FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSrisks and significantly limit grain marketability. Despite extensive breeding efforts, adequate resistance to mycotoxin accumulation has not beendeveloped. Additionally, tools currently available to control mycotoxin contamination are limited in number and efficacy. Recently, host-induced genesilencing (HIGS) has emerged as a way to manipulate gene expression in fungal pathogens via expression of pathogen-specific hairpin RNA (hpRNA) inplants. The goal of this research was to generate transgenic corn inhibiting mycotoxin accumulation via HIGS. To this end, a high-throughput workflow wasdeveloped to create and validate HIGS expression vectors. First, candidate fungal genes regulating mycotoxin biosynthesis were identified through variousapproaches, including expression profiling and functional genomics. Second, a one-step cloning process was developed to simultaneously create hpRNAencodingconstructs comprised of sense and antisense orientations of target fungal genes, separated by an intron from the Magnaporthe oryzae cutinasegene, flanked by the TrpC promoter and terminator. Constructs were validated by phenotypic assessment after transformation into either A. flavus or F.verticiliioides. Finally, constructs encoding hpRNAs that significantly reduced mycotoxin accumulation were cloned into a plant expression vector andtransformed into maize. Currently, silencing vectors have been created that target the a-amylase (AMY1) and hexokinase (HXK1) genes in F. verticillioidesand the polyketide synthase (aflC) and hexokinase (kxk) genes in A. flavus, and transgenic corn plants have been created. Thus, this research will advancethe current understanding of HIGS in maize and will ultimately provide new tools to control mycotoxin contamination of corn.614. CDiT1, a novel type of proteinaceous toxin secreted by the necrotrophic pathogen of the roots of tomato Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. Pierre-HenriClergeot 1 , Herwig Schuler 2 , Ejvind Mørtz 3 , Maja Brus 1 , Simina Vintila 1 , Sophia Ekengren 1 . 1) Vaxtfysiologi, Stockholms Universitet, Stockholm, Sweden; 2)Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 3) Alphalyse A/S, Odense, Denmark.During the 24th <strong>Fungal</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> in Asilomar in 2009, we reported the isolation by Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography of a putativeproteinaceous toxin of 18 kDa, secreted in liquid medium by the corky root rot pathogen of tomato, the filamentous ascomycete Pyrenochaeta lycopersici.This molecule, CDiT1, was thought to be the cause of cell death observed in tomato leaves after infiltration of culture filtrates into their apoplast. Furthercharacterization of CDiT1 revealed that it is secreted as a dimer and encoded by a single gene, whose expression peaks during tomato root infection.Infiltration into leaves of various hosts of P. lycopersici of recombinant CDiT1 purified by affinity confirmed its phytotoxic, but differential activity.Especially, currant tomato (Solanum pimpinellifolium) proved to be tolerant to a higher concentration of recombinant CDiT1 than cultivated tomato (S.lycopersicum). This correlates with the observation that roots of currant tomato are less prone to intracellular infection by a transformant of the fungusexpressing a reporter gene than those of cultivated tomato. Affinity-purified recombinant CDiT1 was also used in cut root assays to confirm lethal activityof the toxin on tomato root cells. Finally, searches made by sequence similarity in the genomes of other pathogenic Pleosporales showed that CDiT1 has aputative orthologue in the cereals pathogens Stagonospora nodorum, Pyrenophora teres f.sp. teres and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, species known forsecreting proteinaceous toxins contributing to virulence as well. In conclusion, our data validate the experimental approach of characterizing moleculessecreted by Pyrenochaeta lycopersici and inducing disease-related symptoms after infiltration into host leaves, this in order to highlight potential geneticresistance against corky root rot in related species or varieties (see also Clergeot et al. 2012, Phytopathology, 102:878-891).615. Nonhost-specific phytotoxicity of the polyketide-derived toxin solanapyrone A produced by Ascochyta rabiei and Alternaria solani. W. Kim 1 , L.Tymon 1 , D. Johnson 1 , W. Chen 2 . 1) Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA; 2) USDA-ARS, Grain Legume Genetic and PhysiologyResearch Unit, Pullman, WA.Solanapyrone A is a polyketide-derived metabolite produced by Ascochyta rabiei and Alternaria solani, which are the most destructive necrotrophicpathogens of chickpea and potato/tomato, respectively. They belong to the Order Pleosporales within the Class Dothideomycetes, but are phylogeneticallydistantly-related. All isolates of the two fungi tested so far are capable of producing solanapyrone A in synthetic media, which may imply that it isindispensable for their life cycle. However, very little is known about the genetics of solanapyrone A production and its role in pathogenesis and their lifecycle. Recently, solanapyrone biosynthesis gene cluster was identified in Al. solani. Six genes (Sol1 - Sol6) form the gene cluster, spaning about 20 kb of thegenome. Among them, Sol5 gene encodes a Diel-Alderase which catalyzes the final step of solanapyrone biosynthesis pathway. Knockout of the Sol5 genein both A. rabiei and Al.solani resulted in the production of three compounds (presumably solanapyrone