FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSGpa1 and Gpg1/Gpg2 in a direct manner, and Gib2 promotes cAMP levels through novel interactions with phosphodiesterase Pde2 and RAS proteins Ras1and Ras2. Using TAP technology, we have identified additional 42 proteins whose putative function range from signal transduction, energy generation,metabolism, and stress response to ribosomal function. Finally, through establishing a protein-protein interactive network, we illustrate that Gib2 adapts ascaffold role to mediate specific protein-protein interactions that drive the formation of various protein complexes. This includes fostering aheterotrimeric complex with Gpa1 and Gpg1/Gpg2, targeting Pde2 (direct) and adenylyl cyclase Cac1 (indirect) to regulate cAMP levels, and likely servingas a conserved ribosomal core protein facilitating fundamental cellular processes to underlie growth and virulence. Our studies reveal the complexity ofthe regulatory network in fungi and advocate Gib2 as a novel target for antifungal therapy.459. Consequences of the loss of transcription factors SreA and HapX on siderophore biosynthesis and iron homeostasis in the perennial ryegrassendophyte, Epichloë festucae. Natasha T. Forester 1,2 , Geoffrey A. Lane 1 , Iain L. Lamont 2 , Linda J. Johnson 1 . 1) Plant <strong>Fungal</strong> Interactions Team, AgResearchLtd, Palmerston North, New Zealand; 2) Biochemistry Dept, University of Otago, Dunedin, NZ.Siderophores are low molecular weight ferric iron chelators that are made by microorganisms to compete for and to sequester iron, an essentialmicronutrient. Epichloë festucae, a fungal endosymbiont of perennial ryegrass, synthesises two siderophores, epichloënin A and ferricrocin to harvest andutilise iron from its host grass. Work by our group has implicated epichloënin A in the maintenance of symbiosis and is described in another abstract. Toexplore the regulation of siderophore biosynthesis and iron homeostasis processes, we have characterised mutants of two major iron-responsivetranscription factors, SreA and HapX that coordinate cellular responses to iron availability. To evaluate the effect of loss of SreA and HapX on siderophorebiosynthesis, we measured the production of epichloënin A and ferricrocin by LC-MS/MS. Relative to wild type; both siderophores were over-produced inDsreA mycelia grown in the presence of iron, while ferricrocin was produced in excess in DhapX mycelia grown under iron deprived conditions. Irondependentphenotypic deviations from wild type fungal growth were also observed in culture and in planta but neither mutant disrupted the E. festucae -L. perenne association under standard soil conditions. However, under iron-limiting conditions through hydroponic control of symbiotic iron supply, wedemonstrated that DsreA mutants can induce chlorosis in their hosts, indicating that DsreA mutants compete for host iron. In planta, the DsreA fungalhyphae are also markedly increased in girth and lack growth in vascular bundles. In DhapX infected plants grown hydroponically in iron deprivedconditions, we observed inappropriate fungal growth such as highly convoluted and compressed hyphae and elongated fungal structures which hinted atreduced resource conservation by DhapX under growth limiting conditions. Collectively, these results suggest that Epichloë fungi have a tightly regulatediron management system for niche adaptation and actively set limits on iron withdrawal from the host, presumably to prevent competition with its host topromote mutualistic interactions. Mutations that interfere with fungal iron management, either by deregulating siderophore synthesis, can destabilise thefungal-plant association.460. Who is to blame: defining the host responses that lead to ToxA-induced susceptibility. Iovanna Pandelova, Viola Manning, Ashley Chu, LyndaCiuffetti. Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR.Pathogenicity by the necrotrophic pathogen of wheat, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr), is attributed to the production of host-selective toxins (HSTs).Understanding the mode-of-action of HSTs is essential for a complete characterization of how these pathogenicity factors condition plant diseasesusceptibility. One of the proteinaceous HSTs produced by Ptr, PtrToxA (ToxA), induces necrosis in sensitive cultivars. Several studies suggest that ToxAinteracts with a high affinity receptor, enters mesophyll cells and localizes to chloroplasts. Additionally, ToxA acts as an elicitor of defense responses byincreasing production of phenolic compounds and by the up-regulation of genes involved in jasmonic acid and ethylene production pathways. After ToxAtreatment and incubation in constant light, there is a decrease in photosystem (PS) I and II transcripts observable already at 9 and 14 hours post infiltration(hpi), which is followed by the drastic reduction in levels of both PSI- and PSII-complex proteins. It is proposed that photosystem dysfunction leads to lightdependentaccumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the development of necrosis. To better understand the role of ROS, photosynthesis anddefense responses in necrosis development induced by ToxA, plants were incubated in light (presence of ROS) or in dark (absence of ROS). In order todetermine the impact of ToxA on gene regulation and to establish when early changes in protein content of PS complexes occur, both biochemical andmicroarray analyses were performed. Some defense-related genes are up-regulated in ToxA-treated leaves incubated in the dark (ToxA/dark), althoughthe number of probesets was considerably less compared to ToxA-treated leaves incubated in light (ToxA/light). Furthermore, ethylene biosynthesis genes,that play a role in symptom development in ToxA/light treatrment are not significantly up-regulated in ToxA/dark-treated leaves. Finally, only a smallfraction of PSI- and II-related and chlorophyll a/b-binding genes are down-regulated in ToxA/dark compared to ToxA/light treatment. These data suggestthat only certain defense-related pathways are involved in ToxA-induced necrosis development, and help to identify those genes whose differentialregulation by ToxA is light and/or ROS-dependent.461. RNA silencing of pacC increases aflR transcript levels under alkaline pH conditions in Aspergillus flavus. Benesh M Somai, Kyle W van der Holst, EssaSuleman. Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, 6031, Eastern Cape, South Africa.Aspergillus flavus produces aflatoxin B1 which is an important hepatocarcinogen, especially amongst the developing third world countries which have alarge number of poor, rural, subsistence communities with little access to fungicides. The master regulator of aflatoxin production is aflR which, in turn,appears to be negatively regulated by pacC. However, until now, there were never any direct measurements of the relative aflR/pacC transcript ratiosproduced under aflatoxin conducive and non-conducive conditions. In the current study, pacC was down-regulated in two transformants by a syntheticpacCRNAi construct under the control of a thiamine inducible promoter. Expression of pacC and aflR transcripts was then measured via RT-qPCR incultures grown under alkaline or acid conditions. At pH 4, between pacCRNAi inducing and repressing conditions, an aflR/pacC transcript ratio of 1.09relative to the reference gene was obtained indicating the production of an equal abundance of aflR and pacC mRNA. It is generally accepted that at acidicpH the majority of pacC mRNA is unprocessed, remains untranslated and non-functional thereby being incapable of repressing AFLR protein production.This stimulates aflatoxin production at acidic pH. Between pH 8 and pH 4, when pacCRNAi was suppressed, the aflR/pacC ratio was 0.2 indicating that pacCproduction was higher than that of aflR. aflR transcript levels were reduced between 76% and 80% therefore explaining the normal lack of aflatoxindetection at pH 8. Between pH 8 and pH 4, when pacCRNAi was induced, the aflR/pacC ratio was between 1.77 and 13.21 indicating that at alkaline pH,suppression of pacC allowed a large increase in AFLR which stimulated aflatoxin production. It is concluded that pacC is produced at acidic pH, but remainslargely non-functional. Furthermore, at pH 8, aflR production decreases only by about 80% and therefore it is possible that the remaining 20% oftranscripts still stimulates aflatoxin production. Finally, via RNAi silencing it is conclusively proved that pacC negatively regulates aflR production at pH 8.462. High-throughput prediction and functional validation of promoter motifs regulating gene expression in spore and infection stages of Phytophthorainfestans. H. Judelson, S. Roy, M Kagda. Dept of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA.Most filamentous pathogens have complex life cycles in which gene expression networks orchestrate the formation of cells specialized for dissemination234
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSor host colonization. In the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, the potato late blight pathogen, we identified major shifts in mRNA profiles duringdevelopmental transitions using microarrays. We then used those data with three search algorithms to discover more than 100 motifs that are overrepresentedin promoters of genes up-regulated in hyphae, sporangia, sporangia undergoing zoosporogenesis, swimming zoospores, or germinated cystsforming appressoria. Most of the putative stage-specific transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) thus identified had features typical of TFBSs such asposition or orientation bias, palindromy, and conservation in related species. Each of six motifs tested in P. infestans transformants using the GUS reportergene conferred the expected stage-specific expression pattern, and were shown to bind nuclear proteins in gel-shift assays. Several motifs linked to theappressoria-forming stage were over-represented in promoters of genes encoding effectors and other pathogenesis-related proteins. To understand howpromoter and genome architecture influence expression, we also mapped transcription patterns to the P. infestans genome assembly. Adjacent geneswere not typically induced in the same stage, including genes transcribed from a small shared promoter region. Analyses of global expression, however,demonstrated that co-regulated gene pairs occurred more than expected by random chance. These data help illuminate the processes regulatingdevelopment and pathogenesis, and will enable future attempts to purify the cognate transcription factors. Our approach should be applicable to bothoomycetes and fungi.463. Cooperative regulation of Aspergillus nidulans cellulase genes by transcription factors McmA and ManR/ClrB. Tetsuo Kobayashi 1 , Nuo Li 1 , MikiAoyama 1 , Yohei Yamakawa 1 , Masahiro Ogawa 2 , Yasuji Koyama 2 . 