11.07.2015 Views

Medical Records and the Law

Medical Records and the Law

Medical Records and the Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68 CHAPTER 4: MEDICAL RECORDS ENTRIEStreatment. A physician’s signature on <strong>the</strong> medical record gives evidencethat <strong>the</strong> practitioner actually reviewed <strong>the</strong> record <strong>and</strong> acknowledged thatit represented a complete <strong>and</strong> accurate record of <strong>the</strong> patient’s course oftreatment. Although a signature does not prove conclusively that <strong>the</strong>physician reviewed <strong>the</strong> record, it is stronger evidence of such verificationthan a signature on a separate form authorizing au<strong>the</strong>ntication of <strong>the</strong>record.Although <strong>the</strong> introduction of computer technology has enabledhospitals to introduce new methods for facilitating a physician’s role in<strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>ntication process, healthcare institutions should not lose sightof <strong>the</strong>ir responsibility in creating accurate <strong>and</strong> complete medicalrecords. Any computer system that does not require physicians to reviewreports after <strong>the</strong>y have been transcribed is likely to fall short ofboth federal <strong>and</strong> state au<strong>the</strong>ntication st<strong>and</strong>ards, as well as to create seriousliability risks for <strong>the</strong> facility implementing such a system. (For amore detailed discussion of EHRs, see Chapter 13.)Verbal OrdersIn <strong>the</strong> course of providing patient care, healthcare practitioners oftendeliver orders verbally. Because of <strong>the</strong> effect that this practice may haveon <strong>the</strong> quality of patient care, it is important for healthcare facilities toestablish st<strong>and</strong>ards governing how <strong>the</strong>se orders are received <strong>and</strong>recorded. Healthcare facilities should require physicians to deliver <strong>the</strong>irorders in writing or by computer entry, except in situations in whichverbal orders are unavoidable. Written <strong>and</strong> computer entry orders arepreferable to verbal ones because written <strong>and</strong> computer entry orderscreate fewer chances for error.Hospital licensing regulations in most states require all physician ordersto be written in <strong>the</strong> patient’s medical record <strong>and</strong> au<strong>the</strong>nticated. 50Indiana requires that (a) all verbal orders be repeated <strong>and</strong> verified, (b)that <strong>the</strong> repetition <strong>and</strong> verification be documented in <strong>the</strong> patient’smedical record, (c) that <strong>the</strong> record be signed by <strong>the</strong> professional whotook <strong>the</strong> order, <strong>and</strong> (d) that if no repetition <strong>and</strong> verification occurred,<strong>the</strong> ordering physician must <strong>the</strong>n au<strong>the</strong>nticate <strong>and</strong> date <strong>the</strong> verbalorder within 48 hours. 51 O<strong>the</strong>r state licensure laws extend <strong>the</strong> time pe-50See, e.g., S.C. Code Ann. Regs. r. 61-16 § 601.6.51Ind. Admin. Code tit. 410, r. 15-1.5-5(b)(3)(O).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!