farmland, offering a below market price to encourage business development andinnovation on the part of farmers. ALBA receives funding from a diverse group ofgovernment and private donors interested in agricultural viability, environmentalprotection, social equity and economic development. ALBA also generates incomethrough its land leasing and produce distribution.Lessons LearnedDue to its proximity to the San Francisco Bay Area, ALBA participants have goodaccess to markets <strong>for</strong> their products. ALBA and its participant farmers maintainclose ties to the local community through its Community Support AgricultureProgram (CSA), by hosting thousands of school children and university studentseach year, and by serving as a demonstration and research site in collaborationwith universities, community colleges, non profit organizations and governmentagencies. As an incubator, the RDC cannot provide long term or permanent accessto land <strong>for</strong> farmers. As such, the concept of an urban edge agricultural parkrepresents a potential alternative <strong>for</strong> ALBA farmers who are seeking long-termaccess or purchase of agricultural land.DRAFT 1.6.05 82
APPENDIX C: FUNDING SOURCES FOR AGPARKCOMPONENTSIn addition to the examples of funding identified in the case studies, there are ahost of mechanisms that may be tapped to support one or more aspects of theAgPark concept. These are all summarized below, including innovative privatesector real estate development, public support <strong>for</strong> farm worker housing, farmlandpreservation, and farmer training and assistance, and finally non-profit andphilanthropic support <strong>for</strong> program development in a variety of areas intersecting inthe AgPark concept presented in this study.Private Sector SourcesOne innovative approach to financing and preserving small farms, pioneered by theQROE example, involves a private entrepreneur with real estate development goalscollaborating with existing farmers to preserve farming activities and open space.This concept is built on the premise that homebuyers will purchase homes or lotswith the nearby amenity of active farming, much like the proven amenity of openspace. The developer purchases existing farms, but provides <strong>for</strong> permanentfarming activity through a Right to Farm agreement with the existing farmer. Then,the developer permits and constructs single family homes and/or townhousessurrounding the farm, and markets the lots or units to affluent buyers interested inthe farm or open space amenity and willing to pay a premium <strong>for</strong> the property. Inaddition, in the QROE example, the developer has created an ongoing operatingsubsidy source <strong>for</strong> the farmer, to ensure that normal business cycles do notthreaten this important development amenity. This operating subsidy is providedby the homebuyers, who agree to fund an emergency operating fund in the eventthe farmer has a low-revenue year.This type of funding source demonstrates creative use of the combined value offarming, open space, and homesite development in semi-rural, urban edge settings.Demographic trends and real estate research indicate that this approach may havewide applicability to AgPark concepts, because a segment of homebuyers seek thistype of amenity and value its scarcity. As baby boomers continue to age, it is likelythat this approach, combining an interest in the environment with a lifestyle choice,could experience strong market demand in select locations near urban areas.Another variation of this approach, which has been used in parts of the suburbanBay Area with grape production opportunities, is illustrated by the Ruby Hillssubdivision in Livermore, as well as in the planned Vineyard Avenue Specific Planarea in Pleasanton. In these cases, the housing is developed on relatively largeindividual lots, and includes small vineyards with each homesite. This concept isDRAFT 1.6.05 83
- Page 1 and 2:
DRAFTURBAN EDGEAGRICULTURAL PARKSFE
- Page 3 and 4:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYOverview of AgPark
- Page 5:
Farmworker Housing on the Rural/Urb
- Page 10 and 11:
seeking to develop effective collab
- Page 12:
INTRODUCTIONHistory of Collective F
- Page 15 and 16:
Contemporary Models of Agricultural
- Page 17 and 18:
accommodations, value-added product
- Page 19 and 20:
45%, from 5,347 in 1997 to 7,771 in
- Page 21 and 22:
information about each site include
- Page 23 and 24:
undertaken. It may be best to furth
- Page 25 and 26:
IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL AGPARK
- Page 27 and 28:
SONOMA COUNTYLaguna Farm 80-acre 3
- Page 29 and 30:
The above examples reflect a range
- Page 31 and 32:
MARTIAL COTTLE PARK FEASIBILITY STU
- Page 33 and 34: Median household income in the neig
- Page 35 and 36: • Relationship to surrounding nei
- Page 37 and 38: • Education/Research Center: 4-H,
- Page 39 and 40: Management and DevelopmentRole of S
- Page 41 and 42: Beyond the capital costs for the in
- Page 43 and 44: ConclusionThis property has great p
- Page 45 and 46: Ardenwood Historic Farm is the rema
- Page 47 and 48: • Establish Ardenwood as a vibran
- Page 49 and 50: These ideas complement and build on
- Page 51 and 52: • Farmer Housing: None proposed.
- Page 53 and 54: ConclusionsThis project identified
- Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Overview of Ag Park Mod
- Page 57 and 58: The National Trust(England, Wales,N
- Page 59 and 60: Crystal Waters Village(Malaney, pop
- Page 61 and 62: McBryde AgriculturalPark (Kauai, HI
- Page 63 and 64: Farm worker Housing on Rural/Urban
- Page 65 and 66: Occidental Arts& EcologyCenter(Occi
- Page 67 and 68: The FarmSchool (Athol,MA)Privatelyo
- Page 69 and 70: To ensure conservation in perpetuit
- Page 71 and 72: King County FarmlandPreservation Pr
- Page 73 and 74: development.Economics/Sources of Fu
- Page 75 and 76: In 2001, the Trust advanced a susta
- Page 77 and 78: LandThe cooperatives have sought la
- Page 79 and 80: ALBA’s Farm Training andResearch
- Page 81 and 82: • “ALBA Organics” distributio
- Page 83: in addition to herbs, flowers, and
- Page 87 and 88: Public Support for FarmlandPreserva
- Page 89 and 90: transactions. Transaction types wil
- Page 91 and 92: Affordable Rural Housing Grant andL
- Page 93 and 94: farm" program, established farmers
- Page 95 and 96: Appendix D: Producer Survey Instrum
- Page 97 and 98: 12. Would you be interested and wil
- Page 99 and 100: Feasibility Study for Urban Edge Ag
- Page 101: Site BLocationFremont, adjacent to