a portion of these funds. Additional funding may come from donations, gifts,federal grants or loans, or other sources. CFCP currently administers bond fundsremaining from Proposition 12 (which passed in 2000). The state budget allocates$10 million to CFCP <strong>for</strong> the current (2003-04) fiscal year.Further, a variety of local measures have been used throughout the Bay Area toprotect open space, inclusive of farmland (rarely exclusively of other open space)including:• Measure AA (Alameda and Contra Costa)• Property tax increment (Marin)• Open space district with taxation (San Mateo, Santa Clara)• Open space bond (San Mateo)• Sales tax (Sonoma)• Landfill tipping fee (Alameda)While a number of these, such as Measure AA and San Mateo’s bond measure haveor will shortly have spent all funds, new sources are being explored in jurisdictionsthroughout the Bay Area, with Solano and Contra Costa counties specificallydeveloping new funding streams.The City of Brentwood in Contra Costa County provides an example of strategies <strong>for</strong>extending conservation easements on to existing farmlands:• Brentwood <strong>Agricultural</strong> Mitigation Fee – An existing development fee on all newconstruction in Brentwood has generated $4 million to date and anticipated togenerate $10 million with fee potentially to be reviewed <strong>for</strong> an increase. A localnon-profit land trust has been initiated to utilize the funds <strong>for</strong> acquisition ofeasement rights. Additionally, under a local Transfer of <strong>Agricultural</strong> Credits(TAC) program, developers may purchase development rights on farmlands at anegotiated price, <strong>for</strong> the local Trust to the hold in perpetuity in order to secureadditional development rights on an eligible development site.• Proposed County Open Space Protection and Enhancement Funding Measure - of$130 million in acquisition funds <strong>for</strong> variety of open space priorities thisprospective bond measure <strong>for</strong> Contra Costa County earmarks $5 million <strong>for</strong>Brentwood agricultural land preservation. Another $65 million <strong>for</strong> maintenanceand operations is scheduled <strong>for</strong> all land types.Further, non-profit intermediaries fund easements as well as provide technicalsupport <strong>for</strong> implementing the strategy. The Great Valley Center’s <strong>Agricultural</strong>Transaction Program (ATP) provides assistance to permanently protect farmland inthe Central Valley, with a specific focus on Yolo, Stanislaus and Merced counties.The three counties are able to access the ATP funds <strong>for</strong> conservation-relatedDRAFT 1.6.05 86
transactions. Transaction types will include, but not be limited to, easements, feetitle purchase and resale, purchase options on land and purchase of subdivisionmap entitlements. The ATP will grant up to 50 percent of the cash portion oftransactions. Successes of these three counties will create new models <strong>for</strong>agricultural land conservation, and will encourage creative ef<strong>for</strong>ts elsewhere. GreatValley Center provided funding from its “LEGACI” (Land Use, Environment, Growth,Agriculture, Conservation and Investment) grant program to partially fund a projectthat will produce a guidebook and series of seminars on farmland protection.Other examples of this approach include the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Coastal Conservancy, whichworks in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s coastal zone; the Wildlife Conservation Board’s land acquisitionprogram, which includes funding <strong>for</strong> conservation easements; and the PackardFoundation’s funding in certain parts of the state <strong>for</strong> agricultural conservationeasements, through its Conserving Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Landscapes Initiative.In general, when land is donated or purchased outright, rather than controlledthrough easement, resulting site control increases the ability to generatesubstantive public education and access as well as direct environmentalstewardship. For example, while the American Farmland Trust typically purchaseseasements, an outright purchase of a 40-acre parcel outside of Fresno allowed <strong>for</strong> apartnership with a local non-profit and the UC Extension to offer farm training andaccess to low cost land to limited-resource farmers.Other Sources of Public Funding <strong>for</strong>Farmland Conservation 15• Conservation of Private Grazing Land Assistance: USDA provides technical,educational and related assistance to owners of private grazing lands. Thetechnical assistance helps to offer opportunities <strong>for</strong> better grazing landmanagement, protecting soil and water quality, and improving wildlife habitat.