11.07.2015 Views

Measurement Science Roadmap for Net-Zero Energy Buildings

Measurement Science Roadmap for Net-Zero Energy Buildings

Measurement Science Roadmap for Net-Zero Energy Buildings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Structural issues within the building industry also serve as impediments to onsiteenergy production. A key barrier is that the existing housing stock was not builtwith the application of future onsite power generation in mind, which means thatsignificant cost could be incurred in retrofitting the building to accommodatethese systems. From a cultural standpoint, the residential building industry ingeneral is not receptive to an energy service company business model.Overcoming compartmentalized thinking in the building industry is a keychallenge.D. <strong>Measurement</strong> BarriersA number of measurement barriers and challenges were identified that arecritical to the development and implementation of onsite building energygeneration. These are summarized in Table III-2 by topical area, with the relativepriorities indicated.Some of the top measurement challenges include:• Clarification of the goals associated with renewable energy resources,• Per<strong>for</strong>mance and technology assessment,• Lack of predictive tools to optimize strategies and to evaluate energyproduction per<strong>for</strong>mance,• Lack of real-world testing protocols to capture actual energy productionper<strong>for</strong>mance,• Closing the gap between design and actual per<strong>for</strong>mance, and• Dynamic per<strong>for</strong>mance measurements of energy generation systems.Table III‐2. Onsite <strong>Energy</strong> Generation – <strong>Measurement</strong> Barriers and Challenges(● = one vote)Per<strong>for</strong>mance MetricsHighPriorityMediumPriorityLowerPriorityTechnology AssessmentHighPriorityMediumPriorityLowerPriority• Uncertainty about goals and what to measure to determine per<strong>for</strong>mance⎯e.g., fueluse, carbon, source energy ●●●●●●●●• Lack of a standardized or validated tariff model and database ●●• Difficulty capturing total financial savings, including externalities (CO 2 ) that trulyreflect PV costs• Inability to effectively determine the impact of excess PV generation on source‐to‐sitemultiplier• Developing standard rating methods that are realistic• Closing the gap between design and actual per<strong>for</strong>mance due to lack of commissioning●●●●• Lack of dynamic per<strong>for</strong>mance measurements ●●●●• Lack of understanding of optimal controls schemes <strong>for</strong> integrated power systems ●●• Lack of customer training on how to assess technology and interpret results• Limited ability to evaluate long‐term per<strong>for</strong>mance of integrated systems10 <strong>Measurement</strong> <strong>Science</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Net</strong>-<strong>Zero</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Buildings</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!