and political relations, and associated <strong>in</strong>stitutions with<strong>in</strong> which land and <strong>property</strong><strong>rights</strong> are situated and are constituted. This can be illustrated with <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g observations. Property <strong>rights</strong> entail cultural and socialmean<strong>in</strong>g; for example, <strong>the</strong> <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> system is a fundamental element uphold<strong>in</strong>g cultural identity <strong>in</strong> many customary societies. In <strong>the</strong>political realm, <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> and <strong>the</strong> ability to manipulate <strong>the</strong>m, confer power. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> are <strong>in</strong>timately related with <strong>the</strong>distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth, and thus provide powerful <strong>in</strong>centives for <strong>the</strong>ir protection. The expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> with<strong>in</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sedoma<strong>in</strong>s has <strong>the</strong> potential ei<strong>the</strong>r to clarify or to stra<strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>property</strong> regimes and <strong>the</strong> larger socio-political doma<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y forma fundamental part.5Our proposed categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>property</strong> <strong>rights</strong> to <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s is <strong>in</strong>spired by some exist<strong>in</strong>g models, such as that presented <strong>in</strong>Fortmann, Louise. (1988). The Tree Tenure Factor <strong>in</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry with Particular Reference to Africa, from Fortmann and Bruce, Whose Trees?Proprietary Dimensions <strong>of</strong> Forestry, p.17; and that presented <strong>in</strong> Ostrom (1999) pp. 339.ROLE OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN NRM: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND EMPOWERMENT OF THE RURAL POOR 3