26.11.2012 Views

The Effectiveness of Health Care Teams in the National Health Service

The Effectiveness of Health Care Teams in the National Health Service

The Effectiveness of Health Care Teams in the National Health Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Black participants were more likely to suggest that race exacerbated team conflict<br />

and miscommunication, whereas white participants attributed problems to role and<br />

status <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> team. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, different emphases and responsibility for communication<br />

were acknowledged amongst <strong>the</strong> diversity <strong>of</strong> races, ethnicities, ages and genders.<br />

Social isolation, selective perception and stereotypes also served to re<strong>in</strong>force <strong>the</strong>se<br />

differences and deepen communication problems. Fewer occasions for social<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction reduced opportunities to develop shared beliefs and a common social<br />

reality across racial groups. <strong>The</strong> researchers <strong>the</strong>refore suggested that team<br />

members be encouraged to understand different perspectives and appreciate<br />

alternative realities, <strong>in</strong> order to lessen social isolation and reduce selective<br />

perceptions and stereotyp<strong>in</strong>g behaviours.<br />

Freeman, Miller and Ross (2000) also developed a grounded <strong>the</strong>ory about<br />

collaborative practice at <strong>the</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organisation, group and <strong>in</strong>dividual. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

conducted case studies <strong>of</strong> 6 teams work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> specialist healthcare<br />

services (diabetes, medical ward, primary healthcare, neuro-rehabilitation unit, child<br />

development assessment, community mental health) and concluded that <strong>the</strong><br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gs different pr<strong>of</strong>essionals ascribed to teamwork shaped how <strong>the</strong>y<br />

communicated and what <strong>the</strong>y communicated about. When <strong>the</strong>re was a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

congruence about aspects <strong>of</strong> teamwork, communication could potentially be<br />

compromised. Individual perceptions determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> role understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

considered necessary, and <strong>the</strong> value assigned to o<strong>the</strong>rs’ contributions. Differences <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g and valu<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> team roles and levels <strong>of</strong> team learn<strong>in</strong>g exacerbated<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g resentments, underm<strong>in</strong>ed pr<strong>of</strong>essional esteem and created conflict.<br />

Individual perceptions also <strong>in</strong>fluenced communication regard<strong>in</strong>g tasks and about<br />

shar<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>essional knowledge and ideas.<br />

Decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Effective decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g processes are central to team performance. Several<br />

studies have reported <strong>the</strong> positive benefits <strong>of</strong> participative decision mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> health<br />

care teams. Yeatts and Seward (2000) compared 3 self-managed work teams <strong>in</strong> a<br />

medium size U.S. rural nurs<strong>in</strong>g home. Team members <strong>of</strong> highly perform<strong>in</strong>g teams<br />

reported that <strong>the</strong>ir ability to participate <strong>in</strong> work related decisions greatly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir job satisfaction and desire to come to work. <strong>The</strong>se team members adopted a<br />

consensus model <strong>of</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y clarified <strong>the</strong> problem, considered<br />

alternatives, weighed <strong>the</strong> strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong> each alternative, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!