1) Grad Sch of Bioagricultural Sci, Nagoya Univ, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan; 2) Kikkoman Corp,Noda, Chiba, Japan.Expression of the endoglucanase A gene (eglA) in A. nidulans is inducible by cellobiose. Previously, the cis-element responsible for the inductiveexpression, designated CeRE (Cellulose Responsive Element), was identified based on mutational analysis of the eglA promoter. CeRE contained thebinding consensus of SRF-MADS proteins, suggesting involvement of McmA, the sole SRF-MADS protein in A. nidulans. While two Zn 2Cys 6 transcriptionfactors in Aspergillus were recently reported to be essential to cellulase induction. One is ManR in A. oryzae, which regulates both mannanase andcellulase genes, and the other is ClrB in A. nidulans, a homolog of the cellulase regulator CLR-2 in N. crassa. Since these factors were orthologous sharing63% identity, we use the name ManR/ClrB. In this presentation, we provide evidences that McmA and ManR/ClrB cooperatively regulate induction ofcellulase genes. Effects of mcmA mutation and manR/clrB deletion on expression of cellulase genes were examined by qRT-PCR. Expression of eglA, eglB,and cbhA was highly induced by cellobiose in the wild type strain. The induction was significantly impaired by the mcmA mutation and abolished by themanR/clrB deletion, indicating that the cellulase genes under control of McmA and ManR/ClrB are overlapped. Binding of His-tagged McmA and FlagtaggedManR/ClrB-DBD (DNA Binding Domain), which were produced in E. coli and purified, to the CeRE containing region of the eglA promoter wasexamined by EMSA. McmA gave two shifted bands corresponding to single and double occupation of the binding sites, which lay within and just upstreamof CeRE. ManR/ClrB-DBD alone showed very weak binding to the region. When both McmA and ManR/ClrB-DBD were added, a slower-migrating and moreabundant shifted band was appeared, which suggested cooperative binding of McmA and ManR/ClrB-DBD. Presence of McmA and ManR/ClrB-DBD in theshifted band was confirmed by supershift assay with the anti-his-tag and anti-flag-tag antibodies. These results indicated that inductive expression of eglAis regulated by cooperative binding of McmA and ManR/ClrB to its promoter, and suggests that regulation of eglB and cbhA would be similar. This workwas supported by the <strong>Program</strong> for Promotion of Basic and Applied Researches for Innovations in Bio-oriented Industry.464. Transcription factor shuttling during cellulase induction in Trichoderma reesei. Alex Lichius, Christian P. Kubicek, Verena Seidl-Seiboth. Institute ofChemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.For economically feasible production of liquid fuels and other value-added compounds from lignocellulosic plant material, strategies are required toboost cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzyme production by industrially relevant fungi. One promising approach is to modulate the transcriptional controlmediating release from carbon catabolite repression (CCR) and induction of cellulase, hemicellulase and xylanase gene expression. To better understandthe underlying molecular dynamics during induction, we characterized nucleo-cytoplamic shuttling of the two transcription factors carbon cataboliterepressor 1 (CRE1) and xylanase regulator 1 (XYR1) of Trichoderma reesei by means of live-cell imaging. In submerged cultures, nuclear import and exportof CRE1 upon repression and induction, respectively, occurred within minutes and therefore was generally faster than shuttling of XYR1. Under CCRconditions XYR1 expression levels were very low, and its nuclear signal required up to one hour to significantly increase upon replacement into an inducingcarbon source. Cultured directly under inducing conditions, nuclear accumulation of XYR1 was detectable after about 20h post inoculation, and stronglyincreased within the following 24 hours. CRE1 under the same conditions was localized exclusively to the cytoplasm. In plate cultures, nuclear recruitmentof CRE1 and XYR1 differed within the central area, the subperiphery and the periphery of the colony depending on the provided carbon source. Mostinterestingly, under inducing conditions we found evidence for increased nuclear recruitment of CRE1 in the central area, correlating with strong nuclearimport of XYR1 in the same region. Notably, the cytoplasmic signal of CRE1 was usually elevated in leading hyphae, whereas XYR1 was never significantlyrecruited to the colony periphery. Taken together our data provide the first temporal resolution of transcription factor shuttling during the induction ofcellulase gene expression in Trichoderma reesei, and reveal some interesting differences between the subcellular localization of CRE1 and XYR1 insubmerged and plate cultures, respectively. These differences indicate that the mycelial organization during fungal growth might be another importantregulatory element to consider for the industrial scale production of cellulolytic enzymes.465. Trichophyton rubrum ap-1 gene expression in response to environmental challenges. Nalu TA Peres, Gabriela F Persinoti, Larissa G Silva, Tiago RJacob, Antonio Rossi, Nilce M Martinez-Rossi. School of Medicine, Univiversity of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.Several families of transcription factors (TF) are found in fungal cells, which contribute for the broad range of cellular responses triggered byenvironmental changes in these organisms. These TF regulate the expression of genes involved in different cellular processes allowing cell survival understressful as well as physiological conditions. The AP-1 TF belongs to the bZIP family (basic leucine zipper), and is involved in the conidiation process,response to oxidative stress, multidrug resistance, and pathogenicity of some fungi. In dermatophytes, a group of keratinophilic fungi, little is known aboutthis