precursors), instead of solanapyrone A. Colony ofsol5 mutants showed expansive growth in agar medium until covering the entire plates, in contrast to restricted growth of colony of their correspondingwild-type progenitors. The restricted growth of the wild type strains is likely due to solanapyrone toxicity. Phytotoxicity of solanapyrone A was examinedwith various plant species including their natural host plants. Solanapyrone A produced similar size of necrotic lesions on all plant species tested. On theother hand, one of the putative solanapyrone precursors with the same molecular weight of solanapyrone A caused much smaller lesion only around thewounds of application sites. These results indicate that solanapyrone A is a nonhost-specific phytotoxin because it caused similar degree of lesions on hostand nonhost species.616. Crosstalk of the unfolded protein response and regulatory pathways controlling pathogenic development in Ustilago maydis. Kai Heimel 1 , JohannesFreitag 2 , Martin Hampel 1 , Julia Ast 2 , Michael Bölker 2 , Jörg Kämper 3 . 1) Department of Molecular Microbiology and <strong>Genetics</strong>, Georg-August-University,Göttingen, Germany; 2) <strong>Genetics</strong> Department, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany; 3) <strong>Genetics</strong> Department, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT),Karlsruhe, Germany.Development of eukaryotic pathogens is accompanied by dramatic changes in morphology, lifestyle, nutrient acquisition and growth behavior.Consequently, pathogens require robust control systems to adapt to changing host environments and to maintain cellular physiology and homeostasis.The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a conserved eukaryotic signaling pathway counteracting endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress during situations ofincreased demands on the secretory pathway. We identified and characterized the homologs of the central UPR regulators, Hac1 and Ire1 in the biotrophicfungus U. maydis. The UPR is tightly interlinked with the b mating-type-dependent signaling pathway that regulates pathogenic development. Exact timingof UPR is required for virulence and premature activation interferes with the b-dependent switch from budding to filamentous growth. A smut-specific C-terminal extension of the U. maydis Hac1 homolog, Cib1, mediates direct interaction with Clp1, an essential component of the b-mediated signalingcascade. This interaction leads to stabilization of Clp1, increased ER stress resistance and thus prevents deleterious hyperactivation of the UPR duringbiotrophic growth of U. maydis. Since Clp1 expression is decisive for cell cycle release and fungal proliferation in planta we suggest that UPR activationserves as a checkpoint to time developmental progression and secretion of effector molecules, which promote the establishment of the biotrophicinteraction.617. Transcriptional profiling of the APSES genes in Trichophyton rubrum during growth on human nail. Elza A. S. Lang 1 , Nalu T. A. Peres 1 , Maíra P.Martins 1 , Tiago R. Jacob 1 , Pablo R. Sanches 1 , Larissa G. Silva 1 , Antonio Rossi 2 , Nilce M. Martinez-Rossi 1 . 1) Department of <strong>Genetics</strong>, Ribeirao Preto School ofMedicine, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil; 2) Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, School of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo,Brazil.272
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSThe dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum is worldwide spread and is the most prevalent causative agent of clinical cases of skin and nail mycoses inhumans. Adhesion, invasion and colonization of keratinized host tissues are crucial for the success of the infection process and depend on the modulationof genetic responses during host-pathogen interactions. The APSES transcription factors are exclusive of the fungi kingdom and have been reported to playimportant roles in cell growth, differentiation, pathogenicity and virulence in several fungi species. In this work, in silico analyses of T. rubrum genomerevealed the presence of genes encoding distinct proteins containing the APSES domain, suggesting that these proteins may play different roles in the cell.A high number of genes potentially regulated by the APSES regulators were identified by in silico analyses of 1000nt upstream of the annotated ORFs of T.rubrum. Transcriptional profiles of the APSES genes were analyzed during growth of T. rubrum on human nail or keratin, as the sole source of nutrients. Invitro infection of human nail was also evaluated by light microscopy. The results revealed that the transcription levels of the APSES genes are modulatedduring the human nail infection process and keratin degradation. Taken together, our findings suggest that the APSES genes of T. rubrum may beimplicated in host-pathogen interactions. Financial support: FAPESP, CAPES, CNPq, FAEPA.618. Carbohydrate binding proteins of two Leptosphaeria pathogens of Brassica napus. Rohan G T Lowe 1 , Bethany Clark 1 , Angela Van de Wouw 1 , AndrewCassin 1 , Jonathan Grandaubert 2 , Thierry Rouxel 2 , Barbara Howlett 2 . 