∂ϕ∂ϕ1 kϕ∂r=− +, (12)∂β ∂θ rsinθ k ∂θk r kwhere θ k and ϕ k are the spherical polar coordinates of kwith respect to ˆr , ˆ θ , ˆϕ as local Cartesian axes. Theautomated homing algorithm proceeds by shooting a ray,computing the miss distances to the desired homing point( ∆ θ , ∆ ϕ ), and adjusting the ray-launch azimuth andelevation by∂θ∂ϕ∆ϕ− ∆θ∂β∂β∆ α = , (13)∂ θ ∂ ϕ ∂ θ ∂ ϕ−∂β ∂α ∂α ∂β∂θ∆θ− ∆α∆ β =∂α, (14)∂θ∂βand then iterating the procedure until the ray lands withinsome specified tolerance from the desired landing point.An example of the performance of the automated rayhomingalgorithm is shown in Figure 3. In this case, weused the ionosphere represented in Figure 1, and sought aray connecting latitude 36°N and longitude 90°W to ahoming point at latitude 30°N and longitude 85.6°W. Theinitial ray (10 MHz) was launched at an azimuth of 155°from north and at an elevation of 20°. The convergencetolerance was set to get the final ray within 0.01 km of thedesired homing point. Eight iterations were required, takingonly about a tenth of a second on my 2.0 GHz laptop. Thefinal azimuth and elevation angles were 149.352316° and25.637033°, respectively. In this case, as is typical, thealgorithm found the low ray mode nearest the initial launchdirection that reached the desired homing point.The automated ray-homing algorithm has also beenincorporated in the ray-tracing package TRACKER,developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory [14].3. HF Channel ModelingDuring the Cold War, it was assumed that in the caseof a massive nuclear attack, the military might have to relyon HF communications. However, the HF ionosphericcommunication channel would then be highly disturbed,and it was necessary to estimate this level of disturbance sothat modems could be hardened by appropriate codingschemes that would be resilient to the channel disruptions.Small-scale ionization structure will cause a propagated HFsignal to suffer angular scattering, so that received signalsare spread over a range of angles and delays, owing to theextra delay of the scattered “micro-multipath” signalelements, or “micro-rays.” Moving ionization (or movinglink geometry through ionization) will introducecorresponding spread in signal Doppler frequency due tothe spread in impinging angles of “micro-rays” on thesmall-scale ionization structures causing the scatter. Thespreads in signal delay and Doppler are characterized by thescattering function, the delay-Doppler power spectrum ofthe received signal.Figure 3. The miss distance as a function of the iterationnumber, using the automated ray-homing algorithm.Figure 4. A plan view of a primary ray path (solid arrow)and associated micro-rays (dotted lines), scattered by anintervening phase-changing screen representing smallscaleionization structure. The phase screen was movingtransversely to the primary ray with speed v .40The<strong>Radio</strong> <strong>Science</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> No <strong>325</strong> (<strong>June</strong> <strong>2008</strong>)
The natural polar ionosphere develops a similarstructuring of ionization at small scales to that expected inthe nuclear environment anticipated by Cold War analysts.Measurements of the channel scattering function for a polarHF propagation link were funded by the US DefenseNuclear Agency and carried out by SRI International, usingan HF channel probe [6]. The measurements revealeddelay-Doppler correlation characteristics that were notanticipated, and I was assigned the task of explaining themeasurements.The expected delay-Doppler correlation was parabolicin shape. This expectation was derived from the followingsimple model. In a typical, highly oblique, HF-propagationgeometry corresponding to a communication link to aremote location, much of the propagation path is in freespace with significant interaction with the ionosphereconfined to a region near the reflection point. Thus, it wasthought that a good propagation model for scatter caused bysmall-scale ionization structure would be a single phasechangingscreen near the midpoint of the propagation path,oriented orthogonal to that path. This is illustrated inFigure 4, which shows a plan view of the modeled path. Inthe absence of small-scale ionization structure, the onlypath connecting the transmitter and receiver would be theprimary ray path. However, the presence of small-scaleionization structure allows some of the energy propagatingat other angles to scatter back to the receiver in “doglegpaths.” These dogleg paths necessarily have longerpropagation delays than the primary ray path (ignoringrefraction of the primary ray path in the vertical plane, agood assumption for highly oblique geometries), andFigure 5. A plan view of a primary ray path (solidarrow) and associated micro-rays (dotted lines),scattered by three intervening phase-changingscreens representing small-scale ionization structure.The phase screens were moving transversely tothe primary ray with speeds v 1 , v 2 , and v 3 .therefore the angular spread in received micro-rays wasexpected to give a similar spread