26.11.2012 Views

The Effectiveness of Health Care Teams in the National Health Service

The Effectiveness of Health Care Teams in the National Health Service

The Effectiveness of Health Care Teams in the National Health Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Communication difficulties between different pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups have been<br />

highlighted particularly. Bond, et. al., (1985) surveyed 161 pairs <strong>of</strong> General<br />

Practitioners (GPs) and health visitors, and 148 pairs <strong>of</strong> GPs and district nurses who<br />

had patients <strong>in</strong> common. <strong>The</strong>y reported low levels <strong>of</strong> communication and<br />

collaboration between GPs and community nurs<strong>in</strong>g staff and suggested that GPs had<br />

a very poor understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> health visitor's role. Similarly, McClure (1984)<br />

describes low levels <strong>of</strong> communication <strong>in</strong> a survey <strong>of</strong> 48 health visitors and 45 district<br />

nurses attached to general practices. Community nurses reported that<br />

communication with practice staff was usually only about specific immediate patient<br />

issues ra<strong>the</strong>r than team objectives, strategies, processes and performance review.<br />

<strong>Health</strong> visitors were noted to be similarly unenthusiastic about progress <strong>in</strong> teamwork.<br />

Ross, R<strong>in</strong>k and Furne (2000) found that health visitors perceived teams as less<br />

effective. <strong>The</strong>y suggested that health visitors were comparatively more defensive<br />

about <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g role boundaries and considered <strong>the</strong>mselves less able<br />

to contribute to <strong>the</strong> teams as currently constituted. Cant and Killoran (1993) reached<br />

similar conclusions, based on <strong>the</strong>ir research study with 928 practice nurses, 682<br />

health visitors and 679 district nurses. <strong>The</strong>y argued that jo<strong>in</strong>t pr<strong>of</strong>essional tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stigation <strong>of</strong> regular team meet<strong>in</strong>gs were necessary to promote good<br />

communication.<br />

Cott (1997) used a social network analysis <strong>of</strong> 93 health care workers across 3<br />

multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary long-term care teams to explore communication processes with<strong>in</strong><br />

teams. She concluded that higher status multi-pr<strong>of</strong>essional members communicated<br />

most openly and worked fairly autonomously across loosely structured tasks, with<br />

low levels <strong>of</strong> authority. In contrast, hierarchical nurs<strong>in</strong>g sub-teams did not report high<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

West and Slater (1996) reported that much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential benefit <strong>of</strong> teamwork was<br />

not be<strong>in</strong>g realised, with less than one <strong>in</strong> four health care teams build<strong>in</strong>g effective<br />

communication and teamwork<strong>in</strong>g practices (see also West & Poulton, 1997). In a<br />

similar ve<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Audit Commission report <strong>in</strong> 1992 drew attention to a major gap<br />

between <strong>the</strong> rhetoric and reality:<br />

"Separate l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> control, different payment systems lead<strong>in</strong>g to suspicion<br />

over motives, diverse objectives, pr<strong>of</strong>essional barriers and perceived<br />

<strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> status, all play a part <strong>in</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>of</strong> multi-<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional, multi-agency teamwork. . . for those work<strong>in</strong>g under such

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!