11.07.2015 Views

Top 100 - Wamda.com

Top 100 - Wamda.com

Top 100 - Wamda.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BrandZ <strong>Top</strong> <strong>100</strong> 2011: SECTORS/COMMENTARY 86Wireless data transmissionsurpassed voice last year for thefirst time.Tele<strong>com</strong>s struggled to keep up with this major shift,which was driven by the proliferation of smartphonesand <strong>com</strong>plicated by smarter consumers choosingtheir provider based on the desired operating systemand device.The <strong>com</strong>panies became one-stop resources for mostforms of electronic <strong>com</strong>munication, including landlines,cable, wireless mobile and Internet, which they marketedin numerous <strong>com</strong>binations. This BrandZ report on brandvalue reflects this convergence and groups all the playersunder the heading of tele<strong>com</strong> providers.Because the brand valuations now reflect the full extentof each enterprise, 11 of the brands appear in the BrandZ<strong>Top</strong> <strong>100</strong> Most Valuable Global Brands: AT&T (No. 7),China Mobile (No. 9), Vodafone (No. 12), Verizon (No.13) Deutsche Telekom (No. 19) Spain’s Movistar (No.21), Orange (No. 36), NTT DoCoMo of Japan (No. 48),Tele<strong>com</strong> Italia (75), Telcel (76) and MTS (80).In their attempts to differentiate, providersconcentrated primarily on two areas,technology and content. The technology<strong>com</strong>petition focused on expandingnetworks and introducing 4G, potentiallya step-change advance in which wirelessdata transmission is faster than cable.Along with functional advantages, the tele<strong>com</strong>s worked toconnect emotionally with customers. They attempted toshift from being simply the “pipes” that delivered content tobe<strong>com</strong>ing content providers with entertainment packagesaimed at maximizing their share of household media.The increasing availability of mobile devices for saleat mass merchants raised pricing issues. Becauseassortments included a variety of devices from diversetele<strong>com</strong> providers with <strong>com</strong>plicated marketing programs,price <strong>com</strong>parison became frustrating for consumershoping for price transparency.European brand O2 attempted to make pricing moretransparent, which increased by 10 percent in brandvalue, attempted to make pricing more transparent. Pricetransparency perhaps was more difficult for Vodafonebecause of its greater reach as the world’s secondlargesttele<strong>com</strong>s provider with 341 million subscribers.Tele<strong>com</strong>ProvidersData went wirelessTOPBRANDSBrand Value$MBrandContributionBrandMomentumBrand ValueChange1 at&t 69,916 3 4 N/A2 China Mobile 57,326 4 9 9%3 Vodafone 43,647 2 4 -2%4 Verizon 42,828 3 4 N/A5 Deutsche Telekom 29,774 2 4 N/A6 Movistar 27,249 2 6 N/A7 Orange 17,597 1 4 N/A8 NTT DoCoMo 15,449 2 8 19%9 O2 11,694 2 5 N/A10 Tele<strong>com</strong> Italia 11,609 4 5 N/A*Because of the convergence of products and services offered,we redefined and renamed this category, formerly called Mobile Operators.Tele<strong>com</strong> Providers includes brands that market fixed line, cable, wireless,mobile, Internet and related products and services.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!