Appendix 1: Proposal to expand Ravenor Primary ... - Ealing Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Schools performanceSt Saviour’s Infant and Nursery School was awarded a grade of “good” for itslast Ofsted inspection in June 2010. Christ Church Junior School wasawarded a grade of “satisfactory” for its last Ofsted inspection in October2010.Christ Church Junior’s 2009 Key Stage 2 contextual value added (CVA) scorewas 101.1, which was significantly above the national average for contextualvalue added. In the 2010, Key Stage 2 tests 73% of pupils also attained bothEnglish and Maths at Level 4+.Number of applications for placesSt Saviour’s received 150 applications for 90 reception places for September2010.Compliance with the School Admissions CodeThe Council confirms that the admission arrangements of schools proposedfor expansion fully meet the provisions of the School Admissions Code.Travel and Accessibility for AllIn considering statutory proposals, Members should satisfy themselves thataccessibility planning has been properly taken into account. Facilities are tobe accessible to all those concerned by being located close to all those whouse them and the proposed changes should not adversely impact ondisadvantaged groups.Members should bear in mind that proposals should not have the effect ofunreasonably extending journey times or increasing transport costs, or resultin too many children being prevented from travelling sustainably dueto unsuitable routes e.g. for walking, cycling etc. Proposals should also beconsidered on the basis of how they will support and contribute to the LA’sduty to promote the use of sustainable travel and transport to school.By expanding schools in areas of increased demand for school places (aspreviously explained) the Council aims to locate primary school places closeto those that will use them and the proposals should not adversely impact ondisadvantaged groups and should continue to encourage the use ofsustainable travel and transport to school.FUNDING AND LANDCapitalAll proposals are to be implemented on existing sites. Capital is beingprovided through the Council’s approved Primary Capital Programme.The Council will continue to bid for capital funding from the Department forEducation for future years of the capital programme.30
Capital ReceiptsThe proposal is not dependent on receiving capital receipts from the disposalof land.New Site or Playing FieldsThe proposal is not dependent on the acquisition of new sites or playingfields.Land Tenure ArrangementsNot applicable as there are no proposed site acquisitions.School Playing FieldsThe minimum team game playing field requirements of the Education (SchoolPremises) Regulations 1999 can be met through a combination of on and offsite provision.SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS (SEN) PROVISIONThere are no proposals for specific SEN provision to be included in theseexpansion plans. The Council is reviewing its expansion plans for SENschool places in light of the cancellation of the BSF programme and theforthcoming outcome of the James Review on future School CapitalSpending.The expansion proposals would support the LA’s strategy for making schoolsand settings more accessible to disabled children and young people and theirscheme for promoting equality of opportunity for disabled people. In particularany new facilities will be fully accessible for those with disabilities and workswill be undertaken to bring existing school buildings up to standard in terms ofaccessibility.All schools will continue to take full account of educational considerations, inparticular the need to ensure a broad and balanced curriculum, including theNational Curriculum, within a learning environment in which children can behealthy and stay safe.OTHER ISSUESViews of Interested PartiesMembers should consider the views of all those affected by the proposals orhave an interest in them including pupils, families of pupils, staff, otherschools and colleges etc including representations made during the statutoryconsultation period. Members should not simply take account of the numbersof people expressing a particular view when considering representationsmade on proposals. Instead Members should give the greatest weight torepresentations from those stakeholders likely to be most directly affected bythe proposals.Details of previous consultations are included in the full proposals andappendices.31