in received signal delay.If there is relative motion between the phase screen and theprimary ray path, Doppler shifts can be imparted to themicro-rays. To first order, motion along the primary raydirection will not impart a Doppler shift; only motiontransverse to the primary ray direction is significant to theDoppler-shift calculation. The wider the angle of the doglegmicro-ray relative to the primary ray direction, the larger inmagnitude will be the Doppler shift imparted by the plasmastructure. Those micro-rays directed against the plasmamotion will be shifted up in Doppler frequency, and thosedirected with the plasma flow will be shifted down inDoppler frequency. This results in the aforementionedparabolic correlation of Doppler shift with delay in thismodel.The HF channel-probe measurements revealedscattering functions with a broad range of delay-Dopplershapes. Only rarely did the anticipated parabolic shapemanifest itself. More typically, the shapes exhibited littlecorrelation between delay and Doppler frequency. I realizedthis must be caused by multiple scattering over the extendedrange of the ray paths in the ionosphere, and that varyingplasma flow structure over that distance would tend todecorrelate delay and Doppler frequency. This is illustratedin Figure 5, which again shows a plan view of the modeledpropagation path, similar to Figure 4, but in this case forthree intervening phase screens. Possible scatter geometriesfor micro-rays are drawn. Clearly, the length (delay) of thescattered micro-rays is no longer exactly correlated withtheir angle of arrival, nor will their Doppler shifts necessarilybe correlated with their delay, especially given that thephase screens may have different speeds. The single-phasescreenmodel was unable to account for these extendedmedia effects, so I set about deriving a multiple-phasescreentheory.The phase-screen approach to stochastic wavepropagation solves the parabolic wave equation (PWE) foreither the scattered wave itself, or for the mutual coherencefunction of that wave. The mutual coherence function is thecorrelation function of the received signal over separatedfrequencies, positions, and times. The scattering function isrelated to the mutual coherence function by Fouriertransforms in each dimension. The multiple-phase-screenapproach to the numerical solution of the parabolic waveequation had been worked out by MRC’s Dr. Dennis Knepp[15]. Knepp also derived an analytical solution for the twofrequencymutual coherence function, for the special casesof an extended region of structured ionization upon auniform background, where the structure is either highlyelongated or isotropic [16]. These works served as a guideto my approach.Solving the parabolic wave equation using multiplephase screens proceeds by imparting phase changes to theincident wave at the first screen, then allowing diffractionto develop using Huygens-Fresnel propagation to the nextThe<strong>Radio</strong> <strong>Science</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> No <strong>325</strong> (<strong>June</strong> <strong>2008</strong>) 41
- Page 4 and 5: URSI Forum on Radio Scienceand Tele
- Page 6 and 7: URSI Accounts 2007Income in 2007 wa
- Page 8 and 9: EURO EUROA2) Routine Meetings 5,372
- Page 10 and 11: URSI Awards 2008The URSI Board of O
- Page 12 and 13: • Compatibility refers to the abi
- Page 14 and 15: Introduction to Special Sections Ho
- Page 16 and 17: In the December 2008 issue, Part 2
- Page 18 and 19: mwÆ = eE + ew× B −mνw , (2)whe
- Page 20 and 21: Haselgrove equations [2]. Furthermo
- Page 22 and 23: anddQ 1 r ∂n= + n −Qdθ2 2 2n
- Page 24 and 25: Ray Tracing ofMagnetohydrodynamic W
- Page 26 and 27: Figure 1a. The refractive-index sur
- Page 28 and 29: 2 ⎡ ∂VAj, ∂VS⎤ω ⎢VAj, +
- Page 30 and 31: ( ω kV j j)dx ∂i 0 + ∂ω0,= =
- Page 32 and 33: compared with the wavelength, i.e.,
- Page 34 and 35: decreasing to half their value in a
- Page 36 and 37: Practical Applicationsof Haselgrove
- Page 38 and 39: **.modeled TID ionospheres using Ha
- Page 42 and 43: screen (which is implemented in a s
- Page 44 and 45: directed boresight and, similar to
- Page 46 and 47: Typical OTH radar ionospheric sound
- Page 48 and 49: ay-homing calculations for analyzin
- Page 50 and 51: Figure 1. A Cartesian geometry cons
- Page 52 and 53: orc dϕh′ = , (5a)4πdfincreases
- Page 54 and 55: in four runs by five rays, giving a
- Page 56 and 57: GPS : A Powerfull Tool forTime Tran
- Page 58 and 59: altitude of ~26562 km will tick mor
- Page 60 and 61: Each component of the errors is ass
- Page 62 and 63: Figure 3. The effect of GPS timeerr
- Page 64 and 65: Figure 6. The frequencystability of
- Page 66 and 67: Figure 9. The participating laborat
- Page 68 and 69: unlike the possibility of a gap in
- Page 70 and 71: Table 5. The capabilities of GPS ti
- Page 72 and 73: 12. References1. C. Audoin and J. V
- Page 74 and 75: ConferencesCONFERENCE REPORT12TH IN
- Page 76 and 77: URSI CONFERENCE CALENDARURSI cannot
- Page 78 and 79: The Journal of Atmospheric and Sola
- Page 80: APPLICATION FOR AN URSI RADIOSCIENT