11.07.2015 Views

Table of Contents Agenda 2 Request for Letter of ... - City of Kerman

Table of Contents Agenda 2 Request for Letter of ... - City of Kerman

Table of Contents Agenda 2 Request for Letter of ... - City of Kerman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Table</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Contents</strong><strong>Agenda</strong> 2<strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support <strong>for</strong> I-5 Social Services<strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support 6Draft <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support 7<strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support <strong>for</strong> AB 300 (Perea) Funding LocalEmergency ServicesAB 300 Fact Sheet 8Draft <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support 10<strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support <strong>for</strong> AB 327 (Perea) Rate PayerEquity ActAB 327 Fact Sheet 11Draft <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support 15MinutesJune 5, 2013 17PayrollPayroll 20Overtime 23Warrant Nos. 37194-37281: $96,306.63AP-Detail-06-19-13 24Monthly Investment Report <strong>for</strong> the month ending May 31, 2013Investment Report May 31, 2013 32Resolution Confirming Diagram and Assessments <strong>for</strong> theLandscaping and Lighting District No. 1 2013-14 Annual LevyStaff Report - LLD No 1 36Emergency Abatement <strong>of</strong> Public Nuisance Pursuant to Section14.02.20 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kerman</strong> Municipal CodeEmergency Abatement 41Resolution Awarding Bid <strong>for</strong> First Street and Middleton AvenueReconstruction ProjectStaff Report - First Street Reconstruction 46Resolution Approving Hourly Engineering Rates <strong>for</strong> <strong>City</strong>Engineering ServicesStaff Report - Engineer Fees 491


Gary Yep - MayorDoug Wilcox – Mayor Pro-TemRaj Dhaliwal – Council MemberCharlie Jones – Council MemberNathan Fox – Council MemberAGENDAKERMAN CITY COUNCILREGULAR MEETING<strong>Kerman</strong> <strong>City</strong> Hall850 S. Madera AvenueWednesday, June 19, 20136:30 PMAGENDA PACKET AVAILABLE FORREVIEW 72 HOURS PRIOR TOTHE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ATTHE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE ANDON THE CITY WEBSITEITEMS RECIEVED AT THEMEETING WILL BE AVAILABLEFOR REVIEW AT THE CITYCLERK’S OFFICEALL MEETING ATTENDEES ARE ADVISED THAT ALL PAGERS, CELLULAR TELEPHONES AND ANY OTHERCOMMUNICATION DEVICES SHOULD BE POWERED OFF UPON ENTERING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,AS THESE DEVICES INTERFERE WITH OUR AUDIO EQUIPMENT.OPENING CEREMONIES• Welcome – Mayor Gary Yep• Call to Order• Roll Call• InvocationAt this time the Council wishes to provide anyone an opportunity to give a brief invocation orinspirational thought. In accordance with law, we would request this opportunity not be used torecruit converts, to advance any one, or to disparage any other faith or belief. If no one steps<strong>for</strong>ward, we will observe a moment <strong>of</strong> silence so that we may all focus our thoughts on how bestto serve our community.• Pledge <strong>of</strong> Allegiance – <strong>City</strong> ClerkAGENDA APPROVAL/ADDITIONS/DELETIONSTo accommodate members <strong>of</strong> the public or convenience in the order <strong>of</strong> presentation, items onthe agenda may not be presented or acted upon in the order listed.1. CEREMONIAL MATTERSA. Special Recognition <strong>for</strong> Glenn Rudolph <strong>of</strong> Rudolph Auto Body <strong>for</strong> his time and materialsinvolved in the painting <strong>of</strong> the new <strong>Kerman</strong> Police Department's DARE Car (JKB)B. <strong>Kerman</strong> Youth Leadership Academy Presentation (PG)C. <strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support <strong>for</strong> I-5 Social Services (MR)ATTACHMENTS: <strong>Request</strong>/Draft <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> SupportD. <strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support <strong>for</strong> AB 300 (Perea) Funding Local Emergency Services (MR)ATTACHMENTS: AB 300/Draft <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> SupportE. <strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support <strong>for</strong> AB 327 (Perea) Rate Payer Equity Act (MR)ATTACHMENTS: AB 327/Draft <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>of</strong> Support2


REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCILThis portion <strong>of</strong> the meeting is reserved <strong>for</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the public to address the Council on items<strong>of</strong> interest that are not on the <strong>Agenda</strong> and are within the subject matter jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> theCouncil. Speakers shall be limited to three minutes. It is requested that no comments be madeduring this period on items on the <strong>Agenda</strong>. Members <strong>of</strong> the public wishing to address the Councilon items on the <strong>Agenda</strong> should notify the Mayor when that <strong>Agenda</strong> item is called, and theMayor will recognize your discussion at that time. It should be noted that the Council isprohibited by law from taking any action on matters discussed that are not on the <strong>Agenda</strong>.Speakers are asked to please use the microphone, and provide their name and address.2. CONSENT CALENDARMatters listed under consent calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motionand one vote. There will be no separate discussion <strong>of</strong> these items. If discussion is desired, amember <strong>of</strong> the audience or a Council Member may request an item be removed from theConsent Calendar and it will be considered separately.A. SUBJECT: MinutesMinutes - June 5, 2013RECOMMENDATION: Council approve minutes as presented.ATTACHMENTS: June 5, 2013B. SUBJECT: PayrollMay 26, 2013 - June 08, 2013: $121,249.07; Retro Pay: $563.04; Overtime: $7,123.20;Standby & FTO: $1,107.63: Uni<strong>for</strong>m Pay: $5800.00; Holiday Pay: $18,416.76RECOMMENDATION: Council approve payroll as presented.ATTACHMENTS: Payroll, Overtime ReportATTACHMENTS:C. SUBJECT: WarrantsWarrant Nos. 37194-37281: $96,306.63Excepting: Kerwest Newspaper #37255 - $510.00RECOMMENDATION: Council approve warrants as presented.(Pursuant to Government Code Section 37208)ATTACHMENTS: AP-Detail-06-19-13Cons ent Cale ndarD. SUBJECT: Monthly Investment Report <strong>for</strong> the month ending May 31, 2013 (TLP)RECOMMENDATION: Council accept the Monthly Investment Report <strong>for</strong> May 2013 aspresented.ATTACHMENTS: Investment Report May 31, 20133


3. PUBLIC HEARINGSThese hearings are scheduled at the time stated, and will be heard by the Council as close tothe time stated as possible.A. SUBJECT: Resolution Confirming Diagram and Assessments <strong>for</strong> the Landscaping andLighting District No. 1 2013-14 Annual Levy (GH)RECOMMENDATION: Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony andadopt resolution confirming the diagram and assessments <strong>for</strong> the Landscaping andLighting District No. 1 2013-14 annual levy in the amounts specified.ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - LLD No. 14. DEPARTMENT REPORTSA. SUBJECT: Emergency Abatement <strong>of</strong> Public Nuisance Pursuant to Section 14.02.20 <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Kerman</strong> Municipal Code (CK)RECOMMENDATION: Council declare dead and dried-out redwood trees located at15838 W. E Street a public nuisance posing an immediate threat <strong>of</strong> property damageand injury pursuant to Section 14.02.20 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kerman</strong> Municipal Code and authorizethe Building Official to immediately abate said nuisance.ATTACHMENTS: Emergency AbatementB. SUBJECT: Resolution Awarding Bid <strong>for</strong> First Street and Middleton Avenue ReconstructionProject (GH)RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the bid to thelowest responsible bidder based on the outcome <strong>of</strong> bids opened Tuesday, June 18 andpresented at the Council meeting.ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - First Street ReconstructionC. SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Hourly Engineering Rates <strong>for</strong> <strong>City</strong> Engineering Services (GH)RECOMMENDATION: Council consider approving revised rate schedule <strong>for</strong> engineeringservices provided by Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc.ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - Engineer FeesD. SUBJECT: Update on Appeal <strong>of</strong> AT&T Cell Tower (LP)RECOMMENDATION: Council to receive verbal update from staff on the action taken bythe Fresno County Board <strong>of</strong> Supervisors regarding the appeal <strong>of</strong> the proposed AT&T celltower project within the sphere <strong>of</strong> influence.4


E. SUBJECT: Resolutions Adopting the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Budget (TP)RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the following resolutions:1. Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Operating and Capital Budget2. Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit <strong>for</strong> Fiscal Year 2013/20143. Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Employee Positions and SalaryScheduleF. SUBJECT: Change <strong>of</strong> <strong>City</strong> Council Meeting Date <strong>for</strong> Wednesday, July 3, 2013 (MR)RECOMMENDATION: Council consider a) rescheduling the July 3, 2013 meeting toanother date, or b) cancelling the meeting and resume the next regularly scheduledmeeting on July 17, 2013, due to possible conflict with the Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceFestival <strong>of</strong> American Fireworks Show.5. CITY MANAGER/STAFF COMMUNICATIONSA. Update on Repairs at the Madera Avenue Railroad CrossingB. Retirement Party <strong>for</strong> Nancy Moore, Thursday, June 27, 4:30-6:30 p.m. CTC6. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORTSA. KSEE 24 at Blue Turtle Express; June 27, 4:30-7:00 a.m.B. Festival <strong>of</strong> the American Spirit Fireworks Show - Wednesday, July 3, 6:00 p.m.C. <strong>City</strong> to Consider Sending a Representative to Kannami, Japan in 2014COUNCIL RECESS TO CONVENE THE PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY (Separate agenda attached)7. CLOSED SESSIONA. Government Code Section 54956.95 - Claimant: Janale Valdez; Agency Claimed Against:<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>B. Government Code Section 54957.6 - Conference with Labor Negotiators; AgencyDesignated Representatives: <strong>City</strong> Manager Luis Patlan; Employee Organizations: <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Kerman</strong> Miscellaneous Employees Group and <strong>Kerman</strong> Public Safety EmployeesAssociation.COUNCIL RECONVENE FROM CLOSED SESSION & REPORT ANY ACTION TAKEN8. ADJOURNMENTIn compliance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance toparticipate at this meeting, please contact the <strong>City</strong> Clerk at (559) 846-9380. Notification <strong>of</strong> 48 hoursprior to the meeting will enable the <strong>City</strong> Clerk to make reasonable arrangement to ensure accessibilityto this meeting. Pursuant to the ADA, the meeting room is accessible to the physically handicapped.5