1) School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 2) INRA-Bioger, Campus AgroParisTech, Thiverval-Grignon, France.Effectors include small secreted proteins (SSPs) produced by pathogens to modify or subvert defence responses of the host organism. Leptosphaeriamaculans “brassicae”, the foremost pathogen of Brassica napus (canola), has 651 genes predicted to encode SSPs. The related species L. biglobosa"canadensis" more aggressively infects Brassica cotyledons, but causes fewer stem cankers. This difference in symptomology may be due to a differentresponse from the host innate immune system. Compared to the L. maculans “brassicae” v23.1.3 reference genome, L. biglobosa has a relatively compactgenome (30 Mbp) lacking the characteristic AT-rich, gene-poor repeats of L. maculans. We are using comparative transcriptomics to identify genesinvolved in early stages of infection. RNAseq analysis revealed that >300 L. maculans “brassicae” genes are highly upregulated (>100-fold) 7 days afterinfection compared to in vitro growth. These genes are enriched for SSPs, which comprise 25 of the top 100, but only 5% of the total gene complement. Amajor class of SSPs are carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZY), some of which play a role in evasion of chitin-triggered immunity in plants. L. maculans“brassicae”and L. biglobosa "canadensis" have different complements of the chitin-associated CAZY domains, CBM18 and CBM50 (aka LysM). Both ofthese domains bind chitin or peptidoglycan and may be found with chitinase domains in the same protein. The genomes of both Leptosphaeria speciesencode a similar number of CBM18 domains (27 and 29, respectively). L. maculans “brassicae” has predominantly multi-domain CBM18 proteins that arenot highly upregulated 7 days after infection, whilst L. biglobosa "canadensis" has more abundant single domain proteins, two of which are highlyupregulated (>100-fold) at 7 days post inoculation. Homologs of the well-characterised CBM50/LysM protein, ECP6, from Cladosporium fulvum are presentin both species, and a triplication of the N terminal LysM domain has occurred in L. maculans “brassicae”. The composition and regulation of CBM18 andCBM50-containing genes in Leptosphaeria may be involved in determining the degree of chitin-triggered immunity in the host canola, and concomitantly,the success of the pathogen. Silencing of key CAZY genes in L. maculans “brassicae” is underway, with a focus on members of the CBM50/LysM family.619. Domains for plant uptake of Ustilago maydis secreted effectors. Anupama Ghosh, Armin Djamei, Shigeyuki Tanaka, Regine Kahmann. Max PIanckInstitute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Department of Organismic Interactions, Karl-Von-Frisch-Strasse 10, D-35043 Marburg, Germany.The genome of the corn smut fungus Ustilago maydis codes for a large repertoire of secreted effectors. Some of them play crucial roles for virulence andestablishment of the biotrophic phase. The chorismate mutase Cmu1 is one such secreted translocated effector of U. maydis. cmu1 deletion strains areattenuated in virulence that is attributed to higher salicylate levels in plants infected with the mutant strain, most likely through alterations in thechanneling of chorismate from the plastids to the cytosol. Here we identify the motif in Cmu1 that is necessary for the translocation of the protein acrossthe plant plasma membrane and present a mutational analysis of this region. To test for uptake we assayed the ability of mutant proteins to complement acmu1 mutant strain as well as the retained ability to complement the growth defect of a Daro7 strain of S. cerevisiae in minimal medium. By deletionanalysis a region of 20 amino acids adjacent to the signal peptide was shown to be essential for the translocation. Microscopic analysis of maize tissueinfected with U. maydis strains expressing Cmu1-mcherry fusion proteins with or without the probable uptake motif revealed that the 20 amino acid motifallows binding of the protein to an as yet unknown plant plasma membrane component. We hypothesize that the translocation of Cmu1 across the plantplasma membrane is a two step process; initiated by binding followed by translocation across the membrane. In addition, we present results where the 20amino acid motif is substituted by motifs from other effectors.620. Lipid metabolism influences virulence in Ustilago maydis. Scott Lambie, Matthias Kretschmer, Jim Kronstad. Michael Smith Laboratories, Universityof British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Plant tissues and surfaces are a source of lipids which act as a potential carbon source and signals for the pathogenic development of the biotrophic smutfungus Ustilago maydis. This pathogen is an excellent model for the molecular genetic analysis of lipid use during disease and responds to lipids with amorphologic transition from budding to filamentous growth. In addition, the fungus possesses both peroxisomal and mitochondrial b-oxidation pathways,and numerous putative phospholipases (PLs), to exploit lipid carbon sources for nutritional and signalling purposes. We have shown that bothmitochondrial and peroxisomal b-oxidation is important for the utilization of fatty acids and the pathogenic development of U. maydis and may thereforerepresent a potential target to combat crop disease caused by fungal pathogens. In U. maydis, deletion of components of these pathways influencedmating, lead to a decrease in virulence, caused a defect in fatty acid metabolism, a loss of acetate metabolism and the accumulation of toxicintermediates. To further explore the role of the b-oxidation pathway during morphogenesis and pathogenic development, we have investigated theeffects of several non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are known to interfere with b-oxidation functions at various stages. Diclofenacinhibited the usage of fatty acids of different chain length and saturation state as sole carbon sources and had an