ARTES-5.1 â ESA Telecom Technology Workplan ... - Emits - ESA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annex 2Page 27Ref. Activity Title Procurement Policy Budget(KEUR)4F.041(09.153.08)Objective:Description:Planned TenderIssueFlash-over evaluation on large solar panels Open Competitive Tender Type: C 900 4Q 2009 18Estimated Duration(months)The objective is to perform ESD tests in vacuum chamber on a large solar panel (8m 2 ), to derive the flash-over current characteristic over the panel and to manufacture and validate a flashover simulator for coupon testing.A better understanding of the characteristics and effects of electrostatic discharge (ESD) events have to be established. Some in-orbit failures on telecom satellites in GEO environments havebeen assigned to ESD events. The new generation of solar cells based on GaAs is more vulnerable to ESD than Silicon. Therefore, an ISO standard is planned to be issued describing test andqualification methods to simulate ESD effects on solar array panels in GEO environment. However, certain points still need to be clarified to avoid unnecessary over-design of the solargenerator as this could result in extra costs. Most important is to determine the maximum surface area that can be neutralized by the flash-over occurring during an ESD event, since thisresults in the maximum energy available to harm the solar panel and helps to define realistic test conditions.Today there is no model allowing to reliably extrapolate ESD laboratory test on small samples to large area solar arrays. It will be the objective of this activity to define extrapolation modelsthat will allow to use coupon testing. A flight-representative panel (8m2) shall be tested in a large vacuum chamber. Once, the correct shape of the flash-over current has been derived a flashoversimulator will be developed and validated that allows for representative tests on small coupons.This particular ESD phenomena and resulting potential solar array performance degradation is exclusively applicable for solar arrays in GEO.Qualification of solar arrays requires a set-up representative to in-flight configuration. It is known that the flash-over current involved in the electrostatic discharge is related to the totaldielectric surface neutralised during the ESD. This flash-over is represented in the classical electrical set-up by a capacitance added to those representing the satellite but this capacitanceshould be replaced by a "flash-over simulator" i.e. a set-up which could deliver the real shape over time of the flash-over current.Two main questions have to be answered to lead to a more representative set-up :- Which maximum surface can be neutralised by the flash-over during an ESD?- Is the flash-over current critical for secondary arc initiation and sustainment?To answer the first question, an experiment has to be performed on a complete solar panel. A large solar panel (8m2) will be tested in a large vacuum chamber with two electron guns facingthe panel. The panel will be biased and charged under the electron flux to reach an Inverted Voltage Gradient state. The panel will be instrumented to detect the blow-off and flash-overcurrents i.e. each string will be cabled and instrumented independently. Then a test in presence of plasma has to be performed and the adaptation of a plasma source has to be considered andplanned to check for the comparability between tests performed with the electron gun and in plasma. The experiment shall be repeated for other capacitance values (to simulate other types ofcover glasses). Once the equivalence of the plasma environment with the electron environment has been proven for at least two different capacitance values, the remaining part of theparametric study will be performed in a plasma environment that is easier to use. Based on the test results on the large panel, a flash-over simulator will be developed and validated to allow allfuture qualification tests to be performed on small coupons (2x2 cells) in plasma environment.
Annex 2Page 283. SPACE SEGMENT - PAYLOAD3.1 Payload – System and ArchitectureRef. Activity Title Procurement Policy Budget(KEUR)5A.011(08.153.45)Objective:Description:Planned TenderIssueOn ground beam forming techniques Open Competitive Tender Type: C 300 1Q 2009 12Estimated Duration(months)The activity is to evaluate the potential benefit of on-ground compared to on-board beam forming in terms of complexity/mass/power and cost for missions with a high number of spot beamslike Mobile Satellite Systems.On-Ground Beamforming (OGB) is an attractive technique allowing a high degree of satellite coverage flexibility while maintaining an affordable satellite payload complexity. OGBtechnology is used on a new generation of hybrid mobile satellite terrestrial networks under development in the USA.Potential advantages of dynamic and adaptive beam forming techniques are widely documented and recognized. Various kinds of flexibility, adaptations and real time pattern control(including interference mitigation and Multi-Input-Multi-Output processing) could be provided to increase the overall telecommunication system traffic capacity or to render the system robustto interferences. The full exploitation of the state-of-the-art techniques in an on-board processor will demand technologies currently at the limit of state of the art.The concept to perform the demanding processing on ground to implement the more sophisticated techniques was first seen for the US TDRSS S-band multiple access service and has recentlybeen adopted by US Mobile Satellite Services (MSS) operators (ICO, MSV, Terrestar). The OGB techniques rely on the transfer of radiating element signals to ground and vice versa. Theforming of beams is realised on-ground with all the flexibility offered by on-ground computer processing power (number of beams, beams’ shapes, adaptive processing, interferencecancellation, MIMO, etc.). The OGB results in a simplification of the on-board routing functions. Tasks to be carried out shall include:• Candidate missions identification• Efficient ground/space partitioning and payload architecture definition• Return and Forward links beam forming requirements definition• Beamforming impairments analysis (mismatches, different frequency conversions, propagation channel, different Doppler per channel, etc.) and countermeasures• Techniques for feeder-link bandwidth reduction (e.g. combined A/D conversion, vector quantization and high-order modulation transmission of the data-flow)• On-ground advanced signal processing algorithms• End-to-end simulator development for identified application scenariosSpace and ground-segment functionalities shall be jointly addressed to identify an effective architecture and to assess overall performances and cost. A roadmap of key technologicaldevelopments shall be prepared to ensure European industry competitiveness in this strategic field.
Page 1 and 2: March 2009ARTES-5.1 - ESA Telecom T
Page 3 and 4: Annex 1Page 1ANNEX 1SUMMARY TABLE F
Page 5 and 6: Annex 1Page 3ActivityRef.Title Cost
Page 7 and 8: Annex 2Page 21. SYSTEM/NETWORKS/PRO
Page 9 and 10: Annex 2Page 4Ref. Activity Title Pr
Page 15 and 16: Annex 2Page 101.2 PropagationRef.al
Page 17 and 18: Annex 2Page 12Ref. Activity Title P
Page 19 and 20: Annex 2Page 142. SPACE SEGMENT - GE
Page 21 and 22: Annex 2Page 162.2 Propulsion System
Page 25 and 26: Annex 2Page 202.3 AOCSRef. Activity
Page 27 and 28: Annex 2Page 222.4 Thermal SystemRef
Page 58: Annex 2Page 53Ref. Activity Title P

ARTES-5.1 â ESA Telecom Technology Workplan ... - Emits - ESA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

ARTES-5.1 â ESA Telecom Technology Workplan ... - Emits - ESA