11.07.2015 Views

Lake Water Quality 2006 Report - Lakefield Herald

Lake Water Quality 2006 Report - Lakefield Herald

Lake Water Quality 2006 Report - Lakefield Herald

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

To put the results in perspective:• 100 E.coli/100 mL is the level at which public beaches are posted unsafe for swimming;• Kawartha <strong>Lake</strong> Stewards Association believes the safe swimming level for our lakes should be more stringent than this,and have set the acceptable level at 50 E.coli/100 mL. KLSA regards counts over 50 as cause for concern;• Counts 20 and below, with an occasional reading between 20 and 50, are normal for the Kawartha lakes;• A “-“ indicates no data available for that date.Chemong L: Smith-Ennismore-<strong>Lake</strong>field Ratepayers Assoc.<strong>2006</strong> E.coli <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Water</strong> TestingE.coli/100 mLSite No. 7-Jul-06 28-Jul-06DW 0 1MF 3 2SND 0 1CW 0 1Chemong <strong>Lake</strong>: Smith-Ennismore-<strong>Lake</strong>field RatepayersCounts were very low at all 4 sites on the 2 dates, as they were in 2005.Clear L: Birchcliff Property Owners of Douro-Dummer<strong>2006</strong> E.coli <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Water</strong> TestingE.coli/100 mLSite No. 20-Jul-06 25-Jul-06 31-Jul-06 3-Aug-06 8-Aug-06 8-Sep-06BB 3 4 15 - 1 01 1 0 1 - 1 02 0 1 89 0, 1, 2, 4, 0, 1 1 03 0 2 3 - 0 264 0 9 12 - 0 665 0 2 2 - 40 06 0 1 1 - 0 07 1 0 1 - 0 08 0 2 1 - 1 3Clear <strong>Lake</strong>: Birchcliff Property Owners of Douro-DummerThe elevated readings for Site 2/July 31 and Site 4/Sep 8 had no apparent cause,and there is no history of high counts at either site. Similar to other years, countswere generally below 10 E.coli/100 mL, indicating a very low level of bacterial pollutionat these sites.71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!