influence on the filamentation efficiencyof those fatty acids. Further it showed fungicidal activity by inducing apoptosis, and influenced mating and pathogenic development. In an attempt tofurther elucidate the role of lipid utilization during infection we are investigating the role of PLs as a potential mechanism by which host-derived lipidsignals or fatty acids for subsequent b-oxidation are generated. We present an analysis of 17 candidate PL genes identified by genome mining, as well as apreliminary functional characterization of these genes during mating and infection. Overall, our work demonstrates the utilization of host-lipids by U.maydis as an important nutritional and signalling source that is required for pathogenic development. Furthermore, we have begun to elucidate theunderlying mechanisms involved which represent a potential target to combat crop diseases caused by fungi.621. Functional characterization of the putative cell surface receptor for hydrophobicity, Msb2, in Ustilago maydis. Marino Moretti, Daniel Lanver, IrinaL. Schmidt, Regine Kahmann. MPI for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.Msb2 is a transmembrane mucin protein involved in plant surface sensing in U. maydis. Msb2 deletion mutants are defective in sensing the hydrophobic<strong>27th</strong> <strong>Fungal</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> | 273
- Page 1:
Asilomar Conference GroundsMarch 12
- Page 7 and 8:
SCHEDULE OF EVENTSFriday, March 157
- Page 10 and 11:
EXHIBITSThe following companies hav
- Page 12 and 13:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESWednes
- Page 14:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESWednes
- Page 17 and 18:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESThursd
- Page 19:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESFriday
- Page 22 and 23:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESSaturd
- Page 24:
CONCURRENT SESSIONS SCHEDULESSaturd
- Page 27 and 28:
PLENARY SESSION ABSTRACTSThursday,
- Page 29 and 30:
PLENARY SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday, Ma
- Page 31 and 32:
PLENARY SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturday,
- Page 33 and 34:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 35 and 36:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSUnravel
- Page 37 and 38:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSynergi
- Page 39 and 40:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 41 and 42:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 43 and 44:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 45 and 46:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSA draft
- Page 47 and 48:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSRegulat
- Page 49 and 50:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSWednesd
- Page 51 and 52:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 53 and 54:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 55 and 56:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 57 and 58:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 59 and 60:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 61 and 62:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThe mut
- Page 63 and 64:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSInnate
- Page 65 and 66:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThursda
- Page 67 and 68:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSGenome-
- Page 69 and 70:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSIdentif
- Page 71 and 72:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 73 and 74:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 75 and 76:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThe Scl
- Page 77 and 78:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSThe rol
- Page 79 and 80:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 81 and 82:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSCompari
- Page 83 and 84:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSNovel t
- Page 85 and 86:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSFriday,
- Page 87 and 88:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSEffect
- Page 89 and 90:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSCommon
- Page 91 and 92:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 93 and 94:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSeconda
- Page 95 and 96:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSheddin
- Page 97 and 98:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 99 and 100:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 101 and 102:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSaturda
- Page 103 and 104:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSprocess
- Page 105 and 106:
CONCURRENT SESSION ABSTRACTSSpecifi
- Page 107 and 108:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTSBioc
- Page 109 and 110:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS81.
- Page 111 and 112:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS160.
- Page 113 and 114:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS239.
- Page 115 and 116:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS322.
- Page 117 and 118:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS401.
- Page 119 and 120:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTSmedi
- Page 121 and 122:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS558.
- Page 123 and 124:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS640.
- Page 125 and 126:
LISTING OF ALL POSTER ABSTRACTS723.