KERMAN CITY COUNCIL850 S. Madera AvenueKERMAN, CA 93630Mayor – Gary YepDoug WilcoxCharlie JonesNathan Fox Phone: (559) 846-9380Raj Dhaliwal Fax: (559) 846-6199June 19, 2013Honorable Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent <strong>of</strong> Public Instruction1430 N StreetSacramento, CA 95814-9501Re: Support <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>for</strong> I-5 Social Services CorporationDear Mr. Torlakson:I-5 Social Services Corporation has a longstanding history <strong>of</strong> working effectively to support many <strong>of</strong> ourneediest families in western Fresno County. Their facility in <strong>Kerman</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers quality services to familieswho normally would not be able to af<strong>for</strong>d childcare.The loss <strong>of</strong> State Contracts has <strong>for</strong>ced I-5 Social Services to close the doors at all eight <strong>of</strong> their EarlyChildhood Education Centers including their facility in <strong>Kerman</strong>. These facilities serve farm-workers andlow-income families and will create harm and disruption to the parents and children who so depend onchildcare services.We encourage you to rescind the action taken by the Child Development Division and re-issue a neworder restoring the childcare contract funding to I-5 Social Services Corporation <strong>for</strong> Fiscal Year 2013-14.Thank you in advance <strong>for</strong> your consideration <strong>of</strong> this request.Sincerely,Gary YepMayorCc: <strong>Kerman</strong> <strong>City</strong> CouncilAlex Valdez”COMMUNITY COMES FIRST”7


AB 300 (Perea)Funding Local Emergency Services(As amended 6/3/13)SUMMARYAB 300 would ensure state and localgovernments receive the necessary resources<strong>for</strong> E911 programs by developing a statewidemechanism to include prepaid services in thealready-established collection <strong>of</strong> fees applied towireless communication services.BACKGROUNDIn Cali<strong>for</strong>nia there are several statesurcharges, taxes and fees assessed ontelecommunication services. These arecollected by telephone service providers fromtheir service customers, and then paid toeither the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Public UtilitiesCommission (CPUC) or the Board <strong>of</strong>Equalization (BOE).For traditional, postpaid services, carrierscollect the required fees from end-users byincluding it in their monthly bill. Thismechanism does not work <strong>for</strong> prepaidconsumers because the users pay <strong>for</strong> prepaidservices be<strong>for</strong>e they use any services. Nomonthly bill is sent to the customer androughly 80% <strong>of</strong> prepaid services are notpurchased from the carrier. They arepurchased from a retailer (e.g. Target, BestBuy, Wal-Mart) and there is no means <strong>of</strong>collecting the fees from the customer after theyleave the retailer.Postpaid Services Payment CycleMonthly Bill Used to CollectExisting fees and surcharges:• Emergency Telephone Users Surcharge Act(E911)• The six CPUC-mandated end-usersurcharges: Universal Lifeline Telephone,Deaf and Disabled TelecommunicationsProgram, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia High Cost Fund-A,Cali<strong>for</strong>nia High Cost Fund-B, Cali<strong>for</strong>niaTeleconnect Fund, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia AdvancedSeries FundPrepaid Services Payment CycleNo Collection Mechanism• Local 911, access line, and utility usertaxes• CPUC User FeeCurrently in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, there is no statewidemechanism to collect the same fees fromprepaid wireless customers that are currentlycollected from postpaid customers. As a result,state and local governments lack reliablemeans <strong>for</strong> ensuring collection <strong>of</strong> theserevenues.Prepaid services are growing rapidly inpopularity. Out <strong>of</strong> 330 million U.S. wirelessOffice <strong>of</strong> Assemblymember Henry T. Perea • AB 300 Fact Sheet • 6/3/2013 11:00 AM8


consumers, almost 20% use prepaid services.The estimated growth rate <strong>of</strong> the industry isexpected to increase 10% annually andCali<strong>for</strong>nia’s share <strong>of</strong> the national wirelessmarket is around 12%. By creating amechanism to collect the required fees fromthis industry, it would help createpredictability and enhanced revenue <strong>for</strong> stateand local governments.Arizona, Nebraska, Utah, North Carolina and25 other states have adopted the point <strong>of</strong> saleapproach <strong>for</strong> 911 fees.THIS BILLSpecifically, AB 300 would:• Create a uni<strong>for</strong>m, statewide point <strong>of</strong> salecollection <strong>for</strong> prepaid services administeredby the BOE that is uni<strong>for</strong>mly administeredand transparent to consumers, similar topostpaid services.• Require that fees collected will bedistributed to the State 911 fund, CPUCPublic Purpose Fund and LocalGovernments.BoostSprintT-MobileTracFone WirelessVerizonVirgin MobileOPPOSITIONPublic Utilities CommissionCali<strong>for</strong>nia Grocers AssociationTURNGreenlining InstituteFOR MORE INFORMATIONJonathan ArambelAssemblymember Henry T. PereaPhone: (916) 319-2031Fax: (916) 319-2131Jonathan.Arambel@Asm.Ca.Gov• AB 300 would not affect current taxes orfees on postpaid services.SUPPORTCali<strong>for</strong>nia Pr<strong>of</strong>essional FirefightersMuni ServicesCali<strong>for</strong>nia Hispanic Chambers <strong>of</strong>CommerceChambers <strong>of</strong> Commerce Alliance <strong>of</strong> Venturaand Santa Barbara CountiesFresno Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceGreater Bakersfield Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceLancaster Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceLos Angeles Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceSan Francisco Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceSouth Bay Association <strong>of</strong> Chambers <strong>of</strong>CommerceTorrance Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceValley Industry and Commerce AssociationCTIA-The Wireless Association (Sponsor)AT&TOffice <strong>of</strong> Assemblymember Henry T. Perea • AB 300 Fact Sheet • Page 2 2/4/2013 11:00 AM9


KERMAN CITY COUNCIL850 S. Madera AvenueKERMAN, CA 93630Mayor – Gary YepDoug WilcoxCharlie JonesNathan Fox Phone: (559) 846-9380Raj Dhaliwal Fax: (559) 846-6199June 10, 2013The Honorable Henry T. PereaAssembly Member 31 st DistrictState Capitol, Room 4112Sacramento, CA, 95814Re: Support <strong>for</strong> AB 300 (Perea) Funding Local Emergency ServicesDear Assembly Member Perea:This letter is to express support <strong>for</strong> AB 300 – which would ensure state and local governments receive thenecessary resources <strong>for</strong> E911 programs by developing a statewide mechanism to include prepaid services in thealready-established collection <strong>of</strong> fees applied to wireless communication services.By creating a mechanism to collect the required fees from the prepaid wireless service, it would help createpredictability and enhanced revenue <strong>for</strong> state and local governments. Programs and services that would receiveadditional revenue by modernizing collection <strong>of</strong> existing taxes and fees on prepaid wireless consumers include:state and local E911 call centers, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia LifeLine, The Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Teleconnect Fund, The Deaf and DisabledTelecommunications Program, The Cali<strong>for</strong>nia High Cost Funds, The Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Advance Services Fund, and thePublic Utilities Commission Reimbursement Account.AB 300 would create a uni<strong>for</strong>m, statewide point <strong>of</strong> sale collection <strong>for</strong> prepaid services administered by the BOEthat is uni<strong>for</strong>mly administered and transparent to consumers, similar to postpaid services. It also requires thatfees collected be distributed to the State 911 fund, CPUC Public Purpose Fund and Local Governments.I strongly support AB 300 (Perea,) which would modernize the collection <strong>of</strong> existing wireless taxes and fees tomaximize revenue and help fund critical programs.Thank you in advance <strong>for</strong> your consideration <strong>of</strong> this request.Sincerely,Gary YepMayorCc: <strong>Kerman</strong> <strong>City</strong> CouncilAlex Valdez”COMMUNITY COMES FIRST”10


AB 327 (Perea)Rate Payer Equity Act(As amended 04/23/13)SUMMARYAB 327 would eliminate provisions in AB1 Xand SB 695 relating to residential rate designretuning the code to the language thatexisted prior to the energy crisis, whichallowed the CPUC to do ratemaking withminimal statutory restriction.BACKGROUNDDuring the energy crisis, the Legislatureenacted ABX1 1 (Keeley) Chapter 4, Statutes<strong>of</strong> 2001, First Extraordinary Session, whichincluded a provision that capped residentialelectricity rates <strong>for</strong> investor-owned utilities<strong>for</strong> usage up to 130 percent <strong>of</strong> baseline,meaning that the rates <strong>for</strong> Tier 1 and 2 usagecould not increase. This rate cap remained inplace until the enactment <strong>of</strong> SB 695 (Kehoe)Chapter 337, Statutes <strong>of</strong> 2009, which allowed<strong>for</strong> modest increases in rates in Tiers 1 and 2as well as customers on the Cali<strong>for</strong>niaAlternate Rates <strong>for</strong> Energy (CARE) program.Specifically, SB 695 allowed <strong>for</strong> non-CARErates in Tiers 1 and 2 to increase by 3-5percent annually based on the ConsumerPrice Index (CPI), and CARE rates to increaseby 0-3 percent annually based on the CalWORKS index.Over the course <strong>of</strong> the AB 1X rate cap, theincreased cost <strong>of</strong> electricity shifted completelyto the upper tiers (over 130 percent <strong>of</strong>baseline) usage, setting those rates at levelsfar above the actual cost <strong>of</strong> providing serviceto those customers. The increase in the cost<strong>of</strong> service was a result <strong>of</strong> higher costs undervarious public policies including enactment <strong>of</strong>the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), theCali<strong>for</strong>nia Global Warming Solutions Act (AB32), reliability and safety investments,infrastructure replacement and inflation.In addition, Tier 1 and 2 rates are not keepingpace with the increased costs mentionedabove. Without an ability to keep pace withthe increase in costs in the lower tiers, theupper tier usage is saddled with theadditional cost burden resulting in thoserates being even higher than the costs toserve the customers paying those rates. Forexample, the gap between Tier 2 and Tier 3rates actually grew after enactment <strong>of</strong> SB 695going from 13.0 cents per kWh to 15.3 centsper kWh currently.Currently, the CPUC has an open proceeding-Order Instituting Rulemaking (OIR)-on policyguidance <strong>for</strong> rate design. This measure doesnot interfere with that proceeding instead itprovides the CPUC authority to actuallyimplement the policies that they ultimatelyadopt be<strong>for</strong>e there is a residential ratepayerrevolt as a result <strong>of</strong> the punitive upper tierrate structure.THIS BILLSpecifically, AB 327 would:• Repeal limitations to raising residentialrates adopted during the energy crisisthereby getting the Legislature out <strong>of</strong>the ratemaking business, which theCPUC is best equipped to do.• Requires the CPUC, when approvingchanges to rates, that the changes arereasonable and necessary.• Requires the CPUC to report to theLegislature findings andrecommendations related to tieredrates in a specified rulemaking byJanuary 21, 2014.SUPPORT1 st Guaranty Mortgage and Realty100 Black Men <strong>of</strong> Long BeachAge Well Senior Services5/20/2013 1:02 PM Office <strong>of</strong> Assemblymember Henry T. Perea • AB 327 Fact Sheet • Page 111


