11.07.2015 Views

comparison of alternative asphalt concrete rut characterization

comparison of alternative asphalt concrete rut characterization

comparison of alternative asphalt concrete rut characterization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BERTHELOT, CROCKFORD & LYTTON 6not to provide proper ranking <strong>of</strong> the Radisson SPS-9A <strong>asphalt</strong> <strong>concrete</strong> mixes concomitant to field <strong>rut</strong>tingperformance after three years <strong>of</strong> service.Table 4 Hveem Stability Measurements and Duncan's Pairwise Comparison <strong>of</strong> Radisson SpecificPavement Studies-9A Asphalt Concrete MixesSPS-9A Test Mean Hveem HveemDuncan's Grouping*Section Stability StabilityCoefficient <strong>of</strong>Variation(Percent)900901 28.61 1.94 D900902 40.02 1.44 A900903 32.53 3.32 C900959 30.95 7.38 C900960 34.78 3.71 B900961 30.80 2.70 C D900962 35.32 3.68 BMean 33.29 3.45* Asphalt <strong>concrete</strong> mixes with same letter are not significantly different.4.3 Unconfined Compressive Strength CharacterizationUnconfined compressive strength testing <strong>of</strong> <strong>asphalt</strong> <strong>concrete</strong> is standardized in ASTM D1074 andAASHTO T167. Unconfined compressive strength testing was performed on triplicate gyratorycompacted samples at seven percent air voids from each Radisson SPS-9A <strong>asphalt</strong> <strong>concrete</strong> mix at 5°C,20°C, 40°C, 70°C, and 100°C. Tables 5 and 6 summarize the mean unconfined compressive strengthmeasurements across the Radisson SPS-9A <strong>asphalt</strong> <strong>concrete</strong> mixes and test temperatures respectively.A statistical analysis was performed at a 95 percent confidence level to evaluate the significance <strong>of</strong> theunconfined compressive strength measurements across the Radisson SPS-9A <strong>asphalt</strong> <strong>concrete</strong> mixes andtest temperatures employed in the analysis. A two-way analysis <strong>of</strong> variance concluded that RadissonSPS-9A <strong>asphalt</strong> <strong>concrete</strong> mix type, test temperature and the interaction effects <strong>of</strong> mix type and testtemperature had a significant effect on the mean unconfined compressive strength measurements..Duncan's pairwise <strong>comparison</strong> determined that the mean unconfined compressive strength <strong>of</strong> mixes900959 and 900962 were significantly different from all other mixes; however, mixes 900901, 900902,900903, and 900960 were not significantly different; and mixes 900901, 900902, 900903 and 900961were not significantly different. Duncan's pairwise <strong>comparison</strong> across the test temperatures grouped byRadisson SPS-9A <strong>asphalt</strong> <strong>concrete</strong> mix determined that the mean unconfined compressive strengths at5°C, 20°C, and 40°C were significantly different from those at all other temperatures; however, there wasno significant difference between 70°C and 100°C.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!