11.07.2015 Views

Statement of Intent 2013 to 2016 - Human Rights Commission

Statement of Intent 2013 to 2016 - Human Rights Commission

Statement of Intent 2013 to 2016 - Human Rights Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION | STATEMENT OF INTENTOutcome area 2: Housing, health and communityOutputs Performance measure Forecast 2012–13 Standard <strong>2013</strong>–14Facilitate engagementand dialogue betweengovernment agencies, civilsociety and business andprovide advice <strong>to</strong> improveengagement in problemidentification, solutiondesign and decisionmakingon housing, healthand community in theCanterbury earthquakerecovery by peoplemost affected by theearthquakesQuantityAt least 15 instances <strong>of</strong> adviceand guidance providedQualityValued by government agenciesin their responsibility <strong>to</strong> meethuman rights standards and bycivil society in supporting theirengagement with governmentagencies around their humanrights as recorded in the<strong>Commission</strong>’s impact registerNew measureQuantity measure metThe impact register records at least3 government agencies providefeedback that they found the adviceand guidance <strong>of</strong> value, and at least5 instances where communityrepresentatives have identified thatthey have new information <strong>to</strong> assistthem <strong>to</strong> advocate for their humanrightsOutcome area 4: <strong>Human</strong> rights mainstreamingOutputs Performance measure Forecast 2012–13 Standard <strong>2013</strong>–14Provide an educationprogramme <strong>to</strong> increaseunderstanding <strong>of</strong> humanrights and responsibilitiesamong duty-bearers,including the human rightsdimensions <strong>of</strong> the Treaty <strong>of</strong>WaitangiQuantityAt least 3 education programmes,one <strong>to</strong> key influencers anddecision-makers, the other two <strong>to</strong>duty-bearers in organisations suchas local governmentQualityProgrammes are <strong>of</strong> value <strong>to</strong>participants in increasing theirunderstanding <strong>of</strong> human rightsand responsibilities, including thehuman rights dimensions <strong>of</strong> theTreaty <strong>of</strong> Waitangi, as assessed byan evaluation <strong>of</strong> participantsNew measureQuantity measure metOn a 5−point scale, at least 75% <strong>of</strong>the evaluation respondents reportthat the programme met scores <strong>of</strong>4 or 5 – <strong>of</strong> value or great value – inincreasing their understanding <strong>of</strong>human rights and responsibilities,including the human rightsdimensions <strong>of</strong> the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Waitangi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!