Statement of Intent 2013 to 2016 - Human Rights Commission
Statement of Intent 2013 to 2016 - Human Rights Commission
Statement of Intent 2013 to 2016 - Human Rights Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
34 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION | STATEMENT OF INTENTOutputs Performance measure Forecast 2012–13 Standard <strong>2013</strong>–14Produce the national actionplan for the promotion andprotection <strong>of</strong> human rightsin New Zealand 2014–19(NPA), in consultation withkey stakeholders, drawingon the recommendations<strong>of</strong> the second UPRQuantityNational plan producedQualityPlan meets quality measure<strong>of</strong> participation, as assessedthrough a survey <strong>of</strong> selected keystakeholdersNew measureQuantity measure metSurvey shows 75% <strong>of</strong> respondentsare satisfied with the opportunitiesfor participation that were providedPlan meets quality measure<strong>of</strong> thoroughness and value,as assessed by feedback fromstakeholdersImpact register records at least5 instances <strong>of</strong> feedback fromkey stakeholders that the NPA isthorough and <strong>of</strong> valuePlan incorporatesrecommendations <strong>to</strong> which theGovernment has committed inadvance <strong>of</strong> release <strong>of</strong> final UPRrecommendations in 2014, asrecorded through internal peerreviewPeer review assessment confirmsthat the NPA incorporatesrecommendations <strong>to</strong> which theGovernment has committed inadvance <strong>of</strong> release <strong>of</strong> final UPRrecommendations in 2014Produce annual review<strong>of</strong> the reporting <strong>of</strong> “goodemployer” obligations byCrown entitiesQuantityAnnual report producedQualityNew measureQuantity measure metReport meets quality measure<strong>of</strong> accuracy as assessed throughfeedback from contribu<strong>to</strong>rsSurvey shows 75% <strong>of</strong> participatingCrown entities are satisfied that theirinformation has been accuratelyrepresentedReport meets quality measures <strong>of</strong>thoroughness and is consideredvaluable in its recommendationsfor Crown entity good employerbest practice, as assessed byselected Crown entitiesOn a 5−point scale, 75% <strong>of</strong> Crownentities score the report 4 or 5 − it is<strong>of</strong> value or great value