Mr. Chairman, just before Mr - The Tribunal of Inquiry into Certain ...

3611:54:571 for had I you on board. At 20 grand an acre with you and George Redmond on2 board I should have listened to you.3 Q. 115 But you didn't and that's unfortunate and not on this issue?4 A. That is my unfortunate --11:55:135 Q. 116 Could you give some evidence to the Tribunal to support that claim please.6 Where it happened, how it happened and how you think I could have achieved it?7 A. It happened on the site the day that you met me on the site. And I should have8 listened to you and George I could have had the land for --911:55:2910 CHAIRMAN: Mr. Gilmartin what, just explain to us again, what happened on the11 site?12 A. Mr. Lawlor wanted 20 --1314 MR. LAWLOR: Nothing because I was never there with him11:55:401516 CHAIRMAN: Yes you were.1718 CHAIRMAN: Mr. Lawlor you asked for the detail. What happened on the site?19 A. Mr. Lawlor, I was down on the site somebody told him I was there. So he came11:55:5120 along the Fonthill Road, I was in walking on the part of the site.21 Mr. Lawlor's car was parked on the Fonthill Road as he I came out he was22 waiting of the and he still was insisting on him getting a 20 per cent stake in23 it. Which I told him, I asked him that, did he realise what he was asking for?2411:56:1625 He told me straight that I had at the time put in the tender, this was 19 --26 July or thereabouts, 1990. And I had put in the tender and he told me how27 stupid I was that had I him and George aboard I could have had it for 20 grand28 an acre. As was the asking price incidentally. Before I paid Mr. Bruton 4029 grand an acre. Mr. Lawlor didn't give up easy. He still insisted on getting11:57:0130 his 20 per cent stake and him being taken on board.Premier Captioning & Realtime Limitedwww.pcr.ie Day 474