American Family HousingAngel View, Inc.Antelope Valley board <strong>of</strong> TradeAssured Coin and LoanBarstow Community Hospital AuxiliaryBarstow Unified School DistrictBlong Xiong, Councilmember, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> FresnoBorder Transportation CouncilBuilding Industry Association <strong>of</strong>Fresno/Madera CountiesBuilding Industry Association <strong>of</strong> the GreaterValleyBusiness Resource GroupC&C Development (Af<strong>for</strong>dable Housing)CTI Environmental, Inc.Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Apartment AssociationCali<strong>for</strong>nia Asian Pacific Chamber <strong>of</strong>CommerceCali<strong>for</strong>nia Association <strong>of</strong> CommunityManagersCali<strong>for</strong>nia Biomass Energy AllianceCali<strong>for</strong>nia Black Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceCali<strong>for</strong>nia League <strong>of</strong> Food ProcessorsCali<strong>for</strong>nia Manufacturers & TechnologyAssociation (CMTA)Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Retailers AssociationCement Masons (Local 500)Central Valley Opportunity Center, Inc.<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Coalinga<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Livingston<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mendota<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Reedley<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> SelmaCoalition <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Utility Employees(CCUE)Cody Campbell, Council Member, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong>VistaCommunity Advocates <strong>for</strong> People withChoices (CAPC), Inc.Community Women <strong>of</strong> San Gabriel ValleyCongress <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia SeniorsCortez Communications, LLC.Costa Mesa Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceCyber Risk Insurance BrokersDelhi CenterDowntown Pomona Owners’ AssociationEd Gallo, Council Member, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> EscondidoEl ConcilioEnergy Communications CorporationErnest Ewin, Council Member, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> LaMesaFresno Metro Black Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceFOCUSCOM, Inc.Fresno Barrios UnidosGardena Valley Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceGary Kendrick, <strong>City</strong> Council, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> El CajonGi and Associates<strong>City</strong> Fabric (Business)5/20/2013 1:02 PM Office <strong>of</strong> Assemblymember Henry T. Perea AB 327 Fact Sheet • Page 212


GRCN Connecting Communities, Inc. (Childand Youth Services)Greater Antelope Valley Association <strong>of</strong>RealtorsHabitat <strong>for</strong> Humanity San DiegoHarvey L. Hall, Mayor, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> BakersfieldHawthorne Chamber <strong>of</strong> CommerceHelpline Youth Counseling (HYC)Hilltop Group, Inc.Hispanic Outreach Task ForceH.O.P.E. <strong>of</strong> the Mountain EmpireIndependent Energy Producers AssociationInland Valley Business AllianceInternational Brotherhood <strong>of</strong> ElectricalWorkers (IBEW Local 47)International Brotherhood <strong>of</strong> ElectricalWorkers (IBEW Local 465)International Brotherhood <strong>of</strong> ElectricalWorkers (IBEW Local 569)James Dahl, Mayor, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> San ClementeJess E. Van Deventer, Sweetwater AuthorityBoardJohn F. Simon, Lumber Estimating ServiceKathleen J. DeRosa, Mayor, Cathedral <strong>City</strong>MainStreetChamber RanchoCucamonga/UplandMark Muir, Council Member, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong>EncinitasMartinez SupplyMeals on Wheels West (Los Angeles)Mercado Business AssociationMike Murphy, Council Member, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong>MercedMountain Health & Community ServicesOliver L. Baines, Council Member, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong>FresnoOrange County Hispanic Chamber <strong>of</strong>CommerceOrange Senior CenterP&P Pools, Inc. (San Diego)Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)Pringle Insurance Services, Inc.Saddleback College FoundationSam Abed, Mayor, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> EscondidoSan Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E)San Diego Port Tenants AssociationSan Diego Regional Minority SupplierDevelopment CouncilKern Council <strong>of</strong> GovernmentsKern County Board <strong>of</strong> SupervisorsKern County Taxpayers AssociationLed<strong>for</strong>d Enterprises (LE)Leticia Perez, Supervisor, Kern CountyLifeHOUSE Management ServicesSan Joaquin Valley Clean EnergyOrganizationSanta Ana College FoundationSave our Rural Community (S.O.R.E.)SELAC Educational FoundationSenior Advocates <strong>of</strong> the DesertSepulveda Group Enterprises, Inc.5/20/2013 1:02 PM Office <strong>of</strong> Assemblymember Henry T. Perea AB 327 Fact Sheet • Page 313


Sierra Dawn Estates (Mobile Home Park)Southern Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Edison (SCE)Stalwart CommunicationsThe Center Long BeachThe Center Palm SpringsThomas W. Amend Drywall ContractorTrilogy PR GroupTulare CountyUnited Association <strong>of</strong> Food Trucks <strong>of</strong> SanDiegoUnited Association <strong>of</strong> Plumbers andSteamfitters, Local Union 230United Cambodian CommunityUnited Communities NetworkWestern Region Asians inTelecommunications and Energy (WRATR)Whittier Uptown AssociationAARPOPPOSITIONAmerican Federation <strong>of</strong> State, County andMunicipal Employees (AFSCME)Division <strong>of</strong> Ratepayer Advocates (DRA)The Greenlining InstituteThe Utility Re<strong>for</strong>m Network (TURN)FOR MORE INFORMATIONCelia Mata, Legislative DirectorAssemblymember Henry T. PereaPhone (916) 319-2031Fax (916) 319-2131Celia.Mata@asm.ca.gov5/20/2013 1:02 PM Office <strong>of</strong> Assemblymember Henry T. Perea AB 327 Fact Sheet • Page 414


KERMAN CITY COUNCIL850 S. Madera AvenueKERMAN, CA 93630Mayor – Gary YepDoug WilcoxCharlie JonesNathan Fox Phone: (559) 846-9380Raj Dhaliwal Fax: (559) 846-6199April 5, 2013The Honorable Henry T. PereaAssembly Member 31 st DistrictState Capitol, Room 4112Sacramento, CA, 95814Re: Support <strong>for</strong> AB 327 (Perea) Rate Payer Equity ActDear Assembly Member Perea:This letter is to express support <strong>for</strong> AB 327 – which would eliminate the rate caps and restrictions adoptedas part <strong>of</strong> ABX1 1 and SB 695, and would allow the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) toconsider and approve residential rate structure modifications, which are fair and reasonable, and are inline with the State’s energy policy goals and objectives.During the energy crisis in 2001, the Legislature passed ABX1 1 to protect Cali<strong>for</strong>nia ratepayers fromrampant price fluctuations due to a dysfunctional wholesale electricity market. ABX1 1 capped rates in thelowest two tiers <strong>of</strong> residential electric service in addition to rates <strong>for</strong> low income customers on theCali<strong>for</strong>nia Alternate Rates <strong>for</strong> Energy (CARE) program. Since the energy crisis, the cost <strong>of</strong> electricity hasincreased due to rising fuel prices and State mandated and CPUC-created programs. As a result <strong>of</strong> the ratecaps in tiers 1 and 2, these increased costs have shifted to customers in the upper tiers. SB 695 providedlimited relief by allowing rates in Tier 1 and Tier 2 to increase by 3 to 5 percent annually through 2018based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). A separate <strong>for</strong>mula was established <strong>for</strong> CARE customers.However, this gradual rate increase does not address the issue <strong>of</strong> the increased costs <strong>of</strong> providing electricserviceAbsent re<strong>for</strong>m, the gap between Tier 1 and Tier 2 rates and the upper tier rates will continue to widen,causing tens <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> customers to pay rates significantly higher than the actual cost <strong>of</strong> electricity.Be<strong>for</strong>e the energy crisis, the highest tiered rate was only 20 percent higher than the lowest tiered rate.Today, the highest tiered rate is between 2-3 times higher than the actual cost <strong>of</strong> service. Withoutlegislative changes, the CPUC has only very limited ability to fix this unfair residential electric ratestructure.15


Perea <strong>Letter</strong> – AB 327Page 2AB 327 would eliminate the rate restrictions adopted during the energy crisis and would provide the CPUCthe flexibility to implement what they determine to be the appropriate course <strong>of</strong> action on rate design andapprove rate structure modifications, which are fair and reasonable, and are in line with the State’s energypolicy goals and objectives. The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> strongly supports AB 327 (Perea,) which would allow CPUCto consider rate re<strong>for</strong>m recommendations from all parties.Thank you in advance <strong>for</strong> your consideration <strong>of</strong> this request.Sincerely,Gary YepMayorC: <strong>Kerman</strong> <strong>City</strong> CouncilAlex Valdez”COMMUNITY COMES FIRST”16


MINUTESKERMAN CITY COUNCILREGULAR MEETING<strong>Kerman</strong> <strong>City</strong> Hall850 S. Madera AvenueWednesday, June 05, 20136:30 PMPresent: Mayor Yep (GY) Dhaliwal (RD), Fox (NF), Jones (CJ) Wilcox (DW)Absent: NoneAlso Present: <strong>City</strong> Manager/Planning & Development Director Patlan, <strong>City</strong> Attorney Blum,Community Services Director, Chief <strong>of</strong> Police, Public Works Director, <strong>City</strong> Engineer, Finance DirectorGary Yep - MayorDoug Wilcox – Mayor Pro-TemRaj Dhaliwal – Council MemberCharlie Jones – Council MemberNathan Fox – Council MemberVoting: Yes, No,Absent (Abstain ifneeded)OPENING CEREMONIES• Welcome – Mayor Gary Yep• Call to Order• Roll Call• Invocation• Pledge <strong>of</strong> Allegiance – <strong>City</strong> Clerk6:30 p.m.All presentexcept *NFarrived at 7:25p.m.Per<strong>for</strong>medAGENDA APPROVAL/ADDITIONS/DELETIONS1. CEREMONIAL MATTERSNoneApproved CJ/DW(4-0-1) NFREQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL2. CONSENT CALENDARA. SUBJECT: Minutes - May 15, 2013RECOMMENDATION: Council approve minutes as presented.Alex Valdez - I5SSJasmine RameroApprovedCJ/DW(4-0-1) NFB. SUBJECT: Payroll - April 28 - May 11; May 12 - May 25RECOMMENDATION: Council approve payroll as presented.C. SUBJECT: Warrants Nos. 37086-37193: $240,383.22RECOMMENDATION: Council approve warrants as presented.D. SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring 2013 the Year <strong>of</strong> the Child (LP)RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt resolution declaring 2013 as "The Year<strong>of</strong> the Child" as requested by the Children's Movement <strong>of</strong> Fresno.E. SUBJECT: Final Acceptance <strong>of</strong> Del Norte Trunk Sewer Main Improvements,Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project No. 11371 (GH)Res 13-26Addressed CCLinda GleasonRes 13-27RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the attached resolution accepting thework per<strong>for</strong>med by Halop<strong>of</strong>f and Sons, Inc. on the Del Norte Avenue TrunkSewer Main Improvements and authorize the <strong>City</strong> Engineer to file theNotice <strong>of</strong> Acceptance.17


