FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSknown protein sequences, RNA-Seq data and ab initio predictors. Then, based on comparative genomics with the pathogenic species Ustilago maydis,Ustilago hordei and Sporisorium reilianum, we identified key features that could explain both the avirulent nature of P. flocculosa toward plants and thevirulent features of the pathogenic Ustilaginales.First, the genome structural annotation showed similarities in total gene number, gene density and average gene length. But these similarities hidesmajor differences with regards to average intron per gene and GC content. In fact, P. flocculosa has about 4 times more introns than U. maydis and has avery high GC content of 65.1%. Moreover, P. flocculosa genome shows a lower level of synteny than pathogenic species compared together.Second, comparison of gene content revealed unexpected results. On one hand, the genome of P. flocculosa harbor many traits usually associated withpathogenic species like plant cell-wall degrading enzymes and genes involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites that are highly conservedcompared to pathogenic species. On the other hand, genes coding for candidate secreted effector proteins (CSEPs) show a much lower level ofconservation, that seem to explain, in part, the differences in lifestyle.Finally, this work led to the identification of certain of the most interesting genetic features in the study of pathogens and biocontrol agents.332. A tale of two poplar pathogens - Moving from sequence to function. B. Dhillon 1 , N. Feau 1 , P. Tanguay 2 , M. Sakalidis 1 , S. Beausiegle 1 , R. Ohm 3 , A.Aerts 3 , I. Grigoriev 3 , G. H. J. Kema 4 , S. B. Goodwin 5 , R. Hamelin 1 . 1) Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2) CFSLaurentian Forestry Centre, Succ. Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada; 3) 3DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA, DOE, USA; 4) Plant ResearchInternational B.V., Wageningen, The Netherlands; 5) USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.Two closely related, morphologically indistinct fungal pathogens of poplars, Mycospharella populorum and M. populicola are prevalent in North America.In natural stands, these two fungal species closely follow the distribution of their host, with M. populorum being found on Aiegeiros botanical section andM. populicola on the Tacamahaca section of poplars. Epidemiologically, M. populorum is considered to be more aggressive, as in addition to leaf-spots, ithas the ability to infect woody tissue and cause cankers, an ability that M. populicola lacks. Moreover, introduction of hybrid plantations has added to M.populorum host range. Availability of genomes will allow us a window into understanding the genetic basis for these observed differences in epidemiologyand host-specificity for these two pathogens. Historical observation of host-specificity was confirmed by comparative sequence analysis the estimated thedivergence time between the two poplar pathogens to be ~6.4 Mya, which agrees with the divergence time estimates for the poplar botanical sections(6.8 - 7.8 Mya). Despite the remarkable macro-synteny exhibited between these two recently diverged pathogens, several genes specific to each pathogenwere identified in genomic regions where synteny broke down. In addition to being candidates for the different physiological and epidemiologicalattributes, these species-specific genes could be utilized for diagnostic and monitoring assays. A consistent expansion of several pathogenicity-relatedgene families was observed in M. populorum, suggesting a role for gene-dosage in determining its ability to cause cankers. Preliminary enzyme assaysshowed significant differences in beta-glucosidase and xylanase activities between these two fungi.333. Defining Open Chromatin Regions in Coprinopsis cinerea Oidia by FAIRE. Virginia K. Hench 1,2 , Patricia J. Pukkila 1,2 . 1) Department of Biology,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599; 2) Office for Undergraduate Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599.Changes in chromatin organization are principal regulatory mechanisms controlling multiple cellular processes including gene expression and meioticcrossover formation. Here we present FAIRE (formaldehye assisted isolation of regulatory elements) data that reveals regions of open chromatin inCoprinopsis cinerea oidia, the asexual spore stage of the C. cinerea life cycle. A standard FAIRE protocol was developed and optimized for oidia and used toenrich for nucleosome-free stretches of chromatin. FAIRE peaks were identified from single-end read whole genome sequence data using ZINBA (Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Algorithm), which identified 7,276 peaks covering 6.3% of the genome. FAIRE peaks are predominantly intergenic with 78% ofFAIRE domains overlapping noncoding sequence. The peak widths range from 98-1390 bps, with an average width of 310 bps. Nearly half or 47% ofannotated genes (Broad version 3) contain a FAIRE peak in the proximal promoter region (defined as 500 bps immediately upstream of the gene start).Differential transcription has been characterized throughout the synchronous meiotic process in C. cinerea (Burns, C. et al., PLOS <strong>Genetics</strong>, vol 6, issue 9,2010), but the extent to which nucleosome occupancy might contribute to gene regulation in this multicellular fungus was not known. We found that aminority of meiotic specific (MS; genes expressed in meiosis and not in vegetative tissue) genes had promoter FAIRE peaks (of 819 genes 37% hadpromoter FAIRE peaks). In contrast, 61% of genes significantly changing during meiosis (SCDM; 2,455 genes) had promoter FAIRE peaks. Out of 295 genesthat were MS and SCDM, 38% had promoter FAIRE peaks in oidia. Genes with known meiotic function including spo11, dmc1, and rec8 were amongst theMS/SCDM genes that did not have promoter FAIRE peaks in oidia. In summary, all examined meiotic gene sets included genes associated with and withoutFAIRE peaks in their promoter regions, indicating that complex gene regulation mechanisms contribute to differential, tissue-specific gene expression in C.cinerea. Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute Community Sequencing <strong>Program</strong>. The work conducted by the U.S. DOE JGI issupported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.334. Ensembl Fungi - genome-scale data portal from fungal species. Uma Maheswari, Heldér Pedro, Mark McDowall, Daniel M. Staines, Paul Kersey.European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, United kingdom.Ensembl Fungi (http://fungi.ensembl.org) is a portal offering access to genome-scale data from fungal species, using the Ensembl genome analysissystem, through a common set of interfaces shared with non-fungal species also represented in the Ensembl system. These include a web-based genomebrowser, Perl and REST-ful APIs, a public MySQL server and a query-orientated data warehouse (BioMart). The current release (January 2013) providesaccess to 36 fungal genomes across 12 different taxonomic orders, including the model species Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomycespombe, (for which data are imported from the Saccharomyces Genome Database and PomBase respectively) but focuses mainly on plant pathogenspecies: genomic data from these is being integrated with information about infectious phenotypes (derived from PHI-base (http://www.phibase.org) on aper-gene basis, thro ugh a new targeted resource PhytoPath (http://www.phytopathdb.org).Core data provided for all species includes genome sequence, sequence patterns, annotation of protein and non-coding genes and functional annotationimported from direct curation, UniProt and InterPro. Information about gene regulation, sequence variation, evolution and conservation is also integratedin the system. Protein alignments are used to reconstruct evolutionary trees and infer homology relationships, while pairwise alignments between DNAsequences are performed between closely related species. Genomic polymorphisms are presented in the context of the reference genome sequences ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae and the phytopathogens Gibberella zeae, Puccinia graminis and Fusarium oxysporum.Ensembl Fungi will continue to expand with the increase in genomic data , we seek to work with the communities actively generating and using data, andare participants in a growing range of collaborations involved in the annotation and analysis of genomes.202
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS335. A draft genome of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Rhizopogon vesiculosus: Characterization of mating system and heterozygosity within the dikaryon.Alija Mujic, Joseph Spatafora. Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.Species of Rhizopogon are EM symbionts of trees in family Pinaceae and produce basidiospores within hypogeous false truffles that are dispersed bymycophagous mammals. All known members of R. subgenus Villosuli form obligate EM relationships with Pseudotsuga spp. (Douglas Fir) and are the onlymembers of the genus known to possess this host association. R. vesiculosus, along with its cryptic sister species R. vinicolor, possess a sympatricdistribution where sampled within the range of their host tree, P. menziesii. While the sporocarp and EM morphology of these fungi may be highly similar;they possess striking life history differences with R. vesiculosus producing larger vegetative genets and displaying greater population structure at bothlocal and landscape scales. We have sequenced the genome of R. vesiculosus using dikaryotic tissue and a whole genome shotgun sequencing approach onthe Illumina HiSeq platform. De novo assembly of the genome was performed using VELVET 1.19 and gene predictions were made using AUGUSTUS withLaccaria bicolor as a training model. The draft genome assembled to a total length of 46 Mb in 6700 contigs with an N50 of 26,783, a maximum contig sizeof 446,818 bp, and 12,604 predicted genes. Here we characterize the mating system of R. vesiculosus, which possesses both an A-locus encoding aheterodimer transcription factor, as well a B-locus encoding transmembrane pheromone receptors and pheromone precursor genes. We presentcomparisons of the mating system of R. vinicolor and its similarities to other members of Boletales (e.g., Serpula) and differences with Agaricales (e.g.,Laccaria). Due to the dikaryotic nature of the genome sequence produced for R. vesiculosus, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can be observed andused to characterize allelic variation. SNPs observed in protein coding regions of both MAT loci indicate that R. vesisculosus is likely heterothallic. We havealso characterized heterozygosity across the whole genome in order to identify hypervariable regions. This genome will allow for comparative analysis ofgene content, mating type system with other Basidiomycota and, ultimately, for population/species-level genomic studies within Rhizopogon.336. Diverse Lifestyles and Strategies of Plant Pathogenesis Encoded in the Genomes of Eighteen Dothideomycetes Fungi. Robin A Ohm 1 , Nicolas Feau 2 ,Bernard Henrissat 3 , Conrad L Schoch 4 , Benjamin A Horwitz 5 , Rosie E Bradshaw 6 , Lynda Ciuffetti 7 , Richard C Hamelin 2,8 , Gert HJ Kema 9 , ChristopherLawrence 10 , James A Scott 11 , Joseph W Spatafora 7 , B. Gillian Turgeon 12 , Pierre JGM de Wit 13 , Shaobin Zhong 14 , Stephen B Goodwin 15 , Igor V Grigoriev 1 ,Other members of the Dothideomycetes community. 