AFFORDABLEHOUSING ISBROADLY DEFINEDAS THAT WHICHIS ADEQUATEIN QUALITY ANDLOCATION ANDDOES NOT COST SOMUCH THAT IT PROHIBITSITS OCCUPANTS MEETINGOTHER BASIC LIVING COSTSOR THREATENS THEIRENJOYMENT OF BASICHUMAN RIGHTS. HOUSINGAFFORDABILITY, HOWEVER,IS MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ANDINVOLVES MORE THAN THEOFTEN-USED SIMPLIFIEDCONCEPTION OF THE RATIO OFHOUSE PURCHASE PRICE TOHOUSEHOLD INCOME.with<strong>in</strong> a country over time, as <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>and</strong> houseprices rise <strong>and</strong>/or fall.1.4The third measure <strong>of</strong> affordability is theresidual <strong>in</strong>come assessment. It is representedas a percentage <strong>of</strong> household <strong>in</strong>come spent on<strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>-related expenses <strong>and</strong> demonstrates ahousehold’s ability to f<strong>in</strong>ancially service <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>without compromis<strong>in</strong>g on necessary non-<strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>expenditure. 46 Although there is no universallyagreed percentage, <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is generally deemed<strong>affordable</strong> when a household spends less than30 per cent <strong>of</strong> their <strong>in</strong>come on <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> relatedexpenses, such as mortgage repayments (forowner-occupiers), rent payments (for tenants),<strong>and</strong> direct operational expenses such as taxes,47 48<strong>in</strong>surance <strong>and</strong> service payments, etc.STRUCTURE AND CONTENT OFTHE VOLUMEDef<strong>in</strong>itions: regional <strong>and</strong> country group<strong>in</strong>gsThe follow<strong>in</strong>g United Nations def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> Asiancountries <strong>and</strong> regions are used throughout thispaper:Western Asia:Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahra<strong>in</strong>, Cyprus, Georgia,Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, OccupiedPalest<strong>in</strong>ian Territory, Oman, Qatar, SaudiArabia, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, UnitedArab Emirates, Yemen.South-Central Asia:Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, IslamicRepublic <strong>of</strong> Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan,Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan.South-Eastern Asia:Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia,Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia,Myanmar, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, S<strong>in</strong>gapore, Thai<strong>l<strong>and</strong></strong>,Timor-Leste, Viet Nam.Eastern Asia:Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Hong Kong, SAR <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Macao SAR<strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Japan, Democratic People’s Republic <strong>of</strong>Korea, Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea, MongoliaData sources <strong>and</strong> analysisEfforts have been made to reflect the enormousheterogeneity <strong>in</strong> the Asia region as this hasimplications for the significant differences <strong>in</strong> theprovision <strong>of</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>policy responses. The analytical assessment is basedon exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation from government reports,such as recent UN-HABITAT Global Reportson Human Settlements, The State <strong>of</strong> Asian Cities2010/11. The analysis draws on comparativeevaluations on the topic carried out by major<strong>in</strong>ternational organisations <strong>and</strong> research <strong>in</strong>stitutesas well as country specific assessments <strong>of</strong> <strong>affordable</strong><strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> alternatives. It <strong>in</strong>corporates statistics<strong>and</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators from <strong>of</strong>ficially publishedsources <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational databases.Volume structurePart One provides an overview <strong>of</strong> the challenge<strong>of</strong> <strong>affordable</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the regional context.It has provided the <strong>in</strong>troductory, historical <strong>and</strong>conceptual sett<strong>in</strong>g for the study <strong>of</strong> <strong>affordable</strong>12PART ONE
Table 2: Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> affordabilityHouse-Price-to-IncomeRatioHouse-Rent-to-IncomeRatioHous<strong>in</strong>g-relatedexpenditure as apercentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>comeMeasureMedian house pricedivided by medianhousehold <strong>in</strong>come. Theratio <strong>of</strong> the median freemarketprice <strong>of</strong> a dwell<strong>in</strong>gunit <strong>and</strong> the medianannual household <strong>in</strong>come.Median annual rent dividedby median annual renterhousehold <strong>in</strong>come. Incomesare median gross <strong>in</strong>comes<strong>of</strong> private <strong>and</strong> public renterhouseholds.Annual median household<strong>in</strong>come divided byannual median <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>expenditure (mortgagepayments, rent, services,taxes, <strong>in</strong>surance, etc).Warn<strong>in</strong>gTrendVery high or ris<strong>in</strong>g ratiosimply that either thereis no effective <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>market or that <strong>l<strong>and</strong></strong>is extremely scarce,generally ow<strong>in</strong>g toregulatory <strong>in</strong>efficiencies orrestrictions.High values imply thatsupply is not keep<strong>in</strong>g up withdem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> affordability islow. Low values usually implycontrolled tenancies or a highproportion <strong>of</strong> public <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.A high percentage <strong>in</strong>dicates<strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is negativelyimpact<strong>in</strong>g on meet<strong>in</strong>g non<strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>basic needs <strong>and</strong>the <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> market is notfunction<strong>in</strong>g properly.SignificanceA key measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>affordability. Also generallyregarded as the s<strong>in</strong>gle<strong>in</strong>dicator that givesthe greatest amount <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>markets.A key measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>affordability, especially forlow-<strong>in</strong>come households whomay be unable to purchase<strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.It can account for essentialnon-<strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expendituresuch as food, water,cloth<strong>in</strong>g, school<strong>in</strong>g,transport, etc <strong>and</strong> thedecisions households makeregard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong>non-<strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditures.<strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Asia. It has highlighted the majorurban, economic, social, <strong>and</strong> historic factors <strong>in</strong>the region underly<strong>in</strong>g differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>provision <strong>and</strong> specific <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> challenges.Part Two canvases the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>affordable</strong> <strong>l<strong>and</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Asia. It systematically reviews trends <strong>in</strong><strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> conditions with respect to <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> needsat the national scale <strong>and</strong> analyses the quality<strong>of</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> stock us<strong>in</strong>g the UN-HABITAT’s ‘shelter deprivations’ framework. Itshows how the <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> stock <strong>in</strong> Asia is grossly<strong>in</strong>adequate, both quantitatively <strong>and</strong> qualitatively.The proportion <strong>of</strong> households liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> slums,which are characterised by <strong>in</strong>adequate but more<strong>affordable</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, is grow<strong>in</strong>g at an alarm<strong>in</strong>g rate<strong>in</strong> many cities.Part Three explores the critical l<strong>in</strong>kages between<strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> challenges <strong>and</strong> policy responses. Itexam<strong>in</strong>es trends <strong>in</strong> <strong>affordable</strong> <strong>l<strong>and</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>delivery systems. Exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>l<strong>and</strong></strong> policy <strong>and</strong>legislative frameworks are reviewed, along withavailability, accessibility <strong>and</strong> affordability <strong>of</strong>serviced <strong>l<strong>and</strong></strong> for <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Several approacheshave been tried <strong>in</strong> seek<strong>in</strong>g to provide an adequatesupply <strong>of</strong> well-located serviced <strong>l<strong>and</strong></strong> at <strong>affordable</strong>cost; <strong>and</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the key ones are presented.The section also reviews <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> policy <strong>and</strong>legislative frameworks. Hous<strong>in</strong>g tenure patterns<strong>in</strong> different countries <strong>and</strong> the dom<strong>in</strong>ant build<strong>in</strong>gtypes are identified, followed by an exam<strong>in</strong>ation<strong>of</strong> the current <strong>affordable</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> stock, thetypes <strong>and</strong> numbers <strong>of</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> units currentlyunder construction, <strong>and</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> beneficiaries.Privatization <strong>of</strong> public <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> publicprivate partnership—two notable ways <strong>in</strong>which <strong>affordable</strong> <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> has been provided—are described; as well as some <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>novativef<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms that have been usedsuccessfully.Part Four firstly summarises the key notabletrends over the last decade, <strong>in</strong> particular regard<strong>in</strong>gsubsidized public <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> programmes, assistedself-help <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, <strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>and</strong> theAFFORDABLE LAND <strong>and</strong> HOUSING IN Asia13
- Page 3: AFFORDABLE LANDAND HOUSING IN ASIAV
- Page 7 and 8: 3.2.1 HOUSING POLICY AND LEGISLATIV
- Page 13 and 14: LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1: A woman pr
- Page 15 and 16: LIST OF TABLESTable 1: Regional urb
- Page 17 and 18: 1PART oneIntroduction- affordableho
- Page 19 and 20: Figure 3: Regional urbanisation tre
- Page 24 and 25: Figure 7: High-rise multi-household
- Page 26 and 27: can be found throughout Asian citie
- Page 30 and 31: Figure 9: Slum housing in South Asi
- Page 32 and 33: The housingstock in manycountries i
- Page 34 and 35: 2. THE STATE OFAFFORDABLE LANDAND H
- Page 36 and 37: 9.3 square metres in 1998. 62 A stu
- Page 38 and 39: An analysis of sufficient living ar
- Page 40 and 41: POORER URBANHOUSEHOLDSIN ASIA SIMPL
- Page 42 and 43: THE FORMAL SECTORPlan Service Build
- Page 44 and 45: PART TWO ENDNOTES49 Nenova, T. (201
- Page 46 and 47: Over the lasttwo decadesmicrofinanc
- Page 48 and 49: 3. ADDRESSINGTHE CHALLENGE:AFFORDAB
- Page 50 and 51: HOUSING IS ACATALYST FORSOCIO-ECONO
- Page 52 and 53: lower- to middle-income groups. How
- Page 54 and 55: Grihayan Tahabil (Housing Fund) thr
- Page 56 and 57: provision, especially in countries
- Page 58 and 59: heritage, infrastructure and servic
- Page 60 and 61: market transactions. All units are
- Page 62 and 63: Boatu and Chengdu alone, 600,000 pe
- Page 64 and 65: have built an estimated 700,000 dwe
- Page 66 and 67: 3.2.7 The contribution of NGOsThe m
- Page 68 and 69: quantity and at an affordable cost,
- Page 70 and 71: OVER THE LASTTWO DECADESMICROFINANC
- Page 72 and 73: Table 7: Community savings groups i
- Page 74 and 75: RemittancesRemittances-money transf
- Page 76 and 77: PART THREE ENDNOTES101 UNCHS (1997a
- Page 78 and 79:
Access toadequate andaffordablehous
- Page 80 and 81:
4. NOTABLE TRENDS,RECOMMENDATIONSAN
- Page 82 and 83:
Overcoming discrimination against w
- Page 84 and 85:
Affordable housing for plantation w
- Page 86 and 87:
opportunities to solve the underemp
- Page 88 and 89:
of other housing delivery systems t
- Page 90 and 91:
PART FOUR ENDNOTES201 UNCHS (1997b)
- Page 92 and 93:
76 PART FIVE
- Page 94 and 95:
AAcioly, C. Jr. (2008). Housing Str
- Page 96 and 97:
JJack, M. (2006). Urbanisation, sus
- Page 98 and 99:
Tipple, A. G. and A. Salim (1999).
- Page 100 and 101:
WWang, Y. P. (2004). Urban poverty,
- Page 102:
AFFORDABLE LANDAND HOUSING INASIAAf