F. SUBJECT: Accept the Stanislaus Ave. Reconstruction Project (GH)Res 13-28RECOMMENDATION: Council should adopt the attached resolutionaccepting the work per<strong>for</strong>med by A. J. Excavation, Inc. and authorizing thefiling <strong>of</strong> the Notice <strong>of</strong> Acceptance.3. PUBLIC HEARINGSA. SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Proposed Utility Rates <strong>for</strong> FY 13/14 (TP)RECOMMENDATION: Council open the public hearing, receive publictestimony, close the public hearing, and adopt resolution approving utilityrates <strong>for</strong> fiscal year 2013/14.4. DEPARTMENT REPORTSA. SUBJECT: Participation in a Joint Law En<strong>for</strong>cement Memorandum <strong>of</strong>Understanding (MOU) to Use State Grant Funds <strong>for</strong> Front Line LawEn<strong>for</strong>cement Activities (JKB)RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the <strong>City</strong> Manager enter into a JointMemorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding (MOU) between the County <strong>of</strong> Fresno, allfifteen cities in the County, and the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Board <strong>of</strong> State andCommunity Corrections (BSCC) accepting $1,019,594 in grant funds fromthe State <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia <strong>for</strong> front-line law en<strong>for</strong>cement activities.B. SUBJECT: Fresno County Regional Enterprise Zone Targeted EmploymentArea Application (LP)RECOMMENDATION: Council adopts attached resolution approving theEconomic Development Corporation serving Fresno County to submit aTargeted Employment Area application to the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia DepartmentHousing and Community Development (HCD) on behalf <strong>of</strong> the FresnoCounty Regional Enterprise Zone.C. SUBJECT: Cities May Prohibit Medical Marijuana Dispensaries (MB)RECOMMENDATION: Council provide direction regarding the amendment<strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>'s existing ordinance concerning medical marijuana dispensariesto prohibit such dispensaries in all land usezones <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>.Opened/ClosedPH *NF arrived7:25 pmApproved CJ/DW(4-1-0) GYAddressed CCRon GarciaEdward VallejoFrank McClureRes 13-29Approved byMinute OrderCJ/DW (5-0-0)Approved CJ/DW(5-0-0)Res 13-30Approved CJ/NF(5-0-0)Instruction givento <strong>City</strong> Attorneyto draft language<strong>for</strong> councilreview at a latermeeting.5. CITY MANAGER/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS6. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORTSA. Sebastian Founders Day; June 14, 11 a.m., Plaza Park18


7. CLOSED SESSION8:55 p.m.A. Government Code Section 54956.9(a) - Conference with Legal Counsel -Existing Litigation; Name <strong>of</strong> case: Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal <strong>for</strong> the FifthAppellate District, Case No. F060148, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Clovis, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Fowler, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Kerman</strong>, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Kingsburg, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Sanger and <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Selma v. County <strong>of</strong>FresnoB. Government Code Section 54957.6 - Conference with Labor Negotiators;Agency Designated Representatives: <strong>City</strong> Manager Luis Patlan; Employeeorganization: <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> Miscellaneous Employees Group, and <strong>Kerman</strong>Public Safety Employees Association.COUNCIL RECONVENE FROM CLOSED SESSION & REPORT ANY ACTION TAKENNo reportableaction.Instructions tonegotiator.9:45 p.m.8. ADJOURNMENT9:46 p.m.19


CITY OF KERMANPAYROLL REPORTRETRO PAY OVERTIMESTANDBY & FTO GROSS COMP TIMEEMPLOYEE SALARY & Other HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT SALARY EARNEDADMINISTRATIONPAY PERIOD: May 26, 2013 - June 08, 2013414 Patlan, Luis $ 4,442.31 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 4,442.3115 Gonzalez, Diana $ 1,747.85 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,747.8587 Madruga, Lydia $ 1,966.15 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,966.15299 Przybyla, Tim $ 3,882.92 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 3,882.92332 Alvarez, Josefina $ 1,473.23 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,473.23350 Jones, Toni $ 2,411.54 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,411.54375 Reyes, Marcia $ 2,346.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,346.00435 Nazar<strong>of</strong>f, Helen $ 1,609.85 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,609.85TOTAL $ 19,879.85 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 19,879.85 0.00REC/SOCIAL11 Gallegos, Philip $ 3,630.92 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 3,630.9235 Arredondo, Barbara $ 1,433.54 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,433.5476 Wright, Judy $ 112.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 112.0097 Gonzalez, Jose Felix $ 295.11 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 295.11233 Moore, Nancy $ 1,858.15 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,858.15237 Salvador, Mark $ 1,810.15 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,810.15292 Silva, Jessica $ 430.13 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 430.13405 Sidhu, Nirmal $ 1,408.15 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,408.15361 Lujan, Vanessa $ 475.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 475.00431 Laurissa, Gallardo $ 1,602.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,602.00341 Temores, Veronica $ 24.75 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 24.75347 Quintana Pedro $ 127.19 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 127.19373 Arredondo, Marissa $ 70.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 70.00383 Rodrigues, Manuel $ 24.06 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 24.06388 Arredondo, Michelle $ 66.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 66.00447 Gonzalez, Devonna $ 140.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 140.00473 Tailor, Abigail $ 35.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 35.00482 Silva, Joel $ 68.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 68.00497 Arredondo, Raquel $ 407.25 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 407.25498 Ayala, Adrien $ 200.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 200.00502 Gallegos, Yenifer $ 172.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 172.00TOTAL $ 14,389.41 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 14,389.41 0.00POLICE29 Rodrigues, Mary $ 1,691.08 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,691.0859 Madruga, Ron $ 2,850.92 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,850.9269 Chapman, Tom $ 2,167.85 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,167.85101 Cubillos, Teresa $ 2,922.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,922.00245 Barbosa, Isaias $ 2,167.85 $ - 16.00 $ 650.35 - $ - $ 2,818.20291 Ramirez, Donald $ 1,691.08 $ - 6.00 $ 190.25 - $ - $ 1,881.32296 Mendoza, Sandra $ 2,116.15 $ - 23.00 $ 912.59 12.00 $ 7.94 $ 3,036.68343 Davis, Jeff $ 2,586.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,586.00354 Ness, Lee $ 2,191.72 $ - 3.00 $ 121.94 - $ - $ 2,313.66363 Barcoma, Wilbert $ 2,462.77 $ - 20.00 $ 923.54 - $ - $ 3,386.31369 Ramer, Joseph $ 1,231.38 $ 377.98 8.00 $ 184.71 - $ - $ 1,794.07402 Nevis, James $ 2,167.85 $ - 3.00 $ 121.94 - $ - $ 2,289.79Page 1 <strong>of</strong> 320


CITY OF KERMANPAYROLL REPORTPAY PERIOD: May 26, 2013 - June 08, 2013RETRO PAY OVERTIMESTANDBY & FTO GROSS COMP TIMEEMPLOYEE SALARY & Other HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT SALARY EARNED423 Magallon, Peter $ 2,116.15 $ - 34.00 $ 1,349.05 77.00 $ 80.68 $ 3,545.88425 Belding, Jeff $ 2,005.38 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,005.38442 Antuna, Eric $ 1,828.15 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,828.15458 Nelson, Christopher J $ 2,715.23 $ - 5.00 $ 254.55 - $ - $ 2,969.78459 Milchovich, Lindsay $ 1,783.38 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,783.38468 Tiwana, Manpreet $ 1,740.92 $ - 23.50 $ 767.09 - $ - $ 2,508.02474 Blohm, Joseph $ 3,671.08 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 3,671.08476 Rodriguez, Erika $ 1,740.92 $ - 12.00 $ 522.28 2.00 $ 10.88 $ 2,274.08478 O'Bar, Joshua $ 1,617.70 $ - 9.00 $ 272.99 - $ - $ 1,890.68485 Lehman, Dustin $ 45.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 45.00487 Antuna, Miguel $ 384.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 384.00500 Bitter, Nathaniel $ 696.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 696.00501 Ledezma, Linda $ 768.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 768.00503 Kroeger, Brent $ 285.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 285.00504 Labetiaux, EJ Medina $ 864.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 864.00TOTAL: $ 48,507.57 $ 377.98 162.50 $ 6,271.28 91.00 $ 99.49 $ 55,256.32 0.00PUBLIC WORKS8Gonzales, Ruben $ 1,888.15 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,888.1520 Rodriguez, Joe $ 1,842.92 $ - 1.00 $ 34.55 - $ - $ 1,877.4825 Prieto, Ruben $ 1,654.62 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,654.6226 Gruce, Robert $ 2,382.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,382.0027 Hearld, Douglas $ 2,783.54 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,783.54134 Ramirez, Manuel $ 1,716.46 $ 185.06 6.00 $ 225.29 21.00 $ 450.57 $ 2,577.38172 Chavez, Fernando M. $ 2,220.92 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,220.92290 Gastelum, Humberto $ 1,848.92 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,848.92298 Barajas, Michael $ 1,754.31 $ - 16.00 $ 592.08 23.25 $ 509.85 $ 2,856.23322 Castro, Joseph $ 1,595.08 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,595.08349 Arechiga, Pastor $ 1,575.69 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,575.69378 Sanchez, Daniel $ 1,408.15 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,408.15389 Zapata, Domingo $ 1,747.85 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,747.85329 Moore, Ken $ 3,853.85 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 3,853.85418 Medeiros, Cheryl $ 1,756.62 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,756.62460 Vallejo, Edward $ 1,696.62 $ - - $ - 2.25 $ 47.72 $ 1,744.33486 Palacios, Jesus $ 290.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 290.00495 Valdivia III, Gregorio $ 290.00 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 290.00TOTAL $ 32,305.69 $ 185.06 23.00 $ 851.92 46.50 $ 1,008.13 $ 34,350.81PLANNING37 Pimentel, Olivia $ 2,063.54 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,063.54234 Kufis, Chris $ 2,299.85 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 2,299.85326 Fonseca, Monica $ 1,178.17 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 1,178.17TOTAL $ 5,541.56 $ - - $ -- $ - $ 5,541.56 0.00PLANNING COUNCILEpperson, R $ -Dhaliwal $ 125.00Lopez, Michael $ -Wilcox $ 125.00Bandy, Robert $ -Yep $ 125.00Harris, Jordan $ -Jones $ 125.00Melgoza, G $ -Fox $ 125.00Nehring, K $ -Nijjer, B $ -Total $ -Total $ 625.00GRAND TOTAL: $121,249.07 $563.04 185.50 $7,123.20 137.50 $1,107.63 $ 130,042.94 0.00Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 321


