11.07.2015 Views

Statement of Intent 2013 to 2016 - Human Rights Commission

Statement of Intent 2013 to 2016 - Human Rights Commission

Statement of Intent 2013 to 2016 - Human Rights Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION | STATEMENT OF INTENTOutputs Performance measure Forecast 2012–13 Standard <strong>2013</strong>–14Produce the national actionplan for the promotion andprotection <strong>of</strong> human rightsin New Zealand 2014–19(NPA), in consultation withkey stakeholders, drawingon the recommendations<strong>of</strong> the second UPRQuantityNational plan producedQualityPlan meets quality measure<strong>of</strong> participation, as assessedthrough a survey <strong>of</strong> selected keystakeholdersNew measureQuantity measure metSurvey shows 75% <strong>of</strong> respondentsare satisfied with the opportunitiesfor participation that were providedPlan meets quality measure<strong>of</strong> thoroughness and value,as assessed by feedback fromstakeholdersImpact register records at least5 instances <strong>of</strong> feedback fromkey stakeholders that the NPA isthorough and <strong>of</strong> valuePlan incorporatesrecommendations <strong>to</strong> which theGovernment has committed inadvance <strong>of</strong> release <strong>of</strong> final UPRrecommendations in 2014, asrecorded through internal peerreviewPeer review assessment confirmsthat the NPA incorporatesrecommendations <strong>to</strong> which theGovernment has committed inadvance <strong>of</strong> release <strong>of</strong> final UPRrecommendations in 2014Produce annual review<strong>of</strong> the reporting <strong>of</strong> “goodemployer” obligations byCrown entitiesQuantityAnnual report producedQualityNew measureQuantity measure metReport meets quality measure<strong>of</strong> accuracy as assessed throughfeedback from contribu<strong>to</strong>rsSurvey shows 75% <strong>of</strong> participatingCrown entities are satisfied that theirinformation has been accuratelyrepresentedReport meets quality measures <strong>of</strong>thoroughness and is consideredvaluable in its recommendationsfor Crown entity good employerbest practice, as assessed byselected Crown entitiesOn a 5−point scale, 75% <strong>of</strong> Crownentities score the report 4 or 5 − it is<strong>of</strong> value or great value

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!