12.07.2015 Views

an_unshakeable_faith.. - Holy Bible Institute

an_unshakeable_faith.. - Holy Bible Institute

an_unshakeable_faith.. - Holy Bible Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EVOLUTION INTRODUCTION1. One doesn’t have to be a scientist to refute Darwinism.The believer should not be intimidated by scientists.Dr. Lowell Ponte, former science <strong>an</strong>d technology editor for Reader’s Digest, reminds us thatscientists are not gods, though they sometimes pretend to be:“Outside their narrow field of expertise, scientists are often no wiser th<strong>an</strong> the drunk at the end of the bar inyour local saloon. In fact they are often more foolish th<strong>an</strong> this drunk, because with the power of science,commissars often become intoxicated with the notion that knowledge <strong>an</strong>d intellect in one field empowers themto speak with the authority of gods in all fields” (“Science Wars,” FrontPage Magazine, Feb. 27, 2004).Phillip Johnson, a law professor who has critiqued Darwinism, rightly says:“Being a scientist is not necessarily <strong>an</strong> adv<strong>an</strong>tage when dealing with a very broad topic like evolution, whichcuts across m<strong>an</strong>y scientific disciplines <strong>an</strong>d also involves issues of philosophy. Practicing scientists are ofnecessity highly specialized, <strong>an</strong>d a scientist outside his field of expertise is just <strong>an</strong>other laym<strong>an</strong>” (Darwin onTrial, p. 13).In fact, you c<strong>an</strong> be your own scientist. You have the God-given ability to make observations <strong>an</strong>dto make decisions based on those observations. Richard Tedder is <strong>an</strong> example of those who cameto Christ when he stopped depending on his university professors <strong>an</strong>d started <strong>an</strong>alyzing theevidence for evolution <strong>an</strong>d studying the <strong>Bible</strong> for himself. He told me that when he startedreading the <strong>Bible</strong> he was amazed that everything it said “r<strong>an</strong>g true” because he could see itreflected in life.We must remember that divine truth has been revealed to the weak rather th<strong>an</strong> to the mighty(Mat. 11:25; 1 Cor. 1:26-28). Further, the “poor m<strong>an</strong>” who has underst<strong>an</strong>ding c<strong>an</strong> examine the“rich m<strong>an</strong>” who is wise in his conceit (Prov. 28:11).The believer has everything he needs to test the doctrine of evolution: We have God’s Word (2Tim. 3:16-17) <strong>an</strong>d we have God’s Spirit (1 John 2:27).Every philosophy must be brought to this Touchstone (2 Cor. 10:5; Col. 2:8; 1 Tim. 6:20-21).Common sense refutes evolution at every turn. Consider, for example, the concept of evolutionthrough r<strong>an</strong>dom genetic mutations. Nothing in life works like this. Take a piece of writing, suchas Genesis chapter one. It could never be created through r<strong>an</strong>dom typing, <strong>an</strong>d if accidentalch<strong>an</strong>ges were introduced to the existing text, the result would invariably be degradation <strong>an</strong>d notimprovement. Take a machine such as the Space Shuttle. It has two million parts (<strong>an</strong>d is far lesscomplex th<strong>an</strong> a bacterial cell). R<strong>an</strong>dom blind ch<strong>an</strong>ges would never create such a machine norimprove <strong>an</strong> existing one. Complicated things are not built by r<strong>an</strong>dom, accidental events. At thefundamental level, the evolution issue is not rocket science!167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!