- Page 127 and 128:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS5. Cha
- Page 129 and 130:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS13. In
- Page 131 and 132:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSbioche
- Page 133 and 134:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS30. Me
- Page 135 and 136:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS38. Me
- Page 137 and 138:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSidenti
- Page 139 and 140:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSsecret
- Page 141 and 142:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSinvolv
- Page 143 and 144:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSdiploi
- Page 145 and 146:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSSaccha
- Page 147 and 148:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSresist
- Page 149 and 150:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS96. Ce
- Page 151 and 152:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS104. M
- Page 153 and 154:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScan ex
- Page 155 and 156:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSturgor
- Page 157 and 158:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSlike p
- Page 159 and 160:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSIndoor
- Page 161 and 162:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSlength
- Page 163 and 164:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSA scre
- Page 165 and 166:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSthen q
- Page 167 and 168:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS170. S
- Page 169 and 170:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSof sup
- Page 171 and 172:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSis fzo
- Page 173 and 174:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSgrowth
- Page 175 and 176:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSSeq da
- Page 177 and 178:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS212. T
- Page 179 and 180:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSCompar
- Page 181 and 182:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmore g
- Page 183 and 184:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmolecu
- Page 185 and 186:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSunexpe
- Page 187 and 188:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSrapid
- Page 189 and 190:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS260. T
- Page 191 and 192:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSFusari
- Page 193 and 194:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSScienc
- Page 195 and 196:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS286. G
- Page 197 and 198:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSincomp
- Page 199 and 200:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSfound
- Page 201 and 202:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS312. I
- Page 203 and 204:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSall th
- Page 205 and 206:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSPia La
- Page 207 and 208:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS335. A
- Page 209 and 210:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS342. F
- Page 211 and 212:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSThis i
- Page 213 and 214:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSJacobs
- Page 215 and 216:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScalciu
- Page 217 and 218:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSThe ab
- Page 219 and 220:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSexpres
- Page 221 and 222:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS394. F
- Page 223 and 224:
FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS398. U
- Page 225 and 226: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSthe id
- Page 227 and 228: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS415. A
- Page 229 and 230: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSAcuM b
- Page 231 and 232: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSdiverg
- Page 233 and 234: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSBck1 f
- Page 235 and 236: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSin the
- Page 237 and 238: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS455. T
- Page 239 and 240: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSor hos
- Page 241 and 242: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSfragme
- Page 243 and 244: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSenhanc
- Page 245 and 246: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSassess
- Page 247 and 248: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmating
- Page 249 and 250: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScommon
- Page 251 and 252: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSOne of
- Page 253 and 254: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScells
- Page 255 and 256: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSof Ave
- Page 257 and 258: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSascaro
- Page 259 and 260: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSis a n
- Page 261 and 262: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSand th
- Page 263 and 264: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSCiuffe
- Page 265 and 266: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSon oth
- Page 267 and 268: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTScopies
- Page 269 and 270: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSChem.
- Page 271 and 272: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS593. C
- Page 273 and 274: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS601. P
- Page 275: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSE.elym
- Page 279 and 280: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSMicrob
- Page 281 and 282: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSchromo
- Page 283 and 284: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSmating
- Page 285 and 286: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSAt the
- Page 287 and 288: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSemerge
- Page 289 and 290: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS666. G
- Page 291 and 292: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSof che
- Page 293 and 294: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSthe lo
- Page 295 and 296: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSin the
- Page 297 and 298: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSpotent
- Page 299 and 300: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSpoint
- Page 301 and 302: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTS716. p
- Page 303 and 304: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSnatura
- Page 305 and 306: FULL POSTER SESSION ABSTRACTSelemen
- Page 307 and 308: KEYWORD LISTABC proteins ..........
- Page 309 and 310: KEYWORD LISThigh temperature growth
- Page 311 and 312: AUTHOR LISTBolton, Melvin D. ......
- Page 313 and 314: AUTHOR LISTFrancis, Martin ........
- Page 315 and 316: AUTHOR LISTKawamoto, Susumu... 427,
- Page 317 and 318: AUTHOR LISTNNadimi, Maryam ........
- Page 319 and 320: AUTHOR LISTSenftleben, Dominik ....
- Page 321 and 322: AUTHOR LISTYablonowski, Jacob .....
- Page 323 and 324: LIST OF PARTICIPANTSLeslie G Beresf
- Page 325 and 326: LIST OF PARTICIPANTSTim A DahlmannR
- Page 327 and 328:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSIgor V Grigorie
- Page 329 and 330:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSMasayuki KameiT
- Page 331 and 332:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSGeorgiana MayUn
- Page 333 and 334:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSNadia PontsINRA
- Page 335 and 336:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSFrancis SmetUni
- Page 337 and 338:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTSAric E WiestUni