CITY OF KERMANPAYROLL REPORTPAY PERIOD: May 26, 2013 - June 08, 2013RETRO PAY OVERTIMESTANDBY & FTO GROSS COMP TIMEEMPLOYEE SALARY & Other HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT SALARY EARNEDPoliceUni<strong>for</strong>m Pay29 Rodrigues, Mary $ 275.0059 Madruga, Ron $ 275.0069 Chapman, Tom $ 275.00101 Cubillos, Teresa $ 275.00245 Barbosa, Isaias $ 275.00291 Ramirez, Donald $ 275.00296 Mendoza, Sandra $ 275.00343 Davis, Jeff $ 275.00354 Ness, Lee $ 275.00363 Barcoma, Wilbert $ 275.00369 Ramer, Joseph $ 275.00402 Nevis, James $ 275.00423 Magallon, Peter $ 275.00425 Belding, Jeff $ 275.00442 Antuna, Eric $ 275.00458 Nelson, Christopher J $ 275.00459 Milchovich, Lindsay $ 275.00468 Tiwana, Manpreet $ 275.00474 Blohm, Joseph $ 300.00476 Rodriguez, Erika $ 275.00478 O'Bar, Joshua $ 275.00GRAND TOTAL: $ 5,800.00Holiday Pay59 Madruga, Ron $ 1,425.4669 Chapman, Tom $ 1,083.92101 Cubillos, Teresa $ 1,461.00245 Barbosa, Isaias $ 1,083.92296 Mendoza, Sandra $ 1,058.08343 Davis, Jeff $ 1,293.00354 Ness, Lee $ 1,083.92363 Barcoma, Wilbert $ 1,231.38402 Nevis, James $ 1,083.92423 Magallon, Peter $ 1,058.08425 Belding, Jeff $ 1,002.69442 Antuna, Eric $ 914.08458 Nelson, Christopher J $ 1,357.62459 Milchovich, Lindsay $ 891.69468 Tiwana, Manpreet $ 870.46476 Rodriguez, Erika $ 870.46478 O'Bar, Joshua $ 647.08GRAND TOTAL: $ 18,416.76Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 322


CITY OF KERMANOVERTIME SUPPLEMENTAL PAYROLL REPORTPOLICE DEPARTMENTPAY PERIOD - 5-26-13 - 06-08-13Regular Training Shift SID Detail Avoid the SpecialOvertime Coverage 21 Grant Events Total27.5 27 36 7.5 52.5 150.5(see note below) (see note below) (see note below) (see note below) (see note below)DOUBLE TIME: (Sunday)12 (see note below) 12PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Sub Total 162.5Overtime Categories - Number <strong>of</strong> HoursWater Sewer AnimalSpecial Other On CallService Emergencies Control Events Duties Total4 5 1 4 14(see note below) (see note below) (see note below) (see note below)DOUBLE TIME: (Sunday)3 6 9COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Sub Total 23.0Regular After HourOvertime Event TotalFINANCE / PLANNING DEPARTMENTS0Sub Total 0Regular Utility Payroll Dog Clinic Year EndOvertime Billing Audit Total0Sub Total 0Total Hours (All Departments) 185.5POLICE DEPARTMENT:Double time- 12 hours/cover a shiftPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT:Water Service - Includes 4 hrs overtime <strong>for</strong> shut-<strong>of</strong>f and turn-on <strong>of</strong> service, all water related emergencies.Animal Control - Vicious or dead animals. (not normally used <strong>for</strong> stray animals)Special Events - Harvest Festival, Pagentry <strong>of</strong> Lights, National Night Out Water Conservation booth, Portuguese Parade, 3rd <strong>of</strong> July, including set up and clean up.Other - 1 hr overtime <strong>for</strong> on-call to remove downed tree limb.Anything not covered in other categories.COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENTRegular Overtime – On occasion, but very rare due to the amount <strong>of</strong> part-time employees.After Hour Event – Occurs only if a full-time employee would have to stay <strong>for</strong> clean-up or as a facility attendent.FINANCE / PLANNING DEPARTMENTSRegular Overtime - Only as needed.Utility Billing - Completed on the 1st <strong>of</strong> each month.Payroll - Completed bi-weekly.Dog Clinic - Once a year clinic held after business hours.Overtime Categories - Number <strong>of</strong> HoursOvertime Categories - Number <strong>of</strong> HoursOvertime Categories - Number <strong>of</strong> HoursRegular Overtime – 27.5 hours-late reports/arrest/explorer meeting.When an incident occurs at the end <strong>of</strong> a shift and <strong>of</strong>ficer needed extra time, i.e. tocomplete a call <strong>for</strong> service, late arrest, report writing, etc.Shift Coverage – 36 hours-shift coverage due to Chapman, Nevis & Davis on vacation/comp time <strong>of</strong>f. When <strong>of</strong>ficer is called in to cover an absence due tovacation, a recent vacancy, or injury <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficer who is out on medical leave.Special Investigation Division (SID) – Special police action is required such as a search warrant, surveillance, and other crime patterns, etc.Training – 27 Hours total/ 24 hours are POST reimb. For CPT training/3 hrs <strong>for</strong> PEBT training. Officers instructing or attending classes. Overtime mayoccur when <strong>of</strong>ficers cover the shift <strong>of</strong> those in training.Grant – 52.5 hours <strong>for</strong> AVOID the 21. Officers conducting Special En<strong>for</strong>cement Control. Avoid the 21, Click It or Ticket, and Special Project. The <strong>City</strong> getsreimbursed <strong>for</strong> overtime through the Grant Programs.Detail- 7.5 HOURS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> High School graduationSewer Emergencies - 5 hrs Overtime and 3 hrs Double time <strong>for</strong> SCADA problems/Sewer emergencies. (SCADA controls pumps, wells and sewer, liftstations, all sewer and storm drain related issues)On-Call Duties 4 hours overtime and 6 hours double time <strong>for</strong> reading and recording flow meters on wells and sewer plant; feed and clean kennels,verify WWTP running effectively, etc. OT is <strong>for</strong> two weekends. and/or any holidaysYear-End Audit - Completed over a period <strong>of</strong> time at the end <strong>of</strong> each fiscal year.Gen Share/Finance Shared/Payroll/Council Overtime Report23


CITY OF KERMANCD/Securities PortfolioAs <strong>of</strong> May 31, 2013 6/30/2012 6/30/2013 FY to DateInterest Rate/ Opening Maturity Book Additions/ Book InterestInstitution Account Number Trans. Date Date Date Balance (Deletions) Cashed In Balance Fair Value PaidCD's:Pacific Mercantile Bank 80900343 0.95% 1/22/08 1/22/13 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 779.52Spiritbank - Tulsa Oklahoma 615-030525-245 1.35% 6/17/10 12/17/12 98,000.00 (98,000.00) - 663.30Firstbank <strong>of</strong> Puerto Rico 615-030525-245 2.05% 2/24/10 2/25/13 196,000.00 (196,000.00) - 2,708.01JP Morgan (Formerly WAMU) 615-030525-245 4.30% 3/12/08 3/12/13 97,000.00 (97,000.00) - 4,171.00CIT Bank 615-030525-245 3.25% 3/25/09 3/25/13 98,000.00 (98,000.00) - 3,185.00American Express Centurion Bank 615-030525-245 2.05% 3/31/10 4/1/13 98,000.00 (98,000.00) - 2,014.51Doral Bank Cantano PR 615-030525-245 2.15% 5/14/10 5/14/13 98,000.00 (98,000.00) - 1,928.05Banco Popular De Puerto Rico Hato Rey 615-030525-245 1.05% 6/8/11 6/7/13 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,009.92 1,305.57Capmark Bank - Midvale Utah 615-030525-245 5.05% 7/30/08 7/30/13 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,679.97 2,469.38Discover Bank 615-030525-245 0.95% 9/14/11 9/16/13 98,000.00 98,000.00 98,151.90 469.33Bank <strong>of</strong> China 615-030525-245 1.05% 10/31/11 11/1/13 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,634.88 2,604.00American Express Bank 615-030525-246 4.75% 12/24/08 12/24/13 95,000.00 95,000.00 97,249.60 2,262.43Spiritbank - Tulsa Oklahoma 615-030525-245 2.00% 6/17/10 2/18/14 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,846.45 1,811.81Scotiabank De Puerto Rico 615-030525-245 1.40% 3/11/11 3/11/14 196,000.00 196,000.00 197,442.56 2,744.00BMW Bank <strong>of</strong> North America 615-030525-245 1.35% 4/27/11 4/28/14 248,000.00 248,000.00 250,093.12 3,348.00GE Capital Financial 615-030525-245 1.45% 5/13/11 5/13/14 248,000.00 248,000.00 250,008.80 3,596.00American Express Centurion Bank 615-030525-245 1.20% 8/11/11 8/11/14 52,000.00 52,000.00 52,509.60 625.71CIT Bank 615-030525-245 1.15% 8/10/11 8/11/14 46,000.00 46,000.00 46,000.00 530.45World Financial Network NB 615-030525-245 1.25% 8/31/11 8/29/14 200,000.00 200,000.00 200,982.00 2,287.68Ally Bank 615-030525-245 1.75% 10/8/10 10/8/14 100,000.00 100,000.00 101,696.00 1,750.00CIT Bank, Salt Lake <strong>City</strong>, UT 615-030525-245 1.50% 5/4/11 11/4/14 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 1,485.00GE Money Bank 615-030525-245 1.70% 11/5/10 11/5/14 97,000.00 97,000.00 98,325.99 1,649.00GE Money Bank 615-030525-245 1.70% 1/21/11 1/21/15 100,000.00 100,000.00 101,486.00 1,704.66State Bank <strong>of</strong> India 615-030525-245 2.00% 3/24/11 3/24/15 98,000.00 98,000.00 100,097.20 1,960.00Ally Bank, Midvale 615-030525-245 1.80% 6/8/11 6/8/15 147,000.00 147,000.00 150,497.13 1,326.62EverBank 615-030525-245 0.70% 12/14/12 6/15/15 98,000.00 98,000.00 98,410.62 -Mercantile Bank <strong>of</strong> Michigan 615-030525-245 2.00% 1/21/11 7/21/15 150,000.00 150,000.00 153,877.50 3,008.22GE Money Bank 615-030525-245 1.50% 8/5/11 8/5/15 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,638.00 752.05Sallie Mae Bank 615-030525-245 1.10% 8/8/12 8/10/15 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,737.20 537.88Discover Bank 615-030525-245 1.55% 9/14/11 9/14/15 99,000.00 99,000.00 101,402.73 1,996.17State Bank <strong>of</strong> India 615-030525-245 2.25% 9/29/10 9/29/15 100,000.00 100,000.00 103,092.00 3,384.25Discover Bank Greenwood 615-030525-245 1.35% 2/1/12 2/1/16 51,000.00 51,000.00 52,163.31 690.39Goldman Sachs Bank 615-030525-245 1.40% 2/1/12 2/1/16 48,000.00 48,000.00 48,521.76 673.84Safra NB <strong>of</strong> New York 615-030525-245 1.20% 4/4/12 4/4/16 98,000.00 (98,000.00) - 1,449.93Doral Bank San Juan PR 615-030525-245 1.20% 6/28/12 6/28/16 99,000.00 99,000.00 100,179.09 595.63State Bank <strong>of</strong> India 615-030525-245 2.00% 8/12/11 8/12/16 47,000.00 47,000.00 48,394.96 942.57Goldman Sachs Bank USA 615-030525-245 1.85% 8/31/11 8/31/16 200,000.00 200,000.00 204,754.00 3,700.00Firstbank <strong>of</strong> Puerto Rico 6-15-030525-245 1.10% 1/25/13 1/25/17 - 53,000.00 53,000.00 53,015.37 191.68Firstbank <strong>of</strong> Puerto Rico 615-030525-245 0.90% 3/1/13 3/1/17 196,000.00 196,000.00 195,351.24 294.81CIT Bank 615-030525-245 0.90% 3/27/13 3/27/17 98,000.00 98,000.00 97,711.88 -Safra NB <strong>of</strong> New York 615-030525-245 1.50% 5/31/12 5/31/17 150,000.00 (150,000.00) - 1,115.75American Express Centurion Bank 615-030525-245 1.70% 7/26/12 7/26/17 98,000.00 98,000.00 99,841.42 839.85Sallie Mae Bank 615-030525-245 1.70% 8/22/12 8/22/17 150,000.00 150,000.00 152,860.50 1,285.48Provident Bank 615-030525-245 4.85% 8/1/08 8/1/12 97,000.00 (97,000.00) - 2,345.81Bank <strong>of</strong> Baroda 615-030525-245 1.25% 3/8/13 3/8/18 248,000.00 248,000.00 247,253.52 -Wells Fargo Bank in SD 615-030525-245 1-3 Years 1%; Year 4-1.25%; Year 5-2%3/28/13 3/29/18 248,000.00 248,000.00 247,221.28 -32


