11.07.2015 Views

Top 100 - Wamda.com

Top 100 - Wamda.com

Top 100 - Wamda.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BrandZ <strong>Top</strong> <strong>100</strong> 2011: SECTORS/COMMENTARY 64Oil & GasDisaster revealed resilienceThe big story, of course, was theBP disaster – the tragic DeepwaterHorizon accident and its impact onthe environment, the local economyand the lives of individuals.The disaster highlighted the importance and thevulnerability of brands in a category where brandcontribution to brand equity traditionally has been low.Oil and gas <strong>com</strong>panies explore the world’s remaining oilreserves, often located in extreme environments milesbelow the ocean floor. Proven <strong>com</strong>petence and brandstature is critical for convincing governments to grantexploration rights and for influencing regulators. The BPdisaster undermined this agenda.It also reminded oil <strong>com</strong>panies to cultivate broadersupport by addressing the contradictory consumermessages: respect the environment, energize our liveswithout interruption, and keep fuel prices low. Each brandattempted to explain this energy paradox more openly,while making an argument for its particular approach toreconciling the seemingly irreconcilable.Exxon’s <strong>com</strong>munications continued to focus onoperational excellence. Shell launched a global corporatecampaign with the strapline “Let’s Go,” emphasizingworking collaboratively with partners and end users tofind answers to the energy challenge.Chevron’s “We Agree” campaign suggested that<strong>com</strong>pany and consumer are on the same side of themulti-faceted energy issue. Ironically, BP may have beenthe most brand-conscious and differentiated brandbecause of its Helios logo and related emphasis oncorporate responsibility.Brand is especially critical for publicallyowned oil <strong>com</strong>panies becausethey <strong>com</strong>pete against state-ownedorganizations that operate in a differentregulatory environment and control mostof the world’s oil business. Projectsavailable to publically owned <strong>com</strong>paniesgenerally require deep water drilling ormeeting other challenges that entail themost expense and risk.TOPBRANDSBrand Value$MBrandContributionBrandMomentumBrand ValueChange1 ExxonMobil 16,973 1 8 10%2 Shell 15,168 1 5 0%3 Petrobras 13,421 1 7 39%4 BP 12,542 1 5 -27%5 PetroChina 11,291 1 10 -19%6 Chevron 8,120 1 8 12%7 Gazprom 6,849 1 7 24%8 ConocoPhilips 6,486 1 6 21%9 Lukoil 5,792 1 10 N/A10 Total 5,262 1 7 -25%Source: Millward Brown Optimor(including data from BrandZ and Bloomberg)OIL & GASUP 1%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!