• Environmental Protection Agency - Agriculture Initiative: provides funding tosupport the implementation of environmentally sound, economically viable, andsocially responsible sustainable agriculture systems. The <strong>Agricultural</strong> Initiative inCali<strong>for</strong>nia focuses on the Central Valley. It provides grants targeted at pollutionprevention systems such as biologically Integrated Farming Systems (BIFS) thedevelopment of sustainable and organic cotton farming. It also provideseducational in<strong>for</strong>mation concerning regulatory issues, human health concernsand policy innovations. In 2002, the <strong>Agricultural</strong> Initiative provided $200,000 incompetitive grants <strong>for</strong> projects that demonstrate innovative pest managementstrategies.• Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Department of Conservation – Williamson Act: enables landowners toreceive a lower property tax assessment <strong>for</strong> agricultural lands. Landowners can15 Taken from Conservation Incentives Available in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, from Wild Farm AllianceDRAFT 1.6.05 87
- Page 1 and 2:
DRAFTURBAN EDGEAGRICULTURAL PARKSFE
- Page 3 and 4:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYOverview of AgPark
- Page 5:
Farmworker Housing on the Rural/Urb
- Page 10 and 11:
seeking to develop effective collab
- Page 12:
INTRODUCTIONHistory of Collective F
- Page 15 and 16:
Contemporary Models of Agricultural
- Page 17 and 18:
accommodations, value-added product
- Page 19 and 20:
45%, from 5,347 in 1997 to 7,771 in
- Page 21 and 22:
information about each site include
- Page 23 and 24:
undertaken. It may be best to furth
- Page 25 and 26:
IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL AGPARK
- Page 27 and 28:
SONOMA COUNTYLaguna Farm 80-acre 3
- Page 29 and 30:
The above examples reflect a range
- Page 31 and 32:
MARTIAL COTTLE PARK FEASIBILITY STU
- Page 33 and 34:
Median household income in the neig
- Page 35 and 36:
• Relationship to surrounding nei
- Page 37 and 38: • Education/Research Center: 4-H,
- Page 39 and 40: Management and DevelopmentRole of S
- Page 41 and 42: Beyond the capital costs for the in
- Page 43 and 44: ConclusionThis property has great p
- Page 45 and 46: Ardenwood Historic Farm is the rema
- Page 47 and 48: • Establish Ardenwood as a vibran
- Page 49 and 50: These ideas complement and build on
- Page 51 and 52: • Farmer Housing: None proposed.
- Page 53 and 54: ConclusionsThis project identified
- Page 55 and 56: Appendix A: Overview of Ag Park Mod
- Page 57 and 58: The National Trust(England, Wales,N
- Page 59 and 60: Crystal Waters Village(Malaney, pop
- Page 61 and 62: McBryde AgriculturalPark (Kauai, HI
- Page 63 and 64: Farm worker Housing on Rural/Urban
- Page 65 and 66: Occidental Arts& EcologyCenter(Occi
- Page 67 and 68: The FarmSchool (Athol,MA)Privatelyo
- Page 69 and 70: To ensure conservation in perpetuit
- Page 71 and 72: King County FarmlandPreservation Pr
- Page 73 and 74: development.Economics/Sources of Fu
- Page 75 and 76: In 2001, the Trust advanced a susta
- Page 77 and 78: LandThe cooperatives have sought la
- Page 79 and 80: ALBA’s Farm Training andResearch
- Page 81 and 82: • “ALBA Organics” distributio
- Page 83 and 84: in addition to herbs, flowers, and
- Page 85 and 86: APPENDIX C: FUNDING SOURCES FOR AGP
- Page 87: Public Support for FarmlandPreserva
- Page 91 and 92: Affordable Rural Housing Grant andL
- Page 93 and 94: farm" program, established farmers
- Page 95 and 96: Appendix D: Producer Survey Instrum
- Page 97 and 98: 12. Would you be interested and wil
- Page 99 and 100: Feasibility Study for Urban Edge Ag
- Page 101: Site BLocationFremont, adjacent to