CITY OF KERMANCD/Securities PortfolioAs <strong>of</strong> May 31, 2013 6/30/2012 6/30/2013 FY to DateInterest Rate/ Opening Maturity Book Additions/ Book InterestInstitution Account Number Trans. Date Date Date Balance (Deletions) Cashed In Balance Fair Value PaidAmerican Express Centurion Bank 615-030525-245 1.15% 5/16/13 5/16/18 98,000.00 98,000.00 97,278.72 -Government Securities:Average Rate 1.99%Subtotal - CD's 4,489,000.00 354,000.00 - 4,843,000.00 4,886,416.22 73,183.34Subtotal - Government Securities - - - - - -Central Valley Comm Bank CD 1.13 6/21/11 9/21/12 505,689.60 1,440.31 (507,129.91) - - 1,440.311.34 6/8/12 6/8/17 200,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 2,232.11Total CD and Government Securities Investments 5,194,689.60 355,440.31 (507,129.91) 5,043,000.00 5,086,416.22 76,855.76Chandler Asset ManagementBeginning Balance - -(<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>) 146,893.43 146,893.43 144,000.00- -Chandler Ending Balance Total Chandler Investments 146,893.43 - - 146,893.43 146,893.43 -Central Valley Money Market Acct 015030960Beginning Balance 6/30/12 2,669,483.07 2,669,483.07Interest 7/31/12 905.58 905.58 905.588/31/12 675.04 675.04 675.049/30/12 388.97 388.97 388.9710/31/12 404.87 404.87 404.8711/30/12 278.68 278.68 278.6812/31/12 237.03 237.03 237.031/31/13 224.56 224.56 224.562/28/13 378.91 378.91 378.913/31/13 327.51 327.51 327.514/30/13 201.25 201.25 201.255/31/13 282.83 282.83 282.83Transfers In/(Out) -7/30/12 (60,000.00) (60,000.00)8/21/12 (90,000.00) (90,000.00)8/23/12 (161,000.00) (161,000.00)9/12/12 (500,000.00) (500,000.00)9/26/12 (200,000.00) (200,000.00)9/26/12 507,129.91 507,129.9110/23/12 (244,000.00) (244,000.00)11/20/12 (110,000.00) (110,000.00)12/13/12 (150,000.00) (150,000.00)1/25/13 (53,000.00) (53,000.00)2/1/13 900,000.00 900,000.002/8/13 (100,000.00) (100,000.00)2/20/13 (200,000.00) (200,000.00)3/8/13 (98,000.00) (98,000.00)3/14/13 (100,000.00) (100,000.00)3/28/13 (151,000.00) (151,000.00)4/3/13 (150,000.00) (150,000.00)4/30/13 600,000.00 600,000.005/3/13 (100,000.00) (100,000.00)-2,669,483.07 (455,564.86) - 2,213,918.21 2,213,918.21 4,305.23SBI, CA Money Market AccountBeginning Balance 6/30/12 248,483.69 248,483.6933


CITY OF KERMANCD/Securities PortfolioAs <strong>of</strong> May 31, 2013 6/30/2012 6/30/2013 FY to DateInterest Rate/ Opening Maturity Book Additions/ Book InterestInstitution Account Number Trans. Date Date Date Balance (Deletions) Cashed In Balance Fair Value PaidInterest 7/31/12 157.85 157.85 157.858/31/10 157.95 157.95 157.959/30/12 139.01 139.01 139.0110/31/12 141.48 141.48 141.4811/30/12 132.70 132.70 132.7012/31/12 137.21 137.21 137.211/31/13 137.65 137.65 137.652/28/13 124.40 124.40 124.403/31/13 137.80 137.80 137.804/30/13 133.43 133.43 133.435/31/13 137.95 137.95 137.95Transfers In/(Out) - -- -- -248,483.69 1,537.43 - 250,021.12 - 1,537.43Ending Balance - Money Market Accts 2,917,966.76 (454,027.43) - 2,463,939.33 2,213,918.21 5,842.66Subtotal All <strong>City</strong> Investments 7,912,656.36 (100,027.43) - 7,306,939.33 7,100,334.43 82,698.4234


CITY OF KERMANCD/Securities PortfolioAs <strong>of</strong> May 31, 2013 6/30/2012 6/30/2013 FY to DateInterest Rate/ Opening Maturity Book Additions/ Book InterestInstitution Account Number Trans. Date Date Date Balance (Deletions) Cashed In Balance Fair Value PaidSUCCESSOR AGENCYTotal - CD's - - - - - -CVCB Money Market Accts 015029549Beginning Balance 6/30/12 340,855.84 340,855.84Interest 7/31/12 50.91 50.91 50.918/31/12 31.18 31.18 31.189/30/12 26.17 26.17 26.1710/31/12 22.69 22.69 22.6911/30/12 14.57 14.57 14.5712/31/12 5.25 5.25 5.251/31/13 4.72 4.72 4.722/28/13 4.27 4.27 4.273/31/13 3.94 3.94 3.944/30/13 3.80 3.80 3.805/31/13 3.54 3.54 3.54Transfers In/(Out) 7/12/12 (110,666.11) (110,666.11)8/31/12 (10,000.00) (10,000.00)9/12/12 (10,000.00) (10,000.00)9/26/12 (10,000.00) (10,000.00)10/9/12 (10,000.00) (10,000.00)10/23/12 (10,000.00) (10,000.00)11/20/12 (120,000.00) (120,000.00)12/11/12 (10,000.00) (10,000.00)12/13/12 (4,000.00) (4,000.00)-Subtotal CVCB Money Market 340,855.84 (294,495.07) - 46,360.77 46,360.77 171.04Subtotal SBI Money Market - - - - - -Ending Balance - Money Market Accts 340,855.84 (294,495.07) - 46,360.77 46,360.77 171.04Subtotal All Successor Agency Investments 340,855.84 (294,495.07) - 46,360.77 46,360.77 171.04Total Investments 8,600,405.63 (393,082.19) (507,129.91) 7,700,193.53 7,293,588.63 82,869.46Market Value Adjustment (406,604.90)(900,212.10)(900,212.10)-35


<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>“Community Comes First”MAYORGary K. YepMAYOR PRO-TEMDoug WilcoxCOUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBERRaj Dhaliwal Nathan Fox Charlie JonesDEPARTMENT: Public WorksSTAFF REPORTCITY COUNCIL MEETINGCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 19, 2013To:From:Subject:Mayor and <strong>City</strong> CouncilGary D. Horn, <strong>City</strong> EngineerPublic Hearing and Approval <strong>of</strong> Resolution Confirming Diagram and Assessments <strong>for</strong> the Annual Levy,2013-2014 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1RECOMMENDATIONCouncil should:1. Conduct a public hearing to receive testimony regarding the proposed 2013-2014 assessments <strong>for</strong> Landscapingand Lighting District No. 1; and2. Adopt the attached Resolution which will confirm the diagram and assessments <strong>for</strong> the annual levy <strong>of</strong>Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 <strong>for</strong> 2013-2014 in the amounts specified.EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Landscape and Lighting District maintains public landscaping in median islands and landscape strips alongmajor streets. The revenue from the district also pays <strong>for</strong> street lighting costs <strong>for</strong> areas with the district. All newdevelopments are annexed into the district and charged an annual assessment that is collected with property taxes.DISCUSSIONThe Landscape and Lighting Act <strong>of</strong> 1972 requires that certain actions be completed by Council prior to levyingassessments upon properties within <strong>Kerman</strong>'s Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 (LLD). The Council haspreviously adopted resolutions initiating the proceedings and authorizing the preparation <strong>of</strong> the Engineer’s Report.The final action required <strong>of</strong> Council is to conduct this public hearing to consider protests to the proposed assessment,to confirm the diagram, and to approve the assessments. The Engineer’s Report <strong>for</strong> the LLD is on file with the <strong>City</strong>Clerk and contains a detailed description <strong>of</strong> the improvements being maintained, the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the LLD, and theproposed assessment <strong>for</strong> each property within the LLD. There have been no annexations to the LLD this past year.Attached is a map showing the various assessment areas. The assessments <strong>for</strong> Areas 1 through 5 were establishedprior to the passage <strong>of</strong> Proposition 218 and there<strong>for</strong>e cannot be raised without a vote <strong>of</strong> the property owners. Theassessments <strong>for</strong> Areas 6 through 12 are adjusted annually by the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). TheCPI increased 2.1% in 2012.36


