11.07.2015 Views

comparison of alternative asphalt concrete rut characterization

comparison of alternative asphalt concrete rut characterization

comparison of alternative asphalt concrete rut characterization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BERTHELOT, CROCKFORD & LYTTON 2750Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Variation (%)454035302520151050Marshall StabilityMarshall FlowHveem StabilityUnconfined Compressive StrengthSHRP Bulk ModulusSHRP Total Simple Shear StrainSHRP Complex Shear ModulusSHRP Shear Phase AngleSHRP Constrained Compression ModulusSHRP RSCSR Cumulative StrainSHRP RSCSR Cumulative Strain RateTriaxial Compression ModulusTriaxial Extension ModulusTriaxial Compression Poisson's RatioTriaxial Extension Poisson's RatioTriaxial Phase AngleFigure 9 Asphalt Concrete Characterization Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Variation <strong>of</strong> Characterization MethodsGrouped by Radisson Specific Pavement Studies-9A Asphalt Concrete Mix, Stress State and HighTest TemperatureTable 25 summarizes the Duncan’s pairwise <strong>comparison</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the <strong>alternative</strong> <strong>asphalt</strong> <strong>concrete</strong><strong>characterization</strong> methods. As can be seen in Table and 25, the rapid triaxial tester best ranked the relative<strong>rut</strong>ting behavior <strong>of</strong> the Radisson SPS-9A <strong>asphalt</strong> <strong>concrete</strong> mixes with the exception <strong>of</strong> mixes 900902 and900962 which appear to be reversed in order.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!