28.11.2012 Views

Tool kit for Gender and Agriculture - Economic Commission for Africa

Tool kit for Gender and Agriculture - Economic Commission for Africa

Tool kit for Gender and Agriculture - Economic Commission for Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28<br />

Improving <strong>Agriculture</strong> through <strong>Gender</strong> Analysis<br />

across villages village<br />

Choice of method. In general, surveys are used <strong>for</strong> data that need to be extrapolated<br />

to larger populations, whereas the other methods are more suitable <strong>for</strong> descriptive<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> identifying relevant issues (see Box 6). Quantitative data are useful<br />

<strong>for</strong> sector work <strong>and</strong> to convince skeptics of the need to address gender issues. Project<br />

identification <strong>and</strong> appraisal requires in<strong>for</strong>mation on gender-roles <strong>and</strong> gender-specific<br />

barriers in the rural economy. Such in<strong>for</strong>mation should be supported by data on the focus<br />

of the project or program, from the monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluation (M&E) or agricultural<br />

statistical units. The project design should include the collection <strong>and</strong> evaluation of<br />

gender-disaggregated data <strong>for</strong> monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluation. Involving ministry staff,<br />

such as extension agents, in organizing, collecting, <strong>and</strong> analyzing in<strong>for</strong>mation is a good<br />

awareness-raising <strong>and</strong> training tool.<br />

Box 6: Household Surveys Compared with Rapid or Participatory Appraisals:<br />

Different Goals <strong>and</strong> Results<br />

• Large household surveys are costly <strong>and</strong> time consuming; the data are not always<br />

equally reliable. Surveys may, however, be needed <strong>for</strong> impact studies or <strong>for</strong> more<br />

detail⎯<strong>for</strong> example, when planning a credit program targeting women or studying<br />

female-headed households. <strong>Gender</strong>-disaggregated questions should be included<br />

(<strong>and</strong> exploited) whenever surveys are conducted.<br />

• Objectively conducted, less exacting methods, such as rapid or participatory rural<br />

appraisals, are preferable. Many different rapid appraisal techniques exist, such as<br />

focus groups, key in<strong>for</strong>mant interviews, village discussions, mapping, transect<br />

walks, seasonal analysis, trend diagramming, matrix ranking, wealth ranking, <strong>and</strong><br />

strength/weakness/opportunity/limitations (SWOL) analyses (<strong>for</strong> details, see Table<br />

5).<br />

• The method chosen depends on the type <strong>and</strong> amount of in<strong>for</strong>mation needed. Walking<br />

tours, spatial maps, <strong>and</strong> group interviews are especially suitable <strong>for</strong> natural resources<br />

management projects. Focus group interviews are useful <strong>for</strong> learning about<br />

gender roles in agriculture; they may be supplemented by calendars <strong>and</strong> labor profiles,<br />

if new technologies or commodities are being promoted.<br />

Two main sources⎯experienced staff <strong>and</strong> the rural population⎯should be used<br />

as cross-checks. Whenever possible, in<strong>for</strong>mation should be collected directly from rural<br />

women (see Box 5). Experienced women agents can provide a cross-check or be the<br />

main source of in<strong>for</strong>mation. The sample size should be decided after consulting extension<br />

staff on the homogeneity of gender roles in the farming system <strong>and</strong> of women’s<br />

other productive activities.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!