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 5The proposed assessments <strong>for</strong> single family residential lots are as follows:AREAASSESSMENT1 $50.462 83.563 30.484 83.565 94.006 125.467 125.468 128.229 124.8810 38.7611 124.8812 124.88Assessments <strong>for</strong> large lots vary and are included in the Engineer’s Report.FISCAL IMPACTThe total proposed assessments <strong>for</strong> this year are $207,281.04.PUBLIC HEARINGA public hearing is required by law.REASON FOR RECOMMENDATIONIn order <strong>for</strong> the assessments to be placed on the County tax roll, <strong>City</strong> Council must hold a public hearing and approvethe attached Resolution confirming the assessments.Attachments:A. ResolutionB. Map37


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 5Attachment ‘A’RESOLUTION NO. 13-___A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN, CALIFORNIA,CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVYFOR 2013-2014 OFLANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1WHEREAS, on May 15, 2013 pursuant to Part 2 <strong>of</strong> Division 15 <strong>of</strong> the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscapingand Lighting Act <strong>of</strong> 1972, the Council <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> did adopt a Resolution <strong>of</strong> Intention to Levy and Collect the AnnualAssessment <strong>for</strong> Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> (herein “LLD No. 1”); andWHEREAS, the Council did declare in said Resolution <strong>of</strong> Intention its intention to levy and collect the annualassessment <strong>for</strong> the maintenance and operation <strong>of</strong> the landscaping and lighting facilities in LLD No. 1; andWHEREAS, said Resolution <strong>of</strong> Intention was duly published and notice given <strong>of</strong> the hearing as provided by law.NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED, as follows:1. The Council hereby determines that the territory within the LLD No. 1, whose boundaries are set <strong>for</strong>th in theEngineer’s Report <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> LLD No. 1 dated MAY 2013, and on file with the <strong>City</strong> Clerk <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> will bethe territory benefited by the maintenance and servicing <strong>of</strong> the improvements described in said Engineer’s Report.2. The hearing on said annual levy <strong>of</strong> assessment was held in accordance with law, all persons filing protests orrequesting to speak and who appeared were heard.3. The Engineer’s Report, the diagram <strong>for</strong> the assessment district, and the assessment <strong>of</strong> the estimated costs <strong>of</strong>the improvements contained therein and each and every part <strong>of</strong> said report, is adopted and approved; and the assessment uponthe land in LLD No. 1 being found to be in proportion to the benefits to be received from the improvements, are finally approvedand confirmed as the assessment to pay the costs <strong>of</strong> said improvements and the expenses incidental thereto.4. The Council hereby orders the levy <strong>of</strong> the assessments described in said Resolution <strong>of</strong> Intention and theEngineer’s Report,5. The assessment diagram showing the assessment district referred to in said Resolution <strong>of</strong> Intention and alsothe subdivisions <strong>of</strong> land within the District, as contained in said Engineer’s Report, is the diagram <strong>of</strong> the properties that are to beassessed to pay the District costs.6. The <strong>City</strong> Clerk shall file the diagram and assessment, as confirmed, or a certified copy there<strong>of</strong>, with theRecorder <strong>of</strong> the County <strong>of</strong> Fresno no later than the 26 th day <strong>of</strong> June 2013 and all assessment in<strong>for</strong>mation required by theCounty Auditor to the Auditor’s <strong>of</strong>fice no later than July 29, 2013.38


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 5BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THEREFORE that the <strong>City</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> finds as follows:A. That the assessment imposed hereby is an assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs <strong>of</strong>maintenance and operation expenses <strong>for</strong> sidewalks, streets and integral portions <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the above-described facilities;B. That the assessment imposed is hereby imposed at the assessment rate according to the methodology adoptedpursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all <strong>of</strong> the parcels subject to the assessment was initially imposed, or thatthe assessment imposed hereby is imposed at the assessment rate and according to the methodology adopted pursuant tomajority voter approval from the voters voting in an election on the issue <strong>of</strong> such assessment.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the <strong>City</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> determines, upon the basis <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>egoingfindings, that the assessment adopted hereby is imposed pursuant to the provisions <strong>of</strong> Proposition 218, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia ConstitutionArticle XIII D, and pursuant to exemptions contained therein.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the <strong>City</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> will indemnify, defend and hold harmless theCounty, the Board <strong>of</strong> Supervisors and the Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector, their agents and employees againstpayment <strong>of</strong> any and all costs and expenses, claims, suits, losses, damages and liability arising from or arising out <strong>of</strong> anynegligent or wrongful acts or omissions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>, including its council members, <strong>of</strong>ficers, agents and employee’s in levyingand collecting the assessment.The <strong>for</strong>egoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>held on the 19 th day <strong>of</strong> June, 2013, by the following vote, to wit :AYES:NOES:ABSENT:ABSTAIN:The Resolution is hereby approved.ATTEST:___________________________GARY YEPMAYORMARCI REYESCITY CLERK39


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 5Attachment ‘B’40


<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>“Community Comes First”MAYORGary K. YepMAYOR PRO-TEMDoug WilcoxCOUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBERRaj Dhaliwal Nathan Fox Charlie JonesDEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENTSTAFF REPORTCITY COUNCIL MEETINGCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2013To:From:Subject:Mayor and <strong>City</strong> CouncilChris Kufis, Building OfficialEmergency Abatement <strong>of</strong> Public NuisanceRECOMMENDATIONCouncil declare dead and dried-out redwood trees located at 15838 W. E Street a public nuisance posing animmediate threat <strong>of</strong> property damage and injury pursuant to Section 14.02.20 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kerman</strong> Municipal Code andauthorize the Building Official to immediately abate said nuisance.EXECUTIVE SUMMARYProperty located at 15838 W. E Street has approximately seven (9) redwood trees located in the rear yard that aredead and dried-out. These trees are about 50 feet tall and pose an immediate fire hazard and danger to life andproperty. Two <strong>of</strong> the trees have fallen and seven remain standing. Section 14.02.20 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kerman</strong> Municipal Code(KMO) allows <strong>for</strong> the emergency abatement <strong>of</strong> such a public nuisance where there is an immediate threat <strong>of</strong> propertydamage or injury.OUTSTANDING ISSUESStaff has contacted several tree service companies to provide a quote <strong>for</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> the trees and all debris.Staff expects to receive estimates on June 18. The quotes will be presented to the Council the night <strong>of</strong> meeting.DISCUSSIONThe Planning and Development Department received a complaint about potential fire hazard caused by nine (9) deadand dried-out mature redwood trees in the rear yard <strong>of</strong> the residence located at 15838 W. E Street. On April 15,2013, staff sent a registered thirty day (30) Notice and Order to Abate the trees. Staff did not receive a response fromthe property owners. Staff made contact with the property owners on June 13. The property owners indicated thatthey understood the hazard, but were not in a position to pay <strong>for</strong> the abatement <strong>of</strong> the trees.Staff is considered that the approaching Fourth <strong>of</strong> July holiday poses a serious threat <strong>of</strong> fire due to the dead anddried-out redwood trees. Redwood trees are highly flammable when dry. The adjoining homes to the west and east <strong>of</strong>the subject property have a wood shake ro<strong>of</strong> that would be highly susceptible to catch on fire should the redwoodignite.41


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff ReportEmergency Abatement – 15838 W. E Street Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 5FISCAL IMPACTThe cost to abate the redwood trees will be presented to the Council the night <strong>of</strong> the meeting. Staff scheduled threetree service companies to provide a cost estimate <strong>for</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> the redwood trees and all debris. The cost <strong>of</strong>abatement will be funded from the weed abatement account.Should the <strong>City</strong> authorize the abatement, staff will bring back an abatement cost report at the next regularlyscheduled meeting <strong>for</strong> the Council to authorize staff to submit the cost <strong>of</strong> abatement to the County Treasurer as aspecial assessment against the real property.PUBLIC HEARINGNone required.REASON FOR RECOMMENDATIONTo emergency abate a public nuisance that is an imminent threat to property damage and injury.Attachments:A. Photographs <strong>of</strong> Trees42


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff ReportEmergency Abatement – 15838 W. E Street Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 5Attachment ‘A’Photographs43


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff ReportEmergency Abatement – 15838 W. E Street Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 544


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff ReportEmergency Abatement – 15838 W. E Street Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 545


<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>“Community Comes First”MAYORGary K. YepMAYOR PRO-TEMDoug WilcoxCOUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBERRaj Dhaliwal Nathan Fox Charlie JonesDEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKSSTAFF REPORTCITY COUNCIL MEETINGCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2013To:From:Subject:Mayor and <strong>City</strong> CouncilGary D. Horn, <strong>City</strong> EngineerResolution Awarding Bid <strong>for</strong> First Street Reconstruction, Federal Project No. STPL-5291(016) andMiddleton Avenue Reconstruction, Federal Project No. STPL-5291(017)RECOMMENDATIONCouncil adopt the attached resolution awarding the bid to the lowest responsible bidder based on the outcome <strong>of</strong> thebids opened Tuesday, June 18, 2013 and presented at the Council Meeting.EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe <strong>City</strong> has received Federal funds <strong>for</strong> the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> First Street and Middleton Avenue. Due to the Project’sproximity to <strong>Kerman</strong> High School, the <strong>City</strong> is expediting the Project to complete the majority <strong>of</strong> construction duringsummer recess in order to minimize the impacts to the High School. We have met with KUSD personnel tocoordinate the project schedule with them. A delay in the project review by Caltrans necessitated the opening <strong>of</strong> bidson Tuesday, June 18, 2013 and the award <strong>of</strong> the project at the Council Meeting the following day. The bid results willbe presented at the Council Meeting.OUTSTANDING ISSUEThe bids were originally scheduled to be opened the morning <strong>of</strong> June 14, 2013; however, the bid opening wasrescheduled to June 18 due to an unanticipated delay in obtaining an authorization to proceed from Caltrans. It isimportant to award the bid on June 18 in order <strong>for</strong> the selected contractor to begin construction as soon as possibleto avoid any conflicts with the start <strong>of</strong> the new school year at the high school in mid-August. Staff hopes that thecontractor would be completed with the project be<strong>for</strong>e the school year starts to limit disruptions to early morning andafternoon traffic at the high school.DISCUSSIONThe First Street and Middleton Avenue Reconstruction consists <strong>of</strong> the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> First Street from KearneyBoulevard to Whitesbridge Road and the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> Middleton Avenue from Del Norte Avenue to First Street.The existing pavement along these streets is in poor condition and needs to be reconstructed to correct deficienciesin the pavement surface, pavement structural section, and drainage. The Project will also include the replacement <strong>of</strong>damaged curb and gutter, valley gutter, sidewalk, and other concrete improvements. New handicap ramps will beinstalled at intersections to meet ADA accessibility requirements.46


