11.07.2015 Views

Recent developments in the research of shape memory alloys

Recent developments in the research of shape memory alloys

Recent developments in the research of shape memory alloys

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

K. Otsuka, X. Ren/Intermetallics 7 (1999) 511±528 519Fig. 13. Composition dependence <strong>of</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t defect (vacancy/ASD) concentrations for Au±Cd <strong>alloys</strong> [77]. Experimentally measured vacancy concentrationsare shown with square symbol [72].Intermetallics are usually divided <strong>in</strong>to three dist<strong>in</strong>cttypes accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>ir defect types [73]: triple defect(TRD) type, ASD type and hybrid type. For TRD type<strong>in</strong>termetallics (e.g. Ni±Al, Co±Al, Fe±Al) vacancy isthought to be a necessary constituent to stabilize <strong>the</strong> B2structure, thus a very high concentration <strong>of</strong> vacancy isconsidered to be stable down to absolute zero. Them<strong>in</strong>imum vacancy concentration z for TRD <strong>in</strong>termetallicsis z ˆ 2x on one side from stoichiometry(where x is <strong>the</strong> composition deviation from stoichiometry)as shown by <strong>the</strong> Bradley±Taylor (BT) [87] l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>Fig. 1. Such stable vacancy is usually called `constitutionalvacancy'. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>in</strong> ASD type andhybrid <strong>in</strong>termetallics vacancy is unstable at low temperatures,thus its concentration is below BT l<strong>in</strong>e. Au±Cdapparently belongs to <strong>the</strong> hybrid type and it conta<strong>in</strong>s alarge amount <strong>of</strong> frozen-<strong>in</strong> vacancy.For over 60 years it has been widely believed thatTRD <strong>in</strong>termetallics such as Ni±Al, Co±Al and Fe±Alconta<strong>in</strong> constitutional vacancies. However, recent carefulmeasurements on <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>termetallics found thateven <strong>the</strong>se `typical' TRD <strong>in</strong>termetallics have vacancyconcentration appreciably below <strong>the</strong> BT-l<strong>in</strong>e [74±76],which is <strong>the</strong> lower limit for constitutional vacancy toexist. This behavior is qualitatively similar to <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong>Au±Cd. This clearly suggests that vacancy is unstable atlow temperature, thus gives a strong challenge to <strong>the</strong>notion <strong>of</strong> constitutional vacancy. Based on <strong>the</strong>seexperimental ®nd<strong>in</strong>gs, we showed that no constitutionalvacancy exists <strong>in</strong> any <strong>in</strong>termetallics, and <strong>the</strong> di€erence <strong>in</strong>vacancy-frozen temperature (which depends on order<strong>in</strong>genergy) gives rise to three apparently di€erent types <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>termetallics [77].3.2. Martensite ag<strong>in</strong>g e€ectÐstabilization and rubber-likebehaviorMartensite ag<strong>in</strong>g e€ect is a puzzl<strong>in</strong>g phenomenonunclear for over 60 years, and has been found <strong>in</strong> Au±Cd,Au±Cu±Zn, Cu±Zn±Al, Cu±Al±Ni, and In±Tl. It <strong>in</strong>volvestwo time-dependent phenomena dur<strong>in</strong>g martensiteag<strong>in</strong>g. One is called martensite stabilization, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r iscalled rubber-like behavior (RLB). Martensite stabilizationrefers to <strong>the</strong> phenomenon that martensiteappears to be more stable with respect to <strong>the</strong> parentphase dur<strong>in</strong>g ag<strong>in</strong>g so that <strong>the</strong> reverse transformationtemperature is <strong>in</strong>creased. The rubber-like behaviorrefers to <strong>the</strong> phenomenon that martensite exhibits arecoverable or pseudo-elastic deformation behaviorafter ag<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> critical stress, asexempli®ed <strong>in</strong> Fig. 14(A). The most puzzl<strong>in</strong>g problemwith <strong>the</strong> RLB is why <strong>the</strong>re should exist a restor<strong>in</strong>g force,because martensite deformation <strong>in</strong>volves only tw<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gand <strong>the</strong>re is no phase transformation <strong>in</strong>volved, unlikethat <strong>of</strong> superelasticity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parent phase due to stress<strong>in</strong>ducedmartensitic transformation. The microstructurechange underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> RLB is a reversible one, that is,<strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al martensite doma<strong>in</strong> pattern is recovered after

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!