10A5. SMITHSet Texts:The Theory of Moral Sentiments, eds. D.D. Raphael and A.L.Macfie, 2 vols (Indianapolis IN,1982)An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, eds. T. Campbell, A. S.Skinner and W. Todd, 2 vols (Indianapolis IN, 1981)Suggested secondary reading:D. Stewart, An Account of the Life and Writings of Adam Smith L.L.D, in Smith, Essays onPhilosophical Subjects, ed. W. P. D. Wightman and J. C. Bryce, (Indianapolis IN, 1982)N. Phillipson, Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life (London, 2010)D. Winch, Adam Smith’s Politics, (Cambridge, 1978)I. Hont, Jealousy of Trade (Cambridge, MA., 2005), ‘Introduction’, pp. 1-156, and ‘Needsand Justice in the Wealth of Nations’, pp. 389-443.I. Hont, ‘Adam Smith’s History of Law and Government as Political Theory’, in R, Bourkeand R. Geuss (eds), Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn (Cambridge, 2009), pp. 131-171.Duncan Kelly, The Propriety of Liberty: Persons, Passions, and Judgement in ModernPolitical Thought (Princeton, 2010), Ch 3A.S. Skinner, A System of Social Science Papers: Papers Relating to Adam Smith, (2ndedn., Oxford, 1995), chapters 4,8A. O. Hirschman, The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before itsTriumph (Princeton NJ, 1977)P. Force, Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science(Cambridge, 2003)C. Griswold, Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment, (Cambridge, 1999)D. D. Raphael, The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy (Oxford, 2007)E. Rothschild, Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment, (Cambridge,Mass, 2001), Chs. 4, 8S. Fleischacker, On Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion (PrincetonNJ, 2004)R. Hanley, Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue (Cambridge, 2009)F. Forman-Barzilai, Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy: Cosmopolitanism and MoralTheory (Cambridge, 2010)J.G.A. Pocock, Barbarism and Religion, Vol. 3: The First Decline and Fall (Cambridge,2003), chapter 16.D. Forbes, ‘Sceptical Whiggism, Commerce and Liberty’, in A. S. Skinner and T. Wilson(eds), Essays on Adam Smith, (Oxford, 1975), 179-201A. Sen, ‘Introduction’, in Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. R. P. Hanley (London,2010), pp. vii-xxvi.J. Robertson, ‘The Legacy of Adam Smith: Government and Economic Development in TheWealth of Nations’, in R. Bellamy (ed), Victorian Liberalism: Nineteenth-Century PoliticalThought and Practice, (London, 1990), 15-41D. Lieberman, ‘Adam Smith on Justice, Right and Law’, in K. Haakonnsen (ed),Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith (Cambridge, 2006), pp. 214-245S. J. Pack and E. Schliesser, ‘Smith’s Humean Criticism of Hume’s Account of the Origin ofJustice,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44 (2006), 47-63.G.J. Stigler, ‘Smith’s Travels on the Ship of State’, in A. S. Skinner and T. Wilson (eds),Essays on Adam Smith, (Oxford, 1975), 237-46.J. Viner, ‘Adam Smith and Laissez Faire’, in D. A. Irwin (ed), Essays on the IntellectualHistory of Economics, (Princeton NJ, 1991), 85-113.
K. Tribe, ‘Natural Liberty and Laissez Faire: How Adam Smith became a Free TradeIdeologue’, in S. Copley and K. Sutherland (eds), Adam Smith’s “Wealth of Nations”: NewInterdisciplinary Essays, (Manchester, 1995), 23-44.D. Winch, ‘Science and the Legislator: Adam Smith and After’, Economic Journal,I. Hont, ‘Adam Smith and the Political Economy of the “Unnatural and Retrograde Order, inHont, Jealousy of Trade, pp. 354-388.93 (1983), 501-29.P. Bowles, ‘Adam Smith and the “Natural Progress of Opulence”’, Economica, n.s. 53 (1986),109.118.S. Muthu, ‘Adam Smith’s Critique of International Trading Companies’, Political Theory 36(2008), 185-212.A. Oncken, ‘The Consistency of Adam Smith’, Economic Journal 7 (1897), 443-450.K. Tribe, ‘”Das Adam Smith Problem” and the Origins of Modern Smith Scholarship’, Historyof European Ideas 344 (2008), 514-525.J.-L. Peaucelle, Adam Smith’s Use of Multiple References for His Pin Making Example’,European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13 (2006), 489-512.11
- Page 1 and 2: Historical Tripos - Part I: Paper 2
- Page 3 and 4: A1. VICOSet Text:The New Science, t
- Page 5 and 6: P. Cheney, ‘Montesquieu’s Scien
- Page 7 and 8: Dees, Richard H. “‘One of the F
- Page 13 and 14: D. Armitage, ‘Edmund Burke and Re
- Page 15 and 16: 15A8. KANTSet Texts:Groundwork of t
- Page 17 and 18: A9. BENTHAM17Set Texts:A Fragment o
- Page 19 and 20: 19A11. HEGELSet Texts:Elements of t
- Page 21 and 22: 21A12. TOCQUEVILLESet Text:Democrac
- Page 23 and 24: 23A13. J. S. MILLSet Texts:On Liber
- Page 25 and 26: 25A14. MARXSet Texts:The Communist
- Page 27 and 28: 27B15. HUMAN NATURE AND HISTORYIN T
- Page 29: 29B16. COMMERCIAL SOCIETYAND THE AM
- Page 32 and 33: (Stanford CA, 1994), pp. 1-41R. Sha
- Page 34: J. G. A. Pocock, ‘1776: The Revol
- Page 37 and 38: 37B20. DISSENT AND THE POLITICSOF R
- Page 39 and 40: 39B21. GERMAN POLITICAL THOUGHT 178
- Page 41 and 42: 41B22. NINETEENTH CENTURY BRITISH S
- Page 43 and 44: 43B23. CLASSICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
- Page 45 and 46: 45B24. SOCIALISM BEFORE 1848Suggest
- Page 47 and 48: 47B25. LEFT HEGELIANISM ANDTHE DEVE
- Page 49: of Politics"’, History of Europea
- Page 52 and 53: 52D. Leighton, The Greenian Moment:
- Page 54 and 55: Radicalism, (New York, 1987)J. Mark
- Page 56 and 57: (Bloomington IN, 1993)A. P. Robson
- Page 58: 2010)U. S. Mehta, Liberalism and Em
Change language