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 3Award <strong>of</strong> Bid - First and Middleton Street Reconstruction ProjectAs part <strong>of</strong> the Project, curb bulbouts (curb extensions) will be constructed at the intersection <strong>of</strong> First Street andStanislaus Avenue. The curb bulbouts have three primary purposes: 1)Pedestrians are able to safely move out to alocation where they have a line <strong>of</strong> sight beyond parked vehicles to check <strong>for</strong> traffic; 2)Reduced crosswalk lengthdecreases the amount <strong>of</strong> distance pedestrians are exposed to traffic; 3)Drivers instinctively slow down due to thenarrowing <strong>of</strong> the street. Curb bulbouts are also included at the intersection <strong>of</strong> First Street and San Joaquin Avenueas an Additive Alternate to the Project. The construction <strong>of</strong> the curb bulbouts will also require the extension <strong>of</strong>existing storm drainage facilities.The Engineer’s Estimate <strong>for</strong> the Base Bid <strong>for</strong> the Project is $1,016,555 and $70,072 <strong>for</strong> Additive Alternate No. 1.FISCAL IMPACTThe <strong>City</strong> has received Federal funds in the amount <strong>of</strong> $553,438 <strong>for</strong> the Project. The remaining funding will come fromLocal Street funds. The exact amount will be determined by the bids received <strong>for</strong> construction.PUBLIC HEARINGNoneREASON FOR RECOMMENDATIONIn order to move <strong>for</strong>ward with the construction <strong>of</strong> the Project, Council must award the bid to the lowest responsiblebidder.Attachments:A. Resolution47


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 3Award <strong>of</strong> Bid - First and Middleton Street Reconstruction ProjectAttachment ‘A’RESOLUTION NO. 13-___RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMANACCEPTING BID FOR THE FIRST STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (FEDERAL PROJECT NO. STPL-5291(016))AND MIDDLETON AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION, FEDERAL PROJECT NO. STPL-5291(017)WHEREAS, the Invitation to Bid <strong>for</strong> the First Street Reconstruction, Federal Project No. STPL-5291(016) andMiddleton Avenue Reconstruction, Federal Project No. STPL-5291(017) Project in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> was listed in the FresnoBee on May 30, 2013 and the <strong>Kerman</strong> News on June 5, 2013; andWHEREAS, the project will consist <strong>of</strong> the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> First Street from Kearney Boulevard to Whitesbridge Roadand Middleton Avenue from Del Norte Avenue to First Street, including concrete and storm drain improvements in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Kerman</strong>; andWHEREAS, the following bids <strong>for</strong> the project were publicly opened and read aloud at the <strong>Kerman</strong> <strong>City</strong> Hall on June 18,2013 at 10:00 a.m.:“BID RESULTS TO BE SUBMITTED AFTER BID OPENING ON JUNE 18”WHEREAS, the <strong>City</strong> Engineer’s estimate <strong>for</strong> the base bid was $1,016,555.NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN RESOLVES upon the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the<strong>City</strong> Engineer that the First Street Reconstruction, Federal Project No. STPL-5291(016) and Middleton Avenue Reconstruction,Federal Project No. STPL-5291(017) Project be awarded to: “TBD AFTER BID OPENING ON JUNE 18” in the amount <strong>of</strong> “TBDAFTER BID OPENING ON JUNE 18”, and that the <strong>City</strong> Manager is authorized to sign the <strong>City</strong>'s standard <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> agreement <strong>for</strong>construction projects, as contained in the bid package on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>.The <strong>for</strong>egoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> held on the 19 th day <strong>of</strong>June, 2013, and passed at said meeting by the following vote:AYES:NOES:ABSENT:ABSTAIN:The <strong>for</strong>egoing resolution is hereby approved.ATTEST:GARY YEPMAYORMARCI REYESCITY CLERK48


<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>“Community Comes First”MAYORGary K. YepMAYOR PRO-TEMDoug WilcoxCOUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBERRaj Dhaliwal Nathan Fox Charlie JonesDEPARTMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENTSTAFF REPORTCITY COUNCIL MEETINGCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 19, 2013To:From:Subject:Mayor and <strong>City</strong> CouncilGary D. Horn, <strong>City</strong> Engineer<strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> Revision to Engineering FeesRECOMMENDATIONCouncil considers revising hourly rates <strong>for</strong> engineering services provided by Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc.EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> contracts with Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc. <strong>for</strong> engineering related services. Yamabe andHorn is requesting an adjustment in the rates paid <strong>for</strong> engineering services <strong>for</strong> two reasons: First, the StateDepartment <strong>of</strong> Industrial Relations (DIR) has drastically increased the prevailing wage rates <strong>for</strong> land surveyors onpublic works projects, which includes our work <strong>for</strong> the <strong>City</strong>. The current rates set by the State Department <strong>of</strong> IndustrialRelations <strong>for</strong> surveyors are as follows:Classification Previous Rate Current RateChief <strong>of</strong> Party $20.36 $62.63Instrumentman $15.10 $59.54Rodman $12.99 $56.66Secondly, Yamabe and Horn has not adjusted its rates <strong>for</strong> engineering services since July <strong>of</strong> 2007. As costs havegone up, Yamabe and Horn is requesting an adjustment to its rates <strong>for</strong> engineering services based on a two-tieredschedule that has lower rates <strong>for</strong> General Fund projects, which are primarily review <strong>of</strong> development projects.OUTSTANDING ISSUESNone.DISCUSSIONWe are presenting our request in two parts. First are the fees paid <strong>for</strong> surveying services. With the increase in thePrevailing Wage rates, all companies providing public works surveying will be required to pay these wages and thecharge out rates will reflect those wages. Attached is a comparison <strong>of</strong> the rate schedules from surrounding citiesshowing that the rates <strong>for</strong> surveying range from $185 to $260 per hour <strong>for</strong> a two man crew, and $140 to $150 <strong>for</strong> aone man crew. Our proposal is <strong>for</strong> $215 <strong>for</strong> a two man crew and $125 <strong>for</strong> a one man crew.49


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 6Y&H, Inc. – New Engineering RatesSecondly we request an increase in the fees <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice engineering services. The last increase in these rates was in2007. In order to minimize the effect on the General Fund, we are proposing a two-tiered rate schedule. Projectsfunded out <strong>of</strong> the General Fund will have a lower rate than the projects paid <strong>for</strong> by enterprise funds, street funds andstate and federal grants. Having two rate schedules will not pose a bookkeeping problem since we invoice the city byindividual project. All <strong>of</strong> the development review work <strong>for</strong> subdivisions, site plans, grading plans and street planreview are funded by the General Plan. We have also expanded the categories <strong>for</strong> personnel to match the skill andexperience levels <strong>of</strong> our staff. After several years <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tness in the engineering job market, we have noticed anincrease in demand <strong>for</strong> engineers. We need to keep our salaries competitive to attract the most capable engineers sothat our high quality <strong>of</strong> service to <strong>Kerman</strong> can be maintained.FISCAL IMPACTThe charges to the General Fund will vary according to the amount <strong>of</strong> development taking place. The charges to theGeneral Fund <strong>for</strong> the current fiscal year are about $14,000. If the proposed increase is adopted, the additional cost<strong>for</strong> that amount would be $700.The increase in charges to the other funds will average 16% <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice work, which accounts <strong>for</strong> about 90% <strong>of</strong> the fees<strong>for</strong> a construction project. Surveying accounts <strong>for</strong> the remaining 10%.PUBLIC HEARINGNot required.REASON FOR RECOMMENDATIONCouncil must approve any changes in contracts.Attachments:A. Comparison with Current RatesB. Comparison with other citiesC. Resolution50


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 6Y&H, Inc. – New Engineering RatesATTACHMENT A51


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 6Y&H, Inc. – New Engineering RatesATTACHMENT B52


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 6Y&H, Inc. – New Engineering RatesATTACHMENT CRESOLUTION NO. 13-__RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMANAPPROVING ENGINEERING FEE RATESWHEREAS, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> and Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc. (Yamabe & Horn) entered into anAgreement <strong>for</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Engineering Services dated October 12, 2009; andWHEREAS, Yamabe & Horn provides services as <strong>City</strong> Engineer <strong>for</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong>; andWHEREAS, Yamabe & Horn has requested a revision in the Fee Schedule <strong>for</strong> said Agreement.NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN RESOLVES that the Fee Scheduleattached as Exhibit “A” is hereby approved <strong>for</strong> engineering services provided by Yamabe & Horn <strong>for</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Kerman</strong>, and that all other provisions <strong>of</strong> the Agreement <strong>for</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Services shall remain in full <strong>for</strong>ce and effect.The <strong>for</strong>egoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kerman</strong> held on the19th day <strong>of</strong> June, 2013, and passed at said meeting by the following vote:AYES:NOES:ABSENT:ABSTAIN:The <strong>for</strong>egoing resolution is hereby approved.ATTEST:______________________________Gary YepMayor____________________________Marci Reyes<strong>City</strong> Clerk53


<strong>City</strong> Council Staff Report Page 6 <strong>of</strong> 6Y&H, Inc. – New Engineering RatesEXHIBIT AFEE SCHEDULE – HOURLY RATESCLASSIFICATION GENERAL FUND ALL OTHER FUNDSPRINCIPAL ENGINEER $110.00 $130.00CIVIL ENGINEER III $105.00 $120.00LAND SURVEYOR $100.00 $110.00CIVIL ENGINEER II $95.00 $105.00CIVIL ENGINEER I $85.00 $95.00ASSISTANT ENGINEER II $80.00 $90.00ASSISTANT ENGINEER I $75.00 $85.00DRAFTER II $70.00 $75.00DRAFTER I $65.00 $70.00CLERICAL $48.00 $50.002-MAN SURVEY CREW $215.00 $215.00(Prevailing Wage Projects)2-MAN SURVEY CREW $135.00(Non-Prevailing Wage Projects)1-MAN SURVEY CREW $125.00 $125.00(Prevailing Wage Projects)1-MAN SURVEY CREW $90.00(Non-Prevailing Wage Projects)54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!