28.11.2012 Views

Tool kit for Gender and Agriculture - Economic Commission for Africa

Tool kit for Gender and Agriculture - Economic Commission for Africa

Tool kit for Gender and Agriculture - Economic Commission for Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10<br />

<strong>Gender</strong> in <strong>Agriculture</strong><br />

higher effective costs <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation, technology, inputs, <strong>and</strong> credit <strong>and</strong> their productivity<br />

is lowered. Women also lack incentives to increase productivity: food crop prices<br />

are low, their access to markets is poor, <strong>and</strong> husb<strong>and</strong>s often control the income from<br />

the products of women’s labor.<br />

C. Why <strong>Gender</strong> Makes a Difference<br />

Women are, of course, an integral part of farming households. They produce over half<br />

the food in many developing countries, bear most responsibility <strong>for</strong> household food<br />

security, <strong>and</strong> contribute to household well-being through their income-generating activities.<br />

Yet, women usually have more limited access to resources <strong>and</strong> opportunities<br />

<strong>and</strong> their productivity remains low relative to their potential. In some regions, men <strong>and</strong><br />

women have different farming systems, different domains⎯<strong>for</strong> example, crops or<br />

livestock⎯different access to resources, <strong>and</strong> different status. In general, compared to<br />

men within the same household, women have:<br />

• A wider range of tasks <strong>and</strong> enterprises<br />

• Different production objectives<br />

• Dissimilar production constraints.<br />

Econometric evidence on gender differences in agricultural productivity points<br />

to the importance of investing in women by increasing their human capital through<br />

education <strong>and</strong> extension, <strong>and</strong> by increasing their access to physical <strong>and</strong> financial inputs.<br />

Key findings are:<br />

• Women farmers are as efficient as men farmers, once other characteristics <strong>and</strong><br />

input levels are controlled <strong>for</strong>. 1<br />

Simulations using Kenyan data (see Table 1)<br />

suggest that increasing women’s physical <strong>and</strong> human resource capital to the<br />

level of men’s would bring significant gains in agricultural production. Limited<br />

access to inputs combined with cultural constraints on women’s farmwork tend<br />

to reduce women’s labor productivity <strong>and</strong> their participation in highproductivity<br />

agricultural work. 2<br />

• Women farmers underper<strong>for</strong>m in agricultural production because they lack access<br />

to in<strong>for</strong>mation, credit, extension, inputs, <strong>and</strong> markets <strong>and</strong> by household <strong>and</strong><br />

child care tasks limit the time they have available. This underper<strong>for</strong>mance oc-<br />

1 A. Quisumbing, 1994, <strong>Gender</strong> Differences in Agricultural Productivity: A Survey of Empirical Evidence,<br />

Discussion Paper Series No. 36, Education <strong>and</strong> Social Policy Department, World Bank,<br />

Washington, D.C.<br />

2 A. Quisumbing (1994).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!