Revolution: A Eurosceptical Inquiry’, History of Political Thought, 20 (1999), 125–39.J.G.A. Pocock, ‘Historiography and Enlightenment: A View of Their History’, ModernIntellectual History 5(2008), 83-96.Robertson, John ‘The Enlightenments of J. G. A. Pocock’, Storia della storiografia –History of Historiography, 39 (2001), 140-51.‘The case for the Enlightenment: a Comparative Approach’, in J. Mali and R. Woklereds., ‘Isaiah Berlin’s Counter-Enlightenment’ Transactions of the AmericanPhilosophical Society, 93 (2003), part 5, 73-90.J. Israel, ‘Enlightenment! Which Enlightenment?’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(2006), 523–45.J. Schmidt, ‘Inventing the Enlightenment: British Hegelians, Anti-Jacobins, and theOxford English Dictionary’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64 (2003), 421–43.J. Schmidt, ‘What Enlightenment Project?’, Political Theory, 734-757.F. Meinecke, ‘Herder’, in Meinecke, Historism: The Rise of a New Historical Outlook, J.E. Anderson ed., (London, 1972), pp. 295-372.C. Taylor, ‘The Importance of Herder’, in Taylor, Philosophical Arguments,(Cambridge MA, 1995), pp. 79-99.S. Wiborg, Political and Cultural Nationalism in Education: The Ideas of Rousseau andHerder concerning National Education’, Comparative Education 36 (2000), 235-243.T. P. Saine, ‘Who’s Afraid of Christian Wolff?’, in A.C. Kors and P.J. Korshin (eds),Anticipations of the Enlightenment in England, France and Germany, (Philadelphia, 1987),pp. 102-33.D. Denby, ‘Herder: Culture, Anthropology and the Enlightenment’, History of the HumanSciences, 18 (2005), 55-76.D. Linker, The Reluctant Pluralism of J. G. Herder, Review of Politics 62 (2000), 267-S. Sikka, ‘Enlightened Relativism: The Case of Herder’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 31(2005), 309-341.S. Meld Shell, ‘Kant’s Idea of History’, in Meld Shell, The Embodiment of Reason: Kant onSpirit, Generation and Community, (Chicago, 1996), pp. 161-89.R. Velkley, ‘The Tension in the Beautiful: On Culture and Civilisation in Rousseau andGerman Philosophy’, in C. Orwin and N. Tarcov (eds), The Legacy of Rousseau, (Chicago,1997), pp. 65-86.28
29B16. COMMERCIAL SOCIETYAND <strong>THE</strong> AMBIGUITIES <strong>OF</strong> CIVILISATIONSuggested primary reading:B. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees, 2 vols., F. B. Kaye ed., (Indianapolis, 1988) A.Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society, ed. F. Oz-Salzberger (Cambridge,1995)Suggested secondary reading:J. G. A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the AtlanticRepublican Tradition, (Princeton NJ, 1975), Chapters 12-14A. O. Hirschman, The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalismbefore its Triumph, (Princeton NJ, 1977)I. Hont, Jealousy of Trade (Cambridge, Mass, 2005), ‘Introduction’ pp. 1-156, andchapters 1, 2, 5 and 6.R. L. Meek, Social Science and the Ignoble Savage, (Cambridge, 1976)D. Winch, Riches and Poverty: An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain1750-1834, (Cambridge, 1996), Part I, 57-89T. A. Horne, The Social Thought of Bernard Mandeville: Virtue and Commerce in EarlyEighteenth Century England, (London, 1978), Chapter 3.E, J, Hundert, The Enlightenment's Fable (Cambridge, 1994)N. O. Keohane, Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to