28.11.2012 Views

Qualitative Research Basics: A Guide for Engineering Educators

Qualitative Research Basics: A Guide for Engineering Educators

Qualitative Research Basics: A Guide for Engineering Educators

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

solving, stress critical thinking, and use technology?” It is better to phrase these into<br />

separate questions. Internal bias is also something to avoid. The question “How does<br />

being the only woman on your design team cause conflict?” assumes that the conflict is<br />

caused by there being only one woman. A more appropriate question is “What factors do<br />

you see as causing conflict on your design team?” This question allows the participant to<br />

fully articulate her own view of what causes conflict.<br />

Another important aspect of developing interview questions is ensuring consistency with<br />

your epistemological perspective and overall research design. Consider as an example a<br />

study of critical thinking of engineering students. If one were conducting this study from<br />

a constructivist perspective, one interview question might be:<br />

What kinds of engineering problems require critical thinking?<br />

This question goes to the constructivist aspect of the study, in that it probes the student’s<br />

own view of what is meant by critical thinking and how it can be applied in engineering.<br />

The following question, although important, would not be consistent with a constructivist<br />

perspective:<br />

How do your engineering professors teach or demonstrate critical thinking?<br />

Asking the student about how they have learned critical thinking from their professors<br />

moves beyond the constructivist perspective towards social constructionism. Keeping the<br />

interview protocol focused within the areas of the general research design ensures that the<br />

specific research questions will be answered. In this example, while asking about the<br />

professors may seem important, including that question in the protocol can lead to a study<br />

that is unfocused and does not provide the data needed to answer the research questions.<br />

Conducting the Interview<br />

Preparing <strong>for</strong> an interview takes considerable planning. Punch (1998) lists several issues<br />

to consider (p. 180):<br />

• Who will be interviewed and why?<br />

• How many will be interviewed, and how many times will each person be<br />

interviewed?<br />

• When and <strong>for</strong> how long will each respondent be interviewed?<br />

• Where will each respondent be interviewed?<br />

• How will access to the interview process be organized?<br />

Each of these aspects represents an important part of the research design process, and<br />

depends on the epistemological perspective and research questions of the study. A<br />

phenomenological study may involve single, one-hour interviews with 5-20 participants,<br />

while a narrative study might involve many hours of multiple interviews with a single<br />

person.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!