1) United States Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI), Walnut Creek, CA, UnitedStates of America; 2) Faculty of Forestry, Forest Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 3) Architecture et Fonction desMacromolécules Biologiques, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Marseille, France; 4) NIH/NLM/NCBI, Bethesda, MD, United States of America; 5) Departmentof Biology, Technion - IIT, Haifa, Israel; 6) Institute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; 7) Department of Botanyand Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America; 8) Natural Resources Canada, Ste-Foy, QC, Canada; 9) Plant ResearchInternational, Wageningen, The Netherlands; 10) Virginia Bioinformatics Institute & Department of Biological Sciences, Blacksburg, VA, United States ofAmerica; 11) Division of Occupational & Environmental Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 12) Departmentof Plant Pathology & Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America; 13) Laboratory of Phytopathology, WageningenUniversity, Wageningen, The Netherlands; 14) Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States of America; 15)United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.The class Dothideomycetes is one of the largest groups of fungi with a high level of ecological diversity including many plant pathogens infecting a broadrange of hosts. Here, we compare genome features of 18 members of this class, including 6 necrotrophs, 9 (hemi)biotrophs and 3 saprotrophs, to analyzegenome structure, evolution, and the diverse strategies of pathogenesis. The Dothideomycetes most likely evolved from a common ancestor more than280 million years ago. The 18 genome sequences differ dramatically in size due to variation in repetitive content, but show much less variation in numberof (core) genes. Gene order appears to have been rearranged mostly within chromosomal boundaries by multiple inversions, in extant genomes frequentlydemarcated by adjacent simple repeats. Several Dothideomycetes contain one or more gene-poor, transposable element (TE)-rich putatively dispensablechromosomes of unknown function. The 18 Dothideomycetes offer an extensive catalogue of genes involved in cellulose degradation, proteolysis,secondary metabolism, and cysteine-rich small secreted proteins. Ancestors of the two major orders of plant pathogens in the Dothideomycetes, theCapnodiales and Pleosporales, may have had different modes of pathogenesis, with the former having fewer of these genes than the latter. Many of thesegenes are enriched in proximity to transposable elements, suggesting faster evolution because of the effects of repeat induced point (RIP) mutations. Asyntenic block of genes, including oxidoreductases, is conserved in most Dothideomycetes and upregulated during infection in L. maculans, suggesting apossible function in response to oxidative stress.337. Domains of meiotic DNA recombination and gene conversion in Coprinopsis cinerea (Coprinus cinereus). Patricia J. Pukkila 1 , Wendy Schackwitz 2 . 1)Dept Biol, Univ North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 2) US DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.We have shown previously that rates of meiotic recombination are highly non-uniform along the assembled chromosomes of C. cinerea (Stajich et al.PNAS 107: 11889-11894, 2010). That study revealed an over-representation of paralogous multicopy genes in regions with elevated levels of meioticexchange. In addition, retrotransposon-related sequences were not found in large segments of the genome with low levels of meiotic exchange. However,the study was limited by the available markers, and only 31 Mb of the 36 Mb genome could be mapped. More recently, we have resequenced 45 meioticsegregants and 4 complete tetrads. We developed a simple script to detect crossover and gene conversion events involving over 75,000 SNPs spanning 35Mb. The data were analyzed using MSTmap (Wu et al. PLoS <strong>Genetics</strong> 4: e1000212, 2008). The new dataset revealed sub-telomeric recombination hotspotsat every chromosome end, and 36% of the crossovers were associated with uninterrupted tracts of gene conversion. The conversion tracts (2-8 SNPs) werequite short (8-219 nt), and the median distance between the flanking SNP markers was also small (500 nt). Since these subtelomeric hotspots correspondto sites of synaptic initiation in C. cinerea (Holm et al. Carlberg Res. Commun. 46: 305-346, 1981), these data may contribute to our understanding of howhomologous chromosome pairing and synapsis are coordinated with meiotic recombination. Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint GenomeInstitute Community Sequencing <strong>Program</strong>. The work conducted by the U.S. DOE JGI is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energyunder Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.338. FungiDB: An integrated functional genomics database for fungi. Raghuraman Ramamurthy 1 , Edward Liaw 1 , Sucheta Tripathy 7 , John Brestelli 2,3 , SufenHu 3 , Wei Li 3 , Omar Harb 3,4 , Brian Brunk 3,4 , Steve Fischer 2,3 , Deborah Pinney 2,3 , Jessica Kissinger 5,6 , Brett Tyler 8 , David Roos 3,4 , Jason Stajich 1 . 1) Plantpathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA; 2) Department of <strong>Genetics</strong>, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine,Philadelphia, PA; 3) Penn Center for Bioinformatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; 4) Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia, PA; 5) Center for Tropical & Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA; 6) Department of <strong>Genetics</strong> and Institute ofBioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA; 7) Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA; 8) Center for Genome<strong>27th</strong> <strong>Fungal</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> | 203
- Page 1:
Asilomar Conference GroundsMarch 12
- Page 7 and 8:
SCHEDULE OF EVENTSFriday, March 157
- Page 10 and 11:
EXHIBITSThe following companies hav
- Page 12 and 13:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESWednes
- Page 14:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESWednes
- Page 17 and 18:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESThursd
- Page 19:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESFriday
- Page 22 and 23:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESSaturd
- Page 24:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESSaturd
- Page 27 and 28:
PLENARY SESSION ABSTRACTSThursday,
- Page 29 and 30:
PLENARY SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday, Ma
- Page 31 and 32:
PLENARY SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturday,
- Page 33 and 34:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 35 and 36:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSUnravel
- Page 37 and 38:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSynergi
- Page 39 and 40:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 41 and 42:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 43 and 44:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 45 and 46:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSA draft
- Page 47 and 48:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSRegulat
- Page 49 and 50:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 51 and 52:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 53 and 54:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 55 and 56:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 57 and 58:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 59 and 60:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 61 and 62:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThe mut
- Page 63 and 64:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSInnate
- Page 65 and 66:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 67 and 68:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSGenome-
- Page 69 and 70:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSIdentif
- Page 71 and 72:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 73 and 74:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 75 and 76:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThe Scl
- Page 77 and 78:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThe rol
- Page 79 and 80:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 81 and 82:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSCompari
- Page 83 and 84:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSNovel t
- Page 85 and 86:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 87 and 88:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSEffect
- Page 89 and 90:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSCommon
- Page 91 and 92:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 93 and 94:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSeconda
- Page 95 and 96:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSheddin
- Page 97 and 98:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 99 and 100:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 101 and 102:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 103 and 104:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSprocess
- Page 105 and 106:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSpecifi
- Page 107 and 108:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTSBioc
- Page 109 and 110:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS81.
- Page 111 and 112:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS160.
- Page 113 and 114:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS239.
- Page 115 and 116:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS322.
- Page 117 and 118:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS401.
- Page 119 and 120:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTSmedi
- Page 121 and 122:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS558.
- Page 123 and 124:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS640.
- Page 125 and 126:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS723.