theEnlightenment, (Princeton NJ, 1980), Parts III and IVH. C. Clark, Compass of Society: Commerce and Absolutism in Old Regime France(Lanham MD, 2007), chapters 2-8.J. Shovlin, The Political Economy of Virtue: Luxury, Patriotism, and the Origins ofthe French Revolution (Ithaca NY, 2006)J.G.A. Pocock, Barbarism and Religion, Vol. 3: The First Decline and Fall (Cambridge,2003), chapter 16, pp. 372-416.J. Robertson, The Scottish Enlightenment and the Militia Issue (Edinburgh, 1985)J. Robertson, The Case for the Enlightenment: Scotland and Naples 1680-1760(Cambridge, 2005), chapter 7, ‘The Advent of Enlightenment: Political Economy in Naples andScotland 1730-1760’, pp. 325-376.I. Hont, ‘The Early Enlightenment Debate on Commerce and Luxury’, in M. Goldie and R.Wokler (eds.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought(Cambridge, 2006), pp. 379-418.I. Hont, ‘Commercial Society and Political Theory in the Eighteenth Century: the Problem ofAuthority in David Hume and Adam Smith’, in W. Melching and W. Velema (eds), MainTrends in Cultural History: Ten Essays, (Amsterdam, 1994), pp. 54- 94.M. Sonenscher, ‘Property, Community and Citizenship’, in M. Goldie and R. Wokler (eds), TheCambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge, 2006), pp. 465-496.J. G. A. Pocock, ‘Virtues, Rights and Manners: A Model for Historians of Political Thought’, inPocock, Virtue, Commerce and History: Essays on Political Thought and History chiefly in theEighteenth Century, (Cambridge, 1985), 37-50J. G. A. Pocock, ‘Perceptions of Modernity in Early Modern Historical Thinking’, IntellectualHistory Review 17 (2007), 79-92.A. O. Hirschman, ‘Rival Views of Market Society’, in Hirschman, Rival Views of MarketSociety and other Recent Essays, (New York, 1986), 105-41D. van Kley, ‘Pierre Nicole, Jansenism, and the Morality of Enlightened Self Interest’ in A. C.
- Page 1 and 2: Historical Tripos - Part I: Paper 2
- Page 3 and 4: A1. VICOSet Text:The New Science, t
- Page 5 and 6: P. Cheney, ‘Montesquieu’s Scien
- Page 7 and 8: Dees, Richard H. “‘One of the F
- Page 10 and 11: 10A5. SMITHSet Texts:The Theory of
- Page 13 and 14: D. Armitage, ‘Edmund Burke and Re
- Page 15 and 16: 15A8. KANTSet Texts:Groundwork of t
- Page 17 and 18: A9. BENTHAM17Set Texts:A Fragment o
- Page 19 and 20: 19A11. HEGELSet Texts:Elements of t
- Page 21 and 22: 21A12. TOCQUEVILLESet Text:Democrac
- Page 23 and 24: 23A13. J. S. MILLSet Texts:On Liber
- Page 25 and 26: 25A14. MARXSet Texts:The Communist
- Page 27: 27B15. HUMAN NATURE AND HISTORYIN T
- Page 32 and 33: (Stanford CA, 1994), pp. 1-41R. Sha
- Page 34: J. G. A. Pocock, ‘1776: The Revol
- Page 37 and 38: 37B20. DISSENT AND THE POLITICSOF R
- Page 39 and 40: 39B21. GERMAN POLITICAL THOUGHT 178
- Page 41 and 42: 41B22. NINETEENTH CENTURY BRITISH S
- Page 43 and 44: 43B23. CLASSICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
- Page 45 and 46: 45B24. SOCIALISM BEFORE 1848Suggest
- Page 47 and 48: 47B25. LEFT HEGELIANISM ANDTHE DEVE
- Page 49: of Politics"’, History of Europea
- Page 52 and 53: 52D. Leighton, The Greenian Moment:
- Page 54 and 55: Radicalism, (New York, 1987)J. Mark
- Page 56 and 57: (Bloomington IN, 1993)A. P. Robson
- Page 58: 2010)U. S. Mehta, Liberalism and Em