Social Indicators of Equality for Minorities and Women - University of ...
Social Indicators of Equality for Minorities and Women - University of ...
Social Indicators of Equality for Minorities and Women - University of ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tooMalesAmer. Ind./Alask. Nat.BlacksMexican AmericansJapanese AmericansChinese AmericansPilipino AmericansPuerto RicansMajorityTABLE 2.6College OverqualificationRaw Measure 11960 1970 197651.658.846.952.448.248.152.942.749.2 C52.647.344.338.345.144.741.751.955.046.549.451.356.241.044.7<strong>Social</strong> Indicator Values b(Ratios <strong>of</strong> raw measures tothe majority male population)1960 1970 19761.211.381.101.231.131.131.241.001.181.261.131.06.921.081.071.001.161.231.041.101.151.26.921.00FemalesAmer. Ind./Alask. Nat.BlacksMexican AmericansJapanese AmericansChinese AmericansPilipino AmericansPuerto RicansMajority46.241.628.132.339.037.142.229.838.735.131.735.034.538.229.824.746.641.338.841.151.239.650.445.41.08.97.66.76.91.87.99.70.93.84.76.84.83.92.71.591.04.92.87.921.14.891.131.02a The percent <strong>of</strong> persons with at least 1 year <strong>of</strong> college who are employed in occupations which typically require less educathanthey have.b See figure 2.6 <strong>for</strong> a graphic representation <strong>of</strong> the indicator values that appear in this table.c Bold type indicates that the difference between this value <strong>and</strong> the majority benchmark is statistically significant at the 0.10level. See appendix C <strong>for</strong> sampling in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>and</strong> data source.* This can be interpreted as follows: "In 1976 the college overqualification rate <strong>for</strong> American Indian <strong>and</strong> Alaskan Native maleswas 16 percent higher than (or 1.16 times) the rate <strong>for</strong> majority males."
Change language