Biblical Separation Defended - Far Eastern Bible College

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CONTENTSINTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 6GROUP ONEARGUMENTS ADVOCATING COOPERATION WITHSO-CALLED NON-OPPONENTSARGUMENT I ............................................................................ 13“Christ Instructed the Twelve and the Seventy to Lodge withAnyone Who Was Willing to Have Them.”ARGUMENT II ........................................................................... 21“The Lord Accepted the Cooperation of AnyWho Did Not Oppose Him”GROUP TWOARGUMENTS ADVOCATING COOPERATION WITHTHOSE IN SERIOUS DOCTRINAL ERRORARGUMENT III.......................................................................... 29“The Lord Attended the Temple Which Was Dominatedby Those Who Erred.”ARGUMENT IV ......................................................................... 37“The Lord Attended the Synagogue Which Was Dominatedby Those Who Erred”ARGUMENT V........................................................................... 46“The Lord Engaged in Religious Contact and Conversationwith Religious Rejects”4
GROUP THREEARGUMENTS ADVOCATING THAT THE EMPHASISOF THE LORD’S MINISTRY FAVORSCOOPERATIVE EVANGELISMARGUMENT VI ......................................................................... 52“Judge Not, that Ye Be Not Judged”ARGUMENT VII ........................................................................ 62“The Lord Did Not Make an Issueout of Theological Error”ARGUMENT VIII....................................................................... 72“The Lord Stressed Fellowship, Not <strong>Separation</strong>”ARGUMENT IX ......................................................................... 79“The Lord’s Method Was to Proclaim the Truthand to Ignore Error”ARGUMENT X........................................................................... 85“The Lord Was Never Concerned with Sponsorship”SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ............................................ 915
Page 3 and 4: BIBLICAL SEPARATIONDEFENDEDA Biblic
Page 5: A Word from the FEBC PressThe doctr
Page 9 and 10: makes in his widely circulated book
Page 11 and 12: four of these areas are biblically
Page 13 and 14: then both good and evil are produce
Page 15 and 16: ARGUMENT I“Christ Instructed the
Page 17 and 18: that there was a profiteer in the t
Page 19 and 20: Matthew 10:11, the verse just quote
Page 21 and 22: liberals, and therefore, Dr. Ferm h
Page 23 and 24: ARGUMENT II“The Lord Accepted the
Page 25 and 26: not to forbid the man who had been
Page 27 and 28: acknowledge Him as an extremely goo
Page 29 and 30: particular sin! There are too many
Page 31 and 32: ARGUMENT III“The Lord Attended th
Page 33 and 34: c. Tenor : Christ at twelve discuss
Page 35 and 36: whether is greater, the gold, or th
Page 37 and 38: Dr. Ferm’s satirical remark, “H
Page 39 and 40: ARGUMENT IV“The Lord Attended the
Page 41 and 42: TABLE 2OUR LORD’S SYNAGOGUE VISIT
Page 43 and 44: Thus it is observed that Christ hab
Page 45 and 46: in turn rejected by the Church. Thu
Page 47 and 48: errorists was one of righteous indi
Page 49 and 50: An Examination of Dr. Ferm’s Conc
Page 51 and 52: there are grave differences in the
Page 53 and 54: GROUP THREEARGUMENTS ADVOCATING THA
Page 55 and 56: state positively upon what verse or
Page 57 and 58:
himself a prophet, or a brother. Ti
Page 59 and 60:
eing saved will not be in the area
Page 61 and 62:
impossible to set up a local commit
Page 63 and 64:
The impossibility and the unnecessa
Page 65 and 66:
Ferm seems to have applied his alle
Page 67 and 68:
that the Lord in His humanity, that
Page 69 and 70:
from the Holy Spirit working in the
Page 71 and 72:
to despise others, and to hate Chri
Page 73 and 74:
ConclusionsThus it has been seen in
Page 75 and 76:
advocates are not delineated by a c
Page 77 and 78:
of aid towards those who are hereti
Page 79 and 80:
criterion of action, and in this ca
Page 81 and 82:
ARGUMENT IX“The Lord’s Method W
Page 83 and 84:
case readily be substantiated by a
Page 85 and 86:
Another point which needs to be not
Page 87 and 88:
ARGUMENT X“The Lord Was Never Con
Page 89 and 90:
was impossible for anyone to think
Page 91 and 92:
fundamentalists’ adherents; and (
Page 93 and 94:
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONDr. Ferm’s
Page 95 and 96:
and its alleged or implied applicat
Page 97 and 98:
denunciation by Christ, and that th
show all

Biblical Separation Defended - Far Eastern Bible College

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?