Page 5 and 6: places in light of the cancellation
Page 7 and 8: subject to the council being able t
Page 9 and 10: • 7½FE to community schools• 1
Page 11 and 12: attained both English and Maths at
Page 13 and 14: During the statutory consultation,
Page 15 and 16: It should be noted that the regulat
Page 17 and 18: improvements to the school building
Page 19 and 20: England schools in the borough by o
Page 21 and 22: Founded on the close bond and commo
Page 23 and 24: Extended SchoolsThe new school woul
Page 25 and 26: CapitalThe amalgamation of the scho
Page 27 and 28: Appendix 4: Proposal to expand St S
Page 29: NEED FOR PLACESCreating Additional
Page 33 and 34: enefit from a Christian education,
Page 35 and 36: • traffic and parking issues• l
Page 37 and 38: Appendix 6: Document collating the
Page 39 and 40: I would also like to know about the
Page 41 and 42: Redevelopment of the school facilit
Page 43 and 44: EUDP 9.1 (Development, Access and P
Page 45 and 46: extra level of pollution to the pre
Page 47 and 48: taking up the places made available
Page 49 and 50: Westmoreland place as a building si
Page 51 and 52: Too many pupils from ourtside catch
Page 53 and 54: I am a strong believer in primary s
Page 55 and 56: As a resident of Westmoreland Place
Page 57 and 58: that that 'Woodfield Road is danger
Page 59 and 60: As a local resident I don't think i
Page 61 and 62: Faith schools have admissions polic
Page 63 and 64: esidents, virtually all of the teac
Page 65 and 66: There is simply not enough room to
Page 67 and 68: they are already going to experienc
Page 69 and 70: end up failing. Demand will also dr
Page 71 and 72: Christ Church is already stretched
Page 73 and 74: outweighed by the benefits of inves
Page 75 and 76: is already gridlocked from 8:45 to
Page 77 and 78: continuing use of their parking fac
Page 79 and 80: • Current traffic levels already
Page 81 and 82:
The above present safety hazards to
Page 83 and 84:
traffic wardens around Eaton Rise a
Page 85 and 86:
Making the Woodfield Crescent/Fairl
Page 87 and 88:
“The vast majority of new pupils
Page 89 and 90:
our community. We do not have doubl
Page 91 and 92:
• PollutionI am also writing from
Page 93 and 94:
There is no evidence in the applica
Page 95 and 96:
EUDP 4.12 Light Pollution The Counc
Page 97 and 98:
As a resident of Woodfield Crescent
Page 99 and 100:
Letter 16)99
Page 101 and 102:
Letter 17)Letter 18)101
Page 103 and 104:
St Saviour’s CE Infant and Christ
Page 105 and 106:
Letter 3)105
Page 107 and 108:
107
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix 8: St Gregory’s Catholic
Page 111 and 112:
London Borough of Ealing Statutory
Page 113 and 114:
The current number of pupils admitt
Page 115 and 116:
(a) the number of pupils for whom i
Page 117 and 118:
• The diocesan authorities• Loc
Page 119 and 120:
www.ealing.gov.uk/consultations•
Page 121 and 122:
Not applicable.(c)the proposed numb
Page 123 and 124:
Extended services23. If the propose
Page 125 and 126:
(c) where the school adheres to a p
Page 127 and 128:
Cc: stephen@icuglobal.co.ukSubject:
Page 129 and 130:
• Brentside -To increase the scho
Page 131 and 132:
DCSFNo.School NamePAN for Sept2010R
Page 133 and 134:
(Ravenor) Appendix 7: Ealing boroug
Page 135 and 136:
Feb 2010 projectionswith additional
Page 137 and 138:
(Ravenor) Appendix 12: Full consult
Page 139 and 140:
PROPOSALS FOR PRESCRIBED ALTERATION
Page 141 and 142:
Reception to Year 6 and 50 PTE on r
