28.11.2012 Views

Qualitative Research Basics: A Guide for Engineering Educators

Qualitative Research Basics: A Guide for Engineering Educators

Qualitative Research Basics: A Guide for Engineering Educators

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Collaboration: Work with research participants as co-researchers through<br />

generating research questions or research design together, by teaming to collect<br />

data, or by jointly interpreting data.<br />

Issues of Responsibility and Ethics<br />

In addition to proper use of method, scholars of qualitative approaches identify other<br />

hallmarks of study quality that are less frequently discussed in the traditional research<br />

literature. For example, Lincoln (1995) lists the following: locating the research in and<br />

serving the purposes of the community in which it was carried out; giving voice to the<br />

participants through direct quotation rather than filtering through the researcher; and<br />

reciprocating through sharing trust, privileges, and ownership of the study with the<br />

participants. Other scholars discuss “usefulness” as an important criterion. If a study is<br />

trivial or has little potential to in<strong>for</strong>m or change human behavior or enable deeper<br />

understanding of the human condition, it fails the quality test, even if it uses methods<br />

soundly.<br />

Major ethical issues that are also associated with the quality of a qualitative study include<br />

the following:<br />

In<strong>for</strong>med Consent: The participants should know what the research is about and how<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation will be shared and used. Their consent should be renegotiated if the<br />

design or usage arrangements change.<br />

Confidentiality: Participants' identities are only revealed to agreed-upon extent<br />

(usually not at all) and the findings and data are communicated in such a way that<br />

these identities are protected. Pseudonyms or codes are used in records and records<br />

are kept secure.<br />

Avoiding Harmful Consequences: <strong>Research</strong> manipulations, interventions, or<br />

suggestions should not threaten the well being of participants. The researcher should<br />

not use his or her authority as a plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> influencing participants’ thinking.<br />

Genuine Reasons <strong>for</strong> Conducting <strong>Research</strong>: The decision to undertake research<br />

should stem from sincere interest in the topic or commitment to change. The<br />

researcher should avoid pursuing trendy topics or fundable projects only out of<br />

opportunism rather than sincere belief in the importance of the study. <strong>Research</strong>ers,<br />

especially in evaluation contexts, should avoid being co-opted by those in control.<br />

Honesty: The researcher should avoid <strong>for</strong>cing conclusions, fudging data, or other<br />

clearly dishonest approaches.<br />

Reciprocity: Responsibility <strong>for</strong> respecting the contributions of participants at<br />

minimum involves reporting back findings. In addition, some researchers feel that<br />

they should share the royalties or other benefits accruing from the study with the<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!