Chapter 6Conclusions<strong>The</strong>re is an urgent need to develop more productive technology for farmersin developing countries. <strong>The</strong> resources available to public and privateinstitutions, and to the farmers themselves, are very limited, however.Thus it is imperative that the process <strong>of</strong> technology generation be made asefficient as possible. One way <strong>of</strong> improving the efficiency <strong>of</strong> agriculturaltechnology development is to doa better job <strong>of</strong> describing and analyzingtechnology adoption.<strong>The</strong>re is no single method for studying technology adoption. Indeed,concerns with adoption and acceptability must form a part <strong>of</strong> thetechnology generation process from its early stages. <strong>Agricultural</strong> researchthat does not include a continual dialogue between farmers andresearchers will have little chance <strong>of</strong> success.As technology is developed and made available, there are several ways <strong>of</strong>follOWing its progress. This manual has described one important method,the formal survey. Its advantages include the ability to provide systematic,quantitative information to those who must take decisions about researchor extension efforts, and its ability to formally test hypotheses that explainadoption patterns.Formal adoption studies can proVide valuable information to research,extension, or rural development institutions that wish to assess theirprogress and take advantage <strong>of</strong> farmer experience. <strong>Adoption</strong> studies arealso valuable tools for improving the efficiency <strong>of</strong> communication betweeninstitutions responsible for research, extension, and agricultural policy.And finally, an adoption study can play an important role indemonstrating the impact <strong>of</strong> a research or extension effort and in justifyingcontinued or expanded support from funding sources.Properly managed, adoption studies can contribute to improving theefficiency <strong>of</strong> agricultural research, technology transfer, input provision,and agricultural policy formulation. Formal adoption studies should thusbe an important part <strong>of</strong> the methodology <strong>of</strong> institutions involved inagricultural development.-84
ReferencesAcharya, M., and L. Bennett. 1982. Women and the Subsistence Sector: EconomicParticipation and Household Decision-Making in Nepal. World BankStaffWorking Paper526. Washington, D.C.: <strong>The</strong> World Bank.Akhtar, R., D. Byerlee, A. Qayum, A. Majid, and P. Hobbs. 1986. Wheat in theCotton Wheat Farming Systems <strong>of</strong>the Punjab: Implications for Research andExtension. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan <strong>Agricultural</strong> Research Council.Alreck, P.L.,and R.B.Settle.1985. <strong>The</strong> Survey Research Handbook. Homewood,Illinois: Irwin.Ashby,J.A.. 1982.<strong>Technology</strong> and ecology: Tmplicationsforinnovationresearch in peasantagriculture. Rural Sociology47(2): 2:'>4-250.Ashby,J. A.. 1990. Evaluating <strong>Technology</strong> with Farmers: A Handbook. Cali,Colombia: CentroInternacional de AgriculturaTropical.Barker, R., R.W. Herdt, and B. Rose. 1985. <strong>The</strong> Rice Economy <strong>of</strong>Asia.Washington, D.C., and Manila, Philippines: Resources for the Futureandthe International Rice Research Institute.Benor, D., andJ.Q. Harrison. 1977. <strong>Agricultural</strong> Extension: Training and VisitSystem. Washington, D.C.: <strong>The</strong> World Bank.Bernsten, R.1980. Design and Management <strong>of</strong>Survey Research: A Guidefor<strong>Agricultural</strong> Researchers. Occasional Paper No.8. Nairobi, Kenya: CIMMYT.BeyeneSeboka, Asfaw Negassa, W. Mwangi, and Abubeker Mussa. 1991.<strong>Adoption</strong> <strong>of</strong>Maize Production Technologies in the Bako Area, Western Shewa andWelega Regions <strong>of</strong>Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Elhiopia: Tnslilule<strong>of</strong> <strong>Agricultural</strong>Research.Birkhaeuser, R.E., R. Evenson, and G.'Feder.1991. <strong>The</strong>economicimpacl<strong>of</strong>agricul.lural extension: A review. Economic Development and Cultural Change:'>9(:'»:607-650.Braun,J. von, and P.J.R. Webb. 1989. <strong>The</strong> impact<strong>of</strong> new crop lechnologyon theagricultural division <strong>of</strong> labor in a West African setting. EconomicDevelopmen t and Cultural Change :'>7(:'»: 51 :'>-5:'>4.Byerlee, D., M. Collinson, etaI.1980. Planning Technologies Appropriate toFarmers: Concepts and Procedures. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.Byerlee, D., and E. Hesse de Polanco. 1986. Farmers' stepwise adoplion <strong>of</strong>technological packages: Evidence from the Mexican Alliplano. AmericanJournal <strong>of</strong><strong>Agricultural</strong> Economics 68: 519-527.85
- Page 9 and 10:
I Chapter 1AdoptionStudiesWhy Study
- Page 11 and 12:
emphasis on participatory research
- Page 13 and 14:
of adoption study must be done with
- Page 15 and 16:
-7some idea of the degree to which
- Page 17 and 18:
80 2. tudl Used to Assess Different
- Page 19 and 20:
Another issue in measuring adoption
- Page 21 and 22:
Yt and we can estimate K (the maxim
- Page 23 and 24:
Measuring ImpactEarlier sections di
- Page 25 and 26:
-17The Role of Adoption Studies in
- Page 27 and 28:
Bo 3. Variable and Criteria __'_."C
- Page 29 and 30:
Farmers in Bumbogo, Rwanda grow bea
- Page 31 and 32:
-23The following graph shows the ac
- Page 33 and 34:
-25One valuable contribution to ass
- Page 35 and 36:
80 1A study of mechanical wheat har
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3UnderstandingAdoptionThe F
- Page 39 and 40:
small test of farmers' skills (for
- Page 41 and 42: Wealth. Wealthier farmers may be th
- Page 43 and 44: degree of adoption may depend on th
- Page 45 and 46: conditions of the preceding or foll
- Page 47 and 48: equired inputs, then the technology
- Page 49 and 50: help in analyzing the degree to whi
- Page 51 and 52: Checklist (cont'd.).....FactorBiolo
- Page 53 and 54: Box 14. Gender Analysis and Adoptio
- Page 55 and 56: Box 16. Labor Availability and Adop
- Page 57 and 58: 80 1 te Trade-offsFarmers must ofte
- Page 59 and 60: -51The adoption of technology is in
- Page 61 and 62: -53Box 22. Source of Purchased Inpu
- Page 63 and 64: Box 24. Knowledge of Recommendation
- Page 65 and 66: services, or markets, it is importa
- Page 67 and 68: - SamplingforcomparisonsTn many ins
- Page 69 and 70: chosen for the survey will determin
- Page 71 and 72: B. Measurements for input use may b
- Page 73 and 74: 2. Where did you acquire the seed?1
- Page 75 and 76: Cha ter 5MethodsforAnalyzingAdoptio
- Page 77 and 78: One of the simplest and most useful
- Page 79 and 80: For instance, a survey may show tha
- Page 81 and 82: -73Revised[Oxen ownership (A) --.t~
- Page 83 and 84: RevisedThe association is tested co
- Page 85 and 86: The following example is a simple l
- Page 87 and 88: where b o is the constant, b}' b 2,
- Page 89 and 90: variables. And a high significance
- Page 91: 1Decision trees are a method of rep
- Page 95 and 96: Jha, D., B. Hojjati, and 5. Vosti.