12.07.2015 Views

an_unshakeable_faith.. - Holy Bible Institute

an_unshakeable_faith.. - Holy Bible Institute

an_unshakeable_faith.. - Holy Bible Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. The fossil record disproves evolution.First, the fossilization itself is evidence of a great worldwide catastrophe.Second, the fossil record does not contain the countless tr<strong>an</strong>sitional creatures that Darwini<strong>an</strong>evolution requires.Third, the fossil record shows creatures appearing suddenly, fully formed, with no evolutionaryhistory.Fourth, the fossil record demonstrates complexity from its earliest layers.Fifth, the fossil record exhibits stability of species rather th<strong>an</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ge.8. Homology is not evidence for evolution. Similarity of structure is not evidence for commondescent nor evidence against common design.9. All “evidence” for evolution is based on evolutionary assumptions rather th<strong>an</strong> genuinescientific proof.10. There is great controversy even among evolutionists over the most import<strong>an</strong>t icons, such asLucy <strong>an</strong>d Archaeopteryx.11. Lucy could not have made the Laetoli foot prints.Russell Tuttle has rightly argued that a creature such as Lucy, with long curved toes, could nothave left the prints <strong>an</strong>d concluded that “we should shelve the loose assumption that the Laetolifootprints were made by Lucy’s kind” (“The Pitted Pattern of Laetoli Feet,” Natural History,March 1990). Further, the footprints are nearly 12 inches long <strong>an</strong>d were obviously made by alarge individual <strong>an</strong>d not the three-foot-tall Lucy.12. Evolutionary artwork is not scientifically honest.Lucy is <strong>an</strong> example. Artistic reconstructions typically depict Lucy with hum<strong>an</strong> h<strong>an</strong>ds, walkinguprightly in a purely hum<strong>an</strong> m<strong>an</strong>ner on hum<strong>an</strong> feet, <strong>an</strong>d typically with hum<strong>an</strong>-proportioned arms<strong>an</strong>d legs. But this is contrary to the scientific evidence.13. Evolutionary dating methods are based on unproven evolutionary assumptions. Further, theresearch performed by the Ph.D. scientists associated with the RATE project (Radioisotopes <strong>an</strong>dthe Age of The Earth) have proven that the date of millions of years is impossible for fossilbearingrocks throughout the earth, because carbon-14 is still present, <strong>an</strong>d this me<strong>an</strong>s the rocksare less th<strong>an</strong> 100,000 years old.14. Life’s mind-boggling complexity points to a Designer. The life-cycle of the butterfly, forexample, had to have been pre-programmed by <strong>an</strong> Almighty Designer.331

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!