- Page 127 and 128:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS5. Cha
- Page 129 and 130:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS13. In
- Page 131 and 132:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSbioche
- Page 133 and 134:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS30. Me
- Page 135 and 136:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS38. Me
- Page 137 and 138:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSidenti
- Page 139 and 140:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSsecret
- Page 141 and 142:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSinvolv
- Page 143 and 144:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSdiploi
- Page 145 and 146:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSSaccha
- Page 147 and 148:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSresist
- Page 149 and 150:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS96. Ce
- Page 151 and 152:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS104. M
- Page 153 and 154:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScan ex
- Page 155 and 156: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSturgor
- Page 157 and 158: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSlike p
- Page 159 and 160: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSIndoor
- Page 161 and 162: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSlength
- Page 163 and 164: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSA scre
- Page 165 and 166: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSthen q
- Page 167 and 168: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS170. S
- Page 169 and 170: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSof sup
- Page 171 and 172: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSis fzo
- Page 173 and 174: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSgrowth
- Page 175 and 176: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSSeq da
- Page 177 and 178: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS212. T
- Page 179 and 180: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSCompar
- Page 181 and 182: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmore g
- Page 183 and 184: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmolecu
- Page 185 and 186: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSunexpe
- Page 187 and 188: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSrapid
- Page 189 and 190: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS260. T
- Page 191 and 192: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSFusari
- Page 193 and 194: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSScienc
- Page 195 and 196: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS286. G
- Page 197 and 198: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSincomp
- Page 199 and 200: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSfound
- Page 201 and 202: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS312. I
- Page 203 and 204: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSall th
- Page 205: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSPia La
- Page 209 and 210: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS342. F
- Page 211 and 212: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSThis i
- Page 213 and 214: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSJacobs
- Page 215 and 216: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScalciu
- Page 217 and 218: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSThe ab
- Page 219 and 220: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSexpres
- Page 221 and 222: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS394. F
- Page 223 and 224: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS398. U
- Page 225 and 226: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSthe id
- Page 227 and 228: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS415. A
- Page 229 and 230: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSAcuM b
- Page 231 and 232: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSdiverg
- Page 233 and 234: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSBck1 f
- Page 235 and 236: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSin the
- Page 237 and 238: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS455. T
- Page 239 and 240: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSor hos
- Page 241 and 242: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSfragme
- Page 243 and 244: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSenhanc
- Page 245 and 246: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSassess
- Page 247 and 248: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmating
- Page 249 and 250: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScommon
- Page 251 and 252: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSOne of
- Page 253 and 254: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScells
- Page 255 and 256: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSof Ave
- Page 257 and 258:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSascaro
- Page 259 and 260:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSis a n
- Page 261 and 262:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSand th
- Page 263 and 264:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSCiuffe
- Page 265 and 266:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSon oth
- Page 267 and 268:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScopies
- Page 269 and 270:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSChem.
- Page 271 and 272:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS593. C
- Page 273 and 274:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS601. P
- Page 275 and 276:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSE.elym
- Page 277 and 278:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSThe de
- Page 279 and 280:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSMicrob
- Page 281 and 282:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSchromo
- Page 283 and 284:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmating
- Page 285 and 286:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSAt the
- Page 287 and 288:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSemerge
- Page 289 and 290:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS666. G
- Page 291 and 292:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSof che
- Page 293 and 294:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSthe lo
- Page 295 and 296:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSin the
- Page 297 and 298:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSpotent
- Page 299 and 300:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSpoint
- Page 301 and 302:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS716. p
- Page 303 and 304:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSnatura
- Page 305 and 306:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSelemen
- Page 307 and 308:
KEYWORD LISTABC proteins ..........
- Page 309 and 310:
KEYWORD LISThigh temperature growth
- Page 311 and 312:
AUTHOR LISTBolton, Melvin D. ......
- Page 313 and 314:
AUTHOR LISTFrancis, Martin ........
- Page 315 and 316:
AUTHOR LISTKawamoto, Susumu... 427,
- Page 317 and 318:
AUTHOR LISTNNadimi, Maryam ........
- Page 319 and 320:
AUTHOR LISTSenftleben, Dominik ....
- Page 321 and 322:
AUTHOR LISTYablonowski, Jacob .....
- Page 323 and 324:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSLeslie G Beresf
- Page 325 and 326:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSTim A DahlmannR
- Page 327 and 328:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSIgor V Grigorie
- Page 329 and 330:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSMasayuki KameiT
- Page 331 and 332:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSGeorgiana MayUn
- Page 333 and 334:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSNadia PontsINRA
- Page 335 and 336:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSFrancis SmetUni
- Page 337 and 338:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSAric E WiestUni