28.11.2012 Views

Shark -new motor design concept for energy saving- applied to - VBN

Shark -new motor design concept for energy saving- applied to - VBN

Shark -new motor design concept for energy saving- applied to - VBN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4<br />

Chapter 1 Introduction<br />

This fact negates the previous suggestion that small <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>s should be main focus <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> <strong>saving</strong>.<br />

The <strong>energy</strong> consumption depends on various fac<strong>to</strong>rs such as: rated power range of the <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>,<br />

efficiency, annual operating time of the equipment, load 2 fac<strong>to</strong>r and usage 3 fac<strong>to</strong>r of the <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>.<br />

Small <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>s, although they are sold in large numbers, usually have a lower usage fac<strong>to</strong>r than<br />

<strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>s rated in the higher power range. This contributes <strong>to</strong> their lower <strong>energy</strong> consumption over a<br />

defined period. There<strong>for</strong>e, more <strong>energy</strong> may be saved by a slight improvement of the efficiency of<br />

large <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>s than by a significant efficiency improvement of small <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>s.<br />

In spite of all the international actions intended <strong>to</strong> promote the use of HEM and in spite of general<br />

demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> <strong>saving</strong> products, the market is still reluctant <strong>to</strong> make changes. The increased<br />

initial purchase cost necessary <strong>for</strong> HEM, caused by the use of improved or more material and by the<br />

increased quality of manufacturing, is at the root of this paradox. The selection of a <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> by a<br />

purchasing agent is dominated by the purchase price and not by the potential lifetime cost <strong>saving</strong><br />

made possible by the use of HEM. It is often <strong>for</strong>gotten that the purchasing price represents less than<br />

5% of the lifetime cost of the <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> [7]. To encourage the HEM market a subsidy of up <strong>to</strong> 30% of<br />

the HEM price is offered in Denmark [7].<br />

In some reports [12], it is argued that an E-<strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> (electric <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> with incorporated electronics) may<br />

bring more advantage than an HEM. This may be true, but any gain in inherent <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> efficiency<br />

may be valuable <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> <strong>saving</strong>. The interest of this thesis is restricted <strong>to</strong> improvements related<br />

<strong>to</strong> the efficiency of the <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> itself.<br />

In this introduc<strong>to</strong>ry section was shown that the general tendency is <strong>to</strong> reduce the <strong>energy</strong> used by<br />

electric <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>s because they represent an important <strong>energy</strong> consumer in industry. To do so <strong>new</strong><br />

standards were approved by CEMEP and high efficiency <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>s are promoted on the market.<br />

Generally, a better efficiency is achieved by using better or more magnetic material or by<br />

optimisation of the radial cross-section of the electric <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong>. Both methods are expensive.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, consideration of the longitudinal cross-section of an electric <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> may further improve<br />

the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the electric <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> or may be considered as an alternative solution <strong>to</strong> the two<br />

methods mentioned above. This <strong>new</strong> <strong>concept</strong> was named <strong>Shark</strong> <strong>concept</strong> and is introduced in the<br />

following section.<br />

1.2 Introduction <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Shark</strong> <strong>concept</strong><br />

Although the development of electrical machines has long been a well-established commercial<br />

enterprise, <strong>design</strong> investigations and innovations are still in progress. The <strong>concept</strong> of HEM involves<br />

the use of better quality or of more material and optimisation of the magnetic circuit. A tremendous<br />

amount of research work dedicated <strong>to</strong> the optimum <strong>design</strong> of electrical machines has revealed that<br />

the material distribution within the machine is one of the key elements <strong>for</strong> improving the machine<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mances.<br />

A common way <strong>to</strong> improve the <strong>design</strong> of an electrical machine is by optimisation of the radial<br />

cross-section [13], [14], [15]. This is governed by considerations relating the cost of manufacture <strong>to</strong><br />

the improvement brought by the <strong>new</strong> geometry of the machine.<br />

2 The load fac<strong>to</strong>r is that fraction of the rated load, at which the <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> is normally loaded<br />

3 The usage fac<strong>to</strong>r is that fraction of time when the <strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r</strong> actually operates

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!