Rational Self-Doubt - Philosophy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Re-Cal Re-capNews about reliability level could require:merely a moment of silence (if already calibrated)loss of confidenceuptick in confidenceThe effect depends on quantity, and is not runaway.A rational subject retains unity and coherence not by perfectself-knowledge or unconditional self-respect but bycoherently 1) handling fallibility, and 2) conforming to a singleprobability function at two orders.Re-Cal 1) is required by the Principal Principle, 2) is coherent, 3)is not distorting, 4) converges in the long run, 5) has addedvalue over first-order conditionalization.48
P f (q) = P i (q/P i (q) = x . PR(q/P i (q) = x) = y) = y49
Page 1 and 2: Rational Self-DoubtSherri RoushDepa
Page 4 and 5: Judgmental Self-DoubtSecond-guessin
Page 6 and 7: Evidence about q vs. evidence about
Page 8 and 9: Terms - 1 st - and 2 nd - order evi
Page 10 and 11: What is the rational thing to do?1)
Page 12 and 13: Second-Order ProbabilitiesA second-
Page 14 and 15: The Principle that Gets in the WayP
Page 16 and 17: Restricted Self-Respect (RSR)P(q/P(
Page 18 and 19: Unrestricted Self-Respect (USR)P(q/
Page 20 and 21: Expressing the QuandaryExplicitly:P
Page 22 and 23: Expressing the QuandaryExplicitly:P
Page 24 and 25: Principal PrincipleP(q/PR(q) = y .
Page 26 and 27: What’s good for the goose is good
Page 28 and 29: Calibration and Re-calibrationCal(s
Page 30 and 31: Taking StockSupposed reasons to ign
Page 32 and 33: Incoherence of Cal?1. P(q) = x,2. P
Page 34 and 35: Incoherence of Second-orderPower Se
Page 36 and 37: Taking StockSupposed reasons to ign
Page 38 and 39: Regress and PathologyRe-CalP f (q)
Page 40 and 41: Regress and Pathology - NoRe-CalP f
Page 42 and 43: Distorting in the long run?The (Pri
Page 44 and 45: Likelihood Ratio Convergence Theore
Page 46 and 47: PointSeidenfeld: Why bother with th
Page 50: Assume:P(q) = xP(P(q) = x) = 1By de

Rational Self-Doubt - Philosophy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?