Additionally, federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits, as administered by theCali<strong>for</strong>nia Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC), provide financing <strong>for</strong> thedevelopment of af<strong>for</strong>dable housing throughout Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, including a set aside oftax credits <strong>for</strong> farmworker housing. This is an ongoing financing source,reauthorized periodically by the federal government.Finally, at the state level, the Joe Serna Jr. Farmworker Housing Grant Programsupports new construction, rehabilitation and acquisition of farmworker housing,either owner-occupied or rental, with priority <strong>for</strong> low-income households. As ofOctober 2003, this program had received $108 million from Proposition 46(administered by the State Housing and Community Development). Further, fundsfrom Prop 46 were provided <strong>for</strong> JSJ Migrant Housing and JSJ Housing with HealthServices with a combined allocation of $45 million.Other Farmworker Housing programs:• Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME)• State Community Development Block Grants (CDBGs)• Farm Labor Housing Loan and Grant Program• State Tax Credit Allocation Commission• Self-Help EnterprisesDirect Farmer AssistanceIn order to support agriculture at the urban edge, it is likely that various <strong>for</strong>ms ofdirect farmer assistance will be needed, such as training <strong>for</strong> new immigrants,organic production methods, adoption of new technologies, joint marketing, orfinancial/technical support to farmers unable to make an operating profit.This type of support, which goes beyond the passive nature of an easementagreement, has generally been funded by philanthropic interests. Additionally, inkindtechnical support is given through public organizations such as the UCCooperative Extension and Sustainable Agriculture Research and EducationProgram.The USDA Farm Service Agency’s New Entry Sustainable Farming Project (NESFP)highlights a geographically specific ef<strong>for</strong>t <strong>for</strong> direct assistance with key linkagesbetween land, new farmers, and marketing. The USDA developed a comprehensivestrategy with a wide range of partners including Tufts University, USDA FSA,University of Massachusetts Extension, Massachusetts Department of Food andAgriculture, USDA NRCS, and several community groups and local farmers. Theinitiative drew on the available programs and resources of these institutions inorder to provide beginning farmers with full access to in<strong>for</strong>mation and assistance tohelp them succeed in small-scale commercial agriculture. Created as a "mentorDRAFT 1.6.05 90
farm" program, established farmers provided access to land <strong>for</strong> programparticipants, assisted with land preparation, and gave on-site technical assistance.After working on a mentor farm site, new farmers were offered opportunities tomove onto larger independent parcels of land in the area as identified by USDA.The Project also linked large immigrant communities in urban areas to consumerpreferences <strong>for</strong> "specialty" crops with high values such as pea tendrils, encouragingfarmers' markets and retail grocery stores to sell the fresh, high quality products.The Project organized training and technical assistance <strong>for</strong> new farmers to addressimportant issues such as production, pesticide use, farm safety, finances,recordkeeping, and marketing. Increasingly the project is emphasizing marketingorientedstrategies as central to successful farming strategies <strong>for</strong> projectparticipants.Locally, the Funders <strong>for</strong> Sustainable Food Systems (FSFS) have a vision ofCali<strong>for</strong>nia as the leader and model state developing sustainable food systems.FSFS works toward this vision by raising funder awareness about the critical need<strong>for</strong> and the multiple problem areas addressed by sustainable food systems. Areassuch as public health, environmental degradation, labor rights, marine ecosystems,animal welfare, and food security are linked to the way food is grown, distributed,and consumed in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. Participating grantmakers include:• Arkay Foundation• Columbia Foundation• Gaia Fund• Fred Gellert Family Foundation• Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund• Clarence E. Heller Charitable Foundation• Homeland Foundation• W.K. Kellogg Foundation• William Zimmerman Foundation• Coastal Conservancy• Rural Development Corporation• American Farmland Trust• Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Rangeland Trust• Conserving Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Landscapes Initiative Resource Legacy FundDRAFT 1.6.05 91
- Page 1 and 2:
DRAFTURBAN EDGEAGRICULTURAL PARKSFE
- Page 3 and 4:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYOverview of AgPark
- Page 5:
Farmworker Housing on the Rural/Urb
- Page 10 and 11:
seeking to develop effective collab
- Page 12:
INTRODUCTIONHistory of Collective F
- Page 15 and 16:
Contemporary Models of Agricultural
- Page 17 and 18:
accommodations, value-added product
- Page 19 and 20:
45%, from 5,347 in 1997 to 7,771 in
- Page 21 and 22:
information about each site include
- Page 23 and 24:
undertaken. It may be best to furth
- Page 25 and 26:
IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL AGPARK
- Page 27 and 28:
SONOMA COUNTYLaguna Farm 80-acre 3
- Page 29 and 30:
The above examples reflect a range
- Page 31 and 32:
MARTIAL COTTLE PARK FEASIBILITY STU
- Page 33 and 34:
Median household income in the neig
- Page 35 and 36:
• Relationship to surrounding nei
- Page 37 and 38:
• Education/Research Center: 4-H,
- Page 39 and 40:
Management and DevelopmentRole of S
- Page 41 and 42: Beyond the capital costs for the in
- Page 43 and 44: ConclusionThis property has great p
- Page 45 and 46: Ardenwood Historic Farm is the rema
- Page 47 and 48: • Establish Ardenwood as a vibran
- Page 49 and 50: These ideas complement and build on
- Page 51 and 52: • Farmer Housing: None proposed.
- Page 53 and 54: ConclusionsThis project identified
- Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Overview of Ag Park Mod
- Page 57 and 58: The National Trust(England, Wales,N
- Page 59 and 60: Crystal Waters Village(Malaney, pop
- Page 61 and 62: McBryde AgriculturalPark (Kauai, HI
- Page 63 and 64: Farm worker Housing on Rural/Urban
- Page 65 and 66: Occidental Arts& EcologyCenter(Occi
- Page 67 and 68: The FarmSchool (Athol,MA)Privatelyo
- Page 69 and 70: To ensure conservation in perpetuit
- Page 71 and 72: King County FarmlandPreservation Pr
- Page 73 and 74: development.Economics/Sources of Fu
- Page 75 and 76: In 2001, the Trust advanced a susta
- Page 77 and 78: LandThe cooperatives have sought la
- Page 79 and 80: ALBA’s Farm Training andResearch
- Page 81 and 82: • “ALBA Organics” distributio
- Page 83 and 84: in addition to herbs, flowers, and
- Page 85 and 86: APPENDIX C: FUNDING SOURCES FOR AGP
- Page 87 and 88: Public Support for FarmlandPreserva
- Page 89 and 90: transactions. Transaction types wil
- Page 91: Affordable Rural Housing Grant andL
- Page 95 and 96: Appendix D: Producer Survey Instrum
- Page 97 and 98: 12. Would you be interested and wil
- Page 99 and 100: Feasibility Study for Urban Edge Ag
- Page 101: Site BLocationFremont, adjacent to