12.07.2015 Views

A Closer Look at Air Pollution in Houston: - Green Houston

A Closer Look at Air Pollution in Houston: - Green Houston

A Closer Look at Air Pollution in Houston: - Green Houston

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and vulnerable subgroups. Substances were design<strong>at</strong>ed“Possible Risks” when there was partial or limited evidenceth<strong>at</strong> suggested they might constitute a significant risk undercerta<strong>in</strong> circumstances, and “Probable Risks” when therewas substantial corrobor<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g evidence th<strong>at</strong> they were likely torepresent a significant risk under the right conditions. Thosesubstances for which there was compell<strong>in</strong>g and conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g evidenceof significant risk to the general popul<strong>at</strong>ion or vulnerablesubgroups <strong>at</strong> current ambient concentr<strong>at</strong>ions were labeled“Def<strong>in</strong>ite Risks.”As shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1, 12 air pollutants were classified as“Def<strong>in</strong>ite Risks”. The Task Force found th<strong>at</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g and projectedambient concentr<strong>at</strong>ions of two criteria pollutants - ozoneand f<strong>in</strong>e particles (PM 2.5) - are almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly caus<strong>in</strong>g respir<strong>at</strong>oryand cardiopulmonary effects <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>dividuals as wellas contribut<strong>in</strong>g to prem<strong>at</strong>ure de<strong>at</strong>h. It was also determ<strong>in</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong>airborne concentr<strong>at</strong>ions of seven carc<strong>in</strong>ogens - diesel particul<strong>at</strong>em<strong>at</strong>ter (see Appendix 4 for more detail on this pollutant),1,3-butadiene, chromium VI (see Appendix 4 for more detailon this pollutant), benzene, ethylene dibromide, formaldehyde,and acrylonitrile - pose an unacceptable <strong>in</strong>creased cancer risk.In addition, it was concluded th<strong>at</strong> five substances -- 1,3-butadience(reproductive effects <strong>in</strong> addition to be<strong>in</strong>g a carc<strong>in</strong>ogen),formaldehyde (respir<strong>at</strong>ory effects), acrole<strong>in</strong> (respir<strong>at</strong>oryeffects), chlor<strong>in</strong>e (respir<strong>at</strong>ory effects), hexamethylene diisocyan<strong>at</strong>e(pulmonary and respir<strong>at</strong>ory effects). -- are present <strong>at</strong>ambient concentr<strong>at</strong>ions th<strong>at</strong> represent an unacceptable<strong>in</strong>creased risk for chronic disease <strong>in</strong> <strong>Houston</strong>.The evidence is not as strong but nevertheless persuasiveth<strong>at</strong> an additional 9 air pollutants are likely to pose unacceptablehealth risks <strong>at</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ions measured or modeled<strong>in</strong> <strong>Houston</strong> air. These substances were design<strong>at</strong>ed as“Probable Risks,” and <strong>in</strong>cluded eight carc<strong>in</strong>ogens - v<strong>in</strong>yl chloride,acetaldehyde, ethylene dichloride, naphthalene, arseniccompounds, carbon tetrachloride, ethylene oxide, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane- and one pollutant - acrylic acid - th<strong>at</strong> has chronicnon-cancer effects. These are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2 on pg. 14.13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!