and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy, (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 40-54C.J. Nederman, ‘Hegel on the Medieval Foundations of the Modern State’, inNederman, Lineages of European Political Thought: Explorations along theMedieval/Modern Divide from John of Salisbury to Hegel ((Washington D.C., 2009),pp. 323-342.Z.A. Pelczynski, ‘Political Community and Individual Freedom in Hegel’s Philosophyof State’, in Pelczynski (ed), The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s PoliticalPhilosophy, (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 55-76D. Henrich, ‘Logical Form and Real Totality: The Authentic Conceptual Form of Hegel’sConcept of the State’, in R. Pippin and O. Höffe (eds), Hegel on Ethics and Politics(Cambridge, 2004), pp. 241-267.L. Dickey, ‘Hegel on Religion and Philosophy’, in F. C. Beiser (ed), The CambridgeCompanion to Hegel, (Cambridge, 1993), pp. 301-4720
21A12. <strong>TO</strong>CQUEVILLESet Text:Democracy in America, eds. H. C. Mansfield and D. Winthrop (Chicago IL, 2000); or asDemocracy in America, De La Démocracy en Amérique, Bilingual edition, Eduardo Nolla(ed.), Translated by James T. Schleifer, 4 vols., Liberty Press, 2010), with a helpfulintroduction by the editor.Suggested secondary reading:L. Siedentop, Tocqueville, (Oxford, 1994)C. Welch (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville (Cambridge, 2006)Tocqueville, The Old Regime and the Revolution, eds. F. Furet and F. Mélonio (Chicago IL,1998)Tocqueville on America after 1840: Letters and Other Writings, eds. A. Craiutu and J. Jennings(Cambridge, 2009)The Tocqueville Reader: A Life in Letters and Politics, eds. O. Zunz and A. S. Kahan (Oxford,2002)H. Brogan, Alexis de Tocqueville: Prophet of Democracy in the Age of Revolution, A Biography(London, 2006)L. Damrosch, Tocqueville’s Discovery of America (New York, 2010).C. B. Welch, De Tocqueville (Oxford, 2001)P. Manent, Tocqueville and the Nature of Democracy (Lanham MD, 1996).R. Swedberg, Tocqueville’s Political Economy (Princeton NJ, 2009)J. Elster, Alexis de Tocqueville: The First Social Scientist (Cambridge, 2009)S. Wolin, Tocqueville Between Two Worlds (Princeton NJ, 2001)R. Boesche, The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville, (Ithaca NY, 1987)P. A. Rahe, Soft Despotism, Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville and theModern Prospect (New Haven CT, 2009), Book 3 ‘The Democratic Republic Reconsidered’.G. A. Kelly, The Humane Comedy: Constant, Tocqueville and French Liberalism,(Cambridge, 1992)Jeremy Jennings, ‘Constitutional Liberalism in France: from Benjamin Constant to Alexisde Tocqueville’, in G. Stedman Jones & G. Claeys (eds), The Cambridge History ofNineteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge: 2011)J. Greenaway, ‘Burke and Tocqueville on Conservatism’, in R. Bellamy and A. Ross (eds), ATextual Introduction to Social and Political Theory, (Manchester, 1996), 179- 204H. Mitchell, ‘The Changing Conditions of Freedom: Tocqueville in the Light of Rousseau’,History of Political Thought 9 (1988), 431-453.H. Mitchell, ‘Alexis de Tocqueville and the Legacy of the French Revolution’, in F. Fehér(ed), The French Revolution and the Birth of Modernity, (Berkeley CA, 1990), 240-63.A. Craiutu, ‘Tocqueville and the Political Thought of the Doctrinaires’, History of PoliticalThought 20 (1999).M. Richter, ‘Tocqueville and Guizot on Democracy: from a Type of Society to a PoliticalRegime’ History of European Ideas, 30 (2004), 61-82.R. Boesche, ‘Why did Tocqueville think a successful revolution was impossible?’ in Liberty,Equality, Democracy, ed. E. Nolla. (New York, 1992), pp. 1-20.J. Elster, ‘Consequences of Constitutional Choice: Reflections on Tocqueville’, in J. Elsterand R. Slagstad (eds), Constitutionalism and Democracy, (Cambridge, 1988), 81-102.S. Kessler, ‘Tocqueville's Puritans: Christianity and the American Founding’, 54(1992) Journal
- Page 1 and 2: Historical Tripos - Part I: Paper 2
- Page 3 and 4: A1. VICOSet Text:The New Science, t
- Page 5 and 6: P. Cheney, ‘Montesquieu’s Scien
- Page 7 and 8: Dees, Richard H. “‘One of the F
- Page 10 and 11: 10A5. SMITHSet Texts:The Theory of
- Page 13 and 14: D. Armitage, ‘Edmund Burke and Re
- Page 15 and 16: 15A8. KANTSet Texts:Groundwork of t
- Page 17 and 18: A9. BENTHAM17Set Texts:A Fragment o
- Page 19: 19A11. HEGELSet Texts:Elements of t
- Page 23 and 24: 23A13. J. S. MILLSet Texts:On Liber
- Page 25 and 26: 25A14. MARXSet Texts:The Communist
- Page 27 and 28: 27B15. HUMAN NATURE AND HISTORYIN T
- Page 29: 29B16. COMMERCIAL SOCIETYAND THE AM
- Page 32 and 33: (Stanford CA, 1994), pp. 1-41R. Sha
- Page 34: J. G. A. Pocock, ‘1776: The Revol
- Page 37 and 38: 37B20. DISSENT AND THE POLITICSOF R
- Page 39 and 40: 39B21. GERMAN POLITICAL THOUGHT 178
- Page 41 and 42: 41B22. NINETEENTH CENTURY BRITISH S
- Page 43 and 44: 43B23. CLASSICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
- Page 45 and 46: 45B24. SOCIALISM BEFORE 1848Suggest
- Page 47 and 48: 47B25. LEFT HEGELIANISM ANDTHE DEVE
- Page 49: of Politics"’, History of Europea
- Page 52 and 53: 52D. Leighton, The Greenian Moment:
- Page 54 and 55: Radicalism, (New York, 1987)J. Mark
- Page 56 and 57: (Bloomington IN, 1993)A. P. Robson
- Page 58: 2010)U. S. Mehta, Liberalism and Em
Change language