12.07.2015 Views

The Online Ethics Center for Engineering & Science - Department of ...

The Online Ethics Center for Engineering & Science - Department of ...

The Online Ethics Center for Engineering & Science - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Online</strong> <strong>Ethics</strong> <strong>Center</strong>: Inez Austin -- Protecting the Public Safety at the Han<strong>for</strong>d Nuclear Reservationprocess engineer. Part <strong>of</strong> her job was to approve safety proceduresregarding the process <strong>for</strong> pumping millions <strong>of</strong> gallons <strong>of</strong> highlyradioactive wastes out <strong>of</strong> aging single-shell storage tanks. Austin wasalso a member <strong>of</strong> the Readiness Review Board, a Han<strong>for</strong>d task group thatcertified the safety <strong>of</strong> cleanup procedures.In June 1990, Austin was asked to prepare a document to certify thesafety <strong>of</strong> pumping dangerous liquid wastes out <strong>of</strong> five tanks in order tostabilize the tanks. A July 1 Tri-Party Agreement deadline <strong>for</strong> pumpingthese tanks was fast approaching, and the pumping issue requiredimmediate attention.Austin was concerned about the safety <strong>of</strong> the pumping operation because<strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> ferrocyanide in the tanks. <strong>The</strong>re were several relevantstudies on the matter that were due to be completed soon, and Austin sawdelaying the pumping until the dangers were clear as a prudentalternative.Nevertheless, she submitted a proposal that adhered to safety principlesregarding pumping procedures and recognized the necessary cautions.Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, her warnings were cut out <strong>of</strong> the proposal by her boss,Richard Kimura, be<strong>for</strong>e it was returned <strong>for</strong> her signature <strong>of</strong> approval onJune 25. Austin realized that some people would be angry if she refusedto sign the proposal, but her integrity and pr<strong>of</strong>essional responsibilities asan engineer mattered more.Austin refused to sign. On June 27, after feeling additional pressure tosign the document, Austin felt discouraged and resigned from theReadiness Review Board. Austin was harassed and threatened bymanagement and coworkers, rather than being recognized or commended<strong>for</strong> ethical behavior and her concern <strong>for</strong> health and safety.Back to TopTANK PICTURESIII. Austin Sees an Unacceptable RiskInez Austin's refusal to certify pumping procedures stemmed from thepresence <strong>of</strong> ferrocyanide (FeCN) in two <strong>of</strong> the tanks. Ferrocyanide wasused in the 1950s and 1960s as a flocculating agent, to bind dangeroussubstances in the liquid waste and allow them to be selectively removed.It has since been found that ferrocyanide becomes unstable over time. InOctober 1989, the U.S. Senate had assessed that this presence <strong>of</strong>ferrocyanide could be highly explosive under specific conditions and thushad to be pumped dry to prevent a possible explosion that would sendlarge amounts <strong>of</strong> radioactive waste into the environment.description heredescription hereAustin feared the risks involved in pumping these tanks. She was not ahttp://onlineethics.org/moral/austin/index.html (3 <strong>of</strong> 7)10/25/2005 9:04:00 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!