Biblical Separation Defended - Far Eastern Bible College

Christ. This was rejected on the grounds that the elements ofcooperation and mutual approval inherent in the sponsorship relationwas and is a very real concern to God and to Christ. Despite the precisesponsorial situation not occurring in Christ’s ministry as it does in thecase of a modern, Christ’s concern with the associations and associatesof His message and messenger more than establish His concern for thesponsorship of that which goes forth in His name.ConclusionFrom the study of the Bible which has now been accomplished itcan only be concluded that New Evangelicalism and its evangelicalmethod, Cooperative [with the liberal neo-orthodox theologians]Evangelism, are not supported by the words and deeds of the Savior, butrather they are boldly and clearly refuted by Christ. Thus the tenarguments for Cooperative Evangelism here analyzed actually provide aclear claim on every true Christian’s conscience for biblical separationfrom all heretics and apostates in doing the work of the Lord. Let allconstantly remember that, “God’s work must be done in God’s way.”Endnotes1Ferm, 36.2Charles G. Finney, Lectures on Systematic Theology (South Gate:Colporter Kemp, 1878), 251-3.96