26.11.2012 Views

The Effectiveness of Health Care Teams in the National Health Service

The Effectiveness of Health Care Teams in the National Health Service

The Effectiveness of Health Care Teams in the National Health Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

senior health visitor and practice manager/senior receptionist <strong>in</strong> each practice. A<br />

reply slip was <strong>in</strong>cluded, which also solicited additional <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> team<br />

(fund hold<strong>in</strong>g status, frequency and type <strong>of</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>gs, Jarman <strong>in</strong>dex, number <strong>of</strong> GPs,<br />

list size etc.) 3<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial letter was followed up with a telephone call to <strong>the</strong> practice manager/senior<br />

receptionist at all 300 practices. If teams had already <strong>in</strong>dicated a will<strong>in</strong>gness to<br />

participate, practical arrangements for questionnaire distribution were made.<br />

Researchers requested <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> a contact person <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> team to enable<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued effective liaison. <strong>The</strong> contact person was telephoned at a later date to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> team was will<strong>in</strong>g to take part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research. <strong>Teams</strong> that did<br />

not return a reply slip were also telephoned and provided with additional <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r follow-up telephone calls were made until <strong>the</strong> team made a decision about<br />

participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research (some PHCTs were contacted six or seven times before<br />

a decision was made). When teams agreed to collaborate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research,<br />

questionnaires were sent to <strong>the</strong> contact person for distribution to team members.<br />

After three months <strong>the</strong> response rate from 10 teams was below 30% and 23 had not<br />

returned any questionnaires. <strong>The</strong>se teams were dropped from <strong>the</strong> sample and<br />

replaced with 7 teams based <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ner city area, and 7 from a rural location,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a f<strong>in</strong>al sample <strong>of</strong> 100 teams. <strong>The</strong> total response rate was 55.8%.<br />

Response rates for teams ranged from 21.4% to 100%, with a mean <strong>of</strong> 57.6%.<br />

Data Collection Methods<br />

Data on team function<strong>in</strong>g and effectiveness were collected us<strong>in</strong>g three methods: self<br />

report questionnaires completed by <strong>in</strong>dividual team members; self report and<br />

telephone <strong>in</strong>terview surveys with <strong>the</strong> team contacts; and external rat<strong>in</strong>gs from<br />

primary health care representatives and health authority staff.<br />

1156 respondents from 100 PHCTs completed questionnaires on <strong>the</strong>ir perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

team function<strong>in</strong>g and team effectiveness. Of <strong>the</strong>se, 85% were female; 15% were<br />

GPs; 14.2 % practice nurses; 23% trust nurses (health visitors, district nurses,<br />

3 Copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview schedules, questionnaires and all data collection <strong>in</strong>struments are<br />

available from <strong>the</strong> first author <strong>of</strong> this report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!