TF and the processes in which it is required. Trichophyton rubrum is the major etiologic agent isolated from clinical cases of cutaneous mycoses inhumans, and studies of the responses of this fungus to several environmental conditions allow a better understanding of its physiology and pathogenicity,thus providing information of how to decrease its growth and to establish more efficient therapeutic measures. Here, we evaluated the ap-1 geneexpression profile during growth of T. rubrum in several nutrient sources (keratin, ex vivo skin and nail), exposure to antifungal drugs, andoxidative/osmotic stresses. An up-regulation of ap-1 gene expression was observed during ex vivo infection and keratin utilization, compared to growth ina glucose containing medium. In response to different antifungal agents, ap-1 was up-regulated, while osmotic and oxidative stress did not alter itsexpression level. These results provide insights into the regulation of the ap-1 TF gene expression, suggesting its involvement in T. rubrum pathogenicity,possibly regulating several genes that allow the utilization of proteins from the host tissues as nutrient sources, and also protecting the cell against thedamages caused by antifungal drugs. Financial Support: FAPESP, CNPq, CAPES, and FAEPA.<strong>27th</strong> <strong>Fungal</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> | 235
- Page 1:
Asilomar Conference GroundsMarch 12
- Page 7 and 8:
SCHEDULE OF EVENTSFriday, March 157
- Page 10 and 11:
EXHIBITSThe following companies hav
- Page 12 and 13:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESWednes
- Page 14:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESWednes
- Page 17 and 18:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESThursd
- Page 19:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESFriday
- Page 22 and 23:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESSaturd
- Page 24:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESSaturd
- Page 27 and 28:
PLENARY SESSION ABSTRACTSThursday,
- Page 29 and 30:
PLENARY SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday, Ma
- Page 31 and 32:
PLENARY SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturday,
- Page 33 and 34:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 35 and 36:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSUnravel
- Page 37 and 38:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSynergi
- Page 39 and 40:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 41 and 42:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 43 and 44:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 45 and 46:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSA draft
- Page 47 and 48:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSRegulat
- Page 49 and 50:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 51 and 52:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 53 and 54:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 55 and 56:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 57 and 58:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 59 and 60:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 61 and 62:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThe mut
- Page 63 and 64:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSInnate
- Page 65 and 66:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 67 and 68:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSGenome-
- Page 69 and 70:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSIdentif
- Page 71 and 72:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 73 and 74:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 75 and 76:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThe Scl
- Page 77 and 78:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThe rol
- Page 79 and 80:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 81 and 82:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSCompari
- Page 83 and 84:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSNovel t
- Page 85 and 86:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 87 and 88:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSEffect
- Page 89 and 90:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSCommon
- Page 91 and 92:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 93 and 94:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSeconda
- Page 95 and 96:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSheddin
- Page 97 and 98:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 99 and 100:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 101 and 102:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 103 and 104:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSprocess
- Page 105 and 106:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSpecifi
- Page 107 and 108:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTSBioc
- Page 109 and 110:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS81.
- Page 111 and 112:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS160.
- Page 113 and 114:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS239.
- Page 115 and 116:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS322.
- Page 117 and 118:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS401.
- Page 119 and 120:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTSmedi
- Page 121 and 122:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS558.
- Page 123 and 124:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS640.
- Page 125 and 126:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS723.