Page 143 and 144:
Additional Site32.—(1) A statemen
Page 145 and 146:
(f) a statement about other sustain
Page 147 and 148:
10Age range39. Where the proposals
Page 149 and 150:
N/A(b) any additional specialist fe
Page 151 and 152:
N/ASex of pupils46. Where the propo
Page 153 and 154:
increase by 13.5% between January 2
Page 155 and 156:
(a) a statement and supporting evid
Page 157 and 158:
(St Gregory’s) Appendix 2: Consul
Page 159 and 160:
• Less outside space per pupil as
Page 161 and 162:
(St Gregory’s) Appendix 4: Freque
Page 163 and 164:
If the expansion is to go ahead, on
Page 165 and 166:
St Gregory’s Appendix 5: Report t
Page 167 and 168:
54% of all forms received commented
Page 169 and 170:
(St Gregory’s) Appendix 6: Notes
Page 171 and 172:
Answering questions about the traff
Page 173 and 174:
173
Page 175 and 176:
(St Gregory’s) Appendix 8: Extrac
Page 177 and 178:
SchoolCurrentsize (FE)Expandedsize
Page 179 and 180:
DCSFNo.School NamePAN for Sept2010R
Page 181 and 182:
In addition the following Governing
Page 183 and 184:
(St Gregory’s) Appendix 11: Lette
Page 185 and 186:
(St Gregory’s) Appendix 13: Recep
Page 187 and 188:
(St Gregory’s) Appendix 15: Ealin
Page 189 and 190:
It is intended that the new school
Page 191 and 192:
1. A questionnaire covering the pro
Page 193 and 194:
affected by the proposals• The di
Page 195 and 196:
of England primary schools.The new
Page 197 and 198:
16. The proposed arrangements for t
Page 199 and 200:
Appendices1. List of those consulte
Page 201 and 202:
Q To what extent are St Saviour’s
Page 203 and 204:
A Ealing Council has been looking f
Page 205 and 206:
QAre the governors pro-expansion?A
Page 207 and 208:
A The Local Authority are looking f
Page 209 and 210:
the way it is managed. It has alrea
Page 211 and 212:
The staff ofthe 2 schoolswill benef
Page 213 and 214:
Respondents were asked for their vi
Page 215 and 216:
• sites at both schools too small
Page 217 and 218:
(St Saviour’s closure) Appendix 8
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
St Saviour’s CE Infant and Christ
Page 225 and 226:
MATTERS TO BE SPECIFIED IN SECTION
Page 227 and 228:
stakeholder groups listed in sectio
Page 229 and 230:
) where the school included provisi
Page 231 and 232:
Appendices1. List of those consulte
Page 233 and 234:
Appendix 1:• The Local Authority
Page 235 and 236:
to external specialist support agen
Page 237 and 238:
Governing Body.- Parents are inform
Page 239 and 240:
waiting list. This waiting list wil
Page 241 and 242:
children with disabilities would ha
Page 243 and 244:
e) details of the tenure (freehold
Page 245 and 246:
Voluntary aided schools31. In addit
Page 247 and 248:
ii) improved access to specialist s
Page 249 and 250:
Appendix 12: Statutory notice and f
Page 251 and 252:
The pre-expanded school’s net cap
Page 253 and 254:
Not applicable.Changes in boarding
Page 255 and 256:
(d) The following groups were sent
Page 257 and 258:
Project costs62. A statement of the
Page 259 and 260:
Not applicable.(e) a statement as t
Page 261 and 262:
Need or demand for additional place
Page 263 and 264:
(b) where the school has a religiou
Page 265 and 266:
Ealing Council: Full Equalities Imp
Page 267 and 268:
Religion/BeliefMedium Yes No Yes No
Page 269 and 270:
The Council have carried out extens
Page 271 and 272:
Completing Officer Sign Off: Servic
Page 273 and 274:
expanded.• The proposal to expand
Page 275 and 276:
Promoting good race relations?Yes N
Page 277 and 278:
The Diocese of Westminster and Scho
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
3. Equality Relevance Relevance to
Page 283 and 284:
4. HumanRightsRelevance to legislat
Page 285 and 286:
Ealing Council: Full Equalities Imp
Page 287 and 288:
Promoting good race relations?Yes N
Page 289 and 290:
The Council, in consultation with t
Page 291:
show all

Appendix 1: Proposal to expand Ravenor Primary ... - Ealing Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?