11.07.2015 Views

Corporate Governance for Banks in Southeast Europe: Policy - IFC

Corporate Governance for Banks in Southeast Europe: Policy - IFC

Corporate Governance for Banks in Southeast Europe: Policy - IFC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The disclosure of compensation, which is viewed as a means of creat<strong>in</strong>g accountability <strong>for</strong> pay, is uncommon,though some SEE countries require banks to disclose their remuneration policy. In Bulgaria, <strong>for</strong> example, thispolicy is disclosed on the website of the Bulgarian National Bank. Where such disclosure is mandatory <strong>in</strong> SEE,it is typically <strong>in</strong> response to EU requirements. Jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union requires compliance with a setof rules, part of which is the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s Capital Requirements and Bonuses Package (CRD3), 59which has explicit rules on the <strong>for</strong>m and disclosure of compensation.Nevertheless, <strong>in</strong>dividual disclosure rema<strong>in</strong>s a sensitive issue, partly because of security risks to executives.It has been suggested that the disclosure of salary <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation may expose executives to extortion orharassment. Still, aggregate disclosure and disclosure of the bank’s remuneration policies may help enhanceaccountability and control potential excesses.Recommendations:Executive remuneration: The board needs to regularly review the bank’s remuneration policies. The boardneeds to be confident that <strong>in</strong>centive programs are effective <strong>in</strong> enhanc<strong>in</strong>g bank per<strong>for</strong>mance, and to bevigilant that such programs are neither excessive nor likely to <strong>in</strong>centivize risk tak<strong>in</strong>g that is not <strong>in</strong> accord withthe bank’s risk strategy.Remuneration of control functions: Compensation <strong>for</strong> the control function (<strong>for</strong> example, CRO and riskmanagement) should be structured <strong>in</strong> a way that is based pr<strong>in</strong>cipally on the achievement of their objectivesand does not compromise the <strong>in</strong>dependence of the control functions (that is, compensation should not betied to bus<strong>in</strong>ess-l<strong>in</strong>e revenue).Board-member remuneration: Views diverge regard<strong>in</strong>g board-member remuneration. Some advocatealign<strong>in</strong>g nonexecutive board-member <strong>in</strong>terest with that of the bank via long-term compensation plans(often us<strong>in</strong>g shares and/or stock options). Others suggest that such plans co-opt boards, damage their<strong>in</strong>dependence, and <strong>in</strong>crease short-termism. They suggest that nonexecutive board members not take part<strong>in</strong> variable pay plans and that they should only be paid a fixed annual fee (and perhaps a separate fee <strong>for</strong>attend<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>gs). Practice with<strong>in</strong> the EU appears to favor the latter approach.Supervisors: Supervisors need to have a clear view of compensation practices <strong>in</strong> banks to ensure that banks’remuneration practices favor long-term <strong>in</strong>terests and do not encourage undue risks.59 For the specific amendments <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the CRD3, see http://ec.europa.eu/<strong>in</strong>ternal_market/bank/docs/regcapital/com2009/Leg_Proposal_Adopted_1307.pdf.42<strong>Policy</strong> Brief<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Governance</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Banks</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!