14A7. WOLLS<strong>TO</strong>NECRAFTSet Text:A Vindication of the Rights of Man and A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. S. Tomaselli,(Cambridge, 1995)Suggested secondary reading:B. Taylor, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft’, in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2004)J. Todd, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life, (London, 2000)K. O’Brien, Women and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge, 2009)V. Sapiro, A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of MaryWollstonecraft, (Chicago, 1992)B. Taylor, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge, 2003)H.N. Brailsford, Shelley, Godwin and their Circle, (2nd edn., London, 1951)M. J. Falco ed., Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, (Pennsylvania,1996)A. Browne, The Eighteenth Century Feminist Mind, (Brighton, 1987)H. Guest, Small Change: Women, Learning, Patriotism, 1750-1810, (Chicago, 2000),Introduction and Part IVJ.B. Landes, Women in the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution, (Ithaca,NY, 1988)S. Tomaselli, ‘The Enlightenment Debate on Women’, History Workshop, 20 (1985),101-24.S. Tomaselli, ‘The Most Public Sphere of all: the Family’, in E. Eger, C. Grant, C. Gallchoirand P. Warburton (eds), Women, Writing and the Public Sphere 1700-1830, (Cambridge, 2001),pp. 239-56.D. Engster, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft’s Nurturing Liberalism: Between an Ethic ofJustice and Care’, American Political Science Review 95 (2001), 577-588.G J. Barker-Benfield, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-CenturyCommonwealthswoman’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 50 (1989), 95-115.M. Brody, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft: Sexuality and Women’s Rights’, in D. Spender (ed), FeministTheorists: Three Centuries of Women’s Intellectual Traditions, (London, 1983), 40-59D. Bromwich, ‘Wollstonecraft as a Critic of Burke’, Political Theory, 23 (1995), 617- 632.J. Conniff, ‘Edmund Burke and His Critics: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft’, Journal ofthe History of Ideas, 60 (1999), 299-318.D. Guralnick, ‘Radical Politics in Wollstonecraft’s Vindication of the Rights of Women’,Studies in Burke and his Time, 18 (1977), 155-66.R. M. Janes, ‘On the Reception of Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights ofWomen’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 39 (1978), 293-302.T. O’Hagan, ‘Rousseau and Wollstonecraft on Sexual Equality’, in R. Bellamy and A. Ross(eds), A Textual Introduction to Social and Political Theory, (Manchester, 1996), pp. 123-54.M. Philp, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft and Political Justice’, in Philp, Godwin’s ‘Political Justice’,(London, 1986), pp. 175-92.K. O’Brien, ‘Catharine Macaulay’s Histories of England: A Female Perspective on the Historyof Liberty’ in B. Taylor and S. Knott (eds), Women, Gender and Enlightenment, (Basingstoke,2005), pp. 523-37.
15A8. KANTSet Texts:Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. M. Gregor (Cambridge, 1998)Political Writings, ed. H. Reiss, (2nd edn., Cambridge, 1991)Suggested secondary reading:M. Kuehn, Kant: A Biography (Cambridge, 2001)P. Guyer, Kant (London, 2006)A. Wood, Kant (Oxford, 2005)A. Wood, Kant’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge 1999)R. J. Sullivan, An Introduction to Kant’s Ethics, (Cambridge, 1994)J. Rawls, Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, Barbara Herman (ed), (CambridgeMA, 2000),’Kant’, pp. 143-325.S. Sedgwick, Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: An Introduction(Cambridge, 2008)H. E. Allison, Kant’s Theory of Freedom, (Cambridge, 1990).A. Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy (Cambridge MA,2009)P. Riley, Kant’s Political Philosophy, (Totowa NJ, 1983)E. Ellis, Kant’s Politics (New Haven, 2005), chs. 1-3O. Höffe, Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace (Cambridge, 2006)D. Henrich, ‘The Moral Image of the World’, in Heinrich (ed), Aesthetic Judgement and theMoral Image of the World, (Stanford CA, 1992), 3-28D. Henrich, ‘The Deduction of the Moral Law: The Reasons for the Obscurity of the FinalSections of Kant’s Groundwork on the Metaphysics of Morals’, in P. Guyer (ed), Kant’s‘Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals’: Critical Essays, (New York, 1998), 303-41R. Galvin, ‘The Universal Law Formulas’ in T. E. Hill Jr. (ed), The Blackwell Guide toKant’s Ethics (Oxford, 2009), pp. 52-82.O. Höffe, ‘Kant’s Principle of Justice as Categorical Imperative of the Law’, in Y. Yovel(ed), Kant’s Practical Philosophy Re-evaluated, (Dordrecht, 1989), 149-67.A. Wood, ‘Kant’s Practical Philosophy’, in K. Ameriks (ed), The CambridgeCompanion to German Idealism (Cambridge, 2000), 57-75A. Wood, ‘Kant and the Problem of Human Nature’, in B. Jacobs and P. Kain (eds), Essays onKant’s Anthropology (Cambridge, 2003), pp. 38-59.P. Frierson, ‘Kantian Moral Pessimism’ in S. Anderson-Cold and P. Muchnik (eds), Kant’sAnatomy of Evil (Cambridge, 2010), pp. 33-56.P. Guyer, ‘The Crooked Timber of Mankind’ in A Oksenberg Rorty and J. Schmidt (eds),Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide (Cambridge,2009), pp. 129-149.R. B. Louden, ‘Applying Kant’s Ethics: The Role of Anthropology’ in G. Bird (ed), ACompanion to Kant: Blackwell Companions to Philosophy (Oxford, 2010), pp. 350-363.C. Taylor, ‘Kant’s Theory of Freedom’, in Taylor, Philosophy and the Human Sciences, 2vols. (Cambridge, 1985), vol. 2, pp. 318-37W. Kersting, ‘Politics, Freedom and Order: Kant’s Political Philosophy’, in P. Guyer (ed), TheCambridge Companion to Kant, (Cambridge, 1992), pp. 342-66.D. Henrich, ‘On the Meaning of Rational Action in the State’, in R. Beiner and W. J. Booth (eds),Kant and Political Philosophy: The Contemporary Legacy, (New Haven CT, 1993), pp. 97-116R. B. Pippin, ‘Mine and Thine: The Kantian State’ in P. Guyer (ed), The Cambridge
- Page 1 and 2: Historical Tripos - Part I: Paper 2
- Page 3 and 4: A1. VICOSet Text:The New Science, t
- Page 5 and 6: P. Cheney, ‘Montesquieu’s Scien
- Page 7 and 8: Dees, Richard H. “‘One of the F
- Page 10 and 11: 10A5. SMITHSet Texts:The Theory of
- Page 13: D. Armitage, ‘Edmund Burke and Re
- Page 17 and 18: A9. BENTHAM17Set Texts:A Fragment o
- Page 19 and 20: 19A11. HEGELSet Texts:Elements of t
- Page 21 and 22: 21A12. TOCQUEVILLESet Text:Democrac
- Page 23 and 24: 23A13. J. S. MILLSet Texts:On Liber
- Page 25 and 26: 25A14. MARXSet Texts:The Communist
- Page 27 and 28: 27B15. HUMAN NATURE AND HISTORYIN T
- Page 29: 29B16. COMMERCIAL SOCIETYAND THE AM
- Page 32 and 33: (Stanford CA, 1994), pp. 1-41R. Sha
- Page 34: J. G. A. Pocock, ‘1776: The Revol
- Page 37 and 38: 37B20. DISSENT AND THE POLITICSOF R
- Page 39 and 40: 39B21. GERMAN POLITICAL THOUGHT 178
- Page 41 and 42: 41B22. NINETEENTH CENTURY BRITISH S
- Page 43 and 44: 43B23. CLASSICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
- Page 45 and 46: 45B24. SOCIALISM BEFORE 1848Suggest
- Page 47 and 48: 47B25. LEFT HEGELIANISM ANDTHE DEVE
- Page 49: of Politics"’, History of Europea
- Page 52 and 53: 52D. Leighton, The Greenian Moment:
- Page 54 and 55: Radicalism, (New York, 1987)J. Mark
- Page 56 and 57: (Bloomington IN, 1993)A. P. Robson
- Page 58: 2010)U. S. Mehta, Liberalism and Em