- Page 127 and 128:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS5. Cha
- Page 129 and 130:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS13. In
- Page 131 and 132:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSbioche
- Page 133 and 134:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS30. Me
- Page 135 and 136:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS38. Me
- Page 137 and 138:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSidenti
- Page 139 and 140:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSsecret
- Page 141 and 142:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSinvolv
- Page 143 and 144:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSdiploi
- Page 145 and 146:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSSaccha
- Page 147 and 148:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSresist
- Page 149 and 150:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS96. Ce
- Page 151 and 152:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS104. M
- Page 153 and 154:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScan ex
- Page 155 and 156:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSturgor
- Page 157 and 158:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSlike p
- Page 159 and 160:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSIndoor
- Page 161 and 162:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSlength
- Page 163 and 164:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSA scre
- Page 165 and 166:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSthen q
- Page 167 and 168:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS170. S
- Page 169 and 170:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSof sup
- Page 171 and 172:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSis fzo
- Page 173 and 174:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSgrowth
- Page 175 and 176:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSSeq da
- Page 177 and 178:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS212. T
- Page 179 and 180:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSCompar
- Page 181 and 182:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmore g
- Page 183 and 184:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmolecu
- Page 185 and 186:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSunexpe
- Page 187 and 188: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSrapid
- Page 189 and 190: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS260. T
- Page 191 and 192: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSFusari
- Page 193 and 194: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSScienc
- Page 195 and 196: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS286. G
- Page 197 and 198: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSincomp
- Page 199 and 200: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSfound
- Page 201 and 202: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS312. I
- Page 203 and 204: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSall th
- Page 205 and 206: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSPia La
- Page 207 and 208: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS335. A
- Page 209 and 210: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS342. F
- Page 211 and 212: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSThis i
- Page 213 and 214: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSJacobs
- Page 215 and 216: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScalciu
- Page 217 and 218: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSThe ab
- Page 219 and 220: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSexpres
- Page 221 and 222: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS394. F
- Page 223 and 224: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS398. U
- Page 225 and 226: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSthe id
- Page 227 and 228: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS415. A
- Page 229 and 230: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSAcuM b
- Page 231 and 232: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSdiverg
- Page 233 and 234: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSBck1 f
- Page 235 and 236: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSin the
- Page 237: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS455. T
- Page 241 and 242: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSfragme
- Page 243 and 244: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSenhanc
- Page 245 and 246: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSassess
- Page 247 and 248: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmating
- Page 249 and 250: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScommon
- Page 251 and 252: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSOne of
- Page 253 and 254: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScells
- Page 255 and 256: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSof Ave
- Page 257 and 258: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSascaro
- Page 259 and 260: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSis a n
- Page 261 and 262: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSand th
- Page 263 and 264: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSCiuffe
- Page 265 and 266: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSon oth
- Page 267 and 268: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScopies
- Page 269 and 270: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSChem.
- Page 271 and 272: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS593. C
- Page 273 and 274: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS601. P
- Page 275 and 276: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSE.elym
- Page 277 and 278: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSThe de
- Page 279 and 280: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSMicrob
- Page 281 and 282: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSchromo
- Page 283 and 284: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmating
- Page 285 and 286: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSAt the
- Page 287 and 288: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSemerge
- Page 289 and 290:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS666. G
- Page 291 and 292:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSof che
- Page 293 and 294:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSthe lo
- Page 295 and 296:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSin the
- Page 297 and 298:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSpotent
- Page 299 and 300:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSpoint
- Page 301 and 302:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS716. p
- Page 303 and 304:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSnatura
- Page 305 and 306:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSelemen
- Page 307 and 308:
KEYWORD LISTABC proteins ..........
- Page 309 and 310:
KEYWORD LISThigh temperature growth
- Page 311 and 312:
AUTHOR LISTBolton, Melvin D. ......
- Page 313 and 314:
AUTHOR LISTFrancis, Martin ........
- Page 315 and 316:
AUTHOR LISTKawamoto, Susumu... 427,
- Page 317 and 318:
AUTHOR LISTNNadimi, Maryam ........
- Page 319 and 320:
AUTHOR LISTSenftleben, Dominik ....
- Page 321 and 322:
AUTHOR LISTYablonowski, Jacob .....
- Page 323 and 324:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSLeslie G Beresf
- Page 325 and 326:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSTim A DahlmannR
- Page 327 and 328:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSIgor V Grigorie
- Page 329 and 330:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSMasayuki KameiT
- Page 331 and 332:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSGeorgiana MayUn
- Page 333 and 334:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSNadia PontsINRA
- Page 335 and 336:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSFrancis SmetUni
- Page 337 and 338:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSAric E WiestUni